| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Civil Attorney (Unnamed)
|
Conflict of interest |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Berman
|
Legal representative |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Jack Goldberger
|
Legal representative |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Martin G. Weinberg
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigator subject |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor subject |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
USANYS Staff
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
four FBI agents
|
Professional collaborative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
victims
|
Investigator witness |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
FBI special agent
|
Professional collaborative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor defendant |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Bruce Barket
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Judge Pitman
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jay
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Victor Norris Hamilton
|
Contractor supervisor |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
SARAH NETBURN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor subject |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lt. Craig
|
Professional interagency cooperation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Agreement to speak again in the near future for subsequent discussions. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The government is accused of violating due process by materially misrepresenting facts before a c... | court | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Email discussion regarding the submission of a 'Director's Award' nomination for the Epstein/Maxw... | New York | View |
| 2021-11-09 | N/A | Filing or transmission of a legal motion to preclude testimony/evidence regarding Dietz and Loftus | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-02-25 | N/A | Assistant U.S. Attorney received a call from a woman identifying as a former victim of Jeffrey Ep... | Phone call (Desk line) | View |
| 2021-02-25 | N/A | Initial call received by AUSA from a woman claiming to be an Epstein victim. | Phone (Desk line) | View |
| 2021-02-25 | N/A | Initial call received by AUSA from a woman identifying as an Epstein victim. | Desk line (Phone) | View |
| 2020-10-11 | N/A | Deletion of duplicate emails related to the Epstein case to maintain file integrity. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-08-13 | N/A | Sending of next round of discovery materials via FedEx. | SDNY to MDC | View |
| 2020-08-11 | N/A | Proposed follow-up call between SDNY and Gary Bloxsome. | Phone (London/New York) | View |
| 2020-08-06 | N/A | Planned mailing of hard drive containing discovery materials to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC. | MDC | View |
| 2020-08-03 | N/A | Scheduled call at 4:00 p.m. (LDN time) | Phone/Remote | View |
| 2020-07-27 | N/A | Conversation between SDNY and Gary Bloxsome | Phone/Remote | View |
| 2020-07-26 | N/A | Email sent regarding SDNY investigation with attached letter. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-22 | N/A | Phone call from 'Brad' (Victims' Counsel) to Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding response to defens... | Phone Call | View |
| 2020-07-20 | N/A | WebEx discussion between SDNY and Fieldfisher attorneys. | Virtual (WebEx) | View |
| 2020-07-16 | N/A | Conversation between SDNY and recipients regarding estate materials. | Phone call (implied) | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Proposal of a 'Negotiation Period' regarding Prince Andrew's interview | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2020-07-09 | N/A | Submission of proposed protective order to defense counsel. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2020-07-08 | N/A | Request made to update website with new case information. | New York | View |
| 2020-07-01 | N/A | Communication regarding zip code 03221 (likely related to tracking/arrest of Maxwell). | New Hampshire (implied by z... | View |
| 2020-06-29 | N/A | Issuance and mailing of a subpoena to UBS. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-05-22 | N/A | Internal SDNY correspondence regarding supplemental memo for Maxwell investigation and perjury. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-05-06 | N/A | Email sent listing status of prosecution memos | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-04-09 | N/A | Assistant U.S. Attorney sends a 'crabby email' to chiefs regarding daily pressure and deadlines o... | Southern District of New York | View |
This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The text argues that the government failed to acknowledge that a redacted individual had voluntarily approached prosecutors multiple times before a grand jury subpoena was issued. It references court appearances in March and April 2019 and alleges the Assistant U.S. Attorney omitted mention of prior contacts between the redacted individual and the government.
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government failed to acknowledge it had approached prosecutors multiple times before a grand jury subpoena was issued. It cites legal appearances in March and April 2019 and references testimony from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (in Exhibits D and E) who allegedly omitted mentioning these prior contacts.
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government failed to acknowledge that prosecutors had been approached multiple times by another party prior to a grand jury subpoena being issued. The document alleges that the government and an Assistant U.S. Attorney continued to omit mention of these prior contacts during court appearances in March and April 2019.
This document is page 6 of a letter to the Honorable Mark Filip, dated May 19, 2008, detailing complaints about the conduct of federal prosecutors in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The text alleges that prosecutors made unprecedented financial demands, including a requirement for Epstein to pay $150,000 to alleged victims (most of whom were later found to be adults, not minors) and to fund a specific civil attorney chosen by the prosecution. It further alleges a conflict of interest where an Assistant U.S. Attorney recommended a civil lawyer connected to their boyfriend, and notes that First Assistant Sloman's former law partner, Mr. Herman, began filing civil suits against Epstein.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-28 | Paid | Assistant U.S. At... | Airline (implied) | $100.00 | Cancellation fee for personal flight caused by ... | View |
Inquiry about the date the facilities manager tested the shower.
Notification that Bruce Barket filed a letter on ECF and request for a call.
Asking if client is available for a 'proffer' on September 4th.
AUSA spoke with the lawyer, who suggested contacting the witness directly and provided her number.
Confirmation that discs are ready; asking where to bring them.
Request to burn specific folders (American Express and Deutsche Bank subpoena returns) to a disc for a Special Agent and Detective.
Discussed representation of Epstein's pilot, subpoena service, and status in investigation.
Clarifying that discs were copied but not processed, and discussing flagging locations of unscanned images.
Scanning finished. Notes that 3 '1As' (evidence items 1A10, 1A28, 1A84) were missing from jackets but retrieved from network. Notes that pornographic images of young girls were NOT scanned per protocol and replaced with 'DocLab kicksheets'.
Confirming meeting location at the Hilton in West Palm Beach.
Phone conversation discussing the client and scheduling the meeting.
Requesting a meeting on Friday afternoon and asking: 'Please send me your proffer letter.'
Confirming call time at 10:00 AM after negotiation regarding 'Florida approach agents' briefing schedule.
Sending Government bail memorandum arguing against release conditions.
Agreeing to set a time for Tuesday morning.
Agreeing to schedule a call for Tuesday.
Offering to schedule a call on Tuesday, possibly before the attorney meets with the client.
Informing SDNY that a former client of late partner Alan Ross was served a grand jury subpoena by an agent earlier that day. Requesting a call.
Requesting a full new scan rather than relying on 2013 data to ensure accuracy for discovery.
Initial introduction from prosecutors. Identifies 23 boxes of papers from FBI case files 72-MM-113327 and 31E-MM-108062.
Forwarding info to Budget Admins regarding personal credit card refunds.
Requesting to fly straight to San Francisco for a wedding after Florida interviews instead of returning to NYC.
Request to load 'Boies Schiller first subpoena response' into Relativity folder structure for US v. Epstein.
Initial request for travel for United States v. Epstein investigation.
Follow up on scanned records (16,000 vs 29,000 pages) and requesting an index.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity