20-3061_Documents.pdf
9.34 MB
Extraction Summary
15
People
6
Organizations
7
Locations
5
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court record / appellate case file
File Size:
9.34 MB
Summary
This document is the complete appellate record for case 20-3061, an interlocutory appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell against the United States. Maxwell appealed a District Court order denying her motion to modify a protective order, seeking permission to share confidential criminal discovery materials under seal with the judge in a related civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) to challenge the government's acquisition of evidence. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, ruling that the protective order decision was not a final judgment or an appealable collateral order, and denied Maxwell's motion to consolidate the criminal appeal with the civil appeal.
People (15)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant-Appellant |
Appealing a District Court order regarding a protective order in her criminal case.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | U.S. District Judge |
Presiding judge in the SDNY criminal case who issued the protective order and denied the motion to modify it.
|
| Loretta A. Preska | U.S. District Judge |
Presiding judge in the related civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) handling unsealing of documents.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Co-conspirator |
Deceased financier named as co-conspirator in the indictment.
|
| Virginia L. Giuffre | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the related civil defamation case.
|
| Audrey Strauss | Acting United States Attorney |
Representing the United States in the appeal.
|
| Maurene Ryan Comey | Assistant US Attorney |
Prosecutor representing the US Government.
|
| Alison Gainfort Moe | Assistant US Attorney |
Prosecutor representing the US Government.
|
| Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz | Assistant US Attorney |
Prosecutor representing the US Government.
|
| Laura A. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Jeffrey S. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Christian R. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Mark Stewart Cohen | Defense Attorney |
Representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Adam Mueller | Defense Attorney |
Representing Ghislaine Maxwell on appeal.
|
| Ty Gee | Defense Attorney |
Representing Ghislaine Maxwell on appeal.
|
Timeline (5 events)
July 8, 2020
Superseding Indictment S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) filed
SDNY
October 19, 2020
Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismisses Maxwell's appeal for lack of jurisdiction
Second Circuit Court of Appeals
Locations (7)
Relationships (2)
Indictment states they had a 'personal and professional relationship,' Maxwell was 'among his closest associates,' and was in an 'intimate relationship' between 1994-1997.
Giuffre is the plaintiff in a civil defamation suit against Maxwell; Indictment alleges Maxwell committed perjury in depositions for that civil case.
Key Quotes (5)
"Maxwell assisted, facilitated, and contributed to Jeffrey Epstein's abuse of minor girls by, among other things, helping Epstein to recruit, groom, and ultimately abuse victims known to MAXWELL and Epstein to be under the age of 18."Source
20-3061_Documents.pdf
Quote #1
"First, the Court finds that the Government has met its burden of showing good cause with regard to restricting the ability of Ms. Maxwell to publicly reference alleged victims and witnesses other than those who have publicly identified themselves in this litigation."Source
20-3061_Documents.pdf
Quote #2
"The defendant’s demand that she and her counsel be permitted to name any individuals who have ever publicly identified themselves as a victim of either Epstein or the defendant in any 'public fora,' and at any time, without limitation, is extraordinarily broad, unnecessary, and inappropriate, and should be denied."Source
20-3061_Documents.pdf
Quote #3
"The Government labors under many restrictions including Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Privacy Act of 1974... all of which the Court expects the Government to scrupulously follow."Source
20-3061_Documents.pdf
Quote #4
"Maxwell’s motion to consolidate is a transparent attempt to circumvent Judge Nathan’s Order without litigating the merits of this appeal."Source
20-3061_Documents.pdf
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document