Jeff Pagliuca
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
9
Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel recipients |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney (Sender)
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GM (Ghislaine Maxwell)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Government Officials
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
PAUL G. CASSELL
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney (Redacted)
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Menninger
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial Begins | Court | View |
| 2021-11-21 | N/A | Submission of proposed redactions regarding Witness-3 | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Exchange of legal documents regarding redactions for Witness-3 evidence. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-17 | Legal proceeding | Jury selection continued for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Legal proceeding | Voir Dire held for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. Jury selection began and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-15 | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-12 | N/A | Submission of Maxwell's Response to Government's Motion In Limine to Preclude Expert Testimony of... | NYSD (New York Southern Dis... | View |
| 2021-11-10 | Pretrial conference | A Pretrial Conference was held for Ghislaine Maxwell, with her present alongside her attorneys an... | Before Judge Alison J. Nath... | View |
| 2021-11-09 | N/A | Travel day for Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger for the hearing. | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-09 | N/A | Deadline for response to Court Order (Dkt. No. 421) missed by counsel. | Court (US v. Maxwell) | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Pretrial Conference | Court | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Pretrial Conference held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | SDNY | View |
| 2021-10-26 | N/A | Filing of Ms. Maxwell's Response to Government's Omnibus Motions in Limine | NYSD Court (via email) | View |
| 2021-10-21 | Meeting | A Pretrial Conference was held via telephone regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. | Telephone | View |
| 2021-10-18 | N/A | Defense team files 13 motions in limine in U.S. v. Maxwell. | NYSD Court | View |
| 2021-08-30 | N/A | Filing of defense letter by Jeff Pagliuca regarding co-conspirator identities | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-04-23 | N/A | Arraignment of Ghislaine Maxwell on Superseding Indictment 2. | Court | View |
EFTA00030069.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 9, 2021, regarding the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Laura Menninger submits a letter to Judge Nathan detailing objections to the government's proposed redactions in an Omnibus Response. Subsequent emails in the chain involve coordination between the defense and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) regarding the exchange of proposed redactions.
EFTA00030068.pdf
An email dated March 8, 2021, from attorney Laura Menninger to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and other defense counsel (Pagliuca, Everdell, Sternheim). The email serves as a cover letter for an attached PDF concerning a request to view evidence and highly confidential materials in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
EFTA00030052.pdf
This document is an email header dated December 30, 2020, with the subject 'RE: Redactions'. It is addressed to Christian Everdell and copies several other attorneys known to represent Ghislaine Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen, Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger. The sender information and specific email addresses are redacted.
EFTA00030021.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case *US v. Maxwell*. The discussion focuses on the protocols for reviewing 'Highly Confidential' materials (specifically nude images and videos seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices), the transport of physical evidence (including massage tables, plaster busts, and a stuffed dog) from the FBI Bronx warehouse to the courthouse, and the scheduling of Maxwell's transport by Marshals to 500 Pearl Street. The prosecution refuses to transport bulky items or obscene digital material freely, requiring the defense to view some items at the warehouse or on specific laptops under supervision.
EFTA00029942.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 involving Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser LLP) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Attorney Christian Everdell raises seven specific discovery issues, including the inability of Maxwell to access files on disks via the prison computer, missing attachments for over 109,000 emails, and significant metadata discrepancies where files extracted from Epstein's devices show modification dates (July 2020) well after his death and device seizure. The email specifically requests metadata overlays to correct these issues and inquires about a gap in document production numbers.
EFTA00029843.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 9, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). Laura Menninger of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. writes to Judge Nathan to submit a letter detailing Ms. Maxwell's objections to redactions proposed by the government in their Omnibus Response. The email includes several attachments related to these redactions and exhibits.
EFTA00029600.pdf
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email, dated September 15, 2021, transmits a government letter regarding 'Flatley' and a document labeled '3503-001', likely referring to Jencks Act material (witness statements).
EFTA00029589.pdf
An internal email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated August 30, 2021. The email circulates a letter filed earlier that evening by defense attorney Jeff Pagliuca regarding 'GM' (Ghislaine Maxwell) and 'CC' (Co-Conspirator) identities and statements.
EFTA00029574.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2021 involving the transmission of Defense Rule 16 Disclosure documents from Christian Everdell (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The attachments include certifications from AT&T and FedEx, FedEx invoices, Interlochen records, a release regarding A. Farmer, and the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The thread shows internal USANYS staff coordinating to save these files to a shared drive.
EFTA00029535.pdf
This document contains an email thread between the US Attorney's Office and defense counsel regarding the case USA v. Maxwell on June 30, 2021. The correspondence follows a court order (Docket 305) requiring the parties to submit proposed redactions to the court's opinion on suppression motions. Defense attorney Christian Everdell confirms they have no redactions, and prosecutor Lara Pomerantz agrees to file a joint letter conveying this to the court.
EFTA00029423.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca), likely regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The correspondence concerns proposed redactions for filings related to 'Witness-3' and includes an attachment referencing a letter to Judge Nathan. Christian Everdell requests a quick phone call with the prosecutor during the exchange.
EFTA00029301.pdf
This document is an email thread from October 2021 regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim sends a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (specifically a letter regarding legal mail) to prosecutors at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and her co-counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email was then forwarded internally within the USANYS office.
EFTA00029236.pdf
This document is an email dated April 8, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell. Sternheim is sending a courtesy copy of an ECF filing, specifically a reply letter concerning the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center), to redacted recipients and co-counsel including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00029162.pdf
This document is an email dated August 18, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and copied to other defense counsel (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves to transmit a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell. The attachment references 'Letter_re_VTCs', likely concerning Video Teleconferences for the trial proceedings.
EFTA00028850.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court hearing held on April 21, 2016, before Judge Robert W. Sweet in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. The proceedings cover motions to admit attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell pro hac vice, which the defense contested citing potential conflicts from related Florida litigation. The hearing also addresses discovery disputes, including the production of the plaintiff's medical records, tax returns, employment history, and communications with law enforcement. No flight logs or aircraft data are contained in this document.
EFTA00028845.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 concerning the US v. Maxwell case, specifically regarding requests from defense counsel to view highly confidential images and physical evidence. The emails detail logistics for reviewing evidence, including questions about image formats, metadata, the need for multiple laptops for review, inventory lists of physical items, and proposed dates and locations for the review at 500 Pearl Street.
EFTA00028646.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser; Haddon, Morgan & Foreman) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery production disputes in Spring 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties Maxwell faced in reviewing digital evidence at the MDC prison (specifically reading disks vs. hard drives), missing attachments for over 109,000 emails, and metadata discrepancies for 'carved' or deleted files recovered from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The correspondence details the logistical back-and-forth regarding file formats, USAfx transfers, and the potential need for judicial intervention (Judge Nathan) to force the MDC to accept specific hard drives.
EFTA00028585.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser; Haddon, Morgan & Foreman) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes. The defense raises seven key issues, including over 109,000 emails missing attachments, metadata discrepancies on files extracted from Epstein's devices, and difficulties providing discovery materials to Maxwell at the MDC due to technical and bureaucratic limitations. The prosecution responds with technical explanations regarding FBI CART processes, 'carved' or deleted files lacking metadata, and the conversion of VHS/cassette tapes.
EFTA00028584.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated May 22, 2021, the email submits the Government's opposition to the defense's supplemental pretrial motions. The sender notes they are emailing the document because the electronic filing system prevents them from filing an opposition brief before the original defense motion appears on the public docket.
EFTA00028571.pdf
This document is a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in Spring 2021. Key issues include the defense's inability to view certain files on prison computers, missing email attachments (over 109,000), and technical disputes over metadata for 'carved' or deleted files recovered from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The prosecution explains that metadata for deleted files was not recovered and that certain images (nude and non-nude) were seized from CDs in Epstein's residences rather than extracted by CART from devices.
EFTA00028272.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and defense counsel Christian Everdell (Cohen Gresser). Everdell submitted a Defense Rule 16 Disclosure letter. The internal USANYS emails discuss saving this document to the shared drive (specifically the 'USvEpstein-2018R01618' folder) and organizing discovery materials into subfolders like 'AT&T' and 'Federal Express'.
EFTA00028203.pdf
This document is an email dated November 6, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Nathan at NYSD Chambers. The email concerns the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330) and submits a letter regarding 'Minor Victim-3' along with proposed redactions. Defense attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger are copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00028183.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Laura Menninger) from March 2021. The correspondence concerns the scheduling of a review of 'highly confidential images' and physical evidence at 500 Pearl Street, as well as the production of indices listing items seized by the FBI from Jeffrey Epstein's residences in New York and the Virgin Islands in 2019. The prosecutor clarifies which items are indexed in spreadsheets versus search warrant returns and coordinates a phone call to discuss these matters.
EFTA00027864.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and US prosecutors (USANYS). The defense raises seven specific technical issues regarding discovery, including the need to provide evidence on hard drives rather than disks for the prison computer, over 100,000 emails missing attachments, and metadata discrepancies where files extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices show creation dates after his death (July 2020). The email also mentions videos from SDFL and PBPD investigations.
EFTA00027861.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser LLP) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The defense raises several technical discovery issues, including the inability of Maxwell to read discovery disks on the prison computer, missing email attachments, and corrupted metadata on files extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices (showing 2020 dates instead of original dates). The prosecution forwards these issues to their contractor (PAE) to address.
FW: Documents Per Judge Nathan's Order
Forwarding attachments that were missing from a previous email.
RE: Letter regarding discovery attached.
Attached please find the Government's response to your August 9, 2020 letter.
Re: Letter regarding discovery attached.
Stating they are considering the request and will respond no later than Thursday, August 13th.
Re: Letter regarding discovery attached.
States he cannot wait until Thursday for a decision, needs to confer by phone tomorrow, or will advise Judge Nathan.
Letter regarding discovery attached.
Sending attached conferral letter.
Letter regarding discovery attached.
Sending an attached conferral letter regarding a protective order.
Letter regarding discovery attached.
Attaches conferral letter.
Legal Call
1 pm call (1 hour)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity