DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOP
|
Organizational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Sessions
|
Leadership |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OLC
|
Advisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Liaison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell (Author)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Traveler]
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler P.A.
|
Investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
D. JOHN SAUER
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SSA [Redacted]
|
Liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's office
|
Limits plea agreements to |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
John Ashcroft
|
Leadership |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Collaboration |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement)
|
Non involvement |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Professional liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lyeson Daniel
|
Employment alleged |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
William Barr
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of New York
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Traveler
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Interview | The subject must agree to meet with and be interviewed by the USAO-SDNY, the Federal Bureau of In... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Consultation | Dr. Loftus consulted with various government agencies involved in the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search warrants served on RRA offices; 40+ boxes obtained by DOJ | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Department of Justice seized 40+ boxes of documents from RRA offices | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Department of Justice sequestered about 13 boxes of documents related to the Epstein case from RR... | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Investigative work conducted into the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Consultation | Witness Loftus consulted with various government agencies at different points in their career. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Department of Justice's practice of limiting plea agreements to specific USAOs ... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-25 | Legal notice | The Department of Justice sent a notice advising that the Court was seeking letters from victims ... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-18 | Legal filing | The Department of Justice filed a motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in the case against Ghi... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-07-18 | N/A | Filing of United States' Motion to Unseal Grand Jury Transcripts | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Memorandum issuance | The [DOJ] and [FBI] issued a memorandum describing a review of investigative holdings relating to... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-06 | N/A | Issuance of Memorandum regarding Epstein investigation review | Unknown | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Publication | The Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation issued a memorandum about their inv... | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-02 | N/A | Anticipated production of Epstein FOIA documents to The Times. | New York | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 204 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Release of OPR investigation report concerning Epstein investigation | Washington D.C. (implied) | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Release of DOJ OPR report on Epstein investigation. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-08-14 | N/A | Legal hold distributed by counsel regarding inmate death. | N/A | View |
| 2019-03-05 | N/A | Just days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department reassigned the Epstein victims' rights... | Atlanta | View |
| 2018-05-10 | N/A | Department of Justice agreed to brief House Intelligence Committee members. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Publication revision | The U.S. Attorneys’ Manual (USAM) was revised and renamed the Justice Manual. | N/A | View |
| 2017-07-26 | Document production | This document is page 1 of a 95-page set produced in response to Public Records Request No. 17-295. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002096.jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit U', filed on December 14, 2020, as part of the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The page itself contains no substantive information beyond identifying the exhibit and its associated case and document numbers, along with a Department of Justice (DOJ) control number.
DOJ-OGR-00002054.jpg
This document is page 3 of a character reference letter filed on December 14, 2020, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. The unnamed author, a long-time acquaintance of the Maxwell family, argues that Ghislaine is not a flight risk, citing her upbringing, specifically the need to face her father 'Bob's' temper, as evidence of her resilience and accountability. The author asserts that Ghislaine remained in the US throughout 2019 to fight civil accusations and intends to defend herself in court.
DOJ-OGR-00002035.jpg
This document is a cover sheet for 'Exhibit E', filed on December 14, 2020, in the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains a Bates stamp indicating it was processed by the DOJ (DOJ-OGR-00002035).
DOJ-OGR-00002011.jpg
This document is page 39 of a defense filing (Document 97) dated December 14, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the government only pursued Maxwell as an 'afterthought' following Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody, noting that subpoenas for her financial records were not issued until August 16, 2019 (six days after his death). The text contends there is a lack of documentary corroboration for the charges, characterizing the case as relying on 25-year-old witness testimony, and urges the court to grant bail.
DOJ-OGR-00001980.jpg
This document serves as page 8 of a legal filing (Document 97) from December 14, 2020, outlining a $28.5 million bail package proposed by Ghislaine Maxwell. The package includes a $22.5 million bond co-signed by Maxwell and her spouse, secured by all their U.S. assets, and $5 million in additional bonds co-signed by seven redacted close friends and family members. Additionally, an unnamed security company offered to post a $1 million bond, which the filing notes is an unprecedented action for a security firm.
DOJ-OGR-00001976.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court filing (Document 97) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 14, 2020. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (United States v. Boustani, Bradshaw, Chen, etc.) cited elsewhere in the filing. The page is numbered 'iii' and bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00001976.
DOJ-OGR-00001904.jpg
This document is page 27 of a court transcript from December 10, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution argues that the defendant poses a significant flight risk because she holds citizenship in France (which does not extradite its citizens) and the UK, owns property abroad, and possesses 'significant and undetermined and undisclosed wealth.' The government expresses concern that she could live indefinitely beyond the reach of US extradition.
DOJ-OGR-00001861.jpg
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of New York signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on December 7, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order sets a briefing schedule for a renewed bail motion, establishes page limits for filings (40 pages for motion/response), and grants permission for the Government to file submissions under seal with redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00001843.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing from the US Attorney's Office for the SDNY regarding the detention conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutors argue that Warden Tellez should provide a first-hand accounting of why Maxwell is subject to strict surveillance measures (body scans, flashlight checks) despite 24/7 camera monitoring, noting that the MDC Legal Department would only provide second-hand information.
DOJ-OGR-00001809.jpg
This document is Page 5 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the Government is failing to meet discovery obligations, specifically regarding 28 boxes of material from Florida and files from Georgia, and that the proposed timeline impairs Maxwell's ability to prepare for the July 2021 trial. The text highlights concerns about witness statements, the age of the claims (26 years), and the difficulty of securing out-of-country testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00001792.jpg
This document is a status update to Judge Alison Nathan regarding the Government's discovery process in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (implied by case number/context). It details the Prosecution Team's acquisition of investigative files from the Palm Beach State Attorney (PBSA), the FBI Florida Office (24 boxes), and the USAO-SDFL (28 boxes) related to the 2006-2010 Epstein investigations. It also notes that the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) has gathered internal emails regarding the handling of the prior Florida investigation, including those of a primary prosecutor referred to as 'Attorney-1'.
DOJ-OGR-00030583.jpg
A single page containing handwritten notes above the typed name 'Jeffrey E. Epstein'. The notes include the word 'BARD !!', 'magazore' (possibly 'magazine'), and a list of several ambiguous names or words. The document includes a footer with a date, page number, public records request number, and a Department of Justice Bates number, indicating it is part of a larger collection of official records.
DOJ-OGR-00030579.jpg
This document is a single, heavily redacted page from a larger government record, likely from the Department of Justice, dated July 26, 2017. The page prominently features the name 'Jeffrey E. Epstein' and is identified as page 112 of 131 from a response to Public Records Request No. 17-295.
DOJ-OGR-00030494.jpg
This document is a printout of a MySpace page from the profile 'lovely', dated June 13, 2006. It displays a personal survey with questions about life experiences, preferences, and physical attributes; however, all the answers have been redacted. The page includes administrative markings, such as a Public Records Request number and a Department of Justice (DOJ) control number, indicating it is part of an official record.
DOJ-OGR-00022147.jpg
This is a 'Nolle Prosequi' filing from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated January 3, 2022. It formally dismisses the criminal case (19 Cr. 830) against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, the correctional officers on duty when Jeffrey Epstein died. The dismissal follows their successful completion of a six-month deferred prosecution agreement entered into in May 2021, which required good behavior and community service.
DOJ-OGR-00022146.jpg
This is a legal document filed on December 30, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT). United States Attorney Damian Williams directs that an order of 'nolle prosequi' (abandonment of prosecution) be filed regarding defendants Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, effectively dropping the charges related to Indictment 19 Cr. 830. The document includes a space for Judge Analisa Torres to order the action.
DOJ-OGR-00022142.jpg
This is a court order filed on December 10, 2021, in the case of United States v. Tova Noel and Michael Thomas (the guards on duty during Jeffrey Epstein's death). Judge Analisa Torres adjourned a status conference originally scheduled for December 16, 2021, at 1:00 p.m., moving it to 3:30 p.m. on the same day. The order specifies that proceedings will be held via videoconference due to COVID-19 protocols and provides dial-in information for the public and press.
DOJ-OGR-00022136.jpg
This document is page 2 of a deferred prosecution agreement filed in May 2021 (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT), likely concerning a Bureau of Prisons employee involved in the Epstein case (guards Tova Noel or Michael Thomas). The text outlines conditions of release, including mandatory cooperation with the FBI and DOJ-OIG regarding BOP activities, 100 hours of community service, and potential administrative termination of employment. The agreement allows for the deferral (and eventual dismissal) of prosecution if all conditions are met over a six-month period.
DOJ-OGR-00022129.jpg
This document is page two of a legal agreement, likely for deferred prosecution, filed on May 25, 2021. It outlines strict conditions for an individual, including reporting to a U.S. Pretrial Services Officer, completing 100 hours of community service, and fully cooperating with investigations by the USAO-SDNY, FBI, and DOJ-OIG, particularly concerning their employment with the Bureau of Prisons. Failure to comply could result in the USAO-SDNY revoking the agreement and proceeding with prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00022121.jpg
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated April 26, 2021, presided over by Judge Analisa Torres in the case against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas (the guards on duty when Jeffrey Epstein died). The order adjourns a status conference originally scheduled for April 28, 2021, rescheduling it to June 17, 2021, to be held remotely via videoconference. It provides dial-in instructions for the press and public while strictly prohibiting recording or rebroadcasting.
DOJ-OGR-00022116.jpg
This is a court order from the Southern District of New York, signed by Judge Analisa Torres on February 25, 2021, and filed on March 8, 2021, regarding the case against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas (the guards on duty during Jeffrey Epstein's death). The order adjourns a status conference originally scheduled for March 17, 2021, rescheduling it to April 28, 2021, to be conducted remotely via video. The document provides specific instructions for video appearance by counsel and defendants, as well as dial-in information for the press and public to access the audio feed.
DOJ-OGR-00022104.jpg
This is page 8 of a court order filed on June 9, 2020, in Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (USA v. Noel and Thomas). The court denies the defendant's (Thomas) motion to compel the government to produce evidence held by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), ruling that the BOP is not part of the prosecution team for Brady disclosure purposes. The document also outlines Thomas's argument that the conduct he is charged with was rampant within the BOP and acquiesced to by leadership.
DOJ-OGR-00022103.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court order filed on June 9, 2020, in the case of United States v. Thomas (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT). The Court denies the defendant's (Thomas) motion to compel disclosure of the Inspector General's report regarding Epstein's death because the report did not exist at the time. Furthermore, the Court rules that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is not considered part of the 'prosecution team' for discovery purposes (Rule 16 and Brady), as there is no evidence BOP officials participated in the criminal investigation leading to Thomas' indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00022099.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Document 36) from June 9, 2020, associated with Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text outlines legal standards associated with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16 regarding discovery obligations, specifically defining 'materiality' of evidence and what constitutes government 'possession, custody, or control.' It relies on legal precedents such as US v. Ulbricht, US v. Abdalla, and US v. Stein to argue the scope of evidence the government must produce.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity