Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Mr. Everdell

Person
Mentions
1327
Relationships
118
Events
605
Documents
644
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
118 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Legal representative
16 Very Strong
35
View
person Ms. Moe
Opposing counsel
15 Very Strong
13
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Opposing counsel
15 Very Strong
14
View
person Ms. Comey
Opposing counsel
13 Very Strong
16
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Co counsel
13 Very Strong
11
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
12 Very Strong
12
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
11 Very Strong
7
View
organization The Court
Professional
11 Very Strong
196
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
9
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
10 Very Strong
22
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
10 Very Strong
38
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
10 Very Strong
28
View
person the Judge
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person your Honor
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Co counsel
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Chapell
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional adversarial
8 Strong
3
View
person Mr. Visoski
Legal representative
8 Strong
3
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person Espinosa
Professional
8 Strong
2
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Opposing counsel
8 Strong
4
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Admission of Government Exhibits 252, 253, and 254 under seal. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of Gregory Parkinson Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court proceedings discussing jury instructions and a question from the jury regarding Count Four. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court Sidebar/Discussion without Jury Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A Recess The court calls for a comfort break during the proceedings. Courtroom (implied) View
N/A Legal proceeding A 'charging conference' was held where the defense requested the inclusion of travel from Florida... Courtroom View
N/A Court proceeding Cross-examination of witness Ms. Chapell by Mr. Everdell regarding an invoice (Government's 802) ... Courtroom View
N/A Trial An ongoing trial is discussed, with the judge stating they are not delaying it and that it may cl... N/A View
N/A Witness testimony Anticipated testimony of Tracy Chapell, through whom Federal Express invoices will be introduced ... Southern District Court (im... View
N/A Evidence handling Mr. Everdell proposes to redact a 'decent number of records' (Federal Express invoices) over the ... N/A View
N/A Court proceeding Examination of witness PATRICK McHUGH, including direct, cross, and redirect. N/A View
N/A Court proceeding Examination of witness KELLY MAGUIRE, including direct and cross. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Examination of witness Tracy Chapell, including direct examination and cross-examination, as part... Southern District Court (im... View
N/A Court hearing A discussion about case timing and scheduling after the jury was dismissed for the evening. Courtroom View
N/A Meeting A proposed charge conference to be held either on the evening of the 16th or on Saturday the 18th. Courtroom View
N/A Court proceeding A discussion about scheduling future court events. Courtroom View
N/A Court hearing A discussion between the judge and attorneys about the scheduling for the remainder of a trial, i... Courtroom View
N/A Charging conference A past conference where Mr. Everdell requested the inclusion of travel from Florida to New York a... N/A View
N/A Court hearing Direct examination of a witness regarding financial records for Epstein covering the period from ... Courtroom View
N/A Court trial An ongoing court trial where jury deliberations are taking place. N/A View
N/A Pretrial conference A final pretrial conference is discussed, for which Mr. Pagliuca's absence is requested. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Cross-examination of witness DAVID RODGERS by Mr. Everdell. N/A View
N/A Testimony Mr. Everdell previously testified about the acreage of the ranch. N/A View
N/A Court proceeding The trial is scheduled to resume on Thursday at 9:30 AM with the defense phase of the case. Courtroom View
N/A Court proceeding Direct examination of Sergeant Dawson regarding items found during a search. N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00013961.jpg

Transcript page from the cross-examination of witness Mr. Sud. Sud confirms he began booking travel for Jeffrey Epstein's office in 1999 and that the records being reviewed (Exhibit RS-1) cover the period from 1999 through 2006. Sud is subsequently excused from the stand, and the defense is invited to call its next witness.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013960.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the testimony of a witness named Sud, questioned by Mr. Everdell regarding the interpretation of columns in financial records (invoices) related to Epstein between January 1999 and December 2006. The witness confirms that the records list passenger names and invoice amounts.

Court transcript / testimony
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013958.jpg

This court transcript dated August 10, 2022, captures a moment in a trial where defense attorney Mr. Everdell introduces 'Defendant's Exhibit RS-1'. He requests it be temporarily sealed to protect third-party personal information, a request to which the opposing counsel, Ms. Moe, does not object. The Court grants the request, admitting the exhibit under seal and allowing it to be presented to the jury.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013952.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Sud, by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. Mr. Sud testifies that he lives in East Windsor, New Jersey, and is the Vice President of Shoppers Travel, a full-service travel agency he has worked for since its founding in 1988.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013951.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the conclusion of Ms. Espinosa's testimony, confirming she worked at Jeffrey Epstein's Madison Avenue office but never at his homes or Palm Beach property. Following her dismissal, defense attorney Mr. Everdell calls the next witness, Mr. Raghu Sud, who is sworn in.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013950.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness, Ms. Espinosa. During questioning, Ms. Espinosa states that in the six years she worked for Ghislaine, she never saw Ghislaine or Jeffrey Epstein engage in any inappropriate activity with underage girls. The page concludes with counsel Ms. Pomerantz beginning her cross-examination of the witness.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013947.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The questioning attorney attempts to establish the date of a prior videoconference interview between Espinosa and prosecutors. As the witness cannot recall the specific date, the attorney, Mr. Everdell, with the court's permission, directs her to a document to refresh her memory.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013945.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details a short recess where the jury and witness, Ms. Espinosa, leave the courtroom. Upon returning, the Court instructs defense attorney Mr. Everdell to continue his direct examination of Ms. Espinosa.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013944.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness testifies about the timeline of a relationship between Ghislaine and Ted Waitt, estimating it began around 2001. The proceedings are then paused for a 15-minute break at the request of an attorney, Mr. Everdell, after he conferred with the defendant.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013940.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. Espinosa identifies Sarah Kellen in a photograph (Government's Exhibit 327) and testifies that Kellen arrived towards the end of Espinosa's employment, specifically between 2000 and 2002. Espinosa states she did not know Kellen's specific job title but observed that Kellen accompanied Jeffrey Epstein to his properties and was essentially always where he was.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013939.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness identifies Sarah Kellen as having occupied an office previously used by Ghislaine. The transcript also captures a procedural discussion between the attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Ms. Pomerantz) and the judge regarding the presentation of Government's Exhibit 327 to the jury.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013931.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of Ms. Espinosa by Mr. Everdell, where she describes her role managing a calendar for approximately a dozen apartments owned by Jeffrey Epstein at 301 East 66th Street. She notes that these apartments were used to house employees, family, friends, and guests.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013929.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness is questioned about an envelope (exhibit CE3) and a photograph (exhibit CE4). The witness identifies the person in the photograph as 'Jane' and is about to describe an inscription on it when an attorney, Mr. Everdell, interjects.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013928.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Mr. Everdell is questioning a witness, Ms. Espinosa, about an exhibit labeled CE3. Ms. Espinosa identifies CE3 as a manilla envelope sent by a person named Jane to a Ms. Cimberly, care of Epstein & Co. at 457 Madison Avenue, but notes that the date on the postage is illegible.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013927.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a direct examination of a witness named Espinosa regarding headshots and an envelope. It also records a motion by defense counsel Mr. Everdell to admit exhibits CE3 through CE8 temporarily under seal to protect witness privacy, which the Court granted, allowing a witness to testify under pseudonym.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013926.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Espinosa, by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. Mr. Everdell introduces several exhibits (CE3-CE8) for identification, which Ms. Espinosa confirms she recognizes as headshots of three cast members and a group cast photo.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013923.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. Espinosa testifies that an individual named Jane was treated as 'extra special' in their office because Jane's mother had claimed Jane was 'Jeffrey's goddaughter'. The questioning also touches upon Jane's siblings and the contact between Jane's mother and someone named Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013921.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The testimony focuses on frequent phone calls received at the office from 'Jane's mother,' who was persistently asking to speak with Jeffrey Epstein. The questioning is interrupted by an objection from Ms. Pomerantz regarding hearsay, prompting the judge to request a proffer.

Court transcript / legal testimony
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013920.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. The questioning focuses on a person referred to by the pseudonym 'Jane,' whom Espinosa recalls seeing in 'the office' approximately five times, starting when Jane appeared to be about 18 years old. Espinosa notes that Jane was accompanied by her mother during these visits.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013917.jpg

This court transcript details the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. She testifies about her first trip to Europe three years prior, during which she stayed at a residence after contacting Ghislaine for permission. The questioning then pivots to her knowledge, from her "work in the office," of whether Epstein made charitable donations, which she confirms he did.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013899.jpg

This document is a transcript of a court proceeding from August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. She testifies that during her six years of employment with Jeffrey Epstein's company, her primary workplace was an office at 457 Madison in Manhattan. She also states that she worked at Ghislaine Maxwell's residence for a total of about one to two weeks, but never worked at Jeffrey Epstein's residence in Manhattan.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013891.jpg

This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It details the beginning of a trial session where the defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, calls his first witness, Cimberly Espinosa. The witness is sworn in, identifies herself for the record, and prepares to undergo direct examination.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013889.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between the judge (The Court) and two attorneys, Ms. Sternheim and Mr. Everdell. The conversation focuses on whether to mark an exhibit for identification and clarifies that Mr. Everdell will be calling the first witness. The court then prepares to bring in the jury to proceed with the trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013887.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between several attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Ms. Comey, Ms. Sternheim) and the judge. The discussion covers procedural issues such as making photocopies, a request for a brief recess, and a request to use a screen for a potential witness, Dr. Loftus. The court resolves the copying issue and prepares to bring in the jury.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013886.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The transcript details a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Defense attorney Mr. Everdell, and Government attorney Mr. Rohrbach regarding trial logistics. Key topics include scheduling a charging conference for Saturday at 9 a.m. with public access, limiting testimony about a 'soap opera' by name, and the Defense's plan to show single copies of newly received photos to the jury by walking past the jury box.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
109
As Recipient
10
Total
119

Jury Instructions / Case Law

From: THE COURT
To: Mr. Everdell

Discussion regarding the use of the word 'dominant' in jury instructions for 18 U.S.C. 2421, citing United States v. An Soon Kim.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of Evidence

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding Government Exhibits 919, 920, and 53, specifically requesting they not be described as 'schoolgirl outfits' to the jury.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding the elimination of a jury charge concerning investigative techniques.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Age of allegations and lack of evidence

From: Mr. Everdell
To: The Court (Your Honor)

Everdell argues that highlighting the 25-year age of the allegations is fair because records get destroyed over time, explaining the absence of corroborating evidence like geo-location data.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Exhibit 913 Privacy

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Requesting privacy interests for photos on a desk.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Procedural point on cross-examination

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Everdell raises a concern about the government referring to passengers as 'and others' without naming them during direct examination.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Issue with fourth witness

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Mr. Everdell informs the court of a small issue regarding the fourth witness (Mr. Rogers) and requests time to confer with the government.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions / Technical Issues

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the definition of 'entice' and citations of case law.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions/Verdict Sheet Language

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the phrasing of Counts Two, Three, Four, and Six, specifically regarding the age of victims and the name 'Jane'.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross Examination

From: Mr. Everdell
To: Visoski

Questioning regarding whether the witness saw any inappropriate activity during 30 years of employment.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination

From: Mr. Everdell
To: Ms. Chapell

Questioning regarding FedEx invoices and their maintenance in the regular course of business.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

TECS Reports

From: Mr. Aznaran
To: Mr. Everdell

Confirmation that Aznaran ran three traveler reports in the TECS system for Jane, Kate, and Annie Farmer.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination regarding Government Exhibits 234 and 245

From: Mr. Everdell
To: Mr. Parkinson

Discussion regarding photos of Epstein's desk and bookcase.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Juror Exhibits

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Request to put folders with exhibits under jurors' chairs.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Trial Logistics

From: THE COURT
To: Mr. Everdell

Discussion regarding the handling of paper evidence binders and maintaining witness anonymity during cross-examination.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of Evidence

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding the admissibility of property ownership records to impeach witness testimony.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Calling next witness

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Everdell calls Raghu Sud to the stand.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Objection to scope of questioning

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding the relevance of Maxwell's father's death and her housing history.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instruction Dispute

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding how to answer a jury question about conspiracy in Counts One and Three.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Exhibit Identification

From: THE COURT
To: Mr. Everdell

Inquiry about trial mark for the 1996 London home sale agreement.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination regarding search video

From: Mr. Everdell
To: Mr. Parkinson

Discussion of Government Exhibit 296 showing a property search.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination

From: Mr. Everdell
To: Rodgers

Questioning regarding flight rules, mingling with passengers, and cockpit procedures.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions/Charge Language

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the specific wording of sex trafficking charges and conspiracy counts.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions regarding New Mexico Law

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Argument that specific sexual activity was not illegal under New Mexico law because it lacked force or coercion, and the jury instruction should reflect this.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Legal definitions

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Verbal exchange regarding case law and definitions for jury instructions.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search