Juror No. 50
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Juror defendant |
12
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
35 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
location
court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
second juror
|
Co jurors |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Defendant juror |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Communication |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Juror court |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant juror |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional potential bias |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional juror defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Lucia Osborne-Crowley
|
Professional interviewer interviewee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Juror defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Social media interaction |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Juror witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Elizabeth Loftus
|
Adversarial juror vs expert witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Judicial oversight |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Juror witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Luc Cohen
|
Interview subject interviewer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Osborne-Crawley
|
Interviewee interviewer implied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lucia Osborne-Crowley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Juror No. 50 questioning during trial. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror No. 50's Twitter account was active. | Online | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror No. 50 communicated with Annie Farmer. | View | |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection Questionnaire Process | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror No. 50 answering Questions 25 and 48 during jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror No. 50 media press tour | Various media outlets | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Voir Dire Questioning | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jurors answering Question 48 regarding abuse history | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation into juror misconduct | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation of Juror No. 50 | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation into the conduct of Juror No. 50. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury selection (voir dire) | The process of screening prospective jurors for Ms. Maxwell's trial, during which Juror No. 50 al... | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | During voir dire, defense counsel attempted to locate the Twitter account of Juror No. 50. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Ms. Maxwell's trial, which is the subject of a motion for a new trial. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Hearing | A proposed evidentiary hearing regarding Juror No. 50, which is being debated by the government a... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Juror misconduct | Juror No. 50 and a second deliberating juror were untruthful on their jury selection questionnair... | The Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A motion for a new trial for Ms. Maxwell, based on issues with a juror's answers during voir dire. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury selection (voir dire) | Juror No. 50 provided answers to questions during the voir dire process, which are now being chal... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, which is the subject of the motion for a new trial. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury selection | Juror No. 50 provided false answers to questions, which deprived the Court of a basis for inquiry... | Court | View |
| N/A | Jury selection | Jurors completed questionnaires as part of the selection process. The document alleges that at le... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury deliberation | Juror No. 50 told his fellow jurors about the abuse he suffered, causing the room to go 'went sil... | Jury room | View |
| N/A | Interview | Juror No. 50 was interviewed by Reuters journalist Luc Cohen. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interview | Juror No. 50 was interviewed by the Daily Mail. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009711.jpg
This legal document details a post-verdict interview given by Juror No. 50 (using the name Scotty David) to The Independent on January 4, 2022. The juror revealed that he was a victim of sexual abuse, shared this personal story with the jury during deliberations, and used his own experience to validate the accusers' testimonies. He explicitly stated that he disregarded the testimony of defense expert Dr. Elizabeth Loftus on memory, influencing the jury based on his personal beliefs.
DOJ-OGR-00009710.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, alleges juror misconduct. It claims that Juror No. 50 and a second deliberating juror were untruthful on their jury questionnaires by denying they had been victims of sexual abuse, assault, or harassment. The document contrasts this with the other alternate and deliberating jurors, none of whom disclosed such a history.
DOJ-OGR-00009708.jpg
This is page 16 of a legal document filed on March 11, 2022, related to case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The document discusses the final composition of the jury, noting that 694 potential jurors answered a questionnaire. A footnote explains that defense counsel was unable to find the Twitter account of 'Juror No. 50' during the voir dire process.
DOJ-OGR-00009707.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing (Document 642) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. It argues that Juror No. 50 was dishonest about deleting his Instagram account and his ability to be impartial, noting he posted about the trial post-verdict. The defense explains they did not ask follow-up questions during voir dire because the juror denied bias, contrasting this with other jurors who disclosed abuse histories.
DOJ-OGR-00009704.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 11, 2022, detailing the jury selection process for the trial of Ms. Maxwell. It specifically focuses on 'Juror No. 50', listing their responses to questionnaire items 13, 25, 42, 43, and 44, wherein the juror denied being a victim of a crime or having biases that would affect impartiality under penalty of perjury. The document notes that 694 individuals originally answered the questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00009701.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, argues for a new trial for a defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The basis for the request is the allegation that Juror No. 50 provided a false answer on a jury selection questionnaire regarding personal experience with sexual assault, which was a core issue in the case. This alleged dishonesty is claimed to have resulted in an unfair and impartial jury, thereby depriving Ms. Maxwell of her constitutional right to a fair trial.
DOJ-OGR-00009695.jpg
This document is page 3 (Table of Contents) of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated March 11, 2022. It outlines arguments claiming Ghislaine Maxwell is entitled to a new trial because 'Juror No. 50' allegedly answered voir dire questions (specifically 25 and 48) falsely. The document also argues against Juror No. 50's right to intervene or receive discovery, noting the juror is currently under investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00009694.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. The filing argues that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, was deprived of a fair trial due to juror misconduct. The primary focus is on "Juror No. 50," who allegedly was untruthful during voir dire and subsequently gave media interviews; it also mentions a second juror who disclosed during deliberations that they were a victim of sexual assault.
DOJ-OGR-00014743.jpg
This document is page 10 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records the reading of the verdict, where the defendant is found 'Not guilty' on Count Two and 'Guilty' on Counts Three through Six. Following the reading, the court polls individual jurors (identified by number) to confirm that this is indeed their verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00008822.jpg
This is a legal letter dated January 19, 2022, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter serves to inform the court that Maxwell's counsel has filed a Motion for a New Trial and requests that all materials concerning Juror No. 50 be kept under seal until the court rules on the motion.
his service as a juror in this case
The document requests all communications to and from Juror No. 50 on social media platforms regarding his jury service.
his service as a juror in this case
The document requests all posts, comments, or photographs posted by Juror No. 50 on social media regarding his jury service.
Identity of the second juror and other matters
The document states that what Juror No. 50 said to the other jurors is relevant to the investigation.
No Subject
Ms. Maxwell requests the Court to authorize a subpoena for these communications as part of pre-hearing discovery.
Unknown, implied to be about the trial
Juror No. 50 has sat for several interviews with journalists.
Unknown
Juror No. 50 has "Tweeted and publicized himself on social media".
His experience as a victim and his role on the jury.
After the verdict, Juror No. 50 gave multiple media interviews to promote himself, which is being used as evidence that his answers on the questionnaire were intentionally false.
No Subject
Juror No. 50 engaged on Twitter with a journalist who wrote about him.
No Subject
Juror No. 50 communicated directly with Annie Farmer.
Twitter handle @ScottyDavidNYC
Defense counsel was unable to locate the Twitter account of Juror No. 50, with the handle @ScottyDavidNYC, during voir dire.
History as a victim of crime or sexual abuse
Juror No. 50 denied being a victim of a crime, sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment on his questionnaire, which the document alleges was untruthful.
Personal history of sexual abuse
During deliberations, Juror No. 50 told his fellow jurors about his experience as a victim of sexual abuse to persuade them to believe Ms. Maxwell's accusers.
Jury deliberation process
Juror No. 50 told several media outlets that he drew on his personal experience as a victim to persuade fellow jurors.
Experience as a juror in the Ms. Maxwell case
Juror No. 50 gave an interview to the Daily Mail, which was the basis for a January 5 article. In the interview, he described Ms. Maxwell as a 'predator' and explained how he helped the jury understand traumatic memories from a victim's perspective.
Juror's beliefs on memory and abuse
Disclosed beliefs such as 'the abusive event is like a video and victims remember the event accurately'.
Potential legal trouble
Alerted the juror that he 'may be in trouble' regarding his disclosures/conduct.
Unknown
The document notes that Juror No. 50 communicated with Annie Famer (Farmer).
Verdict
Proclaimed that the verdict against Ms. Maxwell was a verdict 'for all the victims.'
Voir Dire Answers
Admitting to having provided false answers during voir dire.
Motion for intervention and discovery
Requests regarding judicial document status, currently under seal.
Jury Questionnaire Response
Interviewer challenges Juror No. 50 regarding question 48 about being a victim of abuse.
Juror Disclosures
Statement that a second juror disclosed they were also a victim of childhood sexual abuse.
Press tour
Revealed disclosure of abuse history during deliberations.
Jury Questionnaire Question 48
Failure to disclose being a victim of sexual abuse.
Jury Questionnaire Question 25
Failure to disclose being a victim of a crime.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity