Department of Justice (DOJ)
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory lobbying |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency disagreement and deference |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory legislative commentary |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Government
|
Advisory policy recommendation |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency jurisdictional dispute collaboration |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency policy disagreement and cooperation |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Hierarchical |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency coordination and jurisdictional negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Funder and trainer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Proposed legislation (Mann Act expansion, Sections 222, 223)
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Inter agency disagreement |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Non-government organizations (NGOs)
|
Potential conflict of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS and DHS
|
Collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI, DOL, DHS
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DHS/FBI/DOL
|
Inter agency coordination |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
US States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
National Advocacy Center, National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ recommends adding 'endeavor to' after 'shall' in subsection (c)(3)(A)(ii) to avoid creati... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and response to proposed legislative changes in Sections 202 and 203 of a bill relat... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and recommendations on proposed legislative changes in Secti... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes extending continued presence for trafficking victims for the duration of a civil ... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 202(a) that would legislate the existence of the 'Trafficking... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the 120-day deadline in Section 202(f) as unreasonable. | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 203 that would remove the Attorney General's role in determin... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws concerning minor victims are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on human trafficking, including discussion on using various criminal statutes. | National Advocacy Center an... | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. | Annual conferences, the Nat... | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ expresses opposition to expanding the Mann Act to federalize criminal prosecution of pand... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes a proposed subsection (g) that would expand sex tourism offenses to include illic... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ states its belief that the addition of 18 U.S.C. § 2423A is unnecessary. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the expansion of jurisdiction over offenses involving non-Americans committed out... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ criticizes Section 223, which relates to 'pimping' an alien, for removing a requirement f... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis of and opposition to proposed legislative changes in Sections 205, 211, and 213 of a... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and statement of opposition/deference regarding proposed leg... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
EFTA00017052.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 31 to February 4, 2020, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and another official. The primary subject is the approval of a 'Sweden travel memo' related to the Epstein case, which required clearance from the Office of International Affairs (OIA) and the Department of Justice (DOJ). The emails also detail the logistical coordination of a brief in-person meeting between the two parties.
EFTA00017039.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the Department of Justice's travel system (E2Solutions) dated January 24, 2020. It confirms that a travel authorization (Trip ID 10982121) for a redacted traveler to go to Stockholm, Sweden, from February 3-6, 2020, has received initial approval. The explicitly stated purpose of the trip is 'Epstein investigation (2018R01618) - Witness Interviews'.
EFTA00016830.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel regarding a travel authorization (Trip ID: 10982121) for a DOJ employee. The trip, scheduled for February 3-6, 2020, is to Stockholm, Sweden, for the purpose of 'Witness Interviews' related to the 'Epstein investigation (2018R01618)'. The names of the traveler and the approving official are redacted.
EFTA00016511.pdf
An email chain from November 29, 2021, among staff at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) court. Edward Friedland (District Court Executive) flags that the public web page for the Ghislaine Maxwell case contains outdated dial-in information, causing the public to try to access the trial by phone. He requests the page be updated to reflect that the trial is in-person. The chain includes Joseph Pecorino providing the link and subsequent internal discussions on how to word the update for victims.
EFTA00016396.pdf
This document is a printout of an email header dated December 16, 2019. It serves as a record of a file saved within the Department of Justice's internal network, specifically in a folder path related to the case 'USvEpstein-2018R01618' and 'Witnesses & Cooperators'. The actual content of the email and the identities of the correspondents are completely redacted.
EFTA00016299.pdf
This document is an email dated December 4, 2018, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email shares a network file path concerning FOIA documents related to the investigation 'USvEpstein-2018R01618', indicating active internal handling of Epstein-related files and FBI FOIA requests at that time.
EFTA00016298.pdf
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated December 6, 2018. The email confirms that files received via CD from agents (or a redacted individual) have been uploaded to a DOJ network share specifically dedicated to the 'USvEpstein' investigation (Case File 2018R01618).
EFTA00015719.pdf
This document is an email dated February 6, 2019, circulating a Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown. The article reports that the DOJ, specifically the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), opened an investigation into Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's role in the 2008 plea deal granted to Jeffrey Epstein. This investigation was initiated in response to a request by Senator Ben Sasse following the Herald's 'Perversion of Justice' series.
EFTA00015710.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the Department of Justice VoIP system. It indicates that a voicemail was received from a redacted wireless caller on July 26, 2019, at 8:56 PM. The email was copied to 'USANYS-EpsteinVictims', suggesting the call was related to the investigation or victim outreach regarding Jeffrey Epstein conducted by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
EFTA00015709.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the DOJ VoIP system dated July 29, 2019. It informs a redacted recipient of a voice message received from a redacted individual at Bank of America. The email is carbon copied to the 'USANYS-EpsteinVictims' email address, suggesting the communication is relevant to the Epstein investigation.
EFTA00015708.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the DOJ VoIP system dated July 29, 2019. It indicates that a voice message was received and forwarded as an attachment. The notification was copied to the 'USANYS-EpsteinVictims' email address, suggesting the voicemail was relevant to the Epstein victims' case unit at the Southern District of New York. The identity of the caller and the primary recipient are redacted.
EFTA00015707.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the Department of Justice VoIP system indicating that a voice message was received on July 30, 2019. The message was sent to the USANYS Epstein Victims email alias from an unidentified wireless caller whose details are redacted.
EFTA00015706.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the DOJ VoIP system dated August 1, 2019. It indicates that a voice message was received (sender redacted) and forwarded as a .wav attachment. The email was copied to the 'USANYS-EpsteinVictims' email address, suggesting the voicemail is related to the investigation or victim outreach.
EFTA00015704.pdf
An automated email notification from the DOJ VoIP system dated August 7, 2019 (three days prior to Jeffrey Epstein's death). The email delivers a voice message attachment to a redacted recipient and copies the 'USANYS-EpsteinVictims' email address, indicating a communication related to the victim outreach or case management by the Southern District of New York.
EFTA00015702.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the Department of Justice VoIP system dated August 8, 2019. It alerts a redacted recipient of a new voicemail, with the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York's Epstein Victims email address (USANYS.EpsteinVictims@usa.doj.gov) copied on the message. The email includes a Bates number EFTA00015702.
EFTA00015701.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the Department of Justice's VoIP system dated August 12, 2019. It indicates that a voice message was received and attached as a .wav file. The email was copied to 'USANYS-EpsteinVictims', suggesting the voicemail was relevant to the investigation or victim outreach following Jeffrey Epstein's death (which occurred two days prior). The recipient and the caller's identity are redacted.
EFTA00015700.pdf
This document is an automated email notification generated by the Department of Justice's VoIP system on August 14, 2019. It alerts a redacted recipient and the 'USANYS-EpsteinVictims' group that a voicemail was received from a redacted wireless caller. The email includes a .wav file attachment of the recording.
EFTA00015699.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the Department of Justice's VoIP system regarding a voicemail received on August 16, 2019. The email was copied to the USANYS Epstein Victims email address, indicating the call was likely directed to a line associated with the Epstein investigation or victim support. The caller's identity is marked as unavailable and their number is redacted.
EFTA00015698.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the DOJ VoIP system dated August 19, 2019, informing a redacted recipient of a new voicemail. The email is copied to the USANYS Epstein Victims email address, suggesting the voicemail is related to the investigation or victim outreach following Jeffrey Epstein's death earlier that month.
EFTA00015593.pdf
This document is a chain of internal emails from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) between March and July 2019, requesting administrative approval for government travel. The travel requests are explicitly for the 'United States v. Epstein' case (2018R01618), described as an investigation into the 'enticement of minors for sexual activity.' The emails detail multiple trips by Assistant U.S. Attorneys and agents to Florida (Palm Beach, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale) and Los Angeles to conduct victim interviews.
EFTA00015337.pdf
An email chain from January 2019 within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (Public Corruption Unit). Officials are discussing the retrieval of scanned documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, stored on a DOJ shared drive folder labeled '#Florida Scans'. The documents include 'draft indictments' and 'Letters from Epstein's attorneys'. One official forwards the correspondence with the comment, 'Prepare to be disgusted,' likely referring to the content of the defense submissions or the details of the previous non-prosecution agreement.
EFTA00015219.pdf
This document is a legal declaration by Michael G. Seidel, an FBI official, detailing his role and the FBI's handling of a FOIA request from James Robertson and Radar Online LLC concerning Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines the FBI's process for responding to the request, including the number of pages processed and withheld, and provides background on Epstein's criminal history and death.
EFTA00014613.pdf
This document is an email dated July 18, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to a contractor. The attorney requests that subpoena returns related to the Epstein investigation (specifically from American Express and Deutsche Bank) be burned to a disc. The disc is intended for a Special Agent and Detective, to be handed off to 'Mandy' (likely FBI Agent Amanda Young) and 'Paul' at a conference.
EFTA00014611.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from July 2019 between SDNY and FBI officials regarding the Epstein investigation. An Assistant U.S. Attorney instructs a contractor named Hamilton to burn subpoena returns from American Express and Deutsche Bank onto discs for a Special Agent and Detective. The chain also discusses the addition of a forensic accountant to the investigative squad and plans for a strategy meeting.
EFTA00014608.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between a contractor named Hamilton and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the preparation of evidence discs containing subpoena returns from American Express and Deutsche Bank related to the 'USvEpstein-2018R01618' investigation. The discs were to be delivered to a Special Agent and a Detective, potentially for hand-off at a conference.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity