MAXWELL
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Elizabeth
|
Defendant victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Abusive coercive |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Recruiter victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Recruiter victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Accomplice co conspirator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Author/Victim
|
Victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Coconspirators |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Ransome
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional patronage |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Romantic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Adversarial defendant victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Annie
|
Adversarial defendant victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Unspecified |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Transactional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author of the document
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Victim perpetrator implied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SARAH
|
Unspecified |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Elizabeth
|
Unspecified |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-4
|
Groomer victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew A. Rohrbach
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional exploitative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David
|
Juror and defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury selection for Maxwell's trial, including a jury questionnaire where Juror 50 failed to accur... | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court denies Maxwell's motion for a new trial. | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's indictment was denied, trial proceeded, and she is serving a 20-year sentence. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Relocation of victims from Palm Beach to other places in the U.S. (including Southern District of... | Palm Beach, other places in... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell moved for rehearing en banc, which was denied. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion is being considered by the Court. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's consideration of categories of questions Maxwell argues are ambiguous. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Argument by Maxwell that perjury counts should be dismissed due to immateriality of statements. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | S2 superseding indictment moots Maxwell's grand jury challenge | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of expedited discovery timeline | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to dismiss perjury counts from a civil case deposition. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell contends that the NPA bars her prosecution as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's sentencing to concurrent terms of imprisonment (60, 120, 240 months) followed by superv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal arguments by Maxwell to dismiss indictment | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment based on fabricated stories and perjurious conspiracy by ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks writ of mandamus to direct District Court to modify protective order. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks to consolidate her criminal appeal with civil appeal Guiffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-241... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court denies Maxwell's motions to consolidate as moot. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell appeals denial of motion to modify a protective order. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013721.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a weekend trip the witness took to New Mexico, specifically probing whether Ghislaine Maxwell transported them. The witness denies having personal knowledge of Ghislaine's involvement and confirms that the trip was over a weekend, a fact they discussed with their mother and disclosed to the government.
DOJ-OGR-00013664.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from a case identified as 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It features the direct examination of a witness named A. Farmer, who is questioned about a past settlement received from a fund, the dismissal of a lawsuit against Maxwell and Epstein, and whether their civil case is concluded. A. Farmer confirms the civil case is over, they do not expect more money, and have no financial stake in the outcome of the current trial.
DOJ-OGR-00013662.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness identified as A. Farmer. The witness explains their motivation for testifying was to seek accountability, and confirms they were interviewed by law enforcement in New York in 2019 and have met with the government five or six times since. The witness also confirms having previously sued individuals named Maxwell and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00013661.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The witness testifies about speaking to the media regarding their experiences with Maxwell and Epstein, confirming interviews with the FBI in 2006/2007 and with reporters in 2016 and 2019, for which they were not paid. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, objects to a question about the witness's difficulty in speaking publicly, but the objection is overruled by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00013660.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The witness confirms having experiences with Epstein and Maxwell, which they first discussed with the media in 2002 and later with the FBI in 2006 or 2007. During the FBI interview, the witness reported that Maxwell had given them a massage and Epstein had gotten into bed with them.
DOJ-OGR-00013659.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring testimony from a witness identified as A. Farmer, also referred to as Annie. Annie discusses events from 1996, including a trip to Thailand and Vietnam, a conversation with her mother about not being raped, and her relationship with Dave Mulligan, to whom she also disclosed incidents involving Maxwell and Epstein at 'the ranch.'
DOJ-OGR-00013655.jpg
This court transcript details the testimony of a witness, A. Farmer, regarding her relationship with Maxwell and Epstein. Farmer describes feeling conflicted, being grateful for a trip they funded but also deeply disturbed by an uncomfortable experience with them in New Mexico, which made her want to avoid them permanently. She also testifies that the first person she told about the uncomfortable incident, without giving details, was her mother.
DOJ-OGR-00013652.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The witness describes flying home commercially to Phoenix, Arizona, and explains she did not write about her trip to New Mexico in her journal because she wanted to forget what happened there. She also confirms keeping boots that were purchased for her by Maxwell and Epstein during that trip, which were later packed away when her mother moved.
DOJ-OGR-00013651.jpg
This document is a court transcript of testimony from a witness identified as 'A. Farmer'. Farmer recounts her last day at a ranch in New Mexico with Epstein and Maxwell, describing a feeling of disorientation as their interest in her seemed different from the academic support she expected. She details a final conversation where she tried to discuss her studies with Maxwell, who appeared completely disinterested, before saying goodbye to both of them and leaving.
DOJ-OGR-00013648.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of witness A. Farmer. Farmer testifies that Ghislaine Maxwell set up a portable massage table in Farmer's room, instructed her to undress completely, and then touched her breasts inappropriately during the massage.
DOJ-OGR-00013645.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of A. Farmer's direct examination, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness recounts going to a movie theater in New Mexico with Epstein and Maxwell to see 'Primal Fear', describing odd, playful behavior between Epstein and Maxwell. Farmer testifies that throughout the movie, Epstein inappropriately touched her hand, foot, and arm in a 'blatant' manner, which she contrasts with his more concealed behavior in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00013644.jpg
This document is a court transcript of testimony from a witness identified as Farmer. She recounts being gifted expensive cowboy boots and subsequently going to the movies with Maxwell and Epstein. Farmer expresses initial hesitation about the movie outing due to a prior negative experience in a New York theater, but states she went because she believed it would be different with Maxwell present.
DOJ-OGR-00013642.jpg
This document is a transcript of court testimony from a witness identified as A. Farmer, filed on August 10, 2022. Farmer describes a weekend she spent as a teenager at a ranch with Epstein and Maxwell, noting that no other guests were present. She recounts her mixed feelings about the situation and describes her first impression of Maxwell as outgoing and seemingly expecting her arrival.
DOJ-OGR-00013641.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies about her observations of Epstein and Maxwell during a weekend at a ranch, stating her belief that they were 'romantic partners' based on their intimate behavior. Farmer confirms that she, Epstein, and Maxwell were the only individuals staying in a small residence on the property.
DOJ-OGR-00013636.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal argument over the admissibility of hearsay testimony during the direct examination of witness A. Farmer. Attorneys debate with the judge how to question the witness about why she was willing to see Jeffrey Epstein again, despite her discomfort, focusing on a conversation with her mother about Maxwell's presence. The discussion revolves around whether this testimony is offered for the truth of the matter asserted or to explain the witness's state of mind.
DOJ-OGR-00013619.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of witness A. Farmer by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. The witness testifies about a trip to New York after Christmas 1995, where she stayed with her sister for about a week and met Jeffrey Epstein twice. The witness is also asked to identify 'Government Exhibit 101', which she confirms is her high school photo from her junior year.
DOJ-OGR-00013614.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In it, a witness named Annie Farmer identifies the defendant, Maxwell, in the courtroom and testifies that Maxwell gave her a massage when she was 16 years old. At that time, Farmer was living in Arizona with her mother and sister, Ashley.
DOJ-OGR-00013373.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Hesse, by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Ms. Hesse testifies that she knew women came to a residence to give massages, even when Maxwell was absent, and that she took messages for them. She also confirms knowing about Maxwell's home in New York but denies any knowledge of a residence in Miami.
DOJ-OGR-00013369.jpg
This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, documenting the direct examination of a witness, Mrs. Hesse. The questioning, led by Ms. Moe, first confirms the name 'Carolyn' on an exhibit and then establishes that Mrs. Hesse's job was to work at the Palm Beach house specifically when Maxwell and Epstein were not there.
DOJ-OGR-00013344.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Mrs. Hesse. Hesse describes being instructed by Ghislaine (Maxwell) to record all phone messages in a specific notebook kept in the kitchen whenever Epstein and Maxwell were away from the house. The attorney, Ms. Moe, then presents Government Exhibits to the witness for identification.
DOJ-OGR-00010723.jpg
This document is a personal statement from a victim of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, filed as part of a legal case. The author describes the severe, long-term physical (Complex Regional Pain Syndrome) and psychological trauma they endured, and their journey toward healing through therapy. The arrests of Epstein and Maxwell provided a sense of validation, prompting the author to attend Maxwell's trial in Manhattan to seek justice and closure for the abuse that derailed their life for over two decades.
DOJ-OGR-00010721.jpg
This legal document is a victim's statement detailing her experience with Epstein and Maxwell. The narrator recounts being offered a job, which she declined, leading to anger from Maxwell. Later, Maxwell re-established contact, manipulated the narrator into a trip to Florida that cost her her job, and then began a three-year period of trafficking, rape, and assault in New York and Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00010711.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal filing dated June 23, 2022, regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that victims named Sarah and Elizabeth should be entitled to deliver oral victim impact statements at the sentencing. The filing requests that if the Court doubts this entitlement, they be granted more time to brief the issue, noting they only had 48 hours to respond to a previous court order.
DOJ-OGR-00010710.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that victims identified as Sarah and Elizabeth should be permitted to read their victim impact statements aloud at Maxwell's criminal sentencing. It cites legal precedents, such as United States v. Wilson and Kelly v. California, to support the court's authority to consider such testimony and asserts that doing so will not cause unfair prejudice to Maxwell. A footnote clarifies that Maxwell does not have the right to cross-examine victims during sentencing hearings.
DOJ-OGR-00010705.jpg
This page from a legal document discusses the psychological impact of crime on victims, citing academic research on PTSD and other traumas. It highlights the therapeutic value of victim impact statements in sentencing, referencing a study from Australia. The document concludes by stating that victims named Sarah and Elizabeth have already benefited from the prosecution and conviction of an individual named Maxwell.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Instruction to undress
She told me to get undressed.
Spending time vs Communicating
Witness clarifies distinction between spending physical time vs communicating. States she stopped spending time around age 24.
General life updates and invitations
The witness (Kate) testifies that she communicated with Maxwell by phone. Maxwell would ask about her life, if she was dating, and if she wanted to visit. Sexual topics were not discussed on the phone.
Reconsideration of response
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Scheduling an appointment for Carolyn
Carolyn's mom would receive a phone call, which Carolyn later learned was from Maxwell, and would hand the phone to Carolyn to schedule an appointment.
Scheduling massage appointments
The question implies that Maxwell would call Carolyn to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein, even after learning she was 14.
Scheduling an appointment for Carolyn
Shawn would receive a phone call from Maxwell and would then tell Carolyn that she had a phone call and instruct her to say yes to the appointment.
Epstein's sexual preferences and needs
Maxwell told the witness, Kate, that Epstein likes 'cute, young, pretty' girls and that he needed to have sex about three times a day. These conversations occurred frequently ('All the time') within the first couple of months after they met.
Instruction to touch Epstein
According to Kate's testimony, when Maxwell introduced her to Epstein, Maxwell told her to give his feet a squeeze to show how strong she was.
Massage
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Travel and an invitation to an island
Maxwell asked Carolyn about her travel history and invited her to an island. Carolyn declined, stating she was too young and her mother would not permit it.
Taking over the house
Maxwell told Juan Alessi that she was taking over the house right away when she arrived.
Reply to Government's Opposition
A reply brief cited as "Maxwell Reply at 18" where the Defendant asserts the government failed to prove its case.
Rule 29 Motion for Acquittal
A brief cited as "Maxwell Br. at 30" where the Defendant requests a judgment of acquittal on all counts.
Carolyn's career aspirations
Maxwell asked Carolyn what she wanted to do in the future, and Carolyn replied that she wanted to become a massage therapist.
Massages
Maxwell asked Annie if she had ever received a massage and told her she would have the opportunity to have one, describing how enjoyable it would be.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages while Maxwell was in New York.
Scheduling appointments
Maxwell would call Carolyn to ask if she was available for an appointment, sometimes mentioning that she and Mr. Epstein would be out of town and flying in.
Massage
MAXWELL sent an unsolicited message to Minor Victim-2, during which Minor Victim-2 was topless.
Reconsideration of the District Court's response
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of a response from the District Court, claiming it resulted in a constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Civil Case Testimony
Testimony given by Maxwell in a civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell).
Epstein's whereabouts
Maxwell informing Carolyn that Epstein was on a jog or would be back soon and that she could go upstairs to set up.
Reconsideration of response to jury note
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of Judge Nathan's response to the jury's note and raised issues of constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Scheduling massages
Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages when Maxwell was in New York.
Small talk during massage
making small talk
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity