DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOP
|
Organizational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Sessions
|
Leadership |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OLC
|
Advisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Liaison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell (Author)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Traveler]
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler P.A.
|
Investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
D. JOHN SAUER
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SSA [Redacted]
|
Liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's office
|
Limits plea agreements to |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
John Ashcroft
|
Leadership |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Collaboration |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement)
|
Non involvement |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Professional liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lyeson Daniel
|
Employment alleged |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
William Barr
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of New York
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Traveler
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Interview | The subject must agree to meet with and be interviewed by the USAO-SDNY, the Federal Bureau of In... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Consultation | Dr. Loftus consulted with various government agencies involved in the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search warrants served on RRA offices; 40+ boxes obtained by DOJ | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Department of Justice seized 40+ boxes of documents from RRA offices | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Department of Justice sequestered about 13 boxes of documents related to the Epstein case from RR... | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Investigative work conducted into the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Consultation | Witness Loftus consulted with various government agencies at different points in their career. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Department of Justice's practice of limiting plea agreements to specific USAOs ... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-25 | Legal notice | The Department of Justice sent a notice advising that the Court was seeking letters from victims ... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-18 | Legal filing | The Department of Justice filed a motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in the case against Ghi... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-07-18 | N/A | Filing of United States' Motion to Unseal Grand Jury Transcripts | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Memorandum issuance | The [DOJ] and [FBI] issued a memorandum describing a review of investigative holdings relating to... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-06 | N/A | Issuance of Memorandum regarding Epstein investigation review | Unknown | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Publication | The Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation issued a memorandum about their inv... | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-02 | N/A | Anticipated production of Epstein FOIA documents to The Times. | New York | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 204 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Release of OPR investigation report concerning Epstein investigation | Washington D.C. (implied) | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Release of DOJ OPR report on Epstein investigation. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-08-14 | N/A | Legal hold distributed by counsel regarding inmate death. | N/A | View |
| 2019-03-05 | N/A | Just days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department reassigned the Epstein victims' rights... | Atlanta | View |
| 2018-05-10 | N/A | Department of Justice agreed to brief House Intelligence Committee members. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Publication revision | The U.S. Attorneys’ Manual (USAM) was revised and renamed the Justice Manual. | N/A | View |
| 2017-07-26 | Document production | This document is page 1 of a 95-page set produced in response to Public Records Request No. 17-295. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002377(1).jpg
This is the final page (page 7) of a Protective Order from the civil case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Giuffre v. Maxwell). It contains clause 14 regarding the modification of the order and is signed by United States District Judge Robert W. Sweet on March 17, 2016. The document bears a Department of Justice footer stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00002375(1).jpg
This document is page 4 (filed as Page 5 of 7 in Document 39-1) of a Protective Order from the civil case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Giuffre v. Maxwell). It outlines legal procedures for designating deposition testimony as confidential, filing confidential materials under seal with the Southern District of New York, and the process for objecting to confidentiality designations.
DOJ-OGR-00002346(1).jpg
This is a Notice of Motion (Pretrial Motion #3) filed on February 4, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the SDNY. Maxwell's defense is moving to suppress evidence obtained via a government subpoena to a redacted entity and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment based on the Due Process Clause.
DOJ-OGR-00002336.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 28, 2021. The US Attorney's office is addressing Judge Nathan regarding proposed redactions to the defendant's motions (Motions 3, 10, and 11) to protect victim-witness privacy and the integrity of the ongoing investigation. The government agrees to most redactions but intends to submit limited additional redactions for Motion 3 via email under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00002336(1).jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 28, 2021. The US Attorney's office is addressing Judge Nathan regarding proposed redactions to the defendant's motions (Motions 3, 10, and 11) to protect victim-witness privacy and the integrity of the ongoing investigation. The government agrees to most redactions but intends to submit limited additional redactions for Motion 3 via email under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00002323(1).jpg
This document is page 'ii' (labeled Page 3 of 13 in the PDF) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (Cases) and Statutes cited elsewhere in the filing. The citations heavily reference cases involving jury selection and fair representation (e.g., Duren v. Missouri, Taylor v. Louisiana), suggesting the main document likely involves a motion regarding jury composition or selection.
DOJ-OGR-00002314(1).jpg
This document is a page from a legal motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the Superseding Indictment is vague, failing to identify specific accusers or dates beyond the range of 1994-1997. The filing requests that the Court dismiss Counts One through Four or force the Government to provide a Bill of Particulars, citing Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(c)(1) and Constitutional precedents regarding due process.
DOJ-OGR-00002313(1).jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page from a legal filing dated January 25, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists legal precedents including Hamling v. United States, Russell v. United States, United States v. Jain, and United States v. Resendiz-Ponce, as well as Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(c)(1). The document bears a Department of Justice bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002313.
DOJ-OGR-00002306.jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The defense argues that Count One and Count Three of the indictment are 'multiplicitous' and violate the Fifth Amendment because they allege identical overt acts, geographic scope (NY, FL, NM, UK), and objectives. The filing requests the Court dismiss one of the counts.
DOJ-OGR-00002304(1).jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 122) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on January 25, 2021. The text discusses legal arguments regarding double jeopardy and multiplicity, specifically citing the 'Blockburger test' and the 'Korfant factors' used by the Second Circuit to determine if multiple conspiracy charges constitute the same offense. It outlines eight specific factors courts use to analyze the interdependence and overlap of alleged conspiracies.
DOJ-OGR-00002289.jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal defense filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated January 25, 2021. The text argues that Perjury Counts should not be joined with Mann Act Counts because they are factually distinct and separated by over twenty years. The defense asserts that Ms. Maxwell was not alleged to have conspired with Epstein during the intervening period and was not charged in Epstein's 2007 or 2019 legal proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00002289(1).jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal defense filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated January 25, 2021. The text argues that Perjury Counts should not be joined with Mann Act Counts because they are factually distinct and separated by over twenty years. The defense asserts that Ms. Maxwell was not alleged to have conspired with Epstein during the intervening period and was not charged in Epstein's 2007 or 2019 legal proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00002286.jpg
This document is Page 8 of a legal filing (Document 120) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 25, 2021. The text presents legal arguments regarding the 'joinder' (combining) and 'severance' (separating) of criminal charges, citing various precedents to argue that offenses separated by time, location, or circumstance should not be tried together. It specifically addresses the standards for joining perjury or false statement counts with substantive crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00002285.jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal filing (Document 120) from January 25, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines Counts Five and Six of the indictment, which allege perjury stemming from two civil depositions given by Maxwell in 2016. The text primarily discusses 'Applicable Law' regarding the 'Joinder of Offenses' under Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, citing various legal precedents to justify joining separate offenses in a single indictment for trial efficiency.
DOJ-OGR-00002282(1).jpg
This document is a Table of Authorities page (page iii) from a legal filing submitted on January 25, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It lists relevant statutes including 18 U.S.C. § 1623 (perjury), § 2422 (coercion/enticement), and § 2423(a) (transportation of minors), as well as Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding joinder and severance of charges.
DOJ-OGR-00002263(1).jpg
This document is a Criminal Notice of Appeal (Form A) filed on January 11, 2021, in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by attorney Christian Everdell, is appealing an order entered on December 28, 2020, which denied her renewed motion for release on bail. The document notes that Maxwell is currently 'Committed' (incarcerated) and the case is presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00002236(1).jpg
This is page 4 of a court filing (Document 106) from December 30, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The text discusses the legal standards for reopening a bail hearing under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), citing precedents that a hearing should only be reopened if new information exists that was not known at the time of the original hearing. It introduces the discussion of the Defendant's renewed motion for bail.
DOJ-OGR-00002226(1).jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit B', filed as part of a legal proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) on December 23, 2020. It is the first page of a four-page document and includes a Bates number from the Department of Justice (DOJ-OGR-00002226).
DOJ-OGR-00002181(1).jpg
This document is page 20 of a government filing (Document 100) in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 18, 2020. The text argues that the defendant (Maxwell) represents a flight risk because French law strictly prohibits the extradition of its nationals, even if they hold dual citizenship with the US. The prosecution cites the 2006 case of Hans Peterson as a precedent where France refused to extradite a dual citizen who confessed to murder in the US.
DOJ-OGR-00002161.jpg
This is the second page of a court order (Document 99) filed on December 18, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Judge Alison J. Nathan orders the Government to docket redacted documents and exhibits by that same day, ruling that the redactions are narrowly tailored to protect third-party privacy interests. The document cites legal precedents regarding the presumption of access to judicial documents.
DOJ-OGR-00002130.jpg
This legal document, authored by attorney William Julié and filed on December 14, 2020, provides a background on the bail hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell held on July 14, 2020. It highlights the US Government's argument and the Court's decision to deny bail, both of which centered on Maxwell's French citizenship and France's policy of not extraditing its nationals, which established her as a flight risk. The report's stated purpose is to legally evaluate the validity of the claim that France does not extradite its citizens.
DOJ-OGR-00002111.jpg
This document is a separator page titled 'Annex A' from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 14, 2020. It serves as a cover page for an attachment within the legal filing and bears the Bates number DOJ-OGR-00002111.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity