DOJ-OGR
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Rick Ricarey
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00019408.jpg
This page from a legal filing, dated September 24, 2020, discusses procedural history regarding the unsealing of documents in the Brown v. Maxwell case. It references specific denied motions by Alan Dershowitz and Michael Cernovich to modify a protective order, as well as a denied request by the Miami Herald to unseal the docket. The top half of the page is heavily redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00019401.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing (Document 60, Case 20-3061) dated September 24, 2020. The filing's primary argument is that Judge Nathan incorrectly refused to modify a protective order, which would have allowed Ms. Maxwell to share sealed material information with Judge Preska. The document outlines the structure of the legal brief, including the case history, jurisdictional statements, and the specific points of the argument.
DOJ-OGR-00019397.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing dated September 23, 2020, related to Case 20-3061. It argues in favor of a motion to consolidate legal proceedings involving Ms. Maxwell and Ms. Giuffre, asserting that consolidation will not cause delay or circumvent Judge Nathan's prior orders. The text emphasizes that the Court has already scheduled oral arguments for both cases on the same day.
DOJ-OGR-00019375.jpg
This document is page 9 of a legal brief filed on September 16, 2020, in Case 20-3061 (United States v. Maxwell). The text outlines legal arguments regarding the 'collateral-order doctrine' and 'interlocutory appeals' in criminal cases. It cites numerous precedents (Cohen, Stack, Abney, Sell) to demonstrate that the Supreme Court rarely permits appeals before a trial concludes, arguing that an order is only immediately reviewable if rights would be 'effectively unreviewable' later.
DOJ-OGR-00019318.jpg
This legal document, dated May 18, 2020, is a filing arguing against defendant Maxwell's request to stay discovery in a civil case. The author contends that Maxwell has failed to justify the stay based on a parallel criminal investigation and that a potential claims resolution program involving co-defendant Epstein's Estate does not require litigation to be paused. The filing cites court transcripts and case law to support the position that discovery should proceed, as it may even be necessary to facilitate settlement.
DOJ-OGR-00019317.jpg
This is a legal letter from attorney David Boies representing plaintiff Annie Farmer, addressed to Judge Debra C. Freeman on May 18, 2020. The letter argues against Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's request to stay discovery in the civil case pending a criminal investigation, citing case law that characterizes such stays as extraordinary remedies when no indictment has yet been issued. Boies asserts that Maxwell's motion is an unjustified attempt to delay litigation.
DOJ-OGR-00019301.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service dated September 10, 2020, signed by Nicole Simmons. It certifies that Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion to Consolidate Appeal was filed with the Court via CM/ECF and a copy was emailed to all counsel of record on that date. The document confirms the proper legal service of the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00019298.jpg
This is a page from a legal filing dated September 10, 2020, related to Case 20-3061 (likely an appellate case involving Ghislaine Maxwell). The visible text discusses a dispute over a protective order where the government and Judge Nathan refused to allow Ms. Maxwell to share material facts with Judge Preska under seal. The document is heavily redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00019249.jpg
This legal document, part of Case 20-3061 dated September 9, 2020, lists several alleged federal criminal acts. The charges include coercion, enticement, and transportation of minors for illegal sexual activity, conspiracy to do the same, and making false declarations before a grand jury or court (perjury). The document notes that the highest offense level is a felony and that no counts have been terminated.
DOJ-OGR-00019198.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ) dated July 2, 2020. It discusses the court's decision to implement a partial closure of the courtroom, conducting the hearing via video and telephone conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The court argues this is necessary for public health and cites United States v. Alimehmeti as a precedent for partial closures.
DOJ-OGR-00019117.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a scheduling discussion between the judge, the government's attorney (Ms. Moe), and the defense attorney (Mr. Everdell). The attorneys provide updates on when their respective cases will proceed, and the judge proposes potential dates, specifically the 16th or 18th of the month, for the charge conference. The conversation aims to establish a clear timeline for the remainder of the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00017194.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Rebuttal by Ms. Comey) filed on August 10, 2022, in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor argues against the defense's attempt to discredit witness 'Carolyn' over peripheral details, emphasizing that Carolyn consistently identified Maxwell as the person who scheduled massages with Jeffrey Epstein, even in a 2009 deposition. The text details abuse Carolyn suffered from Epstein and notes she confided in a person named Sean about meeting Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00017048.jpg
This document is page 27 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), specifically the prosecution's summation regarding flight logs (Government Exhibit 662). The prosecutor argues that flight records confirm testimony from 'Jane' and Juan Alessi that Jane, a minor (16 years old in Nov 1996), was transported from Palm Beach to Teterboro/New York by Epstein and Maxwell. The text highlights how Epstein and Maxwell avoided listing minors' names on logs but points to specific entries proving their presence.
DOJ-OGR-00017014.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The discussion centers on finalizing the 'verdict sheet,' specifically correcting a typographical error where a 'T' appeared instead of a checkmark. The Judge outlines a schedule for receiving a letter from the government regarding open issues and sending out final redline and clean versions of the documents.
DOJ-OGR-00016913.jpg
This is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell and Prosecutor Ms. Comey agree to stipulations regarding the admission of redacted Government Exhibits 52-K, 52-J, and 52-L under seal. Additionally, the parties stipulate that the FBI seized Annie Farmer's boots on June 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00016653.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a ruling by the judge during the cross-examination of a witness named Loftus (likely expert Elizabeth Loftus). The judge admonishes attorney Ms. Pomerantz (prosecution) not to draw prejudicial associations with other defendants Loftus has testified for, citing Rule 403 grounds, but allows general questions regarding incentives to testify in high-profile cases.
DOJ-OGR-00013246.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. During cross-examination by Mr. Pagliuca, a witness named Carolyn is confronted with prior testimony where she denied having sexual intercourse with Mr. Epstein. Carolyn clarifies to the court that she answered 'no' previously because she was not a willing participant, explicitly stating, 'He had intercourse with me and I stopped it.'
DOJ-OGR-00013075.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz regarding the authentication of Government Exhibits 420, 421, and 422, which are identified as Word documents printed from Government Exhibit 54. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, offers no objection, and the exhibits are admitted into evidence by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00013072.jpg
This page is a transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz questions witness Mr. Flatley to authenticate Government Exhibits 418 (unredacted) and 418R (redacted), establishing they were printed from 'Government 54' (a master evidence source). The government moves to offer Exhibit 418 under seal and 418R publicly.
DOJ-OGR-00013048.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey questions a witness named Meder regarding Government Exhibits 317 and 318, which are photographs derived from a CD logged as evidence '1B75'. The witness identifies Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein in both photographs.
DOJ-OGR-00010543.jpg
This legal document describes Ghislaine Maxwell's role as supervisor of Jeffrey Epstein's households, where she acted as 'the lady of the house.' It details how she was financially supported by Epstein, receiving a townhouse and $23 million, while enforcing a strict culture of silence among staff to protect their criminal activities. The document cites a household manual and testimony from former manager Juan Alessi to illustrate the extreme rules of secrecy and obedience she imposed.
DOJ-OGR-00010537.jpg
This document is a Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 670, filed 06/22/22) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It outlines sections pertaining to a criminal case, including background, charges, summary of proof at trial concerning the sexual abuse of multiple individuals (Jane, Kate, Annie Farmer, Virginia Roberts, Carolyn, Melissa), pre-sentence report and sentencing guidelines, discussion on the defendant's conduct warranting imprisonment, and financial penalties. The document details various sentencing enhancements and arguments related to the defendant's sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00009217.jpg
This document is page 27 of a heavily redacted legal filing from criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. The only visible substantive text accuses 'the government' of mischaracterizing the record regarding unspecified questions. The footer includes a Department of Justice (DOJ) control number, suggesting its origin or handling within that agency.
DOJ-OGR-00009200.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) argues that Juror No. 50 failed to disclose childhood sexual abuse during jury selection. The defense contends that had this information been known, Ms. Maxwell would have successfully challenged the juror for cause due to inherent bias. The text notes that the juror later spoke to the media about his trauma but is now attempting to walk back those comments after being warned by the government of potential legal consequences.
DOJ-OGR-00009181.jpg
This document is a page from a Daily Mail news article, filed as part of a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-RA) on February 4, 2022. It features a photo of a juror named Scotty and a courtroom sketch of the defendant, Maxwell. The text states that Scotty is satisfied with the guilty verdict and believes Maxwell will spend the rest of her life in prison.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity