| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOP
|
Organizational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Sessions
|
Leadership |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OLC
|
Advisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Liaison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell (Author)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Traveler]
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler P.A.
|
Investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
D. JOHN SAUER
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SSA [Redacted]
|
Liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's office
|
Limits plea agreements to |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
John Ashcroft
|
Leadership |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Collaboration |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement)
|
Non involvement |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Professional liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lyeson Daniel
|
Employment alleged |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
William Barr
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of New York
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Traveler
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Interview | The subject must agree to meet with and be interviewed by the USAO-SDNY, the Federal Bureau of In... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Consultation | Dr. Loftus consulted with various government agencies involved in the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search warrants served on RRA offices; 40+ boxes obtained by DOJ | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Department of Justice seized 40+ boxes of documents from RRA offices | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Department of Justice sequestered about 13 boxes of documents related to the Epstein case from RR... | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Investigative work conducted into the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Consultation | Witness Loftus consulted with various government agencies at different points in their career. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Department of Justice's practice of limiting plea agreements to specific USAOs ... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-25 | Legal notice | The Department of Justice sent a notice advising that the Court was seeking letters from victims ... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-18 | Legal filing | The Department of Justice filed a motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in the case against Ghi... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-07-18 | N/A | Filing of United States' Motion to Unseal Grand Jury Transcripts | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Memorandum issuance | The [DOJ] and [FBI] issued a memorandum describing a review of investigative holdings relating to... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-06 | N/A | Issuance of Memorandum regarding Epstein investigation review | Unknown | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Publication | The Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation issued a memorandum about their inv... | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-02 | N/A | Anticipated production of Epstein FOIA documents to The Times. | New York | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 204 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Release of OPR investigation report concerning Epstein investigation | Washington D.C. (implied) | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Release of DOJ OPR report on Epstein investigation. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-08-14 | N/A | Legal hold distributed by counsel regarding inmate death. | N/A | View |
| 2019-03-05 | N/A | Just days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department reassigned the Epstein victims' rights... | Atlanta | View |
| 2018-05-10 | N/A | Department of Justice agreed to brief House Intelligence Committee members. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Publication revision | The U.S. Attorneys’ Manual (USAM) was revised and renamed the Justice Manual. | N/A | View |
| 2017-07-26 | Document production | This document is page 1 of a 95-page set produced in response to Public Records Request No. 17-295. | N/A | View |
This document contains a court docket entry and a Memorandum Opinion & Order from July 30, 2020, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The order resolves disputes regarding a protective order, specifically denying Maxwell's request to publicly name alleged victims who had previously spoken publicly about her or Jeffrey Epstein, and denying her request to restrict Government witnesses from using discovery materials for purposes other than trial preparation. The court ruled in favor of the Government's proposed protective order to safeguard witness privacy and ensure fair trial procedures.
This document is page 5 of 8 from the Judgment in a Criminal Case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2022. It outlines twelve standard conditions of supervision for her release, including requirements to report to a probation officer, maintain employment, refrain from criminal associations, and prohibitions against owning weapons or acting as an informant. The document bears the Bates number DOJ-OGR-00020482.
A photograph entered as Government Exhibit 902-R in the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case S2 20 Cr. 330). The image depicts a view through a wooden doorway into a room featuring distinctive ornate paisley wallpaper, floor-to-ceiling dark red curtains, a white medical-style lamp on a wheeled stand, and the edge of a bed or massage table with white linens. A framed object on the wall to the right is heavily redacted.
A FedEx invoice dated December 16, 2002, addressed to Jeffrey E. Epstein at 457 Madison Ave, New York. The total amount due is $444.19 for transportation and handling charges, with payment due by December 31, 2002. The document is marked as Government Exhibit 801-R.
This document is a photograph of the exterior of Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan mansion (9 East 71st Street), entered as Government Exhibit 704. The exhibit sticker references case 'S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)', which is the federal criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
This document is a pilot logbook page from February and March 1994 detailing flights of aircraft N908JE (HS125-700). The log, signed by pilot David Rodgers, records flights between Teterboro (TGB/TEB), Palm Beach (PBI), Santa Fe (SAF), Boston (BOS), and other locations. Notable passengers traveling with Jeffrey Epstein (JE) include Ghislaine Maxwell (GM), Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Bobby Kennedy Jr) and his son Bobby Kennedy III, Patricia Kennedy Lawford (Pat Lawford) and Sydney Lawford, and Bear Stearns CEO James Cayne (Jimmy Cayne).
A detailed 'Check Off List' for the 'Master Bathroom Toiletries,' dated February 14, 2005. The document lists specific hygiene and grooming products by brand (including Kiehl's, Peter Thomas Roth, and Mason Pearson) that must be stocked, with specific instructions such as changing razor blades after every use. The document includes fields for a date and signature, presumably for household staff to verify the tasks were completed.
This document is a 'Morgan Account' signature card (Government Exhibit 506) dated November 15, 2006. It establishes signature authority for an account, designating Ghislaine Maxwell as President and Harry Beller as Secretary. Both individuals provided signatures to authorize checks and instructions for the account.
This document is a screenshot of the file properties (metadata) for a Microsoft Word document titled '09/07/02'. The metadata identifies the author and the person who last saved the file as 'gmax' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell). The file was created on September 7, 2002, and last saved on September 13, 2002, with a total editing time of 30 minutes.
A photographic exhibit (Government Exhibit 333) from the US v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial showing Epstein and Maxwell seated together in front of a donor wall, likely at a cultural institution in New York City. The image depicts them in a casual, intimate setting, smiling at one another. The document includes DOJ identification numbers.
A photograph submitted as Government Exhibit 312 in case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The image depicts a private jet, tail number N908JE, parked on a tarmac with a digital date timestamp of August 29, 1991. An unidentified man is standing near the open cabin door.
This document is a government exhibit photograph (Exhibit 282-R) from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 20 Cr. 330). It depicts a wall with nine framed items. Eight of the frames are completely redacted. The central frame contains a handwritten poster with a drawing of two figures and the Star Trek quote 'Live Long AND PROSPER' signed 'SPOCK'.
This document is a photograph of a kitchen interior, labeled as Government Exhibit 266. It is associated with a criminal case, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), and bears the Department of Justice document identifier DOJ-OGR-00015601, indicating its use in legal proceedings.
This document is a photograph from the Department of Justice, identified as 'Government Exhibit 264' for the legal case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The image shows a modern kitchen with a black-and-white checkered floor, a large island, and a view through sliding glass doors to a patio and a lush, tropical garden. The photograph serves as evidence in a government legal proceeding.
This document is a photograph introduced as Government Exhibit 241-R in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). It depicts a console table inside a residence (likely Palm Beach) covered in numerous framed personal photographs. Specifically notable is a photo of a man resembling Jeffrey Epstein next to a redacted individual, as well as a small sign reading 'Gone to Beach'. The image bears a DOJ footer.
This document is a photograph introduced as Government Exhibit 225-R in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. S2 20 Cr. 330 AJN). It depicts a collection of framed photographs sitting on a wooden surface. The central item is a black frame containing a photo that has been heavily redacted with a black box, leaving only a dark round object (possibly a helmet or light fixture) and curtains visible at the top.
This document is a photograph introduced as Government Exhibit 212 in the case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The image depicts a serene swimming pool area surrounded by palm trees and white lounge chairs, with a white building visible on the right side. It bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00015553.
This document is the signature page (page 3) of a legal stipulation from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 28, 2021. It confirms an agreement between the prosecution (Southern District of New York) and the defense team to admit specific Government Exhibits (1004, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16) into evidence. The document bears the signatures of Assistant US Attorneys and Maxwell's defense counsel.
This document contains four phone message slips from a spiral-bound book addressed to 'Jeffrey' (presumably Epstein). Three of the slips record messages from January 10 and 11, 2005: two from 'Jean-Luc' (likely Brunel) and one from 'Darren', all indicating they had called. The document is marked as Government Exhibit 3-DD for case S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), which relates to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial.
This document is page 5 of a General Release, serving as the signature and notarization page. It was executed on November 30, 2020, in Los Angeles, California. The Claimant's identity is redacted, but the document is notarized by Jon Paul Frontino and reviewed/signed by attorney Robert Glassman on behalf of the Releasor.
This document is page 14 of a court filing (Document 809) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It discusses the legal standards for unsealing grand jury materials, citing Rule 6(e) and case law emphasizing that disclosure requires 'exceptional circumstances.' The text argues that the Government's proposal to disclose testimony and exhibits from the grand juries that indicted Maxwell does not meet the required exceptions for law enforcement or national security.
This document is page 17 of a court filing (Document 136) in the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 4, 2021. The text describes a dispute over a line of questioning during testimony where an examiner asked Maxwell to list all girls under 18 she had brought to Jeffrey Epstein's house. The defense argues the question was improper, lacked foundation, and asked for recall of events from nearly 20 years prior; the document notes Maxwell admitted she could not make such a list.
This document is page 8 of a defense filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated February 4, 2021, arguing that Virginia Giuffre's defamation claims against Ghislaine Maxwell were based on lies and that Giuffre attempted to shift the focus to being 'sexually trafficked' by Epstein to third parties. It details the legal history of Maxwell's depositions and a protective order granted to shield confidential information from a 'media circus.' A footnote references a concurrent lawsuit between Giuffre and Alan Dershowitz, noting Dershowitz filed evidence suggesting Giuffre and her lawyers fabricated stories.
This document is a cover sheet for Exhibit G, which was filed under seal on February 4, 2021, as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The Bates number at the bottom, DOJ-OGR-00002405, indicates it is a document from the Department of Justice.
This document is page 4 (filed as page 5 of 18) of a Protective Order from civil case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Giuffre v. Maxwell). It outlines the legal protocols for designating documents and depositions as 'CONFIDENTIAL' during the discovery process to prevent privacy harm.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity