Alan Dershowitz

Person
Mentions
381
Relationships
139
Events
104
Documents
157

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
139 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Friend
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Virginia Roberts
Adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
9
View
person Bradley Edwards
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Business associate
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Client
10 Very Strong
23
View
person Bradley J. Edwards
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Unknown
7
1
View
person Martin Weinberg
Acquaintance
7
1
View
person Addressee (implied Jeffrey Epstein)
Legal representative
7
1
View
person Claus Von Bulow
Client
7
2
View
person Virginia Roberts
Accused accuser
7
2
View
person Unnamed Witness
Client
7
1
View
person Virginia Roberts
Accuser accused
7
2
View
person Subject ('you')
Legal representative
7
1
View
person Mr. Epstein
Client
6
1
View
person THE WITNESS
Questioned about social connection
6
1
View
person Leslie Wexner
Legal representative
6
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Acquaintance
6
1
View
person boies
Legal representative
6
1
View
person Virginia [Roberts Giuffre]
Accuser accused
6
1
View
person Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
Adversarial
6
1
View
person Ken Starr
Business associate
6
1
View
person John Lucido
Client
6
1
View
person Paul Cassell
Legal representative
6
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Deposition of Professor Cassell Deposition Room View
N/A N/A Transfer of flight logs from Alan Dershowitz to Detective Riccari. Unknown View
N/A N/A Dershowitz negotiates Epstein's confidential non-prosecution agreement. Unknown View
N/A N/A Organization of the first law school class on the Vietnam War at Harvard. Harvard Law School View
N/A N/A Release of a statement by 500 law teachers opposing the Johnson Administration's war policy. United States View
N/A N/A Legal proceeding regarding First Amendment rights and obscenity laws. Courtroom (implied) View
N/A N/A Publication of story 'Trump Defender Alan Dershowitz is deeply involved in the sordid Jeffrey Eps... Online View
N/A N/A Prince Andrew meeting guests at Epstein's house. Epstein's House View
N/A N/A Prince Andrew sitting in Dershowitz's law class. Harvard Law School View
N/A N/A Legal Appeals Brooklyn, Albany, Federal C... View
N/A N/A Discussion/Interview regarding legal representation. Unknown View
N/A N/A FBI monitoring and protection of Alan Dershowitz due to death threat. Unknown View
N/A N/A Dershowitz visiting Epstein's properties. Island, New Mexico, Palm Beach View
N/A N/A Career change to writing books and TV appearances US View
N/A N/A Began representing world famous clients/billionaires US View
N/A N/A Devoted time to defense of Israel Global/Israel View
N/A N/A Negotiation of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Southern District of Florida View
N/A N/A Sexual abuse of Jane Doe #3 Unknown View
N/A N/A Congressional hearing regarding impeachment/perjury Washington D.C. (Implied) View
N/A N/A Settlement of case brought by Edwards and Cassell Unknown View
N/A N/A Mr. Krischer's office decided to delay the grand jury session for several months following a meet... Florida View
N/A N/A Confidential settlement negotiations Unknown View
N/A N/A Alan Dershowitz met with prosecutors to cast doubt on teens' reliability using MySpace profiles. Unknown View
N/A N/A OJ Simpson double murder prosecution California (implied) View
N/A N/A Claus Von Bulow assault prosecution Unknown View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017986.jpg

This document is a printout of a Miami Herald letter to the editor written by Alan Dershowitz, filed as a court exhibit on April 16, 2019. In the text, Dershowitz vehemently denies Virginia Roberts' allegations that she had sex with him at Jeffrey Epstein's various properties, citing travel records, Secret Service logs, and a private investigation as proof of his innocence. He further alleges that Roberts was pressured by a wealthy businessman to frame him for financial reasons and challenges her to repeat her claims outside of court so he can sue for defamation.

Legal filing / news article printout (letter to the editor)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010595.jpg

This legal document (page 30, likely from a House Oversight production) outlines evidence justifying the deposition of Alan Dershowitz in relation to Jeffrey Epstein. It cites testimony from housekeeper Alfredo Rodriguez placing Dershowitz at Epstein's home when minors were present, flight logs placing him on Epstein's plane between 2002-2005, and a $30 million donation from Epstein to Dershowitz's university. The text also alleges Dershowitz attempted to discredit victims to the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office despite potentially being an eyewitness to the victims' presence.

Legal filing / court document (page 30)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010522.jpg

This document contains pages 180-181 from a book (likely 'Filthy Rich') detailing the legal maneuvering and intimidation surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case. It describes the trauma of a victim named Mary, whose family faced surveillance and vandalism in Miami, and notes that prosecutors treated her ambiguously. The text also highlights Epstein's high-profile legal team, including Ken Starr, Gerald Lefcourt, and Alan Dershowitz, and mentions that another victim, Alison, never testified.

Book excerpt / evidence exhibit (likely from 'filthy rich' by james patterson)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010480.jpg

This document is a page from a House Oversight report (marked 010480) displaying a collage of evidentiary photographs related to Jeffrey Epstein. It includes photos of Epstein with Ghislaine Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago (1995), Epstein with Alan Dershowitz (2004), and Prince Andrew with Maxwell and a redacted minor in London. The document also features photos of redacted young women (ages 15 and 17) allegedly taken by Epstein at various locations including New York, London, and Zorro Ranch, citing affidavits from the US District Southern Court of Florida.

Evidentiary exhibit / photo collage (likely from a house oversight committee report)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023062.jpg

This document is an email chain from March 4, 2011, detailing the reaction to an upcoming story in 'The Mail on Sunday' involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and Prince Andrew. The chain originates with a journalist's inquiry to Brett Jaffe, which is forwarded through Mark Cohen to Ghislaine Maxwell, who then forwards it to Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein subsequently forwards the chain to Alan Dershowitz, with their direct correspondence redacted as privileged.

Email thread
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022993.jpg

This document, likely a news report or legal summary produced for the House Oversight Committee, details testimony from Epstein's house manager Juan Alessi regarding visits by Prince Andrew and Donald Trump. It contrasts their behaviors, noting Andrew received massages while Trump only ate dinner in the kitchen and declined massages. The text also discusses legal actions led by attorneys Scarola and Edwards regarding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (the 'sweetheart deal') and a separate financial dispute involving Trump's golf club.

News article or legal summary report (part of house oversight committee production)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022992.jpg

This document, stamped with a House Oversight identifier, summarizes the legal landscape surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, focusing specifically on a defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Roberts Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details Giuffre's allegations that Maxwell recruited her at age 15 from Mar-a-Lago to be sexually exploited by Epstein and his powerful associates, including Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton. The text notes that while a 2009 suit against Epstein was settled, the defamation suit against Maxwell was delayed, hinting at a potential settlement.

News article / summary report (contained within house oversight committee records)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015657.jpg

A court order from the 17th Judicial Circuit in Broward County, Florida, dated November 2, 2015, in the case of Edwards & Cassell v. Dershowitz. The court granted Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP's motion to quash a subpoena entirely. However, the court partially denied Jane Doe No. 3's motion to quash, ordering that her deposition proceed at the Boies, Schiller & Flexner offices, though limited to four hours.

Court order
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015655.jpg

This document is a Certificate of Service dated February 8, 2016, signed by attorney Sigrid S. McCawley. It certifies the electronic service of a legal filing to counsel for the defendant, Alan Dershowitz (represented by Cole, Scott & Kissane and Wiley Rein), and counsel for the plaintiffs (represented by Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley). The document lists specific attorneys and their email addresses.

Legal document (certificate of service)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015653.jpg

This document is a legal filing (page 4) arguing that Defendant Alan Dershowitz must produce witnesses, including Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, if he wishes to pursue issues regarding Bill Clinton's travel. It highlights that Dershowitz invoked attorney-client privilege during his January 2016 deposition when asked if Virginia Roberts was lying about Clinton socializing with Epstein. It also notes Epstein's refusal to be deposed despite court orders.

Legal motion / court filing (page 4)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015650.jpg

This is a legal filing from February 8, 2016, in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It is a response by non-party Virginia Giuffre to Defendant Alan Dershowitz's motion regarding a confidentiality order. The document outlines the procedural history, noting that Giuffre was deposed on January 16, 2016, under a confidentiality order, and explicitly states that Giuffre was a victim of sexual trafficking as a minor.

Legal pleading (court filing)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015637.jpg

This document is page 17 of a court filing in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz, specifically a response to Dershowitz's motion to seal records. It quotes Alan Dershowitz attacking attorneys Edwards and Cassell and their client Virginia Giuffre during a CNN interview, accusing them of being unethical and motivated by money. The filing concludes by requesting the court deny Dershowitz's motion to seal documents regarding Giuffre's allegations.

Court filing (response to motion)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015635.jpg

This page is from a legal response by Edwards and Cassell against Dershowitz (Case CACE 15-000072). It documents Dershowitz's public media statements in January 2015 (on the Today Show and in the Miami Herald) where he categorically denies allegations, claims an 'academic relationship' with Epstein, and accuses the opposing lawyers and Ms. Giuffre of lying and fabrication. He specifically threatens that the lawyers will be disbarred and will 'rue the day' they filed the motion.

Legal filing (response to motion)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015634.jpg

This document is page 14 of a legal response filed by Edwards and Cassell in the case Edwards v. Dershowitz. The text argues that Dershowitz selectively uses parts of Virginia Giuffre's affidavit while attempting to seal the rest, preventing a fair assessment of his claims that her statements are 'preposterous.' The document includes a transcript of a BBC interview from January 2015 where Dershowitz categorically denies the allegations, claims he does not know Giuffre, and threatens the opposing lawyers with defamation suits and disbarment proceedings.

Legal filing (response to motion)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015631.jpg

This document is page 11 of a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). Attorneys Edwards and Cassell argue against sealing court records, claiming that Alan Dershowitz selectively reveals confidential information to misrepresent facts while trying to prevent them from correcting the record. The text specifically cites a deposition where Dershowitz allegedly brought up an affidavit by Virginia Giuffre regarding him watching her perform oral sex on Jeffrey Epstein, and subsequently misrepresented settlement discussions involving attorney David Boies.

Legal filing (response to motion)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015625.jpg

This document is page 5 of a legal response filed by Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell in a lawsuit against Alan Dershowitz. The text argues that Dershowitz cannot seal court records containing allegations that he sexually abused Jane Doe #3, particularly because he previously quoted those same allegations in his own counterclaim. It further alleges that Dershowitz, as Epstein's lawyer, negotiated a Non-Prosecution Agreement specifically to secure immunity for himself and other coconspirators regarding crimes committed in Florida.

Legal filing (court response)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015623.jpg

This document is page 3 of a legal response filed by Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell against Alan Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records. The text outlines legal exceptions for confidentiality under Florida Judicial Administration rules, arguing that none apply because the case is a defamation action where disclosure is inherent to the proceedings. The filing cites precedents such as Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers and Carnegie v. Tedder to support the argument that defamatory material cannot be sealed.

Legal filing (response to motion)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015619.jpg

This is a Confidentiality Order from the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida, dated January 12, 2016, in the defamation case of Edwards & Cassell v. Dershowitz. The order, signed by Judge Thomas Lynch, mandates that the deposition testimony and documents produced by non-party Virginia Giuffre remain confidential and filed under seal. This ruling follows a previous order from November 2015 regarding a motion by non-party Jane Doe No. 3.

Legal court order (confidentiality order)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015599.jpg

This document is a Motion to Quash filed on April 9, 2015, in Broward County, Florida, on behalf of 'Jane Doe No. 3' in the defamation case of Edwards & Cassell v. Dershowitz. Jane Doe No. 3 argues that the subpoena served by Alan Dershowitz is oppressive and intended to harass her. The motion cites a recent public statement by Dershowitz claiming he found her hiding in Colorado and intends to send her to jail.

Legal filing (motion to quash or for protective order)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015591.jpg

This document is page 2 of a legal filing by Alan Dershowitz requesting a modification to a Confidentiality Order to allow his counsel to disclose testimony from Ms. Roberts (Virginia Giuffre) for his defense. It outlines the background of the defamation suit brought against Dershowitz by Roberts's lawyers (Edwards and Cassell) and details the procedural history of Roberts's attempts to quash subpoenas and seal deposition transcripts between 2015 and 2016. The document references the 'Federal Action' (Jane Doe v. USA) in the Southern District of Florida.

Legal motion / court filing (page 2)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015012.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight investigation file (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015012) containing research notes or a draft report. It juxtaposes the operations of private military contractor Blackwater (Erik Prince) with the legal defense of Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting a theme of government complicity or utilization of 'assets' for illicit purposes. The text specifically alleges that Epstein's lenient sentence and non-prosecution agreement were related to 'government-sponsored sexual blackmail' and draws parallels between Erik Prince and Osama Bin Laden as intelligence assets.

Investigative research notes / briefing document
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013383.jpg

This document is page 14 of a legal filing arguing that an attorney named Edwards is entitled to summary judgment against claims made by Jeffrey Epstein. The text asserts that Edwards had a sound legal basis to pursue discovery and testimony from high-profile individuals—including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson—regarding Epstein's abuse of minor girls. It specifically notes that these individuals were considered 'friends' of Epstein believed to possess relevant information.

Legal motion/memorandum (summary judgment argument)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013358.jpg

This document is page 40 of a legal filing summarizing Jeffrey Epstein's deposition testimony. It lists paragraphs 105 through 112, detailing specific questions where Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. The questions specifically ask if he socialized with Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Mr. Mottola, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson (Governor of NM) in the presence of females under the age of 18, as well as questions regarding sexual abuse of children and soliciting prostitution.

Legal document / court filing (summary of deposition testimony)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013347.jpg

This document page outlines legal justifications for deposing Donald Trump and Alan Dershowitz in relation to cases against Jeffrey Epstein. It details specific allegations connecting Trump to Epstein, including incidents at Mar-a-Lago, flight logs, and contact information found in Epstein's directory, while also noting Dershowitz's close personal relationship with Epstein.

Legal filing / court document
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029833.jpg

This document is a printed email chain from April 28, 2016, originating from a Reuters journalist, David Ingram, seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The email chain shows this inquiry being forwarded rapidly from Weinberg to Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com), and then from Epstein to his legal team (Dershowitz, Black, Goldberger), with subsequent legal discussions redacted for privilege.

Email chain
2025-11-19
Total Received
$20,000.00
3 transactions
Total Paid
$1,800,000.00
3 transactions
Net Flow
-$1,780,000.00
6 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Harry Reems Alan Dershowitz $0.00 Reems told Dershowitz he had no money; Dershowi... View
N/A Received Bakkers' backers Alan Dershowitz $20,000.00 Legal bill for the Jim Bakker appeal. View
N/A Paid Alan Dershowitz Brad Edwards and ... $900,000.00 Defamation settlement paid by Dershowitz to Rob... View
N/A Paid Alan Dershowitz Brad Edwards and ... $900,000.00 Defamation settlement paid by Dershowitz to Rob... View
N/A Received Matthew Hale Alan Dershowitz $0.00 Proposed legal fee which Dershowitz wanted to d... View
2016-04-01 Paid Alan Dershowitz Brad Edwards and ... $0.00 Settlement of defamation claims; financial term... View
As Sender
43
As Recipient
22
Total
65

Statute of Limitations

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: Public

Stated he would waive statute of limitations so Roberts could sue him.

Television appearance
N/A

Ms. Giuffre's Affidavit

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: Pilchak attorneys

Dershowitz referenced Ms. Giuffre's affidavit regarding him watching her perform oral sex on Epstein.

Deposition
N/A

Denial of allegations

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: Public/Virginia Robert...

Dershowitz calling Giuffre a 'liar' and denying sexual relations.

Television broadcast
N/A

Settlement

From: boies
To: Alan Dershowitz

Confidential settlement discussions that Dershowitz allegedly misrepresented.

Settlement discussions
N/A

Book feedback

From: Uncle Zacky
To: Alan Dershowitz

Zacky told Dershowitz he admired the content but not the heretical views, and suggested changing the word 'Dershowitz' on the cover.

Conversation
N/A

Business discussion

From: Jeffrey Epstein
To: Alan Dershowitz

Discussed business immediately in the bedroom, Jeffrey gave orders/notes while wearing a towel.

Meeting
N/A

Settlement Negotiations

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: Roberts' Lawyer

Confidential settlement negotiations surreptitiously tape recorded by Dershowitz.

Meeting
N/A

Accuser Credibility

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: Prosecutors

Shared information about accusers, including MySpace posts concerning drugs and alcohol.

Meeting
N/A

Denial of involvement

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: The Miami Herald

Dershowitz denied gathering background on girls or directing anyone to follow police/families.

Interview
N/A

Extortion Plot Allegations

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: the media

Falsely told media he was a pawn in a plan to extort a billionaire.

Public statement
N/A

Passover Haggadah

From: Tammy
To: Alan Dershowitz

A 'Christian Evangelical rip-off' of a Haggadah meant for Jews for Jesus.

Gift/mail
N/A

Legal Representation

From: Harry Reems
To: Alan Dershowitz

Reems asked Dershowitz to argue his appeal pro bono.

Meeting
N/A

Clerkship Recommendation Advice

From: Alex Bickel
To: Alan Dershowitz

Advice to 'turn off one of your barrels' and be respectful/polite to judges.

Conversation
N/A

Private Meeting

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: Barry Krischer

Recarey describes this meeting as involving 'shenanigans'.

Meeting
N/A

Denial of involvement

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: The Miami Herald

Dershowitz denied gathering background on girls or directing people to follow police/families.

Interview
N/A

Private meeting

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: Barry Krischer

Described by Recarey as involving 'shenanigans'.

Meeting
N/A

Biggest legal fee

From: TV Host
To: Alan Dershowitz

Host asked about biggest fee; Dershowitz cited Sharansky's hug rather than money from Milken or Helmsley.

Tv interview
N/A

Victim Credibility

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: Krischer, Recarey

Dershowitz shared results of an investigation into one of the girls to discredit her, describing her as an 'accomplished drama student'.

Meeting
N/A

Epstein Case

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: Barry Krischer

Private meeting described by Recarey as involving 'shenanigans'.

Meeting
N/A

N/A

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: Mr. Simpson

Excited whispering during testimony

Whispering/in-person communication
N/A

Presidential Immunity

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: Public

Arguments that a president cannot be prosecuted for exercising constitutional prerogatives.

Television appearances
N/A

Denial of involvement

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: Miami Herald

Dershowitz denied gathering background on girls or directing people to follow them.

Interview
N/A

Victim credibility/website

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: Michael Recarey

Enclosing examples of a victim's website showing 'fascination with marijuana'.

Letter
N/A

Victim credibility

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: Krischer and Recarey

Dershowitz shared results of an investigation into a victim, characterizing her as a drama student to undermine her credibility.

Meeting
N/A

Myspace Information

From: Alan Dershowitz
To: State

Information showing alleged victims boasted of alcohol and marijuana use.

Submission
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity