Department of Justice (DOJ)
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory lobbying |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency disagreement and deference |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory legislative commentary |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Government
|
Advisory policy recommendation |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency jurisdictional dispute collaboration |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency policy disagreement and cooperation |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Hierarchical |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency coordination and jurisdictional negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Funder and trainer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Proposed legislation (Mann Act expansion, Sections 222, 223)
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Inter agency disagreement |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Non-government organizations (NGOs)
|
Potential conflict of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS and DHS
|
Collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI, DOL, DHS
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DHS/FBI/DOL
|
Inter agency coordination |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
US States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
National Advocacy Center, National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ recommends adding 'endeavor to' after 'shall' in subsection (c)(3)(A)(ii) to avoid creati... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and response to proposed legislative changes in Sections 202 and 203 of a bill relat... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and recommendations on proposed legislative changes in Secti... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes extending continued presence for trafficking victims for the duration of a civil ... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 202(a) that would legislate the existence of the 'Trafficking... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the 120-day deadline in Section 202(f) as unreasonable. | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 203 that would remove the Attorney General's role in determin... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws concerning minor victims are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on human trafficking, including discussion on using various criminal statutes. | National Advocacy Center an... | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. | Annual conferences, the Nat... | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ expresses opposition to expanding the Mann Act to federalize criminal prosecution of pand... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes a proposed subsection (g) that would expand sex tourism offenses to include illic... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ states its belief that the addition of 18 U.S.C. § 2423A is unnecessary. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the expansion of jurisdiction over offenses involving non-Americans committed out... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ criticizes Section 223, which relates to 'pimping' an alien, for removing a requirement f... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis of and opposition to proposed legislative changes in Sections 205, 211, and 213 of a... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and statement of opposition/deference regarding proposed leg... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
EFTA00021357.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel titled 'Travel Authorization 10808018 has received final approval,' sent on November 8, 2019. It authorizes travel for an unnamed individual from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) for the dates of November 13-15, 2019. The stated purpose of the trip is 'U.S. v. Epstein (2018R01618) - Witness Interviews,' indicating ongoing investigative work related to the Epstein case months after his death.
EFTA00021156.pdf
This document is an automated email notification dated November 12, 2019, from the E2 Solutions travel system regarding a late travel voucher (Trip ID 10777198). The email is addressed to a DOJ employee (name redacted) who traveled to West Palm Beach from November 4-5, 2019. The stated purpose of the trip was 'R20NYS13144 - Epstein investigation - Witness Interviews'.
EFTA00021150.pdf
An internal Department of Justice email dated April 5, 2019, from a reporting server distributing the 'Child Exploitation & Porn Update Report III' for Project Safe Childhood. The email instructs Chiefs and Coordinators to ensure assigned AUSAs update their cases.
EFTA00021147.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel regarding the approval of a travel voucher (Trip ID 10982122). The trip took place from February 3-6, 2020, in Stockholm, Sweden, for the purpose of 'Witness Interviews' related to the 'Epstein investigation' (Case 2018R01618). The traveler's name is redacted, but the document confirms active DOJ investigation efforts involving international travel in early 2020.
EFTA00021061.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 31, 2020, to February 4, 2020, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and another official. The correspondence concerns administrative approval for a 'Sweden travel memo' related to the Epstein case (likely post-mortem investigation), involving delays in obtaining Office of International Affairs (OIA) and final Department of Justice (DOJ) approval. The participants also coordinate a meeting time to discuss the matter.
EFTA00021005.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel regarding a Department of Justice travel authorization (Trip ID 10894369). The email confirms that a redacted traveler has been approved to travel to Santa Monica, CA, from December 15-17, 2019, for the purpose of conducting 'Witness Interviews' related to the case 'U.S. v. Epstein' (Case ID R20NYS13261). The document dates from December 2019, several months after Jeffrey Epstein's death, indicating ongoing investigative activity.
EFTA00020999.pdf
This document is an automated email notification dated December 8, 2019, confirming the final approval of a travel voucher for an individual traveling on behalf of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The travel took place from November 13-15, 2019, to Santa Monica, CA, for the specific purpose of a 'Witness Interview' related to the case 'U.S. v. Epstein'. The traveler's name is redacted.
EFTA00020997.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel regarding a travel voucher for a DOJ employee or witness. The trip took place from November 13-15, 2019, in Santa Monica, CA, for the specific purpose of a 'Witness Interview' related to the case 'U.S. v. Epstein' (Case ID R20NYS13179). The voucher lists total expenses of $1,585.76.
EFTA00020986.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel regarding a Department of Justice travel voucher. The voucher relates to a trip taken on November 4-5, 2019, to West Palm Beach, FL, specifically for 'Epstein investigation - Witness Interviews' (Case R20NYS13144). The document details the expenses incurred ($548.87) and indicates the voucher is pending further approval.
EFTA00020916.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel regarding the approval of a final travel voucher (ID 10810811(1)). The voucher relates to a trip taken by a redacted individual to Santa Monica, CA, from November 14-15, 2019, for the purpose of 'Witness Interviews' related to the 'Epstein investigation (2018R01618)'. The document lists expenses totaling $740.28 and indicates the involvement of the Department of Justice via internal network links.
EFTA00020915.pdf
An automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel regarding the final approval of a travel voucher for a DOJ employee (likely from the SDNY office). The travel took place on November 14-15, 2019, to Santa Monica, California, for the specific purpose of conducting witness interviews for the Epstein investigation (Case ID 2018R01618).
EFTA00020904.pdf
This document is a heavily redacted email record dated January 20, 2021, originating from a Department of Justice email address (@usa.doj.gov). The subject line is 'Re: Brunel', likely referring to Jean-Luc Brunel, a key figure in the Epstein investigation who was arrested in December 2020. The document appears to be part of an internal communication or filing system (USAHUB-USAJournal111).
EFTA00020830.pdf
This document is an email header dated November 7, 2020, regarding the 'JE iPhone review,' likely referring to evidence related to Jeffrey Epstein. It involves communication between the Department of Justice (indicated by the usa.doj.gov domain) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).
EFTA00020787.pdf
This document is an email dated August 23, 2019, circulated within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), containing the full text of a New York Times article by Katie Benner. The article details Attorney General William Barr's reaction to Jeffrey Epstein's death in federal custody, describing his anger at the Bureau of Prisons' incompetence and his subsequent actions to overhaul BOP leadership, including transferring the warden and appointing Kathleen Hawk Sawyer. It highlights the political pressure on Barr, conspiracy theories surrounding the death, and the unresolved questions regarding the failure of prison protocols such as regular checks and cellmate assignment.
EFTA00020711.pdf
This document is a 'Second Supplemental Privilege Log' from the case Jane Doe v. United States, listing internal DOJ, FBI, and USAO communications withheld from civil discovery. The log chronicles the timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation from late 2006 to August 2008, detailing the internal deliberations regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), plea negotiations, and the drafting of the indictment. It reveals critical details such as internal disagreements over plea terms, Epstein's refusal to plead to anything other than 'assault on the plane,' Jay Lefkowitz's admission that he never intended Epstein to register as a sex offender, and the government's struggles with victim notification and harassment by Epstein's defense team.
EFTA00020692.pdf
This document is an email chain from March and April 2019 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and IT/litigation support staff regarding the 'US v. Epstein' case (2018R01618). The correspondence details the technical process of uploading subpoena returns from the law firm Boies Schiller (referred to as BSF) into the Relativity review platform. The text reveals specific file paths indicating the government was in possession of video interviews with individuals identified by initials (H.R., J.H., S.V., A.D., A.T.).
EFTA00020539.pdf
This document is an internal Department of Justice email dated April 5, 2021, from an automated reporting server. It distributes the 'Child Exploitation & Porn Update Report III' for Project Safe Childhood and instructs Chiefs and Coordinators to ensure assigned AUSAs update their cases. The recipients of the email are redacted.
EFTA00020439.pdf
This document contains an email chain from March 2021 between defense attorney David Oscar Markus and a redacted Assistant United States Attorney regarding U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Markus introduces himself as appellate counsel for Maxwell's bail appeal and requests access to specific unredacted docket entries. The government confirms its opposition to the bail motion and notes that a protective order (ECF No. 36) is already in place.
EFTA00020090.pdf
This document is a 'Touhy Request' dated June 8, 2020, sent by attorney Robert S. Glassman to US Attorney Geoffrey Berman. It requests the production of evidence gathered during the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein for use in a civil lawsuit (Jane Doe v. Indyke et al.). The request specifically seeks photographs, flight logs, videos, correspondence, and trust documents (specifically 'The 1953 Trust' dated August 8, 2019) related to a Jane Doe victim who met Epstein at a Michigan summer camp in 1994.
EFTA00019958.pdf
An email dated August 8, 2019, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a DOJ official in the USVI. The email submits a search warrant application and exhibits regarding the US Virgin Islands. It notes that a female Special Agent (the affiant) is copied on the email and is available to speak with Judge Miller the following day.
EFTA00019473.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York, dated December 19, 2018, detailing a phone call regarding the opening of an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The call discussed identifying potential witnesses, the role of victim attorneys, and the need for confidentiality due to the sensitive and early stage of the investigation. The parties agreed to maintain confidentiality and to continue discussions.
EFTA00019215.pdf
An internal email from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated November 28, 2021, preparing staff for the opening of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial the following morning. The email contrasts the SDNY's willingness to prosecute historical sex crimes with prosecutors in Florida and provides logistical details for staff wishing to attend the proceedings at the courthouse.
EFTA00019182.pdf
An email dated February 6, 2019, from a Special Assistant to the U.S. Attorney at the SDNY to a redacted recipient. The subject is 'OPR' (likely Office of Professional Responsibility), and the content is a link to a Reuters article reporting that the Justice Department is conducting a professional misconduct probe into the Epstein case.
EFTA00019063.pdf
An email chain from February 24, 2020, between attorney Bruce Barket and DOJ officials regarding a scheduling conflict for a status conference involving Mr. Tartaglione (likely Nicholas Tartaglione, Jeffrey Epstein's former cellmate). Barket informs the prosecution that his request for a day off from a trial in the EDNY was denied, complicating his attendance at the Tartaglione conference where a 'Curcio issue' is to be addressed. The DOJ officials discuss consulting with 'Bobbi' before responding.
EFTA00017892.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York regarding the opening of the trial *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* in late November 2021. The emails contain motivational messages to the prosecution team (specifically naming an 'Andrew'), logistical details for staff wishing to watch the proceedings, and a pointed criticism of Florida prosecutors regarding their handling of similar crimes.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity