MAXWELL
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Guiffre
|
Litigation opponent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Criminal exploitative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
plaintiff
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Co-Executors
|
Allied in motion |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Unclear |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Supervisory professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional conspiratorial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
["her attorneys"]
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-3
|
Facilitator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ted Waitt
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators implied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Victim abuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
minor victim(s)
|
Groomer victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Mentorship grooming |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Defendant victim witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Defendant judge |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Boies Schiller
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kellen
|
Superior subordinate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Collaborative professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-4
|
Recruiter victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
McMahon
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional transactional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury selection for Maxwell's trial, including a jury questionnaire where Juror 50 failed to accur... | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court denies Maxwell's motion for a new trial. | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's indictment was denied, trial proceeded, and she is serving a 20-year sentence. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Relocation of victims from Palm Beach to other places in the U.S. (including Southern District of... | Palm Beach, other places in... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell moved for rehearing en banc, which was denied. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion is being considered by the Court. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's consideration of categories of questions Maxwell argues are ambiguous. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Argument by Maxwell that perjury counts should be dismissed due to immateriality of statements. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | S2 superseding indictment moots Maxwell's grand jury challenge | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of expedited discovery timeline | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to dismiss perjury counts from a civil case deposition. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell contends that the NPA bars her prosecution as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's sentencing to concurrent terms of imprisonment (60, 120, 240 months) followed by superv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal arguments by Maxwell to dismiss indictment | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment based on fabricated stories and perjurious conspiracy by ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks writ of mandamus to direct District Court to modify protective order. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks to consolidate her criminal appeal with civil appeal Guiffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-241... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court denies Maxwell's motions to consolidate as moot. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell appeals denial of motion to modify a protective order. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020751.jpg
This document is a page from a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 29, 2021. It details allegations of Maxwell's involvement in recruiting and facilitating the sexual abuse of minors by Epstein, specifically mentioning Minor Victim-3 in London (1994-1995) and Minor Victim-4 from Florida (2001-2002). The page also outlines Count Four of the indictment, charging Maxwell with the transportation of a minor for criminal sexual activity between 1994 and 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00020748.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 29, 2021. It details several allegations of Maxwell's involvement in the sexual abuse of minors, including arranging for victims to provide massages to Epstein and travel with him between 1994 and 2002. The page outlines specific incidents involving three unnamed minor victims in locations such as New Mexico, London, and Florida, and introduces COUNT TWO: "Enticement of a Minor to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts."
DOJ-OGR-00020744.jpg
This legal document, part of a criminal case, outlines allegations against MAXWELL for grooming and recruiting several minors for sexual abuse by Epstein. It details specific instances involving 'Minor Victim-2' in New Mexico and 'Minor Victim-3' in London between 1994-1995, stating MAXWELL was aware of the abuse. The document also mentions 'Minor Victim-4' was recruited and paid by Epstein or his associates for sexualized massages.
DOJ-OGR-00020738.jpg
This legal document outlines the alleged methods used by MAXWELL to facilitate Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minor victims. It details how MAXWELL would groom victims through outings, normalize sexual abuse by discussing sexual topics and being present during abusive acts, and use her presence as an adult woman to put victims at ease. The document also states that MAXWELL encouraged victims to provide sexualized massages to Epstein, which resulted in abuse, and to accept financial offers from him for travel and education.
DOJ-OGR-00020617.jpg
This document is a 'Criminal Appeal Transcript Information - Form B' filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case USA v. Maxwell (Docket 22-1426). Dated February 22, 2023, and signed by attorney Diana Fabi Samson, the form indicates that the counsel is not ordering a transcript for the appeal proceedings. The document contains contact information for the attorney and a DOJ Bates stamp at the bottom.
DOJ-OGR-00020598.jpg
This is a Notice of Appearance filed on July 28, 2022, in the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). Lara Pomerantz of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is entering the case as additional counsel, serving as co-counsel alongside Won S. Shin for the Appellee (USA). The document certifies her admission to the court renewed on December 3, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00020595.jpg
This legal document, dated July 15, 2022, is a notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case of "United States of America v. Maxwell" (Docket # 22-1426). The notice states that the case manager assigned to the matter has been changed. It provides a phone number for any inquiries related to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00020594.jpg
This is a 'Criminal Appeal Transcript Information' form filed on July 15, 2022, with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The form, submitted by attorney John M. Leventhal for the case USA v. Maxwell (Docket 22-1426), indicates that a transcript of court proceedings is not being ordered.
DOJ-OGR-00020486.jpg
This document is a formal "Notice of Record on Appeal Filed" from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated July 8, 2022. It confirms that the electronic index for the record on appeal has been filed in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket # 22-1426). The notice is issued under the authority of Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Clerk of Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe.
DOJ-OGR-00020385.jpg
This document is a docketing notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding case 22-1426, United States of America v. Maxwell. It outlines procedures for appellate counsel and pro se parties to access necessary forms and information related to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00018954.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination involving a witness named Hesse. The testimony focuses on Hesse's employment history with Maxwell and Epstein, specifically when she started (roughly September 2003) and stopped working for them (around 2004), and that she was hired by Epstein after an interview with Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00018953.jpg
This document is page 91 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness, Mrs. Hesse, by Ms. Moe. The testimony focuses on identifying a message from 'Carolyn' in Exhibit 3E and establishing that Mrs. Hesse worked at the Palm Beach house specifically when Maxwell and Epstein were not home.
DOJ-OGR-00018909.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the direct examination of a witness named Shawn in the case US v. Maxwell. The testimony focuses on a girl named Carolyn, described as a 14-year-old middle school dropout who visited Jeffrey Epstein's house. The witness confirms Carolyn knew 'Maxwell' but could not pronounce her first name, and the questioning begins to address gifts or money Carolyn received.
DOJ-OGR-00018783.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a complaint (Exhibit C5) where Carolyn made a claim against a Mr. Epstein; Carolyn now states that the complaint, which she previously testified under oath was accurate, was in fact not accurate. Mr. Pagliuca also establishes that a specific paragraph of the complaint does not contain the name "Maxwell."
DOJ-OGR-00018732.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the questioning of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Carolyn confirms her previous testimony from December 2009, stating she would call Mr. Epstein's residence to arrange to give him a massage for payment. She specifies that she would often speak with household staff, identified as 'Sarah or Maxwell' or possibly a cook, to make these arrangements.
DOJ-OGR-00018731.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, likely from the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Prosecutor Ms. Comey is examining a witness named Carolyn regarding her prior testimony from December 2009. Carolyn confirms that while she cannot recall specific dates of her visits to Epstein's home, she remembers the events clearly, and states that Epstein did not contact her directly, but rather had 'Sarah or Maxwell' call her.
DOJ-OGR-00018726.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. She testifies that in 2007, the FBI interviewed her specifically about Jeffrey Epstein, not Ghislaine Maxwell. She discusses her employment as a stripper and escort after turning 18 and details a 2009 lawsuit she filed against Epstein and Sarah Kellen for emotional damage and complicity.
DOJ-OGR-00018725.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies that she no longer speaks to her ex-boyfriend, Sean, and has not discussed Jeffrey Epstein with him. She confirms she was interviewed by the FBI in 2007, during which she identified a woman named Maxwell as an 'older lady' she saw at Epstein's residence during her first visit there with someone named Virginia.
DOJ-OGR-00018714.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies that she gave her address to someone named Maxwell so that Jeffrey Epstein could send her gifts, which included lingerie from Victoria's Secret, a massage book, and concert tickets. She also confirms that other females, including a person named Virginia, were present in the room when she was massaging Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00018710.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. She testifies that when she was 14, almost 15, Ghislaine Maxwell and several others saw her naked in a massage room at Jeffrey Epstein's house. Carolyn confirms that Maxwell touched her breasts on one occasion and continued to schedule massage appointments for her with Epstein even after this event.
DOJ-OGR-00018708.jpg
This document is a page from the court testimony of a woman named Carolyn. She describes an incident at Jeffrey Epstein's house where Maxwell touched her breasts, hips, and buttocks, telling her she had a 'great body for Mr. Epstein and his friends.' Immediately after Maxwell left the room, Mr. Epstein entered.
DOJ-OGR-00018707.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from a direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies that a person named Maxwell invited her to an island, but she declined, stating she was only 14. Despite knowing her age, Maxwell allegedly continued to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn with Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00018706.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies about personal conversations with someone named Maxwell, to whom she disclosed her mother's alcoholism and that she had been raped and molested by her grandfather. She also recounts being invited to an island by 'Mr. Epstein and Maxwell' but was unable to go because she was too young to obtain a passport.
DOJ-OGR-00018705.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies that she drove herself to Jeffrey Epstein's house a few times for massage appointments, entering through the kitchen. Upon arrival, she would be met by Maxwell, who would inform her that Mr. Epstein was out jogging but would return shortly.
DOJ-OGR-00018704.jpg
This document is a page of a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies that either Maxwell or Sarah would schedule her appointments and arrange for a car to take her to Jeffrey Epstein's house. She states that her driver, Shawn, waited outside and that she saw Mr. Epstein outside the house on at least one occasion when she was with Shawn.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Scheduling an appointment to massage Epstein
Maxwell, acting as one of Epstein's employees, would call victims to schedule appointments for them to massage Epstein at his Palm Beach Residence.
Interaction with Epstein
Maxwell directed Juan Alessi to speak to Epstein only when spoken to and not to look him in the eyes.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Carolyn testified that Maxwell called her to schedule sexualized massages.
Advice about boyfriends
Maxwell advised Jane that once she has a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, she can always have one again because they are 'grandfathered in'.
Reply to Government's Opposition
A reply brief cited as "Maxwell Reply at 18" where the Defendant asserts the government failed to prove its case.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages while Maxwell was in New York.
Reconsideration of response to jury note
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of Judge Nathan's response to the jury's note and raised issues of constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Appointments
Maxwell has been on record since 2009 calling Carolyn for appointments.
Taking over the house
Maxwell told Juan Alessi that she was taking over the house right away when she arrived.
Staff rules and operation of the Palm Beach residence
A household manual dictated the operation of the Palm Beach residence and included rules for staff, such as to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing'.
Epstein's whereabouts
Maxwell informing Carolyn that Epstein was on a jog or would be back soon and that she could go upstairs to set up.
Massages
Maxwell asked Annie if she had ever received a massage and told her she would have the opportunity to have one, describing how enjoyable it would be.
Scheduling massages
Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages when Maxwell was in New York.
Spending time vs Communicating
Witness clarifies distinction between spending physical time vs communicating. States she stopped spending time around age 24.
Reconsideration of response
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Scheduling appointments
Maxwell would call Carolyn to ask if she was available for an appointment, sometimes mentioning that she and Mr. Epstein would be out of town and flying in.
Rule 29 Motion for Acquittal
A brief cited as "Maxwell Br. at 30" where the Defendant requests a judgment of acquittal on all counts.
Instruction to undress
She told me to get undressed.
Small talk during massage
making small talk
Legal Review
Review of discovery materials
Request to question Juror 50
Renewing request to question Juror 50 directly and proposing twenty-one pages of questions.
Civil Case Testimony
Testimony given by Maxwell in a civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell).
Famous people (e.g., Prince Andrew, Donald Trump)
The witness, Kate, states that Maxwell might be talking on the phone about her famous friends while Kate was present.
Reply brief
A filing titled "Maxwell Reply" is cited, where the Defendant raises an argument in a footnote for the first time.
Scheduling appointments
Maxwell called to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn, who was a minor.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity