Trove
Sign In Sign Up

CHRISTIAN EVERDELL

Person
Mentions
625
Relationships
52
Events
92
Documents
312
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
52 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
75 Very Strong
88
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
19 Very Strong
16
View
person Bobbi C. Sternheim
Business associate
19 Very Strong
19
View
person Laura Menninger
Business associate
11 Very Strong
11
View
person Bobbi C Sternheim
Business associate
10 Very Strong
10
View
person MARK S. COHEN
Business associate
10 Very Strong
10
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Laura Menninger
Co counsel
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Bobbi C. Sternheim
Co counsel
7
7
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Professional
6
2
View
person Jeff Pagliuca
Co counsel
6
6
View
person Lara Pomerantz
Professional
6
2
View
person Juror 50
None
6
2
View
person Alison Moe
Professional
6
2
View
person ANDREW ROHRBACH
Professional
6
2
View
person Juror 50
Lack of relationship
5
1
View
organization Cohen & Gresser LLP
Professional
5
1
View
person Assistant United States Attorney
Opposing counsel
5
5
View
person Judge Nathan
Legal representative
5
5
View
person Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell - implied by Case ID)
Legal representative
5
1
View
person ALEX ROSSMILLER
Opposing counsel
5
1
View
person MAURENE COMEY
Opposing counsel
5
1
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Business associate
5
1
View
person Mark Cohen
Co counsel
5
1
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Pretrial conference A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... Courtroom View
N/A Legal stipulation The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
N/A Pretrial conference A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Christian Everdell read... Southern District of New Yo... View
2022-08-10 Legal proceeding An opening statement was made by Ms. Sternheim on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, in cas... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding The defense, led by Ms. Sternheim, delivers its opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghisla... Southern District Court (im... View
2022-07-22 N/A Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell Courtroom (Southern District) View
2022-06-28 N/A Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell District Court View
2022-06-28 N/A Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. Southern District of New York View
2022-03-11 Court hearing A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... Court (unspecified) View
2022-03-08 Court proceeding/appearance A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... New York, N.Y., Southern Di... View
2022-02-11 N/A Filing of Motion for New Trial by Ghislaine Maxwell. Court View
2022-02-11 N/A Motion for New Trial filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. SDNY View
2021-12-18 N/A Jury Trial held before Judge Alison J. Nathan Court View
2021-12-17 Legal stipulation The prosecution and defense agreed that Government Exhibit 1010 may be received in evidence at tr... New York, New York View
2021-12-17 Legal agreement A stipulation was agreed upon by the defense and prosecution to allow Defense Exhibit A1 to be re... New York, New York View
2021-12-17 N/A Court hearing regarding motions in limine, specifically discussing evidence related to consent an... Southern District of New York View
2021-12-10 Legal agreement A stipulation was signed agreeing that Government Exhibit 1009 may be received in evidence at trial. New York, New York View
2021-12-09 N/A Jury Trial proceedings held Court (before Judge Alison ... View
2021-12-09 N/A Jury Trial Proceedings SDNY Court View
2021-12-06 N/A Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell SDNY Court View
2021-12-06 N/A Jury Trial held Court (Judge Alison J. Nathan) View
2021-12-02 N/A Jury Trial proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan. SDNY Court View
2021-11-30 N/A Jury Trial SDNY Court View
2021-11-29 N/A Jury Selection / Jury Trial SDNY Court View

DOJ-OGR-00010216.jpg

This document is an appearance list for a court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on March 8, 2022, in the Southern District of New York. It details the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and lists all attorneys representing the United States, the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, and Juror 50. The document also includes the case number and the court reporting agency.

Legal document (court appearance list)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009775.jpg

This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire for case 20-cr-000389-AEN, filed on March 24, 2022. The respondent, identified as Juror ID 50, attests that they do not personally know and have had no dealings with any of the listed defense attorneys or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The juror's negative responses indicate no known conflicts of interest with the key legal figures in the case.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009677.jpg

This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 9, 2022. Juror ID 50 attests that they do not know and have no past or present dealings with any of the listed defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The responses indicate no declared conflicts of interest between the potential juror and the key legal figures in the case.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002716.jpg

This document is a Certificate of Service filed on February 4, 2021, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney Christian Everdell certifies that on January 25, 2021, he served a memorandum and exhibits via email to Assistant U.S. Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach at the SDNY office.

Court filing (certificate of service)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005374.jpg

This is the final signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page contains proposed jury instructions (Paragraph 67) regarding the prohibition of electronic communications and social media usage by jurors during the trial. It is signed by the prosecution team (US Attorney's Office) and the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 11, 2021.

Legal filing / court document (signature page)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005365.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 22, 2021, containing proposed voir dire questions (21-25) for the jury selection in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the specific legal teams for both the defense (led by Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution (led by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach). The document includes margin comments highlighting a dispute between the prosecution and defense regarding whether to refer to Maxwell as 'the defendant' or 'the accused'.

Legal filing (jury questionnaire / voir dire draft with comments)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005332.jpg

This document is page 10 of a juror questionnaire from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. The questionnaire asks potential jurors to disclose any personal acquaintance or dealings with key individuals involved in the case, including the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, the prosecution team, the defense team, and the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The purpose is to identify potential biases that could prevent a juror from being fair and impartial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005295.jpg

This document is page 19 of a juror questionnaire for a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It asks potential jurors to disclose any personal connections or dealings with the defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) and their respective law firms. It also asks about any connections to the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan, or her staff, to assess potential bias for jury selection.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002674.jpg

This is a legal document filed on February 4, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated January 25, 2021, the document is a 'Notice of Motion' from Maxwell's legal team at Cohen & Gresser LLP, stating their intent to file a motion to strike 'surplusage' from the superseding indictment against her. This is identified as Pretrial Motion #6.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002673.jpg

This document is a Certificate of Service filed in federal court case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN on February 4, 2021. It certifies that on January 25, 2021, Christian Everdell served a memorandum and exhibits via email to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York: Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002692.jpg

This document is a legal filing from the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York, dated January 25, 2021. It serves as a notice of motion from Maxwell's defense team, led by the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP, requesting a bill of particulars and other pretrial disclosures from the prosecution. The document also requests oral argument on the motion.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011707.jpg

This document is a transcript of the defense's opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. The defense attorney, Ms. Sternheim, argues that the jury must focus solely on whether the government can prove the charges against Maxwell, not on the actions of Epstein. She characterizes the prosecution's case as weak, asserting it relies on the testimony of four accusers whose memories are unreliable, corrupted over 25 years, and motivated by a desire for money.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
89
As Recipient
54
Total
143

RE: Discovery Requests

From: Assistant United State...
To: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL

Government response to defense concerns regarding discovery hard drives, metadata, flight log pages, and unsealed warrants.

Email
2021-01-18
Communication Source

RE: Discovery Requests

From: Assistant US Attorney ...
To: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL

Detailed response to 9 points raised by defense regarding discovery, including hard drives, metadata, FBI reports, Rodgers flight logs, and Daily Beast article.

Email
2021-01-17
Communication Source

RE: Discovery Requests

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
To: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL

Detailed response to 9 discovery points raised by defense, including hard drive access, FBI reports, Rodgers flight logs, and metadata issues.

Email
2021-01-17
Communication Source

RE: Discovery Requests

From: [Redacted] (AUSA)
To: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL

Detailed response to defense's Jan 7 letter. Addresses 4TB drive, metadata, FBI report redactions, Rodgers flight logs, and Daily Beast article.

Email
2021-01-17
Communication Source

RE: Bill of Particulars Request

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
To: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL

Counsel, Please see attached. Best, [Redacted]

Email
2021-01-10
Communication Source

Discovery Requests

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: Assistant United State...

Defense request for status of hard drives for Maxwell, unredacted FBI reports, missing flight log pages (Rodgers), and clarification on Daily Beast article.

Email
2021-01-07
Communication Source

Discovery Requests

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Letter outlining 9 specific discovery issues/deficiencies including missing flight logs pages, unreadable CDs at MDC, and request for unredacted FBI reports.

Email
2021-01-07
Communication Source

Discovery Requests

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

Formal letter raising 8 discovery issues + 1 media issue. Key points: Hard drive delays preventing Maxwell's defense prep, unredacted FBI report request, missing Rodgers flight logs (pages 1-27), metadata gaps, and inquiry about unsealed affidavit.

Email
2021-01-07
Communication Source

Discovery Requests

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: Assistant US Attorney ...

Initial lengthy email raising 9 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing flight log pages, unredacted FBI reports, and Daily Beast article concerns.

Email
2021-01-07
Communication Source

Discovery Requests

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: USANYS Prosecutors

Detailed letter listing 8 discovery issues including hard drive access for Maxwell, missing flight logs, metadata gaps, and questions about a Daily Beast article.

Email
2021-01-07
Communication Source

Redactions

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: USANYS (Maurene)

Stating that after reviewing Judge Nathan's order denying bail, they do not believe redactions are necessary and requesting the prosecution write the joint letter.

Email
2020-12-30
Communication Source

RE: Redactions

From: Maurene (Assistant Uni...
To: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL

Agreement to write a joint letter to the Court conveying the parties' position regarding redactions.

Email
2020-12-30
Communication Source

RE: Redactions

From: REDACTED
To: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL

Email header information regarding redactions. The body is an embedded message labeled 'RE: _Redactions.msg'.

Email
2020-12-30
Communication Source

Bill of Particulars Request

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)

I hope you all had a good holiday. Please see attached a request for a Bill of Particulars.

Email
2020-12-28
Communication Source

U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: Judge Nathan (via cour...

Submission of sealed documents including a cover letter, reply memorandum (redacted and unredacted), and exhibits A-B pursuant to Court order Dkt. 89.

Email
2020-12-19
Communication Source

U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: Judge Nathan (Chambers)

Submission of accompanying exhibits O-X (unredacted) to the Court and counsel under seal pursuant to Court order (Dkt. 89).

Email
2020-12-08
Communication Source

U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: [REDACTED]

Submission of a renewed bail motion and exhibits to be filed under seal in the Ghislaine Maxwell case.

Email
2020-12-08
Communication Source

U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) -- Renewed Ba...

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: Judge Nathan (via reda...

Submission of redacted exhibits O-P, S, and W-X under seal pursuant to Court order Dkt. 89.

Email
2020-12-08
Communication Source

Letter re: Briefing Schedule

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: USANYS Recipients (Red...

Attached is a draft of the letter to Judge Nathan regarding the briefing schedule. Unless you have any comments, we will send it to the judge in the next hour or so.

Email
2020-12-04
Communication Source

RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery production

From: Assistant US Attorney
To: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL

AUSA explains drive sizing and confirms consolidation of CD images (Epstein's iPhone) and hard drive documents onto a single new drive.

Email
2020-11-19
Communication Source

RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery production

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: [REDACTED]

Defense asks about drive size and questions why a CD was used alongside a hard drive, noting the laptop lacks a disk drive.

Email
2020-11-18
Communication Source

RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - discovery production

From: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
To: [REDACTED]

Defense complains about broken/missing hard drives, the 'patchwork' of drives, and the restricted access hours (7 hours vs 13 hours) at MDC.

Email
2020-11-18
Communication Source

RE: US v. Maxwell - discovery production

From: [REDACTED]
To: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL

Informs that 'Your drive' is ready for pickup at 1 St. Andrews, and Ms. Maxwell's drive has been sent to the MDC. Attached a letter.

Email
2020-10-20
Communication Source

RE: US v. Maxwell - discovery production

From: [REDACTED]
To: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL

Email header information regarding discovery production in the US v. Maxwell case. The body content is embedded as an attachment and not visible on this page.

Email
2020-10-20
Communication Source

RE: US v. Maxwell - discovery production

From: [Redacted] (Assistant ...
To: CHRISTIAN EVERDELL

Confirms receipt of drives, states they are being loaded, and will update when 'yours' is ready for pickup and client's sent to MDC. Mentions agents will plan for Friday from 8am to 3pm.

Email
2020-10-19
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search