Jeff Pagliuca
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
9
Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel recipients |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney (Sender)
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GM (Ghislaine Maxwell)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Government Officials
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
PAUL G. CASSELL
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney (Redacted)
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Menninger
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial Begins | Court | View |
| 2021-11-21 | N/A | Submission of proposed redactions regarding Witness-3 | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Exchange of legal documents regarding redactions for Witness-3 evidence. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-17 | Legal proceeding | Jury selection continued for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Legal proceeding | Voir Dire held for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. Jury selection began and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-15 | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-12 | N/A | Submission of Maxwell's Response to Government's Motion In Limine to Preclude Expert Testimony of... | NYSD (New York Southern Dis... | View |
| 2021-11-10 | Pretrial conference | A Pretrial Conference was held for Ghislaine Maxwell, with her present alongside her attorneys an... | Before Judge Alison J. Nath... | View |
| 2021-11-09 | N/A | Travel day for Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger for the hearing. | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-09 | N/A | Deadline for response to Court Order (Dkt. No. 421) missed by counsel. | Court (US v. Maxwell) | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Pretrial Conference | Court | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Pretrial Conference held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | SDNY | View |
| 2021-10-26 | N/A | Filing of Ms. Maxwell's Response to Government's Omnibus Motions in Limine | NYSD Court (via email) | View |
| 2021-10-21 | Meeting | A Pretrial Conference was held via telephone regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. | Telephone | View |
| 2021-10-18 | N/A | Defense team files 13 motions in limine in U.S. v. Maxwell. | NYSD Court | View |
| 2021-08-30 | N/A | Filing of defense letter by Jeff Pagliuca regarding co-conspirator identities | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-04-23 | N/A | Arraignment of Ghislaine Maxwell on Superseding Indictment 2. | Court | View |
EFTA00027752.pdf
An email dated October 15, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330). The email serves to distribute a courtesy copy of a defense filing (Defense_Reply_to_Dkt_350.pdf) to redacted recipients, copying attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00027749.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 14-15, 2021, involving the U.S. Attorney's Office (USANYS) and defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. Following a letter filed by defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding legal mail at the MDC, Judge Nathan ordered the prosecution to respond by 5 PM on October 15. The emails depict the prosecution team scrambling to draft a response, coordinating with the BOP and a contact named Sophia at the MDC, and expressing frustration regarding the tight deadlines imposed by Judge Nathan.
EFTA00027703.pdf
This document is an email dated October 19, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (including Christian Everdell, Bobbi Sternheim, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca). The email serves to serve the Government's 'motions in limine' and requests that certain attached documents be filed under seal. The email references case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
EFTA00027663.pdf
This document contains an email chain from November 2021 regarding the criminal case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell submits a response to the government's letters concerning 'Accuser-3's evidence' to Judge Nathan's chambers, filing the document under temporary seal to allow for potential redactions. The correspondence also lists other defense team members including Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, and Bobbi Sternheim.
EFTA00027653.pdf
An email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to defense counsel Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email notes that a court-ordered response due by 12:00 p.m. that day had not yet been received.
EFTA00027648.pdf
An email chain from November 9, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers emailed counsel noting a missing response to a court order (Dkt. 421) that was due at noon. Defense attorney Christian Everdell forwarded this to others (likely including the prosecution), clarifying that the defense understood the government was responsible for handling victim notifications and reporting to the Court.
EFTA00027456.pdf
This document is an email dated April 23, 2021, from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger. The email serves to transmit a sealed order attached as a PDF regarding the case '20-cr-330, US v Ghislaine Maxwell'. The document indicates legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell were ongoing in 2021 under Judge Nathan.
EFTA00027167.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 22, 2021, involving the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Laura Menninger, representing Maxwell, emailed Judge Nathan attaching a Letter Motion for an adjournment of the trial (120 or 180 days) and requesting permission to redact names of other clients based on professional conduct rules. Subsequent emails between government attorneys discuss a draft response due by 5 PM that same day.
EFTA00027165.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 22, 2021, concerning the case US v. Maxwell. The initial email features Laura Menninger, defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, submitting a Letter Motion for an adjournment of the trial to Judge Nathan and requesting redactions to protect client confidentiality under Rule 1.6. Subsequent emails show internal coordination among USANYS prosecutors drafting a response to this motion, which was due by 5 PM that day.
EFTA00027162.pdf
An email chain from April 21, 2021, between attorneys Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner), Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger regarding compliance with an order from Judge Nathan. McCawley requests confirmation to send specific documents and redactions related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case to the Government. Pagliuca forwards the relevant PDF attachments, noting they were missing from a previous email.
EFTA00027076.pdf
This document is an email header dated October 20, 2020, regarding 'US v. Maxwell - discovery production'. It is addressed to Christian Everdell and copies several other attorneys including Mark S. Cohen, Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca, and Bobbi Sternheim. The sender is redacted, and the document appears to be part of the legal discovery process for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
EFTA00026872.pdf
This document contains a series of email exchanges between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the logistics of reviewing discovery evidence in March and April 2021. The correspondence details disputes over the location of the review (FBI Bronx Warehouse vs. 500 Pearl Street courthouse), specifically concerning 'bulky' items such as massage tables, plaster busts, and framed art which the government refused to transport. Significant discussion focuses on the protocols for reviewing 'Highly Confidential' materials, including approximately 2,100 nude or obscene electronic images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices, which required specific viewing conditions on non-networked laptops due to their nature.
EFTA00026566.pdf
An email dated February 16, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to redacted recipients and copied to attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing related to 'MDC Conditions' in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
EFTA00026526.pdf
This document is an email dated July 2, 2020, from an Assistant US Attorney in the SDNY to Judge Nathan regarding the case 'United States v. Maxwell'. The email submits a memorandum in support of detention for Ghislaine Maxwell and notes that a copy is being provided to the Magistrate Judge in New Hampshire for proceedings occurring that afternoon. Defense counsel Jeff Pagliuca is copied on the correspondence.
EFTA00026464.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated November 24, 2020, regarding the case 'U.S. v. Maxwell'. The email circulates a courtesy copy of an ECF filing titled 'Maxwell_Reply_to_90-day_conditions_ltr.pdf' to a group of attorneys including Mark S. Cohen, Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00025508.pdf
This document is a series of emails from October 2020 concerning discovery production in the 'US v. Maxwell' case. The correspondence details the delivery and pickup of hard drives, the sending of Ms. Maxwell's drive to the MDC, and the scheduling of a prison visit for Ms. Maxwell to review a secure laptop. The emails involve legal teams from the Southern District of New York, Cohen Gresser, and HMFLAW, discussing logistical arrangements for evidence exchange and client access.
EFTA00025218.pdf
This document is an email dated June 7, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Bobbi Sternheim, Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca). The prosecution is informing the defense that a letter regarding MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) conditions is due to the Court that day and requests to know by 8:30 PM if the defense intends to seek any redactions to the attached document.
EFTA00025206.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between defense attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell (Laura Menninger, et al.) and Assistant United States Attorneys for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence concerns scheduling a call to discuss evidence requests and includes the transmission of an index of physical items held in FBI custody by the Miami office. The prosecutor references a previous discovery production from August 2020 and specific Bates ranges for scanned items.
EFTA00025196.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from March 8-9, 2021, between defense attorney Laura Menninger and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The correspondence concerns a request to view evidence, specifically discussing spreadsheets indexing physical evidence seized by the FBI from Jeffrey Epstein's residences in New York and the US Virgin Islands in 2019. The prosecutors note that while some evidence is indexed in Excel, other items like search warrant returns are not, and they mention specific Bates ranges for previously produced scans.
EFTA00025195.pdf
An email chain from February 23, 2021, involving Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Bobbi Sternheim, Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, Jeff Pagliuca) sending a courtesy copy of a bail application filing to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The email was forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office with the commentary 'Apparently they think third time's the charm,' referring to Maxwell's repeated attempts to secure bail.
EFTA00025059.pdf
An email from Nicole Simmons of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. to Judge Nathan's chambers, dated October 26, 2021. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the Government's Omnibus Motions in Limine, sent at the request of attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca.
EFTA00025037.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 between the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell (Christian Everdell, Bobbi Sternheim, etc.) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the scheduling and procedure for filing a 'request to charge' (jury instructions) with Judge Nathan. The parties discuss extensions, the possibility of filing separate requests rather than a joint one, and agree to a schedule where the Government files first, followed by the Defense's redline or separate filing in early November.
EFTA00024931.pdf
An email dated May 5, 2021, from Assistant US Attorney Lara [Redacted] to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The prosecutor is sharing a draft letter regarding 'flashlight checks' (as indicated by the attachment filename) pursuant to Judge Nathan's April 29 order, asking the defense to identify any necessary redactions of private medical information before the letter is publicly filed.
EFTA00024912.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Bobbi Sternheim) and the US Government prosecutors regarding the scheduling of the trial start date in Case 20 Cr. 330. The defense argues strongly for a November 8, 2021 start date, citing Maxwell's health in detention and holiday conflicts, while the government proposes November 29, 2021, citing witness availability. The defense also leverages the scheduling dispute to suggest that granting Maxwell bail would resolve the flexibility issues.
EFTA00024911.pdf
An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim dated May 11, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email attaches a letter requesting a trial start date of November 8th. Several other attorneys, including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca, are copied on the correspondence.
FW: Documents Per Judge Nathan's Order
Forwarding attachments that were missing from a previous email.
RE: Letter regarding discovery attached.
Attached please find the Government's response to your August 9, 2020 letter.
Re: Letter regarding discovery attached.
Stating they are considering the request and will respond no later than Thursday, August 13th.
Re: Letter regarding discovery attached.
States he cannot wait until Thursday for a decision, needs to confer by phone tomorrow, or will advise Judge Nathan.
Letter regarding discovery attached.
Sending attached conferral letter.
Letter regarding discovery attached.
Sending an attached conferral letter regarding a protective order.
Letter regarding discovery attached.
Attaches conferral letter.
Legal Call
1 pm call (1 hour)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity