Assistant U.S. Attorney

Person
Mentions
59
Relationships
117
Events
159
Documents
29

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
117 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Civil Attorney (Unnamed)
Conflict of interest
6
2
View
person Roy Black
Legal representative
5
5
View
person Judge Berman
Legal representative
4
4
View
person Jack Goldberger
Legal representative
4
4
View
person Martin G. Weinberg
Opposing counsel
3
3
View
person Redacted Recipient
Business associate
3
3
View
person Roberta Kaplan
Legal representative
3
3
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Investigator subject
3
3
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Prosecutor subject
3
3
View
person USANYS Staff
Business associate
3
3
View
person four FBI agents
Professional collaborative
2
2
View
person victims
Investigator witness
2
2
View
person FBI special agent
Professional collaborative
2
2
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Prosecutor defendant
2
2
View
person Bruce Barket
Opposing counsel
2
2
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Roy Black
Opposing counsel
2
2
View
person Judge Pitman
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Jay
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Victor Norris Hamilton
Contractor supervisor
2
2
View
person SARAH NETBURN
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Jeff
Business associate
2
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Prosecutor subject
2
2
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Investigative
1
1
View
person Lt. Craig
Professional interagency cooperation
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Agreement to speak again in the near future for subsequent discussions. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The government is accused of violating due process by materially misrepresenting facts before a c... court View
2022-06-29 N/A Email discussion regarding the submission of a 'Director's Award' nomination for the Epstein/Maxw... New York View
2021-11-09 N/A Filing or transmission of a legal motion to preclude testimony/evidence regarding Dietz and Loftus Southern District of New York View
2021-02-25 N/A Assistant U.S. Attorney received a call from a woman identifying as a former victim of Jeffrey Ep... Phone call (Desk line) View
2021-02-25 N/A Initial call received by AUSA from a woman claiming to be an Epstein victim. Phone (Desk line) View
2021-02-25 N/A Initial call received by AUSA from a woman identifying as an Epstein victim. Desk line (Phone) View
2020-10-11 N/A Deletion of duplicate emails related to the Epstein case to maintain file integrity. Southern District of New York View
2020-08-13 N/A Sending of next round of discovery materials via FedEx. SDNY to MDC View
2020-08-11 N/A Proposed follow-up call between SDNY and Gary Bloxsome. Phone (London/New York) View
2020-08-06 N/A Planned mailing of hard drive containing discovery materials to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC. MDC View
2020-08-03 N/A Scheduled call at 4:00 p.m. (LDN time) Phone/Remote View
2020-07-27 N/A Conversation between SDNY and Gary Bloxsome Phone/Remote View
2020-07-26 N/A Email sent regarding SDNY investigation with attached letter. Southern District of New York View
2020-07-22 N/A Phone call from 'Brad' (Victims' Counsel) to Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding response to defens... Phone Call View
2020-07-20 N/A WebEx discussion between SDNY and Fieldfisher attorneys. Virtual (WebEx) View
2020-07-16 N/A Conversation between SDNY and recipients regarding estate materials. Phone call (implied) View
2020-07-14 N/A Proposal of a 'Negotiation Period' regarding Prince Andrew's interview Email Correspondence View
2020-07-09 N/A Submission of proposed protective order to defense counsel. Southern District of New Yo... View
2020-07-08 N/A Request made to update website with new case information. New York View
2020-07-01 N/A Communication regarding zip code 03221 (likely related to tracking/arrest of Maxwell). New Hampshire (implied by z... View
2020-06-29 N/A Issuance and mailing of a subpoena to UBS. Southern District of New York View
2020-05-22 N/A Internal SDNY correspondence regarding supplemental memo for Maxwell investigation and perjury. Southern District of New York View
2020-05-06 N/A Email sent listing status of prosecution memos Southern District of New York View
2020-04-09 N/A Assistant U.S. Attorney sends a 'crabby email' to chiefs regarding daily pressure and deadlines o... Southern District of New York View

DOJ-OGR-00002359(3).jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The text argues that the government failed to acknowledge that a redacted individual had voluntarily approached prosecutors multiple times before a grand jury subpoena was issued. It references court appearances in March and April 2019 and alleges the Assistant U.S. Attorney omitted mention of prior contacts between the redacted individual and the government.

Court filing / legal motion (case 1:20-cr-00330-ajn - us v. ghislaine maxwell)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002359(2).jpg

This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government failed to acknowledge it had approached prosecutors multiple times before a grand jury subpoena was issued. It cites legal appearances in March and April 2019 and references testimony from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (in Exhibits D and E) who allegedly omitted mentioning these prior contacts.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002359(1).jpg

This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government failed to acknowledge that prosecutors had been approached multiple times by another party prior to a grand jury subpoena being issued. The document alleges that the government and an Assistant U.S. Attorney continued to omit mention of these prior contacts during court appearances in March and April 2019.

Legal document
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019229.jpg

This document is page 6 of a letter to the Honorable Mark Filip, dated May 19, 2008, detailing complaints about the conduct of federal prosecutors in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The text alleges that prosecutors made unprecedented financial demands, including a requirement for Epstein to pay $150,000 to alleged victims (most of whom were later found to be adults, not minors) and to fund a specific civil attorney chosen by the prosecution. It further alleges a conflict of interest where an Assistant U.S. Attorney recommended a civil lawyer connected to their boyfriend, and notes that First Assistant Sloman's former law partner, Mr. Herman, began filing civil suits against Epstein.

Legal correspondence / letter (page 6)
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$100.00
1 transactions
Net Flow
-$100.00
1 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
2019-05-28 Paid Assistant U.S. At... Airline (implied) $100.00 Cancellation fee for personal flight caused by ... View
As Sender
50
As Recipient
31
Total
81

Re: Letter from Tartaglione counsel

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: Staff Attorney (MCC)

Inquiry about the date the facilities manager tested the shower.

Email
2019-08-21

Letter from Tartaglione counsel

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: Staff Attorney (MCC)

Notification that Bruce Barket filed a letter on ECF and request for a call.

Email
2019-08-20

Re: [Redacted] - Epstein

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: Joseph E. Nascimento

Asking if client is available for a 'proffer' on September 4th.

Email
2019-08-19

Contacting witness

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: Witness's Lawyer

AUSA spoke with the lawyer, who suggested contacting the witness directly and provided her number.

Call/meeting
2019-07-23

RE: financial documents (Epstein)

From: Hamilton (Contractor)
To: Assistant U.S. Attorney

Confirmation that discs are ready; asking where to bring them.

Email
2019-07-18

RE: financial documents (Epstein)

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: Hamilton, [Redacted] [...

Request to burn specific folders (American Express and Deutsche Bank subpoena returns) to a disc for a Special Agent and Detective.

Email
2019-07-17

Representation of pilot

From: Kate Cassidy
To: Assistant U.S. Attorney

Discussed representation of Epstein's pilot, subpoena service, and status in investigation.

Call
2019-07-16

RE: case records scanning

From: FBI DocLab/Scanning Team
To: Assistant U.S. Attorney

Clarifying that discs were copied but not processed, and discussing flagging locations of unscanned images.

Email
2019-07-15

RE: case records scanning

From: FBI DocLab/Scanning Team
To: Assistant U.S. Attorney

Scanning finished. Notes that 3 '1As' (evidence items 1A10, 1A28, 1A84) were missing from jackets but retrieved from network. Notes that pornographic images of young girls were NOT scanned per protocol and replaced with 'DocLab kicksheets'.

Email
2019-07-12

RE: [Redacted] - Epstein

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: Joseph E. Nascimento

Confirming meeting location at the Hilton in West Palm Beach.

Email
2019-07-11

N/A

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: Kaiser

Phone conversation discussing the client and scheduling the meeting.

Call
2019-07-10

Re: [Redacted] - Epstein

From: Joseph E. Nascimento
To: Assistant U.S. Attorney

Requesting a meeting on Friday afternoon and asking: 'Please send me your proffer letter.'

Email
2019-07-09

RE: [Redacted] - Epstein

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: Joe

Confirming call time at 10:00 AM after negotiation regarding 'Florida approach agents' briefing schedule.

Email
2019-07-08

RE: U.S. v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: Pretrial Services/Counsel

Sending Government bail memorandum arguing against release conditions.

Email
2019-07-08

Re: [Redacted] - Epstein

From: defense attorney
To: Assistant U.S. Attorney

Agreeing to set a time for Tuesday morning.

Email
2019-07-07

RE: [Redacted] - Epstein

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: Joe

Agreeing to schedule a call for Tuesday.

Email
2019-07-07

Re: [Redacted] - Epstein

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: defense attorney

Offering to schedule a call on Tuesday, possibly before the attorney meets with the client.

Email
2019-07-07

[Redacted] - Epstein

From: Joe (Attorney)
To: Assistant U.S. Attorney

Informing SDNY that a former client of late partner Alan Ross was served a grand jury subpoena by an agent earlier that day. Requesting a call.

Email
2019-07-06

RE: case records scanning

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: FBI DocLab/Scanning Team

Requesting a full new scan rather than relying on 2013 data to ensure accuracy for discovery.

Email
2019-07-03

RE: case records scanning

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: FBI DocLab/Scanning Team

Initial introduction from prosecutors. Identifies 23 boxes of papers from FBI case files 72-MM-113327 and 31E-MM-108062.

Email
2019-06-27

FW: travel approval request

From: Legal Assistant (SDNY)
To: Assistant U.S. Attorney

Forwarding info to Budget Admins regarding personal credit card refunds.

Email
2019-05-28

Re: travel approval request

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: Approver (Redacted)

Requesting to fly straight to San Francisco for a wedding after Florida interviews instead of returning to NYC.

Email
2019-05-24

RE: documents for Relativity

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: Redacted Recipient

Request to load 'Boies Schiller first subpoena response' into Relativity folder structure for US v. Epstein.

Email
2019-03-25

travel approval request

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: Approver (Redacted)

Initial request for travel for United States v. Epstein investigation.

Email
2019-03-14

RE: Epstein investigation

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: Unit Chief

Follow up on scanned records (16,000 vs 29,000 pages) and requesting an index.

Email
2019-02-13

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity