Department of Justice (DOJ)
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory lobbying |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency disagreement and deference |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory legislative commentary |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Government
|
Advisory policy recommendation |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency jurisdictional dispute collaboration |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency policy disagreement and cooperation |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Hierarchical |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency coordination and jurisdictional negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Funder and trainer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Proposed legislation (Mann Act expansion, Sections 222, 223)
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Inter agency disagreement |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Non-government organizations (NGOs)
|
Potential conflict of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS and DHS
|
Collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI, DOL, DHS
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DHS/FBI/DOL
|
Inter agency coordination |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
US States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
National Advocacy Center, National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ recommends adding 'endeavor to' after 'shall' in subsection (c)(3)(A)(ii) to avoid creati... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and response to proposed legislative changes in Sections 202 and 203 of a bill relat... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and recommendations on proposed legislative changes in Secti... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes extending continued presence for trafficking victims for the duration of a civil ... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 202(a) that would legislate the existence of the 'Trafficking... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the 120-day deadline in Section 202(f) as unreasonable. | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 203 that would remove the Attorney General's role in determin... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws concerning minor victims are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on human trafficking, including discussion on using various criminal statutes. | National Advocacy Center an... | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. | Annual conferences, the Nat... | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ expresses opposition to expanding the Mann Act to federalize criminal prosecution of pand... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes a proposed subsection (g) that would expand sex tourism offenses to include illic... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ states its belief that the addition of 18 U.S.C. § 2423A is unnecessary. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the expansion of jurisdiction over offenses involving non-Americans committed out... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ criticizes Section 223, which relates to 'pimping' an alien, for removing a requirement f... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis of and opposition to proposed legislative changes in Sections 205, 211, and 213 of a... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and statement of opposition/deference regarding proposed leg... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00028606.jpg
A computerized inspection log entry dated April 28, 2014. The record notes that the subject of the inspection was compliant and no action was taken. An officer identified as ASCBPO (likely related to Customs and Border Protection) is associated with the advice given. The document contains multiple redactions protecting law enforcement techniques and personal privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00028600.jpg
This is an inspection remarks log dated April 28, 2014. It documents that a subject traveling on a private aircraft to New Jersey was inspected and, with no other derogatory information found, was permitted to continue their travel by an SCBPO (likely a U.S. Customs and Border Protection Officer).
DOJ-OGR-00028595.jpg
This document is a Secondary Inspection Report dated April 5, 2012, recording the entry of Jeffrey Epstein via aircraft N491GM. The inspection took place at the Culebra port, arriving from/departing to St. Thomas (STT). The inspection lasted approximately two hours (11:20 to 13:34), resulted in a negative inspection finding (no contraband/violations found), and was marked complete; specific reasons for the referral and remarks are redacted under law enforcement exemptions.
DOJ-OGR-00028590.jpg
This document is a printout of an 'Inspection Remarks' record dated April 28, 2014. It indicates that a subject (redacted) was inspected, found to be in compliance with 'no action taken,' and subsequently notified. The record involves an official designated as 'SCBPO' and contains significant redactions protecting law enforcement techniques and personal privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00028559.jpg
A Department of Justice secondary inspection record detailed the entry of Jeffrey Epstein into Teterboro Airport (Hanger 2) on November 1, 2006. Epstein arrived from St. Thomas (STT) on aircraft N909JE. The inspection included a bag exam but no personal search, lasted 5 minutes (10:15 to 10:20), and the reason for the referral was redacted under FOIA exemptions.
DOJ-OGR-00028535.jpg
This document is a Department of Justice database record (API/HIT DATA) tracking the travel of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. It records an outbound flight on May 7, 2011, from Newark International (EWR) to Paris Orly (ORY) aboard Open Skies flight 4. The document includes standard law enforcement redactions regarding privacy and investigative techniques.
DOJ-OGR-00028507.jpg
This document is an Advance Passenger Information (API) record dated June 6, 2013, showing that Jeffrey E. Epstein was a passenger on Air France flight 7. The flight was an outbound trip departing from John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) and arriving at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport (CDG).
DOJ-OGR-00028465.jpg
This document is an Advance Passenger Information (API) hit data record dated December 11, 2011. It details an outbound, general aviation flight for Jeffrey E. Epstein on aircraft with tail number N909JE. The flight departed from Atatürk Airport (IST) in Istanbul, Turkey, with the arrival location listed as unknown.
DOJ-OGR-00028460.jpg
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) Advance Passenger Information (API) record dated January 1, 2012. It details a flight involving Jeffrey E. Epstein on a general aviation aircraft with tail number N491GM. The flight was outbound, departing from Istanbul Atatürk Airport (IST) to an unknown arrival location.
DOJ-OGR-00028419.jpg
This document is a database printout (PQH API/HIT DATA) recording the arrival of Jeffrey Epstein at Teterboro Airport (TEB) on September 4, 2013. He arrived on his private aircraft, tail number N909JE, from an unknown departure point ('XXX'). The document includes FOIA redactions regarding law enforcement techniques and personal privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00028368.jpg
This is a U.S. Customs (CUS) record from the TECS system, dated May 29, 2005. It documents a data query and subsequent hit for Jeffrey Epstein related to flight/vessel number 909JE at Palm Beach International. The document is part of a Department of Justice (DOJ) record set.
DOJ-OGR-00028224.jpg
This document is a TECSII Primary Query History log, dated April 28, 2014, detailing passenger activity queries for Jeffrey E. Epstein. It lists six separate queries from July to September 2013 related to travel involving Long Island MacArthur, Ataturk, and an "Unknown Airport" associated with a specific document number. The queries appear to be related to the Advance Passenger Information System (APIS).
DOJ-OGR-00018354.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a sidebar conference where prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach objects to the defense's intention to ask the upcoming witness, 'Kate,' to identify her personal counsel in the courtroom. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that if a witness brings counsel for support, it is relevant and 'fair game' for cross-examination.
DOJ-OGR-00018320.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of Sergeant Dawson by Ms. Comey regarding Government Exhibits 1, 3, and 4, which the witness identifies as message books found during a search warrant. The Judge interrupts briefly to ask the witness to remove their mask and speak closer to the microphone.
DOJ-OGR-00018303.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Parkinson. The questioning focuses on the floor plan of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence, specifically identifying a 'staff' room located near the kitchen, which is identified in Government Exhibit 238 as a small office. Attorneys Everdell and Comey discuss the admissibility of Exhibit 238 with the Judge.
DOJ-OGR-00018298.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Parkinson. The testimony details the execution of a search warrant on October 20, 2005, specifically confirming Parkinson's role in videotaping the search (warrant reading, security sweep, walk-through) and identifying Kim Paveolic as the photographer.
DOJ-OGR-00018238.jpg
This document is a page from the trial transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Parkinson (likely law enforcement), by defense attorney Mr. Everdell. They are reviewing a video (Government Exhibit 296) showing the initial police search of a residence (likely Epstein's Palm Beach home), describing the layout, and identifying the property manager, Janusz Banasiak, as he is being read a search warrant.
DOJ-OGR-00018224.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. Witness Mr. Parkinson testifies about an event around 2006 where his office personnel formed a human chain to transfer evidence to an FBI agent. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) then introduces Government Exhibits 264-268, which Parkinson identifies as photos depicting the kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way (Epstein's Palm Beach residence) as it appeared on October 20, 2005.
DOJ-OGR-00018107.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey argues for the admissibility of evidence showing a 'sexually suggestive photograph of a young girl' located in the entryway to the bedroom where Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein allegedly slept. Comey argues this proves Maxwell's knowledge of the environment, countering the defense's portrayal of Epstein as an upstanding citizen surrounded by prominent people.
DOJ-OGR-00018095.jpg
This document is a court transcript page (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of Mr. Alessi. Alessi testifies about leaving Jeffrey Epstein's employment due to illness and fatigue, and signing a separation agreement that prohibited him from discussing the lives of Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell. He further states that he did not see Maxwell again after leaving, but he did return to Epstein's house one time in 2004 while dealing with marital issues.
DOJ-OGR-00018077.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Alessi, likely Juan Alessi. The testimony details the procedure for handling incoming phone calls for Mr. Epstein; specifically, if Epstein was unavailable, Alessi, his wife, or a staff member named Taylor would record the caller's name and number in a message book. Alessi confirms that these message books, both new and old, were stored in a utility closet within his office located off the staff room. The page concludes with prosecutor Ms. Comey introducing Government Exhibit 2.
DOJ-OGR-00018022.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Alessi (likely Juan Alessi), who is discussing household management protocols, specifically the use of checklists to ensure tasks are completed for Mr. Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, and their guests. The page contains Bates number DOJ-OGR-00018022.
DOJ-OGR-00017945.jpg
This document is page 72 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between Ms. Pomerantz and Mr. Pagliuca before the Judge regarding the scope of cross-examination for an expert witness, Dr. Rocchio. The defense (Pagliuca) argues that topics such as confabulation, the process of storing memories, and the effect of alcohol on memory are relevant to explaining delayed disclosure.
DOJ-OGR-00017911.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio, an expert witness, who defines the concept of 'grooming' and outlines its five distinct stages, including victim selection, isolation, building trust through deception, desensitization, and maintaining control for coercion.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity