Alison Moe
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Co counsel prosecution |
15
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
location
USA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Geoffrey S. Berman
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Subordinate superior |
7
|
3 | |
|
location
USA
|
Employment representation |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Appellant's counsel (filer)
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-10 | Legal agreement | A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held | Court (before Judge Alison ... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | N/A | Jury Trial Proceedings | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-09 | Legal filing | Document 533 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-09 | Court filing | Document 534 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-08 | Jury trial | Jury Trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2021-12-07 | Jury trial | Jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-06 | N/A | Jury Trial held | Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) | View |
| 2021-12-06 | Legal filing | The United States Attorney's office filed Document 528 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-03 | N/A | Filing of Document 526 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-12-02 | Jury trial | Jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held before Judge Alison... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-12-02 | N/A | Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-12-01 | Jury trial | Jury trial for Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Hon. Alison J. Nathan, with legal teams repres... | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2021-11-30 | N/A | Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Jury Selection / Jury Trial Begins | Court | View |
| 2021-11-29 | Jury trial | The jury trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330-... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-11-29 | Jury trial | The jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell,... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-11-28 | N/A | Stipulation agreed upon regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 1004 and 11-16. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-11-23 | Hearing | A court hearing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20-cr-3... | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2021-11-22 | Court filing (letter) | USA filed a reply letter regarding the GX-52 document. | Court | View |
| 2021-11-22 | Court filing (letter motion) | USA filed a letter motion regarding proposed redactions. | Court | View |
| 2021-11-22 | Court filing (letter motion) | USA filed a letter motion to quash a Rule 17(c) subpoena. | Court | View |
| 2021-11-22 | Court filing (letter) | Letter 491 was filed by USA in reply regarding GX-52. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020706.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the SDNY regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell between December 17 and 19, 2021. It details daily minute entries for the jury trial, orders regarding jury charges and verdict sheets, and various letters filed by both the defense and prosecution concerning jury instructions, testimony preclusion (specifically regarding Alexander Hamilton), and closing logistics. The document highlights specific judicial edits to legal definitions, such as defining a 'minor' as an individual under the age of 18.
DOJ-OGR-00020705.jpg
This document is a docket report from the SDNY regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing events from December 15 to December 17, 2021. It records minute entries for the jury trial held on December 16, 2021, listing all present attorneys for the defense and prosecution. The document also details various court orders regarding the admissibility of witness testimony (specifically mentioning Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton) and procedural disputes over prior inconsistent statements.
DOJ-OGR-00020704.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings between December 11 and December 15, 2021. It details various filings including letters regarding witness orders, privilege stipulations, and expert testimony, as well as a significant Memorandum Opinion denying a defense motion to allow witnesses to testify anonymously. The document lists the legal teams for both the prosecution (USA) and the defense, along with Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings during this trial period.
DOJ-OGR-00020703.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering entries from December 9 and 10, 2021. It details legal arguments over the admission of Government Exhibit 52 (GX 52), involving witness Juan Alessi, where Judge Nathan overruled defense objections. It also records minute entries for the jury trial proceedings on those dates and the filing of transcripts.
DOJ-OGR-00020702.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from December 6 to December 8, 2021. It details minute entries for the jury trial proceedings, identifying the attorneys present for both the defense (Sternheim, Pagliuca, Everdell, Menninger) and the prosecution (Pomerantz, Comey, Moe, Rohrbach). The document also includes an order regarding the reimbursement of transportation costs for Juror Number 70 and notes the filing of a transcript for a conference held on November 15, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020701.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the SDNY court case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from December 2, 2021, to December 5, 2021. It records minute entries for jury trial proceedings, orders regarding witness anonymity and juror transportation, and various correspondence regarding witnesses 'Jane', 'Michael Dawson', and 'Witness-3'. The document tracks the legal motions and daily trial activities involving the prosecution team, defense team, and Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020700.jpg
This document is a court docket page from the SDNY regarding US v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events on November 29 and 30, 2021. It details the beginning of the jury trial, orders regarding the production of materials from the Epstein Victims Compensation Program, and the handling of witness privacy and pseudonyms. It lists the legal teams for both the defense and prosecution present during the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00020699.jpg
This document is a court docket from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings from late November 2021. The entries primarily concern procedural matters ahead of trial, including court orders for the production of documents from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, motions regarding expert testimony, and letters from both the prosecution (USA) and Maxwell's defense team about trial procedures and jury instructions. The presiding judge is Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020697.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 22, 2021. It lists several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including directives regarding the sealing and redaction of opinions, the denial of motions to quash a subpoena related to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, and memorandum opinions precluding the expert testimony of Bennett Gershman and Dr. Ryan Hall.
DOJ-OGR-00020696.jpg
This document is a court docket from November 22, 2021, detailing numerous filings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The entries include an order regarding the testimony of 'Witness-3', an endorsement about providing a video monitor, and a series of letters and motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense. These filings address various pre-trial matters such as redactions, subpoenas, and the admissibility of evidence like birth certificates and testimony from 'Accuser-3'.
DOJ-OGR-00020694.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the SDNY case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 19, 2021. It details orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a motion in limine to exclude evidence from 'Accuser-3' (Witness-3), ultimately ruling that testimony regarding Maxwell introducing the witness to Epstein and facilitating sexualized massages is admissible as evidence of Mann Act counts. It also mentions a letter from the prosecution team and procedural orders regarding the sealing and redaction of documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020692.jpg
This document is a court docket report (SDNY) covering November 15-17, 2021, detailing pretrial proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the filing of transcripts for prior conferences, a memo endorsement ordering the government to use FedEx for disclosures due to mail delays at the MDC, and minute entries for a pretrial conference, voir dire, and the beginning of jury selection. The document lists the full legal teams for both the defense and the prosecution present during these proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00020691.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from November 13 to November 15, 2021. It details procedural orders regarding jury questionnaires and voir dire logistics (including COVID protocols), the filing of transcripts for previous conferences, and a sealed document. It also lists correspondence from both the prosecution (regarding exhibits) and the defense (regarding late disclosures to the MDC).
DOJ-OGR-00020690.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 12, 2021. It details orders regarding strict COVID-19 protocols for an upcoming in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021, including the use of overflow courtrooms for the public. Additionally, it includes an order addressing a Government motion, where the Judge rules that limiting cross-examination of pseudonymous witnesses regarding their careers would violate Maxwell's Sixth Amendment rights, though specific employer names cannot be elicited.
DOJ-OGR-00020688.jpg
This document is a court docket report (Case 22-1426, SDNY) from November 2021 details legal proceedings in the US v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. It lists various filings including orders on redactions to protect victim privacy, motions in limine regarding 'Accuser-3' and co-conspirator statements, and a dispute over an unauthenticated hearsay document (Exhibit 52). The docket reflects active pre-trial litigation between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach) and defense counsel (Pagliuca, Everdell) regarding the admissibility of evidence and pseudonym logistics.
DOJ-OGR-00020687.jpg
This document is a court docket entry from February 28, 2023, for Case 22-1426, primarily concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. It details court orders and filings from November 2021, including COVID-19 protocols for courthouse access, scheduling revisions for motions in limine, and a pretrial conference. The entries highlight communications between the prosecution (USA) and defense (Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys) regarding trial logistics and a ruling on witness testimony, all overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020685.jpg
This document is a docket report from the SDNY for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 8-9, 2021. It details several filings, including the Government's opposition to bail reconsideration, a motion to preclude expert testimony from Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus, and letters regarding legal mail. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders scheduling a conference for November 10, 2021, denying the renewed request for bail, and establishing protocols for the defendant's transport and access to legal counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020684.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and rulings from early November 2021. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings on motions to exclude witnesses, a denial of a motion regarding juror name disclosure, and an order compelling the government to clarify its position on the legal status of an alleged victim. The document outlines the ongoing legal arguments and procedural matters in the lead-up to Maxwell's trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020683.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the SDNY regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically detailing orders from November 2021 leading up to her trial. Key issues addressed include the logistics of transporting Maxwell from the MDC to the courthouse, security concerns, delays in Maxwell receiving legal mail, and the schedule for juror selection and peremptory strikes. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders requiring coordination with the US Marshals and MDC legal counsel to resolve these pre-trial issues.
DOJ-OGR-00020682.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from November 1-3, 2021. It details a pretrial conference where Maxwell was present and remanded, as well as various filings including motions for reconsideration regarding bond and juror disclosure. The Judge also issued orders regarding voir dire instructions and scheduled a hearing for November 10, 2021, to discuss evidentiary rules (Rule 412 and 702/Daubert).
DOJ-OGR-00020681.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, printed in 2023 as part of an appeal or related filing. It lists filings from late October and early November 2021, including multiple Motions in Limine by the defense attempting to exclude evidence regarding 'flight' logs, terms like 'victim', items seized from a 2005 search of 358 El Brillo Way, and alleged rape by Jeffrey Epstein. It also includes judicial orders regarding hearing schedules for Rule 412 (sexual behavior evidence) and Daubert (expert witness) motions, as well as orders regarding legal mail issues at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00020678.jpg
This document is a page from the docket report for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York, listing entries from October 22, 2021, to October 27, 2021. The entries document various procedural orders regarding jury questionnaires, voir dire, and scheduling for motions in limine and jury charges. It includes orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan and correspondence from both the prosecution and defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020677.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the SDNY regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 2021. It details a pretrial conference where Maxwell appeared via telephone and sets forth a comprehensive order regarding jury selection protocols, including the use of questionnaires, anonymized juror numbers, and schedules for voir dire in November 2021. The Judge explicitly denied a request to seal the proposed jury questionnaires, citing the First Amendment right to public access despite the case's significant media attention.
DOJ-OGR-00020676.jpg
This document is a docket report from the SDNY case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering entries from October 18-21, 2021. It details pre-trial motions regarding jury selection (voir dire), motions in limine, and sealing requests, as well as orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling a telephone conference. Notably, media organizations and reporters filed letters opposing 'secret jury selection' and the sealing of juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020675.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings from October 15 to October 18, 2021. The entries primarily concern pre-trial procedural matters, including a dispute over the timely delivery of legal mail to Maxwell at the MDC, and judicial orders setting deadlines for motions related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412. The docket reflects communications between the prosecution (USA), the defense (Maxwell's counsel), and the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan.
Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense co...
Request for extension of time.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense counsel's letter.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
Request for extension until 5 p.m. the following day.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
No preview available
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity