| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Martin Weinberg
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Addressee (implied Jeffrey Epstein)
|
Legal representative |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Claus Von Bulow
|
Client |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Accused accuser |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Accuser accused |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Subject ('you')
|
Legal representative |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Questioned about social connection |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Leslie Wexner
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
boies
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia [Roberts Giuffre]
|
Accuser accused |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Ken Starr
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
John Lucido
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Professor Cassell | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transfer of flight logs from Alan Dershowitz to Detective Riccari. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dershowitz negotiates Epstein's confidential non-prosecution agreement. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Organization of the first law school class on the Vietnam War at Harvard. | Harvard Law School | View |
| N/A | N/A | Release of a statement by 500 law teachers opposing the Johnson Administration's war policy. | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal proceeding regarding First Amendment rights and obscenity laws. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Publication of story 'Trump Defender Alan Dershowitz is deeply involved in the sordid Jeffrey Eps... | Online | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prince Andrew meeting guests at Epstein's house. | Epstein's House | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prince Andrew sitting in Dershowitz's law class. | Harvard Law School | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal Appeals | Brooklyn, Albany, Federal C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion/Interview regarding legal representation. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI monitoring and protection of Alan Dershowitz due to death threat. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dershowitz visiting Epstein's properties. | Island, New Mexico, Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Career change to writing books and TV appearances | US | View |
| N/A | N/A | Began representing world famous clients/billionaires | US | View |
| N/A | N/A | Devoted time to defense of Israel | Global/Israel | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual abuse of Jane Doe #3 | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Congressional hearing regarding impeachment/perjury | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement of case brought by Edwards and Cassell | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Krischer's office decided to delay the grand jury session for several months following a meet... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Confidential settlement negotiations | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alan Dershowitz met with prosecutors to cast doubt on teens' reliability using MySpace profiles. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | OJ Simpson double murder prosecution | California (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Claus Von Bulow assault prosecution | Unknown | View |
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the reference to his book 'The Best Defense') submitted to the House Oversight Committee. It details two specific legal cases involving attempted murder: one involving the 'factual impossibility' of killing a corpse, and another utilizing a biblical analogy (the 'Abraham Defense') regarding a man who threatened his sister's abuser but was stopped by police. Both cases highlight complex legal defenses regarding intent and impossibility, resulting in the clients going free.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir written by Alan Dershowitz (identified via the books mentioned in footnotes). The text details his involvement in the O.J. Simpson and Claus Von Bulow trials, specifically focusing on his strategy regarding the death penalty and the forensic defense involving DNA evidence. It mentions his collaboration with Barry Scheck, Peter Neufeld, and F. Lee Bailey.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir by Alan Dershowitz, submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017221). It details Dershowitz's historical defense of a professor named Franklin at Stanford University, his collaboration with research assistant Joel Klein, and his public conflict with Stanford President Lyman regarding First Amendment rights. The text describes the Faculty Committee's decision to fire Franklin for urging students to occupy a computation center and Dershowitz's subsequent lecture criticizing the faculty's stance on civil liberties.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or essay written by Alan Dershowitz (identified via references to his books 'Finding Jefferson' and 'Shouting Fire'). The text discusses the author's stance on free speech, arguing for precise 'speech codes' on university campuses to prevent arbitrary censorship while acknowledging that extreme forms of speech (like racial slurs used by professors) are inevitably censored. The document bears a House Oversight stamp.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or legal narrative, likely by Alan Dershowitz (referenced in the footnote), produced during House Oversight proceedings. The text recounts the author's legal work during the Vietnam War era, specifically his involvement in high-profile First Amendment and anti-war protest cases, including the defense of the Chicago 7 lawyer William Kunstler, Harvard students, and Stanford professor Bruce Franklin. It details the author's perspective on the conflict between national security and civil liberties during that period.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz) discussing the legal defense of actor Harry Reems in the 'Deep Throat' obscenity case. The text details the prosecutor's (Parrish) motivations, Dershowitz's decision to take the case pro bono, and the strategy to win in the 'court of public opinion' by garnering support from mainstream celebrities and The New York Times. The page bears a House Oversight stamp, indicating it was part of a document production.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book written by Alan Dershowitz, stamped with a House Oversight production number. It recounts a legal argument Dershowitz made before Judge Julian and Judge Aldrich regarding First Amendment protections for films, specifically involving Grove Press and the distinction between enclosed theaters and public displays of obscenity. The text includes both transcript-style dialogue and first-person narrative commentary by Dershowitz.
This document appears to be a draft page (page 94) from a manuscript, likely written by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. It is Chapter 6, titled 'Offensiveness- Pornography: I Am Curious Yellow and Deep Throat,' and discusses freedom of speech, offensive language (citing specific racial and ableist slurs), and government regulation, referencing George Carlin's 'seven dirty words' and Supreme Court rulings. The document contains a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017181', indicating it was part of evidence gathered by the House Oversight Committee.
This document appears to be a page from a book manuscript or personal essay (likely by Alan Dershowitz, based on the reference to his book 'The Case for Israel'). The text discusses the author's philosophy on free speech, his defense of unpopular clients ('sons of bitches'), and his personal experiences with defamation and legal challenges. It includes a word count header and a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (dated April 2, 2012) of a book, likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the specific legal history and cases mentioned (Harry Reems, bestiality defense, etc.). The text discusses the evolution of the First Amendment, contrasting it with Charlton Heston's views on the Second Amendment, and lists the controversial types of speech the author has defended. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, likely related to the Epstein case in which Dershowitz was involved.
The author, likely Alan Dershowitz, reflects on his early career at Harvard Law School, recounting his tenure process involving a critical article on law and psychiatry and his mentor Judge Bazelon. He details a salary negotiation that led to a universal raise for faculty, coined "the Dershowitz bump," and lists his prolific writing output and the diverse range of courses he has taught.
This document appears to be a page (Page 71) from a memoir manuscript, likely by Alan Dershowitz, detailing the beginning of his academic career at Harvard Law School in 1964. The text recounts his experiences as a 25-year-old 'Boy Professor,' his interactions with senior faculty members Clark Byse and Ben Kaplan, and the development of his teaching philosophy and Socratic method. The page includes a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017158', indicating it is part of a larger production of documents for a congressional oversight committee.
This document is a page from a manuscript (Chapter 3) written by Alan (likely Dershowitz), dated April 2, 2012. It details the author's experience at Yale Law School around 1962, specifically focused on the fierce competition for Supreme Court clerkships and the specific biases of various Justices. The narrative highlights the author's conflict with Professor Fred Rodel over a men-only seminar location and his mentorship under Professor Alex Bickel.
This document appears to be page 32 of a memoir or manuscript written by Alan Dershowitz (identified by name in the text). It recounts his childhood in Brooklyn, specifically focusing on his love for the Brooklyn Dodgers and Jackie Robinson, his poor academic performance at Yeshiva high school, and his family's cultural dynamics regarding communication and politeness. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be page 13 of a manuscript or memoir draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the birth date of Sept 1, 1938) included in House Oversight Committee records. The text details the author's birth in Brooklyn, his family's Jewish immigrant roots from Poland, and his upbringing in the Williamsburg and Boro Park neighborhoods. It provides biographical details about his parents, including his mother's brief attendance at City College during the Great Depression and his father's Yeshiva education.
This document appears to be page 11 of a manuscript or autobiographical statement by Alan Dershowitz (inferred by context), dated April 2, 2012, and bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. The text lists numerous high-profile individuals the author has advised, including Presidents and celebrities, as well as prominent figures he has debated. It details his involvement in legal cases, his media advocacy for Israel, and mentions that in 2010 he declined an offer from the Israeli Prime Minister to serve as Israel's Ambassador to the UN.
This document is a digital forensic log of text messages exchanged on June 13, 2019, involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation involves reviewing a 'lawyers document' which Epstein confirms he and 'Dan' reviewed, followed by the sharing of a Daily Caller article about Alan Dershowitz, Trump, and Biden, and the comment 'What a Dick'.
This document is a log of digital messages from March 7, 2019, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an email address associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation revolves around a Daily Beast article accusing Epstein and associates of sex trafficking, with the redacted individual expressing concern about 'incoming' media pressure and mentioning Ann Coulter. Epstein responds by sharing the article link and dismissing the criticism, stating 'She is obsessed with u' and 'She should get in line.'
This document is an email chain from January 23, 2012, between Jeffrey Epstein and Reid Weingarten. Epstein claims that Alan Dershowitz told him President Obama called to ask about the situation in Israel, to which Weingarten replies, 'Don't believe it.' The document includes a standard confidentiality disclaimer associated with Epstein and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
A Miami Herald article included as a court exhibit discussing allegations against Alan Dershowitz by Sarah Ransome and Virginia Roberts. It details a defamation settlement where Dershowitz reportedly paid $900,000 to Roberts' lawyers, Edwards and Cassell, and mentions mentions Ransome's claims involving high-profile figures like the Clintons and Donald Trump.
This document is a printout of a Law.com interview with Alan Dershowitz, filed as an exhibit in a 2019 court case (Case 1:19-cv-03377). In the interview, Dershowitz vehemently defends himself against 'heinous crimes' (implied to be related to the Epstein case), calling the situation the 'fight of my life' and citing his constant travel with his wife as evidence against the accusations. The document includes a footer indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee production.
This document is a printout of a Law.com interview with Alan Dershowitz, filed as a court exhibit on April 16, 2019. In the interview, Dershowitz vigorously denies sexual allegations made by 'Jane Doe No. 3' (Virginia Giuffre), characterizing his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as strictly professional and academic. He admits to visiting Epstein's properties in New Mexico, Palm Beach, and the Caribbean island but claims this was 'lawyer profiling' used to target him to void Epstein's plea agreement. He also attacks the credibility of the accuser and the motivations of the opposing counsel, Paul Cassell.
This document is a reprint of a 2015 article from The American Lawyer featuring an interview with Alan Dershowitz. In the interview, Dershowitz defends his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, explaining he was introduced by Lady de Rothschild and that Epstein was a major donor to Harvard ($50 million). The text outlines the legal context, including the 2008 plea deal and lawsuits filed by lawyers Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell alleging Dershowitz's involvement in sexual misconduct.
This document is a court filing exhibit containing a screenshot of a tweet by Alan Dershowitz dated March 2, 2019. In the tweet, Dershowitz accuses Virginia Roberts and Sarah Ransomme of perjury, specifically disputing Roberts' claim that she met Al Gore on Epstein's island and Ransomme's claim regarding sex tapes involving Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document is a court exhibit containing a printed news article from Law&Crime dated December 4, 2018. The article details Alan Dershowitz's appearance on the network where he vehemently denied sexual abuse allegations made by Virginia Roberts (Giuffre) immediately following a civil settlement involving his former client, Jeffrey Epstein. Dershowitz claims to have conclusive travel records proving his innocence and asserts that Roberts fabricated the claims.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Harry Reems | Alan Dershowitz | $0.00 | Reems told Dershowitz he had no money; Dershowi... | View |
| N/A | Received | Bakkers' backers | Alan Dershowitz | $20,000.00 | Legal bill for the Jim Bakker appeal. | View |
| N/A | Paid | Alan Dershowitz | Brad Edwards and ... | $900,000.00 | Defamation settlement paid by Dershowitz to Rob... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Alan Dershowitz | Brad Edwards and ... | $900,000.00 | Defamation settlement paid by Dershowitz to Rob... | View |
| N/A | Received | Matthew Hale | Alan Dershowitz | $0.00 | Proposed legal fee which Dershowitz wanted to d... | View |
| 2016-04-01 | Paid | Alan Dershowitz | Brad Edwards and ... | $0.00 | Settlement of defamation claims; financial term... | View |
Stated he would waive statute of limitations so Roberts could sue him.
Dershowitz referenced Ms. Giuffre's affidavit regarding him watching her perform oral sex on Epstein.
Dershowitz calling Giuffre a 'liar' and denying sexual relations.
Confidential settlement discussions that Dershowitz allegedly misrepresented.
Zacky told Dershowitz he admired the content but not the heretical views, and suggested changing the word 'Dershowitz' on the cover.
Discussed business immediately in the bedroom, Jeffrey gave orders/notes while wearing a towel.
Confidential settlement negotiations surreptitiously tape recorded by Dershowitz.
Shared information about accusers, including MySpace posts concerning drugs and alcohol.
Dershowitz denied gathering background on girls or directing anyone to follow police/families.
Falsely told media he was a pawn in a plan to extort a billionaire.
A 'Christian Evangelical rip-off' of a Haggadah meant for Jews for Jesus.
Reems asked Dershowitz to argue his appeal pro bono.
Advice to 'turn off one of your barrels' and be respectful/polite to judges.
Recarey describes this meeting as involving 'shenanigans'.
Dershowitz denied gathering background on girls or directing people to follow police/families.
Described by Recarey as involving 'shenanigans'.
Host asked about biggest fee; Dershowitz cited Sharansky's hug rather than money from Milken or Helmsley.
Dershowitz shared results of an investigation into one of the girls to discredit her, describing her as an 'accomplished drama student'.
Private meeting described by Recarey as involving 'shenanigans'.
Excited whispering during testimony
Arguments that a president cannot be prosecuted for exercising constitutional prerogatives.
Dershowitz denied gathering background on girls or directing people to follow them.
Enclosing examples of a victim's website showing 'fascination with marijuana'.
Dershowitz shared results of an investigation into a victim, characterizing her as a drama student to undermine her credibility.
Information showing alleged victims boasted of alcohol and marijuana use.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity