DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOP
|
Organizational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Sessions
|
Leadership |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OLC
|
Advisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Liaison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell (Author)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Traveler]
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler P.A.
|
Investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
D. JOHN SAUER
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SSA [Redacted]
|
Liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's office
|
Limits plea agreements to |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
John Ashcroft
|
Leadership |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Collaboration |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement)
|
Non involvement |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Professional liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lyeson Daniel
|
Employment alleged |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
William Barr
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of New York
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Traveler
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Interview | The subject must agree to meet with and be interviewed by the USAO-SDNY, the Federal Bureau of In... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Consultation | Dr. Loftus consulted with various government agencies involved in the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search warrants served on RRA offices; 40+ boxes obtained by DOJ | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Department of Justice seized 40+ boxes of documents from RRA offices | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Department of Justice sequestered about 13 boxes of documents related to the Epstein case from RR... | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Investigative work conducted into the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Consultation | Witness Loftus consulted with various government agencies at different points in their career. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Department of Justice's practice of limiting plea agreements to specific USAOs ... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-25 | Legal notice | The Department of Justice sent a notice advising that the Court was seeking letters from victims ... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-18 | Legal filing | The Department of Justice filed a motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in the case against Ghi... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-07-18 | N/A | Filing of United States' Motion to Unseal Grand Jury Transcripts | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Memorandum issuance | The [DOJ] and [FBI] issued a memorandum describing a review of investigative holdings relating to... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-06 | N/A | Issuance of Memorandum regarding Epstein investigation review | Unknown | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Publication | The Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation issued a memorandum about their inv... | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-02 | N/A | Anticipated production of Epstein FOIA documents to The Times. | New York | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 204 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Release of OPR investigation report concerning Epstein investigation | Washington D.C. (implied) | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Release of DOJ OPR report on Epstein investigation. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-08-14 | N/A | Legal hold distributed by counsel regarding inmate death. | N/A | View |
| 2019-03-05 | N/A | Just days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department reassigned the Epstein victims' rights... | Atlanta | View |
| 2018-05-10 | N/A | Department of Justice agreed to brief House Intelligence Committee members. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Publication revision | The U.S. Attorneys’ Manual (USAM) was revised and renamed the Justice Manual. | N/A | View |
| 2017-07-26 | Document production | This document is page 1 of a 95-page set produced in response to Public Records Request No. 17-295. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00030413.jpg
This document is a Colonial Bank internal research request form dated January 19, 2005. Submitted by Rosa Tarquino from the Worth Avenue office, it requests copies of two financial items ($2,000 and $1,000) associated with a Demand Deposit Account (DDA) titled 'JEFFREY E EPSTEIN OR GHISLAINE MAXWELL'. This confirms the existence of a joint bank account between Epstein and Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00030399.jpg
This document is a scanned envelope from the law firm Ricci-Leopold P.A., addressed to Lanna Belohlavek, Esq. It was mailed on June 18, 2008, and stamped received on June 19, 2008. The document references File #: 080048 and is part of a larger Department of Justice public records release dated 2017.
DOJ-OGR-00030381.jpg
This document is page 28 of a 114-page Public Records Request (No. 17-295) produced by the DOJ-OGR on July 26, 2017. It contains the text of a state statute (identifiable as Florida Law based on citations like s. 775.082 and s. 787.01) detailing the legal requirements for sexual offender registration, legislative findings on public safety, and criminal penalties for individuals who harbor or conceal non-compliant offenders. It specifically outlines the requirement for offenders to register in person during their birth month and the sixth month following.
DOJ-OGR-00030356.jpg
This is a legal 'Close Out Sheet' for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein regarding Case Number 06-9454. The document indicates the case was closed on June 30, 2008, following a 'Negotiated Plea' rather than a trial. The sentencing noted on the form is '12 months' in County Jail.
DOJ-OGR-00030267.jpg
This is a FOI/PA Deleted Page Information Sheet from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, dated January 31, 2020, concerning Civil Action No. 17-cv-03956. The document states that a total of four pages, identified by Bates numbers 03956-11026-11027 and 03956-11028-11029, were withheld because they are duplicates of pages 10983-10984.
DOJ-OGR-00021098.jpg
This legal document page describes the extensive, eight-month negotiation of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) starting in January 2007, contrasting it with a potential plea agreement that was also drafted. It emphasizes the deep involvement of multiple levels of the U.S. government, including the Department of Justice, the USAO for the Southern District of Florida, the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, and the FBI, in the negotiation and approval process.
DOJ-OGR-00021097.jpg
This legal document, dated February 28, 2023, is a page from a court filing that argues about the scope of plea agreements. It discusses whether a plea agreement made with a U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) in one district can prevent prosecutions in other districts, citing several legal precedents like United States v. Alessi and United States v. Russo. The document uses Leslie Groff, an assistant to Epstein, as an example and analyzes factors such as whether other USAOs or the Department of Justice were involved in the negotiations.
DOJ-OGR-00021091.jpg
This page from a legal filing (dated Feb 28, 2023) argues against allowing the Government to bypass the terms of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by moving jurisdictions ('parachuting into a new circuit'). It cites various legal precedents to argue that the court should apply the law of the circuit where the violation or agreement occurred (referencing the 11th Circuit) to protect the defendant's Fifth Amendment rights in the plea-bargaining process.
DOJ-OGR-00021057.jpg
This document is page 'ix' from a legal filing, specifically Document 59 in Case 22-1426, dated February 28, 2023. It serves as a table of authorities, listing numerous U.S. court cases with their legal citations and corresponding page references within the larger document. The cases cited span from 1926 to 2017 and originate from various federal district and circuit courts.
DOJ-OGR-00021006.jpg
This page contains a legal analysis from a court document (Case 1:20-cr-00330, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) discussing the legal standards for 'variance' versus 'constructive amendment' of an indictment. It cites Second Circuit precedents (Banki, Rigas, Bastian, Salmonese, etc.) to establish that a defendant must prove substantial prejudice to reverse a conviction based on a variance claim. The text concludes by noting the Defendant is bringing a motion pursuant to Rule 33 to vacate judgment and grant a new trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020954.jpg
This document is page 11 of a court order filed on April 1, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the Court's assessment of 'Juror 50,' who failed to disclose a history of sexual abuse during voir dire; the juror testified that this history did not affect his impartiality. The document also notes the denial of a defense request to stay the ruling pending the release of a documentary featuring said juror.
DOJ-OGR-00020941.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely a juror questionnaire or notes page, identified as page 27 of 29 in Document 638 from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on March 9, 2022. The page is mostly blank ruled lines but contains a handwritten notation identifying "Juror ID: 50". The header also references another case, 22-1426, and the footer includes a Department of Justice Bates number.
DOJ-OGR-00020917.jpg
This document is a schedule provided to prospective Juror ID 50 regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines the timeline for jury selection (Nov 16-19, 2021) and the trial start date (Nov 29, 2021), clarifying that the jury will not be sequestered. It also emphasizes the civic duty of jury service, stating that only extraordinary hardship will be accepted as an excuse.
DOJ-OGR-00020869.jpg
This document is a court exhibit (A-243) containing an excerpt from an article in The Independent. It features an interview with Scotty David, a juror in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, who discusses why the jury found the victims credible and the verdict justified. David reveals his own history as a sexual abuse survivor, explaining how his personal experience helped him understand how victims process traumatic memories.
DOJ-OGR-00020854.jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal letter addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 27, 2021, filed during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The defense argues that a jury note indicates confusion regarding Counts Two and Four, specifically concerning jurisdiction and New York law. The text argues that the jury should not be permitted to convict Maxwell based on conduct that occurred in New Mexico (specifically aiding in a return flight from New Mexico) as it does not constitute a violation of New York law.
DOJ-OGR-00020815.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated February 28, 2023, rejecting Ghislaine Maxwell's argument that her prosecution violates the Double Jeopardy Clause. The court argues that because Maxwell herself was not previously prosecuted or punished in the Florida investigation, and because Epstein's previous plea deal does not confer immunity to his co-conspirators, the charges against her stand. The text cites various legal precedents to support the Government's position that co-conspirators are not automatically protected by another's non-prosecution agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00020800.jpg
This document is a page from a plea agreement involving Epstein, detailing sentencing timelines and conditions regarding 'gain time' during incarceration in Florida. It outlines confidentiality expectations and stipulates that if Epstein fulfills the agreement, the United States will not prosecute named co-conspirators and will suspend federal Grand Jury investigations.
DOJ-OGR-00020742.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court indictment filed on March 29, 2021, detailing allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell regarding the grooming of minors. It specifically outlines the grooming of 'Minor Victim-1,' who was approximately 14 years old when met by Maxwell. The text describes how Maxwell and Epstein befriended the victim between 1994 and 1997 via shopping trips and movies, asked personal questions, and normalized nudity to facilitate sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00020639.jpg
This document is a court docket report from December 2020 regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders allowing redacted filings to protect privacy interests, denying an in-camera conference, and setting a briefing schedule for a renewed bail motion. The docket entries list sealed documents, letters from defense counsel Christian Everdell regarding sealing and schedules, and a specific letter regarding Maxwell's confinement conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.
DOJ-OGR-00020611.jpg
A court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated January 18, 2023 (Docket No. 22-1426). Circuit Judge Michael H. Park granted Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to file an oversized principal brief of up to 20,000 words for her appeal.
DOJ-OGR-00020598.jpg
This is a Notice of Appearance filed on July 28, 2022, in the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). Lara Pomerantz of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is entering the case as additional counsel, serving as co-counsel alongside Won S. Shin for the Appellee (USA). The document certifies her admission to the court renewed on December 3, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00020592.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated July 15, 2022, regarding the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). The order grants a motion by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to be relieved as counsel for Maxwell because Maxwell has retained new counsel for her appeal. The document is signed by the Clerk of Court, Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe.
DOJ-OGR-00020573.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet (Case 22-1426) containing entries from April 2022 regarding USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Key entries include the denial of Maxwell's motions for a new trial (Rule 33) and acquittal (Rule 29), confirmation that Juror 50 was found credible, and the scheduling of her sentencing for June 28, 2022. The document explicitly references Maxwell's role as a coconspirator with Jeffrey Epstein in a decade-long agreement to groom and sexually abuse underage girls.
DOJ-OGR-00020538.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from October 27 to October 29, 2021. It details numerous 'motions in limine' filed by Maxwell's defense team (Pagliuca, Everdell) attempting to exclude specific evidence, including items seized from Epstein's Palm Beach home (358 El Brillo Way) in 2005, evidence related to 'Accuser-3', and an alleged flight. The document also records an order from Judge Nathan scheduling an in-person pretrial conference for November 1, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020508.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from January 25, 2021, to February 2, 2021. It lists numerous pretrial motions filed by the defense, including motions to dismiss specific counts and requests for separate trials, as well as government correspondence regarding redactions and prison access. The document also includes judicial orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan, including a denial of a request by the Bureau of Prisons regarding a previous court order.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity