SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00014485.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation (closing argument) by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that the testimonies of accusers 'Carolyn' and 'Jane' are unreliable because their stories changed over time to implicate Maxwell after pressure from lawyers and the FBI. Specifically, it notes that Carolyn's 2008 lawsuit against Epstein and Sarah Kellen never mentioned Maxwell, and alleges that Jane was coached to identify Maxwell as the woman with the 'foreign accent' present during the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00014484.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that the witnesses (specifically naming Jane and Annie) were motivated by financial gain, noting they hired lawyers like Robert Glassman and communicated with firms like Boies Schiller to file civil suits and claims with the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund. Menninger emphasizes that cooperation with the government was advised as a way to help their civil cases, resulting in them receiving millions of dollars.
DOJ-OGR-00014483.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court summation by Ms. Menninger on August 10, 2022. It discusses the burden of proof, the importance of lack of evidence, and argues that the jury should find the defendant not guilty. The summation claims that accusers initially focused on Jeffrey Epstein, later adding Ghislaine Maxwell to their stories, and that accusers sought legal counsel and engaged with the FBI, potentially motivated by financial gain.
DOJ-OGR-00014482.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger on behalf of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that the prosecution is attempting to convict Maxwell through her association with Jeffrey Epstein, whose lavish and criminal lifestyle was put on display for the jury. She claims the government's case is weak, highlighting that they only presented a few "innocuous" photos of Maxwell and Epstein out of 38,000 seized, suggesting the remaining evidence did not support their narrative.
DOJ-OGR-00014481.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the summation (closing argument) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that Maxwell is innocent and that the prosecution's case relies on stories manipulated by personal injury lawyers and motivated by money. She asserts that the government successfully proved Jeffrey Epstein was a manipulator and abuser, but failed to connect those actions to Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00014480.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. In this excerpt, the judge directs Ms. Williams to bring in the jury and then instructs the jury to give their full attention to Ms. Menninger, who is about to deliver the closing argument on behalf of her client, Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00014479.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The judge denies a request for a mistrial concerning evidence about phone numbers, stating the admission was for a limited purpose. The court then calls for a 20-minute luncheon recess, after which a technical difficulty with a non-working screen is reported.
DOJ-OGR-00014478.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca objects to the prosecution's closing argument regarding 'grooming-by-proxy' for Jeffrey Epstein; the Judge overrules this, clarifying that while experts couldn't testify to it, lawyers could argue it based on evidence. Prosecutor Ms. Moe then discusses Government Exhibit 52, arguing it demonstrates knowledge and intent because the listed individuals were obviously not 'real masseuses.'
DOJ-OGR-00014477.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca requests a mistrial, arguing that the government violated a limiting instruction regarding 'Exhibit 52' (pages from a book) during closing arguments by using hearsay to prove the truth of the matter asserted—specifically linking names in the book to 'sexualized massages' described by a witness named Jane and implying Ms. Maxwell knew the individuals were minors. Pagliuca alternatively requests a curative instruction to the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00014475.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. After the jury is dismissed for lunch, an attorney, Ms. Sternheim, raises an objection to the judge concerning a statement made by opposing counsel, Ms. Moe. Ms. Sternheim argues that Ms. Moe's assertion during closing arguments—that a massage table originating from California affects interstate commerce—is legally inaccurate and unsupported by evidence presented in the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00014474.jpg
This document is a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. An attorney, Ms. Moe, is delivering a closing argument, urging the jury to find Maxwell guilty of sexually exploiting and trafficking underage girls based on witness testimonies from individuals like Juan Alessi, David Mulligan, and Janice Swain. Following the argument, the judge addresses the jury, announcing a 20-30 minute lunch break.
DOJ-OGR-00014473.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe in the trial of a defendant named Maxwell. Ms. Moe refutes the defense's arguments regarding Maxwell's London residence and counters the claim that four key witnesses (Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie) are lying for financial gain. She asserts the witnesses have no financial stake in the current trial's outcome, as their civil suits are concluded and they have already received compensation from the Jeffrey Epstein Victim Compensation Program.
DOJ-OGR-00014472.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe in a criminal case. Ms. Moe argues that the defense has deliberately misled the jury by taking a witness's, Jane's, statements out of context. She provides two examples: one involving a question about orchestra music and another where the defense selectively quoted from a legal document, omitting a key sentence that states the defendant, Maxwell, facilitated and was present for Jane's sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00014470.jpg
This document is page 70 of a court transcript (summation) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Moe argues against the testimony of defense memory expert Loftus, contrasting the implanting of false memories about getting lost in a mall with the impossibility of implanting false memories about invasive physical trauma like enemas or sexual abuse. Moe emphasizes that Loftus admitted on cross-examination that core traumatic memories are stronger than other types of memory.
DOJ-OGR-00014469.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe, filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Moe argues against the credibility and relevance of the defense's expert witness, Professor Loftus, who specializes in memory. She contrasts Loftus's academic experiments on malleable memory with the powerful, traumatic memories of sexual abuse victims, portraying Loftus as a biased, paid advocate for the defense whose testimony is a distraction from the actual facts of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00014468.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation delivered by Ms. Moe in the trial of a defendant named Maxwell. Ms. Moe argues to the jury that the testimony of four witnesses—Jane, Annie, Carolyn, and Kate—is credible, despite the defense's claims that they are liars or have faulty memories. She asserts that their consistent accounts of being exploited by Maxwell and Epstein are devastating evidence of Maxwell's guilt and cannot be dismissed as a mass delusion.
DOJ-OGR-00014467.jpg
This document is a page from the prosecution's closing argument (summation) by Ms. Moe in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor rebuts the defense's claim that Maxwell was too busy managing Epstein's life (including tasks like ordering sand for his private island and interviewing staff in limos) to be involved in crimes. Ms. Moe argues that Maxwell participated in the abuse, lived with Epstein, and knew exactly what was happening with the young girls she interacted with.
DOJ-OGR-00014466.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case USA v. Maxwell. Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that the case centers on manipulation, money, and memory, highlighting how Maxwell groomed victims for Epstein. The text contrasts the small payments made to victim Carolyn (approx. $100) against the $30 million Maxwell received from Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014465.jpg
This document is page 65 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the summation by prosecutor Ms. Moe. She argues that the government has met its burden of proof regarding the six crimes charged against Ghislaine Maxwell. Ms. Moe specifically refutes the defense's narrative that Maxwell is being blamed for a man's actions, asserting instead that Maxwell made her own choices and committed crimes 'hand-in-hand' with Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014464.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation delivered by Ms. Moe. She argues that crimes occurred within the Southern District of New York, citing evidence related to several counts, including trips to Manhattan by individuals named Jane and Annie, and Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule 'sexualized massages' in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00014463.jpg
This document is a page from the prosecution's summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Moe outlines the evidence for 'Count Five' (sex trafficking conspiracy spanning 2000-2004), detailing how Maxwell recruited Virginia Roberts at Mar-a-Lago and facilitated Carolyn's sexual abuse in Palm Beach and New York. The prosecutor emphasizes the legal standard for conspiracy, noting that the jury only needs to find that the agreement existed for 'one moment' and that an overt act was taken by either Maxwell or Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014462.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Moe in the case against Maxwell. The summation outlines three conspiracy counts, alleging that from 1994 to 2004, Maxwell conspired with Epstein to commit crimes against victims Jane, Carolyn, and Annie. Ms. Moe argues that Maxwell groomed Carolyn and Annie as part of an agreement to provide Epstein with underage girls for abuse, which constitutes the conspiracy.
DOJ-OGR-00014460.jpg
This document is a page from the summation transcript in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that Maxwell is guilty of Count Four and Count Six (sex trafficking of a minor). The text details Maxwell's interactions with victims named Kate, Jane, and specifically Carolyn, a 14-year-old middle school dropout whom Maxwell recruited for massage appointments with Epstein knowing she was a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00014459.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor argues that Maxwell knowingly transported a minor named 'Jane' (whom she met at a summer camp) across state lines for sexual abuse, emphasizing Maxwell's knowledge of Jane's age (under 17). It also references testimony from a victim named 'Kate' regarding an incident where Maxwell instructed her to wear a schoolgirl outfit for Epstein, establishing Maxwell's knowledge of Epstein's preferences.
DOJ-OGR-00014458.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a prosecutor's, Ms. Moe's, summation. She argues that the defendant, Maxwell, is guilty of Count Four: transporting a minor named Jane to New York for illegal sexual activity. Ms. Moe asserts that Maxwell arranged the travel, was on flights with Jane as confirmed by witness Juan Alessi and flight records, and thereby aided and abetted Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity