Virginia Giuffre
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Trafficker victim |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Emmy
|
Friend |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Senator George Mitchell
|
Alleged abuse |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Recruiter victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Victim recruiter |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Ghislaine Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Andrew
|
Accused accuser |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Accuser accused |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Accused accuser |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abusive exploitative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
T.J.
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-13 | Deposition | Virginia Giuffre gave approximately nine hours of deposition testimony over two days. | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2020-11-25 | N/A | Ruling in Giuffre v. Maxwell regarding privacy interests | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-09-09 | N/A | Ruling in Giuffre v. Dershowitz | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2019-04-16 | N/A | Plaintiff Maria Farmer filed an affidavit in Virginia Giuffre's defamation case against Dershowitz. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2017-05-25 | N/A | Filing of Complaint | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2017-05-24 | N/A | Settlement agreement and dismissal of civil action (Giuffre v. Maxwell) | Court | View |
| 2017-04-07 | N/A | Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre submitted witness solicitation materials for in camera review, pursuan... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2016-06-28 | N/A | Videotaped deposition of Tony Figueroa, taken at the instance of the Defendant. The deposition co... | Southern Reporting Company,... | View |
| 2016-04-21 | N/A | Hearing held before the S.D.N.Y. Court in the Giuffre v. Maxwell matter | S.D.N.Y. Court | View |
| 2016-02-08 | N/A | Document e-filed with the court. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2016-02-08 | N/A | Submission of legal request to release confidential deposition transcript to law enforcement. | Fort Lauderdale, Florida (S... | View |
| 2016-01-16 | N/A | Virginia Giuffre testified at her deposition. | Unknown | View |
| 2016-01-12 | N/A | Confidentiality Order signed and entered by Judge Thomas Lynch. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2016-01-12 | N/A | Confidentiality Order entered designating Giuffre's testimony as Confidential. | Court | View |
| 2015-12-18 | N/A | Court entered a Confidentiality Order regarding Giuffre's deposition (Note: Text contains a typo ... | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-11-12 | N/A | Court issued Order granting in part Giuffre's Motion to Quash subpoena served by Dershowitz. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-09-21 | N/A | Litigation commenced (Giuffre v Maxwell). | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2015-09-21 | N/A | Filing of Complaint (Case 1:15-cv-07433) | US District Court, SDNY | View |
| 2015-09-21 | N/A | Filing of Document 1 in Case 1:15-cv-07433 | Court (implied) | View |
| 2015-01-01 | Legal filing | Virginia Giuffre filed a civil defamation case, Giuffre v. Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | Filing of civil defamation case Giuffre v. Maxwell | Civil Court (implied) | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | Start of Maxwell's campaign to discredit Giuffre (January 2015). | Global/Media | View |
| 2014-12-30 | N/A | Giuffre moved to join on-going litigation filed by Jane Doe 1 challenging Epstein's non-prosecuti... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2014-12-30 | N/A | Ms. Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 3) and Jane Doe No. 4 filed a motion to join the case. | Court | View |
| 2014-12-23 | N/A | Giuffre incorporated Victims Refuse Silence, Inc. | Florida | View |
DOJ-OGR-00010658.jpg
This is a letter dated June 16, 2022, from Alan Dershowitz's attorneys to the U.S. prosecutors in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The attorneys inform the prosecution about a recent, confidential deposition of Virginia Giuffre from her civil lawsuit against Dershowitz, arguing it contains information critical to her credibility. They urge the prosecutors to obtain and review this deposition transcript before allowing Giuffre to provide a victim impact statement at Maxwell's upcoming sentencing.
DOJ-OGR-00010654.jpg
This document is a letter dated June 7, 2022, from legal ethics expert Bruce A. Green to the SDNY prosecutors handling the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Green, retained by Alan Dershowitz, argues that prosecutors may have an ethical obligation to review a sealed deposition given by Virginia Giuffre in a separate civil case before Judge Preska. Dershowitz claims this deposition proves Giuffre lacks credibility regarding the Epstein-Maxwell matter, and Green suggests the prosecutors should verify this before Giuffre provides a victim impact statement at Maxwell's sentencing.
DOJ-OGR-00010596.jpg
This document is page 5 of a defense filing (dated June 24, 2022) related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that the definition of 'victim' under the CVRA is narrower than sentencing guidelines and asserts that Maxwell's due process rights must be protected against new allegations in victim impact statements from accusers Annie Farmer and 'Kate' that were not cross-examined at trial. The document also attempts to impeach the credibility of Virginia Giuffre, noting she did not testify and alleging in a footnote that she failed to disclose prior abuse by a man named Ron Eppinger.
DOJ-OGR-00010593.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, discusses the victim impact statements of seven women in a case involving Epstein and Ms. Maxwell. It argues their standing as statutory victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), noting that only Annie Farmer and Virginia Giuffre were minors during the relevant period of the charged offenses. The document contends that allegations of abuse alone are insufficient and must be directly linked to the federal offense conduct, which requires the victim to have been a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00009861.jpg
This document is a news article detailing the perspective of a juror, 'Scotty,' from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Scotty explains that the defense team's aggressive tactics, particularly attorney Laura Menninger's questioning of a victim, backfired and helped convince the jury of the defense's lack of respect for the victims. The article also contains a sidebar about a separate, 'brutal' court hearing for Prince Andrew in New York concerning a lawsuit filed by his accuser, Virginia Giuffre.
DOJ-OGR-00003056.jpg
This document is a legal filing (page 122 of 239) by the Government opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence and dismiss Counts Five and Six. The Government argues that suppression is unwarranted because the contested materials, specifically Maxwell's 2016 deposition transcripts, were already unsealed in civil litigation by Judge Preska and affirmed by the Second Circuit, making them subject to 'inevitable discovery.' Footnote 42 discusses the defendant's failed attempt to modify a protective order to use criminal discovery materials in her civil case.
DOJ-OGR-00003035.jpg
This document is a page from a 2021 court filing detailing the procedural history regarding the unsealing of documents in the Giuffre v. Maxwell civil case. It describes Magistrate Judge Netburn's 2019 denial of a Government application to modify a protective order, citing a lack of compelling need, and notes the subsequent reassignment of the case to Judge Preska, who ordered materials unsealed in July 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00003026.jpg
This court document outlines the procedural history of the civil litigation between Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell, including deposition dates in 2016 and a settlement in 2017. It details how the USAO-SDNY formally opened its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and co-conspirators in late November 2018, explicitly crediting Julie K. Brown's reporting in the Miami Herald as the catalyst. The document also clarifies that a specific prosecutor, 'AUSA-1', was not involved in opening this 2018 investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00004800.jpg
This court document (page 16 of a filing from June 2021) denies Ghislaine Maxwell's argument that the Government deliberately misrepresented facts to Judge McMahon regarding communications with the Boies Schiller firm (BSF). The court rules that the prosecutor's failure to mention a 2016 email/meeting with Giuffre's attorneys during an April 2019 hearing was likely because the question was understood to refer only to the *current* investigation, not all historical contacts. The text references the standard set by *Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co.* regarding coordination between civil litigants and criminal prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00004785.jpg
This document is an Opinion & Order filed on June 25, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The judge denies Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence obtained via a grand jury subpoena issued to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, the law firm that represented Virginia Giuffre in a 2015 civil defamation suit against Maxwell. The document outlines the background of the civil suit, noting that Giuffre alleged defamation regarding accusations of sexual abuse by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00002818.jpg
This legal filing argues against a subpoena issued by the Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) to BSF, claiming the requested documents are either procurable from the government or are items (boots and photographs) better produced at trial if relevant. The document specifically mentions photographs connecting the Defendant, Virginia Giuffre, and Prince Andrew at a London townhome, as well as items related to Annie and Maria Farmer.
DOJ-OGR-00002883.jpg
This legal document, dated March 22, 2021, is a submission by Sigrid S. McCawley arguing against a defendant's motion to subpoena evidence from a third party, BSF. The document contends that the requested materials—including communications, a Grand Jury subpoena, cowboy boots, and photographs involving individuals like Annie Farmer, Virginia Giuffre, and Jeffrey Epstein—are either obtainable from the government or not relevant enough to require pre-trial production. The author concludes that the defendant's motion should be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00002877.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (BSF) to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated March 22, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. BSF objects to a subpoena issued by Maxwell's defense, arguing it is overly broad and lacks clarity on which victims require notice, while clarifying that the firm represents victims Annie Farmer (Minor Victim-2) and Virginia Giuffre. The firm states its intention to notify all Epstein victims it represents about the subpoena out of an abundance of caution.
DOJ-OGR-00002872.jpg
A court order filed on March 29, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Judge orders that specific pages (129–134) of the Government's brief be unredacted because the information is already public record in a superseding indictment. The Judge also addresses proposed redactions related to the civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell, requiring separate justification for maintaining those seals.
DOJ-OGR-00011586.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 22, 2022, from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It contains a victim impact statement written by Virginia Giuffre (referred to as Virginia Roberts by the court) and read by her counsel. The statement directly accuses Maxwell of spotting Giuffre at Mar-a-Lago in the summer of 2000, procuring her for Jeffrey Epstein, and participating in the subsequent abuse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022996.jpg
This document is an email from attorney Brad Edwards to Miles and Kathy Alexander, former employees of Jeffrey Epstein on Little St. James. Edwards is soliciting their cooperation and testimony for a defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell on behalf of his client, Virginia Giuffre (whose name is mostly redacted but revealed at the end). The email emphasizes that the Alexanders are remembered fondly by the victim and urges them to simply tell the truth about the recruitment and events on the island to support the ongoing litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022993.jpg
This document, likely a news report or legal summary produced for the House Oversight Committee, details testimony from Epstein's house manager Juan Alessi regarding visits by Prince Andrew and Donald Trump. It contrasts their behaviors, noting Andrew received massages while Trump only ate dinner in the kitchen and declined massages. The text also discusses legal actions led by attorneys Scarola and Edwards regarding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (the 'sweetheart deal') and a separate financial dispute involving Trump's golf club.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022981.jpg
This document is a printout of a 'Raw Story' online news article from the House Oversight Committee files. It discusses Virginia Giuffre's impending court date and reveals details about her employment at Mar-a-Lago. The article contrasts Donald Trump's 2015 denial of a close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein against a 2002 quote where Trump praised Epstein's social life and interest in 'younger' women.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015654.jpg
This document is the conclusion page (page 5) of a legal filing dated February 8, 2016. Attorney Sigrid S. McCawley, representing non-party Virginia Giuffre, requests the court to allow a limited release of Giuffre's confidential deposition transcript to law enforcement. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015654.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015651.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal filing (page 2) regarding a dispute between Virginia Giuffre and Alan Dershowitz. Giuffre agrees to release her confidential deposition to law enforcement but requests conditions, arguing that Dershowitz is only seeking it to accuse her of perjury regarding her claim that she saw Bill Clinton on Epstein's island. A footnote highlights that flight logs confirm Clinton traveled internationally on Epstein's private plane, countering Dershowitz's skepticism.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015650.jpg
This is a legal filing from February 8, 2016, in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It is a response by non-party Virginia Giuffre to Defendant Alan Dershowitz's motion regarding a confidentiality order. The document outlines the procedural history, noting that Giuffre was deposed on January 16, 2016, under a confidentiality order, and explicitly states that Giuffre was a victim of sexual trafficking as a minor.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015637.jpg
This document is page 17 of a court filing in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz, specifically a response to Dershowitz's motion to seal records. It quotes Alan Dershowitz attacking attorneys Edwards and Cassell and their client Virginia Giuffre during a CNN interview, accusing them of being unethical and motivated by money. The filing concludes by requesting the court deny Dershowitz's motion to seal documents regarding Giuffre's allegations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015636.jpg
This document is page 16 of a legal response filed by Edwards and Cassell in a defamation case against Alan Dershowitz. It cites a January 3, 2015, BBC Radio 4 interview where Dershowitz publicly claims he wants all evidence released and aggressively attempts to discredit his accuser. In the transcript, Dershowitz denies allegations against himself, Bill Clinton, and Prince Andrew, asserting that Secret Service records will prove Clinton was never on Epstein's island.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015635.jpg
This page is from a legal response by Edwards and Cassell against Dershowitz (Case CACE 15-000072). It documents Dershowitz's public media statements in January 2015 (on the Today Show and in the Miami Herald) where he categorically denies allegations, claims an 'academic relationship' with Epstein, and accuses the opposing lawyers and Ms. Giuffre of lying and fabrication. He specifically threatens that the lawyers will be disbarred and will 'rue the day' they filed the motion.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015631.jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). Attorneys Edwards and Cassell argue against sealing court records, claiming that Alan Dershowitz selectively reveals confidential information to misrepresent facts while trying to prevent them from correcting the record. The text specifically cites a deposition where Dershowitz allegedly brought up an affidavit by Virginia Giuffre regarding him watching her perform oral sex on Jeffrey Epstein, and subsequently misrepresented settlement discussions involving attorney David Boies.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Virginia Giuffre | $0.00 | Payment for the trip and 'showing his friend, t... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Virginia Giuffre | $0.00 | Paid extremely well, money used for pills and a... | View |
| 2025-11-13 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Virginia Giuffre | $0.00 | Jeffrey stopped paying the narrator's 'expensiv... | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Virginia Giuffre | $30,000,000.00 | Plaintiff's alleged request for damages in the ... | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Virginia Giuffre | $5,000,000.00 | Plaintiff's alleged claim for lost wages. | View |
| 2015-09-21 | Received | GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Virginia Giuffre | $75,000.00 | Jurisdictional requirement for damages requeste... | View |
| 2001-01-01 | Received | Media Sources | Virginia Giuffre | $500,000.00 | Defense counsel alleges plaintiff admitted to b... | View |
Summons
Request to meet them in Jeffrey's study.
Dismissal
I'll call you next time I'm in town
Recollection of Bill Clinton
Stated recollection of witnessing Bill Clinton on Epstein's island.
Invitation to Epstein's mansion
Maxwell asked that Giuffre come with her to Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion for the purposes of teaching her how to perform 'massages'.
Introduction
Emmy introduces herself as Ghislaine's PA; Narrator introduces herself as 'Jenna'.
Employment
Ghislaine tells narrator she has potential as a massage therapist and asks to see her again the next day.
Cancellation
Canceling the meeting because Jeffrey demanded a massage.
Sexual crimes committed against her
Contains highly sensitive information about experiences as a minor.
Meeting at airport
Arranging a pickup/meeting.
Instruction
Told her to go to 'Rick's' room for a massage and come back to his room after.
Instruction
Whispered that the man she danced with was a prince.
Victim impact statement
A statement written by Virginia Giuffre and read by her counsel in court, directly addressing Ghislaine Maxwell. It accuses Maxwell of procuring her for Jeffrey Epstein at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 and participating in her sexual, physical, and emotional abuse.
Criminal Investigation
Judge rules plaintiff's own statements to law enforcement must be submitted in camera.
Unknown
Defense claims plaintiff produced only two emails despite 200 search terms; Plaintiff claims full compliance.
Interview regarding Epstein and Maxwell
Giuffre provided truthful and accurate information to the FBI about Epstein and Maxwell’s sexual abuse.
Sexual contact allegations
Dershowitz claims this conversation is alleged to have happened secretly, but denies its truth.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity