AUDREY STRAUSS
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional subordinate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Denial of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional hierarchical |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional superior subordinate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicolas Roos
|
Subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor vs defendant |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison G. Moe
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor subject |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (USANYS)
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional superior subordinate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Stephen E. Boyd
|
Professional government |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown Sender
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Co-Chief
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Testimony/deposition | The deponent is questioned about their awareness of Mr. Epstein's sexual activities with others a... | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-05 | N/A | Date subpoena was issued/signed | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-08-12 | N/A | Transmission of discovery materials to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC Brooklyn. | MDC Brooklyn | View |
| 2021-07-07 | N/A | Subpoena issued by Audrey Strauss. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-07-01 | Legal filing | The United States Attorney's office filed Document 309 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-05-21 | Legal filing | The U.S. Attorney's office submitted the conclusion of a legal motion arguing that the court shou... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-05-20 | N/A | Signing of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-04-15 | Court filing | The U.S. Government filed this letter with the court. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-04-09 | N/A | Discussion regarding Main Justice FOIA response and potential document production reconsideration. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2021-04-06 | Court filing | Document 196 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-03-29 | N/A | Letter sent regarding discovery materials for Minor Victim-4 in US v. Maxwell | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-03-29 | N/A | Filing of Document 187 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN | United States District Court | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Internal USANYS correspondence regarding issuing a subpoena. | New York (implied SDNY office) | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Approval of friendly subpoena issuance | View | |
| 2021-02-10 | N/A | Law360 article published regarding potential replacements for SDNY U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss. | New York | View |
| 2020-12-18 | Legal filing | Document 100 was filed with the court in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-18 | Legal filing | Document 100 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-17 | N/A | Transmission of discovery materials to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC Brooklyn via Federal Express. | New York, NY to Brooklyn, NY | View |
| 2020-12-16 | Legal filing | Submission of a legal document arguing for the denial of a defendant's Renewed Bail Motion. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-12-16 | Legal filing | The U.S. Attorney's office filed a document arguing that a defendant's 'Renewed Bail Motion' shou... | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-12-16 | Legal document creation | The conclusion of a legal motion arguing for the denial of a Renewed Bail Motion was dated. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-12-03 | N/A | Transmission of discovery materials to MDC for Ghislaine Maxwell | New York, NY to Brooklyn, NY | View |
| 2020-11-23 | N/A | Filing of Document 74 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-11-12 | N/A | Submission of OPR's final report on the Jeffrey Epstein matter to USANYS. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2020-11-05 | N/A | DAG Meeting Case Overview | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020928.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire (Juror ID 50) for legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on March 9, 2022. The prospective juror denies having any association with the NYPD and states they have no opinion of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, or former Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss that would impede their ability to be a fair and impartial juror.
DOJ-OGR-00020759.jpg
This document is the cover page for a superseding indictment filed on March 29, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case is United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, who is named as the defendant. The indictment was presented by United States Attorney Audrey Strauss and signed by the grand jury foreperson.
DOJ-OGR-00020758.jpg
This document is page 23 of 24 from a legal filing (Document 187) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 29, 2021. It details the 'Substitute Asset Provision,' outlining the government's intent to seize alternative property from the defendant if the original proceeds of the alleged crimes (specifically Count Six) cannot be located, have been transferred, or diminished in value. The document is signed by the Grand Jury Foreperson and United States Attorney Audrey Strauss.
DOJ-OGR-00002338(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on February 1, 2021, is the U.S. Government's response regarding a defendant's access to a laptop for reviewing discovery materials. The U.S. Attorney's office argues that the current arrangement, where the MDC and BOP provide the defendant with 65 hours of laptop access per week plus optional weekend desktop access, is sufficient, noting that the trial is still approximately six months away.
DOJ-OGR-00002336.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 28, 2021. The US Attorney's office is addressing Judge Nathan regarding proposed redactions to the defendant's motions (Motions 3, 10, and 11) to protect victim-witness privacy and the integrity of the ongoing investigation. The government agrees to most redactions but intends to submit limited additional redactions for Motion 3 via email under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00002336(1).jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 28, 2021. The US Attorney's office is addressing Judge Nathan regarding proposed redactions to the defendant's motions (Motions 3, 10, and 11) to protect victim-witness privacy and the integrity of the ongoing investigation. The government agrees to most redactions but intends to submit limited additional redactions for Motion 3 via email under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00002232.jpg
A legal letter dated December 30, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter confirms that neither the prosecution nor the defense proposes any redactions to the Court's December 28, 2020 Opinion and Order denying Maxwell's renewed bail motion. The document is signed by Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00002232(1).jpg
This document is a letter filed on December 30, 2020, by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutors inform the court that, after conferring with the defense, both parties agree that no redactions are necessary for the Court's December 28, 2020 Opinion and Order denying Maxwell's renewed bail motion. Consequently, they have no objection to the order being filed publicly in its entirety.
DOJ-OGR-00002197.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing from the Acting U.S. Attorney's office, dated December 16, 2020, and filed on December 18, 2020. The prosecution argues that a defendant's Renewed Bail Motion should be denied, citing the Court's previous finding that the defendant 'poses a substantial actual risk of flight' and that no conditions of bail can assure their presence in court.
DOJ-OGR-00002197(1).jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing from the office of the Acting United States Attorney, dated December 16, 2020, and filed on December 18, 2020. The prosecution argues that a defendant's 'Renewed Bail Motion' should be denied, reiterating the Court's previous finding that the defendant 'poses a substantial actual risk of flight' and that no conditions of bail can ensure their presence in court.
DOJ-OGR-00001843.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing from the US Attorney's Office for the SDNY regarding the detention conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutors argue that Warden Tellez should provide a first-hand accounting of why Maxwell is subject to strict surveillance measures (body scans, flashlight checks) despite 24/7 camera monitoring, noting that the MDC Legal Department would only provide second-hand information.
DOJ-OGR-00001834.jpg
This document is a court order from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Government requested to delay the disclosure of sensitive witness information to the defense to protect an ongoing investigation and encourage victim cooperation. Judge Alison J. Nathan granted the request for delay but rejected the Government's proposed timeline, ordering that the materials be produced by March 12, 2021, to ensure the defense can adequately prepare for trial.
DOJ-OGR-00001824.jpg
This document is a Mandate and Summary Order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061-cr). Issued on November 9, 2020, following an October 19, 2020 term, it lists the presiding judges and legal representation for both the prosecution (SDNY) and the defense. The document confirms the filing of the order in the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00001782.jpg
This document is an affidavit of certification filed on October 6, 2020, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Comey attests that the government attempted to negotiate with Maxwell's defense counsel to delay the disclosure of materials concerning victims of Jeffrey Epstein, but the defense refused to consent, leading to an inability to reach an agreement. The affidavit is filed pursuant to Local Criminal Rule 16.1 to certify this impasse to the court.
DOJ-OGR-00022140.jpg
A formal letter filed on July 29, 2021, to Judge Analisa Torres regarding the case United States v. Tova Noel et al. (related to the guards on duty during Jeffrey Epstein's suicide). Assistant U.S. Attorney Jessica Lonergan informs the court she is leaving the U.S. Attorney's Office for other employment and requests to be withdrawn as counsel of record.
DOJ-OGR-00022130.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) dated May 20, 2021. The text is upside down in the image. It appears to be the signature page of a Deferred Prosecution Agreement involving the SDNY (represented by Audrey Strauss, signed by Jessica Lonergan). The agreement stipulates that if the defendant completes supervision and fulfills terms, the Government will move to dismiss the indictment. The case number corresponds to United States v. Torgerson (involving the prison guards on duty when Jeffrey Epstein died).
DOJ-OGR-00022123.jpg
This legal document, filed on May 21, 2021, is a submission from the United States Attorney's office to the Court, signed by Assistant United States Attorneys Jessica Lonergan and Nicolas Roos. It addresses the scheduling of a court proceeding, stating that if the proposed date is inconvenient or if an in-person proceeding is desired, the parties can propose alternative dates. Copies were sent to Defense Counsel and Pretrial Services.
DOJ-OGR-00022119.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Analisa Torres, filed on April 15, 2021. The prosecution provides an update on the trial schedule for defendants Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, proposing dates in the third quarter of 2021 based on the availability of their respective counsel. The letter concludes by requesting, with the defendants' consent, that the time until the new trial date be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
DOJ-OGR-00019643.jpg
This is the conclusion page (page 36 of 37) of a legal filing submitted on October 2, 2020, by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The filing argues that the District Court's order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to modify a Protective Order should be affirmed. It is signed by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys Pomerantz, Comey, Moe, and Metzner.
DOJ-OGR-00019557.jpg
This document is the final page (page 4) of a legal filing dated August 21, 2020, submitted to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Maxwell). The Government, represented by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz, requests a date approximately 180 days later to update the Court on its position regarding the sealing of materials. The document indicates copies were sent to all counsel of record by email.
DOJ-OGR-00019553.jpg
This is page 5 of a legal letter filed on August 21, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Government, represented by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and AUSAs Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz, argues that the defendant's request to use criminal discovery materials in separate Civil Cases should be denied. The Government asserts this is an attempt to bypass protective orders and falsely accuse the Government and an unnamed 'Recipient' of malfeasance.
DOJ-OGR-00019521.jpg
This legal document, dated July 28, 2020, is a filing from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution argues against a defendant's motion to impose restrictions on the government and third parties, labeling the request as unprecedented and without legal basis. The government urges the court to deny the defendant's motion and instead implement the government's own proposed protective order.
DOJ-OGR-00019514.jpg
This document is the signature page for a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 27, 2020. It is ordered by Judge Alison J. Nathan and shows the agreement and consent of both the prosecution, led by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, and the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by her legal counsel. The specific nature of the order is not detailed on this page.
DOJ-OGR-00019492.jpg
This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell arguing that her right to a fair trial has been prejudiced by public statements made by the prosecution. It specifically cites a press conference held by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss following Maxwell's July 2, 2020 arrest, quoting her statements to the New York Law Journal and the Washington Post as evidence of prejudicial commentary on Maxwell's credibility and guilt.
DOJ-OGR-00019489.jpg
This document is the cover page of a superseding indictment, case number S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), filed on July 8, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The indictment is brought by the United States of America against the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and is presented by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Explanation of enhanced security schedule and flashlight checks.
Friendly Subpoena to [Redacted] Attorney
Requesting permission to send a friendly subpoena to an attorney to obtain a settlement agreement between a victim and Epstein from a 2009 civil suit.
Re: Friendly Subpoena to [Redacted] Attorney
Approved
Friendly Subpoena to [Redacted] Attorney
Requesting approval to send a subpoena to an attorney interviewed in Florida to obtain a 2009 settlement agreement between a victim and Epstein.
Friendly Subpoena to [Redacted] Attorney
Requesting approval to send a 'friendly subpoena' to an attorney to obtain a 2009 settlement agreement between a victim and Epstein. The attorney is willing but needs the subpoena. The document is relevant to the Maxwell investigation.
Re: Friendly Subpoena to [Redacted] Attorney
Approved
Re: [Redacted] 91A1040
Attorney Lombardino informs US Attorney Strauss that his client (former FBI/Lt. Col) at Clinton Correctional Facility possesses important information regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, and requests an interview.
Arrest of Ms. Maxwell
Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss held a press conference immediately following Ms. Maxwell's arrest, where she commented on Maxwell's credibility and alleged guilt, which this document argues was prejudicial.
Arrest of Ms. Maxwell and announcement of charges
Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss held a press conference immediately following Ms. Maxwell's arrest, commenting on her credibility and alleged guilt, which this document argues was prejudicial.
FW: GM remarks - electronic copy
Discussing editing the remarks to be shorter and more natural while comporting with the indictment.
FW: GM Press Materials
Sending edits on draft remarks geared toward simplifying language.
Re: GM Press Materials
Many thanks.
GM Press Materials (implied)
Submitting draft remarks and Q&A for a potential press conference regarding Ghislaine Maxwell.
GM Press Materials
Sender informs Audrey they have put together draft remarks and a Q&A for a potential press conference next week regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. Mentions working with the press office on a visual.
Re: Do we have transcript of hearing?
Confirming they will send it and are ready to do updates.
Re: Do we have transcript of hearing?
Instructing to send transcript now so she can pass it along, then will call.
RE: Do we have transcript of hearing?
Sending the attached transcript (J8RpEPSf.pdf).
Do we have transcript of hearing?
Asking if they have the transcript because [Redacted] is asking for it.
Automatic reply: Your opening
Automatic reply stating the sender is on trial before Judge Ronnie Abrams and providing alternative contacts for United States v. Epstein case matters.
Epstein memo
Audrey – Attached is a revised (and shortened) memo for ODAG.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity