Doe
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Indyke
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul G. Cassell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan M. Dershowitz
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Professional expert witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Andrew
|
Accuser accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dershowitz
|
Accuser accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Alleged abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bill Clinton
|
Alleged sexual contact |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bin Laden
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged victim abuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan M. Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Accuser accused |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
PAUL G. CASSELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim sex trafficker |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Abuser procurer |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Defendant victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Abuser |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE #4
|
Proposed co plaintiffs new victims |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney in Palm Beach County dropped a case regarding Jane Doe #3. | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | N/A | Woman accused of being a sex slave by Jeffrey Epstein levels claims against his friends. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Allegations made against Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jean Luc Brunel b... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal filing | The Doe v. Indyke case was initiated after the Government opened its investigation and after the ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal case | The civil case Doe v. Indyke, where discovery was just beginning and the Government moved to inte... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Connecticut disciplinary hearing for 'Doe' | Connecticut | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual abuse of Jane Doe #3 | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation by Alan Dershowitz's legal team verifying evidence against Jane Doe #3 | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | New court filing submitted asking for Jane Doe #3 and another woman to join a pending case. | West Palm Beach, Fla. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged sexual encounter or inappropriate contact | Little Saint James Island | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The 'Doe case' was stayed to avoid adversely affecting an ongoing criminal prosecution against Ma... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged dinner party (disputed by Dershowitz) | Epstein's private island | View |
| 2015-01-21 | N/A | Filing of Jane Doe No. 3 public affidavit in the CVRA case. | Court (CVRA case) | View |
| 2015-01-02 | N/A | Corrected Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 For Joinder in Action filed by Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2009-11-05 | N/A | Epstein appeared at the location of Jane Doe #3's psychological IME to intimidate her. | IME Location | View |
| 2009-09-16 | N/A | Deposition of Jane Doe #4 | Unknown | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Jane Doe #3 escaped to a foreign country. | Foreign country | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Jane Doe #3 allegedly escaped Epstein and moved to Australia. | Australia | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Jane Doe #3 alleges she escaped Epstein and moved to Australia. | Australia | View |
| 1999-01-01 | N/A | Jane Doe #3 approached by Ghislaine Maxwell, began being sexually exploited by Epstein. | Epstein's mansion | View |
| 1999-01-01 | N/A | Period Jane Doe #3 alleges she was kept as a sex slave by Jeffrey Epstein. | Unknown | View |
| 1999-01-01 | N/A | Epstein kept Jane Doe #3 as his 'sex slave' and frequently sexually abused her. | West Palm Beach, New York, ... | View |
| 1999-01-01 | N/A | Jane Doe #3 forced to have sexual relations with Alan Dershowitz on numerous occasions. | Florida, private planes, Ne... | View |
| 1999-01-01 | N/A | Alleged period Jane Doe #3 was kept as a sex slave. | Unspecified | View |
| 1988-01-01 | Legal case | The case of Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee, 847 F.2d 57 (2nd Cir. 1988) was decided, in which... | Connecticut | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009450.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (originally 2012, refiled 2022) discussing attorney ethics regarding the reporting of perjury (fraud on the tribunal). It cites a precedent case involving 'Doe,' arguing that an attorney must have actual knowledge, not just strong suspicion, of perjury before a duty to disclose arises. The author of this text notes in a footnote that they served as the expert witness for 'Doe' in a Connecticut disciplinary hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00009449.jpg
This legal document, page 3 of 29 from a court filing, discusses a lawyer's ethical obligations under various New York Rules of Professional Conduct. It emphasizes that a lawyer's duty to take remedial action, such as disclosing fraudulent conduct to a court, is triggered only by "actual knowledge," a subjective standard. The document cites the 1988 Second Circuit case 'Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee' to support the argument that a mere belief of wrongdoing is insufficient to compel disclosure.
DOJ-OGR-00003078.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 16, 2021, provides the factual background for a case, detailing how Virginia Roberts Giuffre joined a lawsuit concerning a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein. Giuffre alleged that the defendant was a "primary co-conspirator" who procured underage girls for Epstein and participated in sexual abuse. The document cites Giuffre's specific allegations that the defendant persuaded her to go to Epstein's mansion and was involved in a sexual encounter there.
DOJ-OGR-00003018.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 16, 2021, is a rebuttal to a defendant's accusation that the Government delayed an indictment for tactical advantage. The author contrasts the Government's decision to stay the civil case of *Doe v. Indyke* with its inaction in the settled case of *Giuffre v. Maxwell*, arguing the different procedural postures and the risk of witness deposition in the active *Doe* case justified the different legal strategies. The document asserts that the Government's actions were logical and not part of a conspiracy to gain an advantage in the criminal case.
DOJ-OGR-00005561.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, argues that the defense in a federal criminal case is improperly relying on civil case law regarding pseudonyms for plaintiffs. It asserts that the current case involves crime victims, who are entitled to statutory protections under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, unlike civil plaintiffs who are generally required to identify themselves. The document criticizes the defense for ignoring relevant precedent from high-profile sex abuse trials and for citing irrelevant civil cases.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012033.jpg
This document, marked as Exhibit R, details allegations from a court filing stating that Jeffrey Epstein forced a minor, Jane Doe #3, to have sexual relations with Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew. It includes denials from Dershowitz, who threatens legal action against the accuser's lawyers, and a denial from Buckingham Palace regarding Prince Andrew's involvement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012032.jpg
This document is a news article from Politico dated December 31, 2014, reporting on a new court filing in which a woman identified as Jane Doe #3, an alleged sex slave of Jeffrey Epstein, accused prominent friends of Epstein, including Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jean Luc Brunel, of participating in debauchery. The article details Epstein's prior conviction and plea deal, and states that the new filing seeks to allow Jane Doe #3 and another woman to join a pending victims' rights case against federal prosecutors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017931.jpg
This document is page 28 of a Westlaw legal report regarding 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539). It discusses a legal motion for reconsideration filed by NCB (National Commercial Bank) regarding personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction under the FSIA. The text analyzes legal standards for reconsideration and jurisdiction, citing various precedents (Steel Co., Bush, etc.), but does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell on this specific page, despite the House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023409.jpg
This document is page 49 of a legal brief or court opinion titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001,' printed via Westlaw. It discusses the legal necessity of jurisdictional discovery regarding 'Sovereign Defendants' and 'NCB' (National Commercial Bank), which claims to be an instrumentality of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The text concludes by requesting the reversal of a lower court's dismissal of certain defendants and includes detailed footnotes referencing the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), the 9/11 Commission Report, and CIA documents concerning Usama Bin Laden and Enaam Arnaout.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023408.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or court opinion (sourced from Westlaw) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It argues for the reversal of dismissals for the Saudi Joint Relief Committee, Saudi Red Crescent Society, and National Commercial Bank based on the precedent set in 'Doe v. Bin Laden' regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, though the text itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023367.jpg
This document is page 7 of a Table of Authorities from a legal brief generated via Westlaw in 2019, likely related to the 9/11 terrorist attacks litigation ('In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'). It carries a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee. While the user identifies this as Epstein-related, there are no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein or his immediate associates on this specific page; however, the inclusion of cases involving Deutsche Bank (implied by similar financial litigations) or UBS AG suggests this may be part of a larger file regarding financial institutions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023365.jpg
This document is a page from a Table of Contents and Table of Authorities for a legal filing related to the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It outlines legal arguments regarding the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), the Torture Victim Protection Act, and negligence claims against defendants alleged to have materially supported al-Qaeda, specifically mentioning 'NCB' (National Commercial Bank) and 'Sovereign Defendants.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional production, likely related to investigations into financial networks supporting terrorism.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015625.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal response filed by Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell in a lawsuit against Alan Dershowitz. The text argues that Dershowitz cannot seal court records containing allegations that he sexually abused Jane Doe #3, particularly because he previously quoted those same allegations in his own counterclaim. It further alleges that Dershowitz, as Epstein's lawyer, negotiated a Non-Prosecution Agreement specifically to secure immunity for himself and other coconspirators regarding crimes committed in Florida.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015624.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal response by Edwards and Cassell in a case against Alan Dershowitz, arguing that sexual abuse allegations are inherent to the lawsuit and not peripheral. The text references legal precedents regarding confidentiality and cites Dershowitz's own counterclaim, which quotes specific allegations that Epstein forced a minor (Jane Doe #3) to have sexual relations with Dershowitz in various locations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015614.jpg
This email from Susan Moss, Judicial Assistant to Judge Thomas M. Lynch IV, conveys court rulings in the case of Edward & Cassell v. Dershowitz. The judge quashed a subpoena against the law firm Boies Schiller but granted parts of a subpoena regarding 'Jane Doe #3,' while establishing strict protocols for a future deposition, including a 4-hour limit and the requirement of a Defendant-paid special master to rule on objections.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015580.jpg
This document is an email thread from January 23, 2015, between Donna Paine, a freelance TV producer for ITN News, and attorneys Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards. Paine is requesting to be added to a media contact list in anticipation of a ruling by Judge Marra regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case and specific allegations made by Jane Doe #3 against Prince Andrew. Cassell confirms he will have his assistant, Joan, add Paine to their contacts list.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015545.jpg
This document contains responses to legal interrogatories (questions 13-16) provided by attorneys Edwards and Cassell regarding their client, Jane Doe #3. It details that Jane Doe #3 began informing Brad Edwards of abuse allegations involving Dershowitz via phone calls starting in 2011 and filed a public affidavit in 2015. The attorneys state they have not seen photographic evidence of Jane Doe #3 with Dershowitz but are attempting to obtain such materials from the U.S. Attorney's Office.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013479.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on June 28, 2010, in the case of Doe v. Epstein (Case No. 08-CIV-80893). It certifies that defense counsel Robert D. Critton, Jr. electronically served a preceding document to plaintiff's counsel (Edwards and Cassell) and co-defense counsel (Goldberger). The document lists the contact information for the attorneys involved, though specific email addresses or contact details have been redacted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013477.jpg
This court document, filed on June 28, 2010, updates the court on the status of Doe v. Epstein. It reports that since mediation on April 5, 2010, Jeffrey Epstein has resolved/settled numerous lawsuits, including cases involving C.L., C.M.A., and multiple Jane Does, leaving only the current federal case and two state court cases unresolved, all represented by Brad Edwards. The document also notes the extensive scope of the upcoming trial, citing over 170 potential witnesses and 140 exhibits.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013412.jpg
This document is page 2 of a printout from the Palm Beach Daily News archives, dated April 7, 2011. It contains the conclusion of an article discussing legal proceedings involving Jeffrey Epstein and a 'Doe case,' specifically noting a discovery deadline of May 31 and a trial date of July 14. The page is predominantly filled with unrelated web advertisements and bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013337.jpg
This document page details the timeline and nature of multiple civil lawsuits filed against Jeffrey Epstein around 2008 by attorneys Brad Edwards and the firm Herman and Mermelstein. It describes complaints alleging sexual assault of minors filed in Florida and New York, including a specific suit by Ava Cordero.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013321.jpg
This legal memorandum page details evidence supporting attorney Edwards' conclusion that Epstein operated a 'pyramid abuse scheme' to access underage girls. It cites specific testimony from victims Jane Doe #4 and E.W., as well as a Palm Beach Police Incident Report concerning a 14-year-old victim, S.G. The document describes the recruitment payment structure ($200-$300 per recruit) and graphic details of sexual abuse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029225.jpg
An email from Jeffrey Epstein to media mogul Mortimer Zuckerman dated February 10, 2015, urging him to publish a forwarded press statement. The statement, originally sent to Alan Dershowitz, attempts to discredit accuser 'Jane Doe #3' by calling her allegations about Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Dershowitz 'lies' and 'fantasy.' The document includes detailed quotes from Jane Doe #3 regarding a helicopter ride piloted by Ghislaine Maxwell and a dinner with Bill Clinton on Epstein's island.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029227.jpg
This document contains an email sent by Alan Dershowitz to recipients identified as Darren, Martin, and 'me'. The content includes a draft statement or update asserting that Dershowitz's legal team has found evidence proving a 'pattern of lying' by accuser Jane Doe #3. The email includes a confidentiality disclaimer referencing 'JEE' (likely Jeffrey Epstein Enterprises) and the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014105.jpg
This document is page 22 of a legal response filed on March 24, 2015, in the case involving Alan Dershowitz. It details the Defendant's objections to Requests for Production #12 and #13, which seek evidence regarding claims that Jane Doe #3 lied about world leaders and that a Palm Beach County State Attorney dropped a case due to her lack of credibility. Dershowitz's defense emphasizes that his original declaration stated these claims were made 'on information and belief' and agrees to produce non-privileged documents in his possession.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | British Tabloid | Doe | $0.00 | Payment for selling her story. | View |
Information regarding abuse/Dershowitz
Jane Doe No. 3 provided information related to the subject of abuse by Dershowitz.
Various
Statements reflected in the media.
Allegations
Information referencing Dershowitz by name concerning allegations.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity