MS. POMERANTZ
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
61 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Flatley
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Drescher
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN
|
Professional |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination testimony of witness Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of witness 'Kate' | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Stephen Flatley | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 5 into evidence. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of A. Farmer's testimony. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Calling of witness David Mulligan. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lisa Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination testimony regarding sexual abuse disclosure statistics. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness 'Kate' regarding exhibits 3513-014. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Defendant's Exhibit MA1 into evidence under seal. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding the 'Craven article' and the definition of grooming. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court testimony regarding the nature of Epstein and Maxwell's relationship. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 424 into evidence during the testimony of Mr. Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio regarding Government Exhibit 3. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Jane | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Lisa Rocchio | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court Sidebar/Discussion without Jury | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Witness Kate is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about a visit to Maxwell's house and is shown Governm... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2049. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Redirect examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2213. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2231. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Redirect examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2245. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of JANICE SWAIN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2247. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Witness Annie Farmer is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz, identifies the defendant in the courtroom, a... | courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016561.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about her observations of Jeffrey Epstein's relationships, stating she believed he and Celina Midelfart were a couple. She also states that Ghislaine Maxwell was unaware that Espinosa was buying flowers for Midelfart on Epstein's behalf, possibly during a time when Maxwell and Epstein were also in a romantic relationship.
DOJ-OGR-00016560.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness testifies about guests visiting Jeffrey Epstein's office, noting that visits occurred behind closed doors. The questioning specifically focuses on Celina Midelfart, revealing the witness was tasked with sending her flowers (specifically orchids) on Epstein's behalf. The page ends with an overruled objection regarding whether the witness perceived a romantic relationship between Epstein and Midelfart.
DOJ-OGR-00016548.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. The witness is questioned about their observations of the relationship between individuals named Jane and Mr. Epstein. Espinosa testifies to seeing them interact in an office three or four times and describes their impression of the relationship as "loving."
DOJ-OGR-00016547.jpg
This document is a partial court transcript from the direct examination of Ms. Espinosa on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on an individual named Jane, her relationship as Jeffrey's goddaughter, and how this status influenced her treatment in 'the office' where her mother also worked. The examination also inquires about Jane's siblings and the extent of contact between Jane's mother and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00016541.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing testimony from Espinosa. The testimony covers her trip to Europe three years prior, where she stayed at a residence after contacting Ghislaine, and questions about the residence's features. It also includes questions and answers regarding Epstein's charitable donations.
DOJ-OGR-00016540.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa confirms knowledge of two of Ghislaine's residences: a townhouse on 65th Street in New York and a property at 44 Kinnerton Street in London, which Espinosa states they visited three years prior. The witness also testifies that to their knowledge, Ghislaine never resided with Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00016530.jpg
This document is page 47 of a court transcript featuring the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa testifies about the properties owned by Jeffrey Epstein at the start of their employment (Zorro Ranch, 9 East 71st St, El Brillo) and subsequent acquisitions, specifically a Paris apartment and Little Saint James island. The witness notes that the island's name was changed to 'Little Saint Jeffs' and describes the preparation of the island as a 'humongous project' involving themselves and Ghislaine.
DOJ-OGR-00016507.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over evidence. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, seeks to admit photographs given to him by Ms. Espinosa, which were sent to her by a soap opera star named Jane. The government's attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, objects to the admission of these photographs, questioning their relevance to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00016482.jpg
This document is an index page (Page 266 of 267) from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It lists the examination of four witnesses: William Brown, Annie Farmer, David James Mulligan, and Janice Swain. The index details which attorneys conducted the direct, cross, and redirect examinations for each witness, referencing specific page numbers in the full transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00016451.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the conclusion of testimony by a witness named Ms. Swain, who confirms she was in Germany while a person named Annie was in Thailand. Following her excusal, attorney Ms. Moe formally announces that the government rests its case.
DOJ-OGR-00016449.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness Swain) filed on August 10, 2022. The witness testifies that while they had phone calls with Jeffrey Epstein, they never discussed Ghislaine Maxwell and have never spoken to Maxwell personally. The questioning also covers discussions with Epstein regarding a trip to New Mexico involving individuals named Annie and Maria.
DOJ-OGR-00016447.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Swain by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The witness testifies that they never met, spoke to, or received calls from Ghislaine Maxwell, but did have a phone call with Jeffrey Epstein wherein Epstein referenced the witness's wife. The defense attempts to ask if Epstein admitted to keeping secrets from Maxwell or dating other women, drawing an objection from the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00016446.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Swain. Swain recounts multiple attempts to ask a person named Annie about a trip she took to New Mexico, specifically after Annie's return from Thailand and Vietnam in the summer of 1996. Annie was consistently evasive and refused to discuss the trip, repeatedly stating, "I'm not going to let it ruin my life."
DOJ-OGR-00016445.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Swain by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The questioning focuses on what another individual, Annie, may have told the witness about who paid for her trips to Thailand, Vietnam, and New Mexico. The testimony is heavily contested, with opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger, successfully objecting on grounds of hearsay, preventing the witness from revealing who paid for the trips.
DOJ-OGR-00016443.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where a witness named Swain is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz. Swain testifies that a person named Annie took a weekend trip to New Mexico in the spring of 1996, that Epstein paid for the trip, and that Swain personally drove Annie to the airport. The witness denies ever having spoken to or met a person named Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00016442.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Swain - direct examination) filed on August 10, 2022. The witness describes a phone call with Jeffrey Epstein regarding a trip to New Mexico for 'academically gifted' students, including a girl named Annie. During the call, Epstein falsely claimed that Ghislaine Maxwell was his wife and that she would be chaperoning the girls to reassure the witness.
DOJ-OGR-00016439.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Swain. Swain recounts her first phone conversations with Jeffrey Epstein in 1995, stating that he called her to invite a woman named Maria on a work trip to Florida and subsequently discussed Maria's art career and talent with her over several calls.
DOJ-OGR-00016438.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Swain. The witness identifies a girl named Annie from a photograph (Government Exhibit 101) and discusses college plans. The testimony also establishes that a woman named Maria lived in New York in 1995 working as an artist, and concludes with the witness confirming they spoke with Jeffrey Epstein on the phone.
DOJ-OGR-00016437.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination dated August 10, 2022. An unnamed witness, Annie's mother, testifies about Annie's background, stating she was born in Missouri and grew up there, in Florida, and in Arizona. The testimony focuses on the year 1995, during which the witness was a divorced single mother with a 'very limited income', working as a sales representative and living with Annie and a younger daughter.
DOJ-OGR-00016436.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Swain, by attorney Ms. Pomerantz, where the witness identifies Maria Farmer's middle child as Annie Farmer. The questioning then leads to the identification of Government Exhibit 13 as Annie Farmer's birth certificate.
DOJ-OGR-00016435.jpg
This document is page 219 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (filed Aug 10, 2022). It depicts the swearing-in and start of the direct examination of witness Janice Swain by attorney Ms. Pomerantz. Swain identifies herself, states she is 71 years old, a high school graduate, and currently works as a sales representative with three children.
DOJ-OGR-00016434.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the end of the testimony of a witness named Mulligan, who speaks briefly about a memorable conversation with someone named Annie regarding New Mexico. After Mulligan is excused, the government's attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, calls the next witness, Janice Swain.
DOJ-OGR-00016433.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Mr. Mulligan. The questioning establishes that Mulligan had spoken to The New York Times about the case and that an individual named Annie Farmer attended his recent wedding. The transcript concludes with attorney Ms. Pomerantz beginning her redirect examination by referencing a previous question from defense counsel about Mulligan's conversations with 'Annie'.
DOJ-OGR-00016431.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mulligan. The questioning focuses on conversations Mulligan had with an individual named Annie, specifically regarding Annie's media appearances, alleged contact with other Epstein victims, and a withdrawn question about Annie's potential financial motivation ('make a lot of money off of this case'). Ms. Pomerantz raises hearsay objections during the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00016428.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which a witness named Mulligan provides testimony. The witness recounts what a person named Annie told her about an experience with Jeffrey Epstein in New Mexico while they were in high school. According to the testimony, Annie was afraid to speak up about the incident because she feared jeopardizing her sister Maria's opportunities with Epstein. The witness states that Annie told her that after a massage, Epstein followed her into her bedroom and climbed into bed with her.
Witness Transition
Pomerantz ends questioning of Farmer and calls David Mulligan; Sternheim requests a sidebar.
Clarification of questioning regarding grooming
Discussion regarding a distinction between third-party presence and sexual gratification in the context of grooming strategies.
Work location cross-examination
Pomerantz confirms Espinosa worked at the Madison Ave office, not the homes or Palm Beach house.
Cross-examination regarding consulting history
Pomerantz questions Loftus about her history consulting with defense attorneys in criminal cases 'hundreds of times'.
Direct and Redirect Examination
Legal examination in court
Grooming and sexual gratification
Ms. Pomerantz asks if the person doing the grooming is always the recipient of sexual gratification. Dr. Rocchio begins to answer 'No' before being interrupted by an objection.
Identification of Journal Entry
Questioning regarding Government Exhibit 603.
Direct Examination
Establishment of witness age (42) and introduction of Government Exhibit 13.
Direct examination and introduction of evidence
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Flatley, about his review of evidence using forensic software. She successfully enters Government Exhibit 418B into evidence and requests that exhibits 420, 421, and 422 be displayed for the witness.
Allegations of recruiting underage girls for sexual abuse
Ms. Pomerantz outlines the prosecution's case, alleging the defendant recruited multiple underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse under the guise of massages, citing specific examples involving victims named Jane, a 16-year-old, and a 17-year-old in various locations.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity