Jeff Pagliuca
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
9
Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Business associate |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel recipients |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney (Sender)
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GM (Ghislaine Maxwell)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Government Officials
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
PAUL G. CASSELL
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney (Redacted)
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Menninger
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-18 | N/A | Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial Begins | Court | View |
| 2021-11-21 | N/A | Submission of proposed redactions regarding Witness-3 | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Exchange of legal documents regarding redactions for Witness-3 evidence. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-11-17 | Legal proceeding | Jury selection continued for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-16 | Legal proceeding | Voir Dire held for Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. Jury selection began and was adjourned. | Courtroom | View |
| 2021-11-15 | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-11-12 | N/A | Submission of Maxwell's Response to Government's Motion In Limine to Preclude Expert Testimony of... | NYSD (New York Southern Dis... | View |
| 2021-11-10 | Pretrial conference | A Pretrial Conference was held for Ghislaine Maxwell, with her present alongside her attorneys an... | Before Judge Alison J. Nath... | View |
| 2021-11-09 | N/A | Travel day for Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger for the hearing. | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-09 | N/A | Deadline for response to Court Order (Dkt. No. 421) missed by counsel. | Court (US v. Maxwell) | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Pretrial Conference | Court | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Pretrial Conference held before Judge Alison J. Nathan | SDNY | View |
| 2021-10-26 | N/A | Filing of Ms. Maxwell's Response to Government's Omnibus Motions in Limine | NYSD Court (via email) | View |
| 2021-10-21 | Meeting | A Pretrial Conference was held via telephone regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. | Telephone | View |
| 2021-10-18 | N/A | Defense team files 13 motions in limine in U.S. v. Maxwell. | NYSD Court | View |
| 2021-08-30 | N/A | Filing of defense letter by Jeff Pagliuca regarding co-conspirator identities | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-04-23 | N/A | Arraignment of Ghislaine Maxwell on Superseding Indictment 2. | Court | View |
EFTA00016509.pdf
An email dated November 28, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email submits a motion to preclude cross-examination under seal and copies defense attorneys including Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger.
EFTA00016508.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding legal proceedings. Laura Menninger of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. sends a supplemental letter to USANYS counsel regarding the anticipated testimony of a redacted individual (Mr. [Redacted]). The forwarding email references 'Flatley and their rebuttal expert,' suggesting the correspondence concerns expert witness testimony or rebuttal.
EFTA00016492.pdf
Email correspondence from November 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Bobbi Sternheim, et al.). The prosecution confirms they spoke with David Boies and Sigrid McCawley, who denied reports that their client (name redacted) intended to give press briefings during the upcoming trial, affirming compliance with court rules regarding extrajudicial statements.
EFTA00016484.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 24, 2021, related to the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It involves correspondence between the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan and legal counsel (including Brian Burns, Patrick Smith, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger) regarding the issuance of protective orders. An Assistant United States Attorney subsequently follows up with counsel to coordinate the transfer of materials via file sharing or thumb drive.
EFTA00016470.pdf
An email correspondence dated November 24, 2021, from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to counsel involved in the US v. Maxwell case (20cr330). The email serves to distribute two attached orders regarding protective orders and subpoenas. Recipients include attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger, as well as representatives from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).
EFTA00016302.pdf
An email dated September 4, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email submits agreed-upon proposed redactions to defense letters dated August 24, 2020, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). Legal counsel Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Christian Everdell, and Mark S. Cohen are copied.
EFTA00016265.pdf
This document is an email dated October 31, 2021, from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to defense counsel (including Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger) and prosecutors (USANYS) regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email serves to transmit an attached Order issued by Judge Nathan that was scheduled to be docketed the following morning.
EFTA00016204.pdf
This document contains an email chain dated November 3, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim circulates courtesy copies of Electronic Case Files (ECF) filings, specifically a bail application and a document regarding the disclosure of juror names. The email is copied to other defense attorneys including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00016203.pdf
An email dated November 3, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to a redacted recipient, copying attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email serves as a courtesy copy of an ECF filing in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330), specifically attaching a document regarding the disclosure of juror names.
EFTA00015968.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 17, 2020, between defense counsel (Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger) and government prosecutors regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (referred to as 'GM' in attachments). The defense provides a proposed Protective Order and argues for specific terms, including the removal of a 'Highly Confidential' designation and the provision of a laptop to Maxwell in the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) so she can review discovery materials, as in-person legal visits were not allowed at the time. The email emphasizes the defense's desire to avoid trying the case in the press and cites concerns about witness harassment.
EFTA00015804.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing discovery evidence in March and April 2021. The discussions concern protocols for viewing 'highly confidential' materials, including nude images and physical evidence (such as massage tables and plaster busts) seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The parties negotiate the location of the review (FBI Bronx warehouse vs. 500 Pearl Street courthouse), the presence of the defendant, and the use of electronic devices by defense counsel during the review.
EFTA00015770.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case *US v. Maxwell*. The correspondence details negotiations over the location of the review (500 Pearl St vs. FBI Bronx Warehouse), the transportation of specific physical evidence (including excluding 'bulky' massage tables and cash), and protocols for viewing 'highly confidential' and 'obscene' electronic images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The defense expresses concerns about missing items, the format of electronic surveillance, and the need for their client to meaningfully participate in the review.
EFTA00015753.pdf
This document contains a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Menninger, Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for case 20 Cr. 330. The discussions focus on scheduling physical evidence reviews at an FBI warehouse in the Bronx and electronic evidence reviews at the 500 Pearl Street courthouse. Key evidence items discussed include massage tables, plaster busts, cash, shredded paper, and thousands of 'highly confidential' nude or partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices and residences.
EFTA00015738.pdf
This document is a chain of email correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case US v. Maxwell. The emails discuss the scheduling of Maxwell's transport by Marshals to 500 Pearl Street to review 'Highly Confidential' materials, including 2,100 nude/partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The correspondence also details disputes over the transport of physical evidence from an FBI warehouse in the Bronx, specifically mentioning 'bulky' items like massage tables, plaster busts of female torsos, and a stuffed dog, which the government argued were difficult to transport.
EFTA00015636.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office regarding discovery disputes. Key issues include the logistics of providing electronic discovery to Maxwell in prison (MDC) because she cannot use disks, missing email attachments, and metadata discrepancies for thousands of files and photos recovered from Epstein's devices and residences. The prosecution explains that 'carved' or deleted files lack original metadata and that certain photos came from seized CDs rather than devices processed by the FBI's CART unit.
EFTA00015185.pdf
An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (including Christian Everdell and others) dated October 8, 2021. The email serves as notification for an additional discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330) and discusses logistical arrangements for providing digital evidence to Ms. Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
EFTA00014884.pdf
An email dated November 24, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to defense attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger regarding the 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell' case (implied by context and case number 20cr330). The email discusses the procedure for filing proposed redactions related to expert testimony and sealing specific exhibits, referencing Docket No. 495. Several attachments containing proposed redactions and responses are included.
EFTA00014710.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding *U.S. v. Maxwell*. Defense attorneys Bobbi Sternheim and Nicole Simmons communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers about submitting Ghislaine Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the response was submitted under temporary seal and that the government and moving parties were subsequently served after redactions were handled.
EFTA00014699.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 22, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell. Defense attorneys (Sternheim and Simmons) communicate with Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the submission of Maxwell's response to motions to quash a subpoena issued to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The correspondence confirms that the EVCP has been served and discusses protocols for redactions and serving the moving parties.
EFTA00014695.pdf
An email dated November 22, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger. The email discusses the procedure for filing redacted versions of legal documents related to birth certificates, exhibit GX-52, and a motion to quash, referencing Docket Numbers 473, 474, and 476. The sender proposes a sequence for filing cover letters and redacted motions to the Court.
EFTA00014669.pdf
This document is an email thread from May 2021 regarding the case US v. Maxwell. An Assistant United States Attorney contacts Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Laura Menninger, et al.) to dispute a claim made in a recent filing that the defense had made multiple unanswered attempts to confer with the government regarding specific photographs. The AUSA requests the defense either identify these communications or correct the representation to the Court. The thread includes the underlying email from Laura Menninger to Judge Nathan's chambers submitting the filing in question.
EFTA00014661.pdf
This document contains an email exchange between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Laura Menninger, and US Prosecutors regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, which limits press statements. Menninger initially flags comments made by attorney Spencer Kuvin in 'The Sun' as a potential violation. The prosecution responds that Kuvin does not represent any trial witnesses, but counters that Maxwell's own appellate attorney, David Markus, may have violated the rule via statements to the 'NY Post'.
EFTA00014655.pdf
This document contains an email chain from November 20, 2021, between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca). The correspondence concerns the logistics of discovery production, including the shipment of hard drives containing witness materials to counsel in Colorado and to Maxwell at the MDC, as well as clarifications regarding Bates numbering errors. The emails provide specific FedEx tracking numbers for the shipments.
EFTA00014647.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2021 between defense attorney Christian Everdell and an Assistant United States Attorney for the SDNY. They are negotiating the specific wording of a legal stipulation regarding a partial transcript of a witness's trial testimony given on a February 26th. The names of several other attorneys (Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca) appear in the CC line.
EFTA00013302.pdf
This document is an email chain dated December 30, 2020, between Assistant US Attorney Maurene (Comey) and defense attorney Christian Everdell, with other legal team members CC'd. The correspondence concerns a recent order by Judge Nathan denying bail; the defense states they believe no redactions are necessary for the opinion, and the prosecution agrees, attaching a draft joint letter to the Court to convey this position. The document is marked with Bates stamp EFTA00013302.
FW: Documents Per Judge Nathan's Order
Forwarding attachments that were missing from a previous email.
RE: Letter regarding discovery attached.
Attached please find the Government's response to your August 9, 2020 letter.
Re: Letter regarding discovery attached.
Stating they are considering the request and will respond no later than Thursday, August 13th.
Re: Letter regarding discovery attached.
States he cannot wait until Thursday for a decision, needs to confer by phone tomorrow, or will advise Judge Nathan.
Letter regarding discovery attached.
Sending attached conferral letter.
Letter regarding discovery attached.
Sending an attached conferral letter regarding a protective order.
Letter regarding discovery attached.
Attaches conferral letter.
Legal Call
1 pm call (1 hour)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity