DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Federal Bureau of Investigation
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOP
|
Organizational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Sessions
|
Leadership |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OLC
|
Advisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Liaison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell (Author)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Authority |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Traveler]
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler P.A.
|
Investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
D. JOHN SAUER
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SSA [Redacted]
|
Liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Attorney's office
|
Limits plea agreements to |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional investigative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
John Ashcroft
|
Leadership |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of Florida
|
Collaboration |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement)
|
Non involvement |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew FINKELMAN
|
Professional liaison |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lyeson Daniel
|
Employment alleged |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
William Barr
|
Professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of New York
|
Institutional independence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Traveler
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Interview | The subject must agree to meet with and be interviewed by the USAO-SDNY, the Federal Bureau of In... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Consultation | Dr. Loftus consulted with various government agencies involved in the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Search warrants served on RRA offices; 40+ boxes obtained by DOJ | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Department of Justice seized 40+ boxes of documents from RRA offices | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Department of Justice sequestered about 13 boxes of documents related to the Epstein case from RR... | RRA Offices | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Investigative work conducted into the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Consultation | Witness Loftus consulted with various government agencies at different points in their career. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Department of Justice's practice of limiting plea agreements to specific USAOs ... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-25 | Legal notice | The Department of Justice sent a notice advising that the Court was seeking letters from victims ... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-18 | Legal filing | The Department of Justice filed a motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in the case against Ghi... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-07-18 | N/A | Filing of United States' Motion to Unseal Grand Jury Transcripts | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Memorandum issuance | The [DOJ] and [FBI] issued a memorandum describing a review of investigative holdings relating to... | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-06 | N/A | Issuance of Memorandum regarding Epstein investigation review | Unknown | View |
| 2025-07-06 | Publication | The Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation issued a memorandum about their inv... | N/A | View |
| 2021-07-02 | N/A | Anticipated production of Epstein FOIA documents to The Times. | New York | View |
| 2021-04-16 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 204 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Release of OPR investigation report concerning Epstein investigation | Washington D.C. (implied) | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Release of DOJ OPR report on Epstein investigation. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2019-08-14 | N/A | Legal hold distributed by counsel regarding inmate death. | N/A | View |
| 2019-03-05 | N/A | Just days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department reassigned the Epstein victims' rights... | Atlanta | View |
| 2018-05-10 | N/A | Department of Justice agreed to brief House Intelligence Committee members. | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Publication revision | The U.S. Attorneys’ Manual (USAM) was revised and renamed the Justice Manual. | N/A | View |
| 2017-07-26 | Document production | This document is page 1 of a 95-page set produced in response to Public Records Request No. 17-295. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00022085.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically a brief or motion, dated April 24, 2020. It argues that the involvement of agents from a government agency in an investigation does not automatically make the entire agency part of the "prosecution team" for discovery purposes. The text cites several legal precedents (Stein, Pelullo, Locascio, Ghailani, and Middendorf) to outline the factors courts use to determine the scope of the prosecution team and its disclosure obligations under Rule 16.
DOJ-OGR-00022069.jpg
This document is page 7 of a government legal filing (Document 35) from April 24, 2020, in the case against Michael Thomas and Tova Noel (the guards on duty when Jeffrey Epstein died). The prosecution argues against Thomas's motion to compel the production of BOP records and a DOJ-OIG draft report, stating these materials are irrelevant, not in the prosecution's possession, or privileged. The document also restates the facts of the November 19, 2019 indictment charging the defendants with conspiracy and making false records.
DOJ-OGR-00022068.jpg
This legal document is a preliminary statement from the U.S. Government, filed on April 24, 2020, in opposition to a motion by defendant Michael Thomas to compel discovery. The Government argues that Thomas's request for materials—including a not-yet-existent DOJ-OIG report and documents about past incidents at the Metropolitan Correctional Center—is without merit because the items are not in the Government's possession or legally discoverable. The Government requests that the court deny Thomas's motion.
DOJ-OGR-00022052.jpg
A Washington Examiner article filed as a court document reporting Attorney General William Barr's announcement of a DOJ Inspector General investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death. The article details the timeline of Epstein being found unresponsive in the Manhattan Correctional Center's Special Housing Unit on the morning of August 10, 2019, and notes an ongoing FBI inquiry. It also references the 14-page indictment regarding Epstein's alleged sex trafficking crimes between 2002 and 2005.
DOJ-OGR-00022045.jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit A' from a legal proceeding. It is identified as page 22 of 38 of Document 33, filed on April 9, 2020, in case number 1:19-cr-00830-AT. The Bates number in the footer, DOJ-OGR-00022045, indicates it is part of a document production from the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00022002.jpg
This is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated January 30, 2020, presided over by Judge Analisa Torres in the case of United States v. Tova Noel and Michael Thomas (the guards on duty when Jeffrey Epstein died). The order grants a motion to adjourn the trial date, moving it from April 20, 2020, to June 22, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00021955.jpg
This document is page 2 of a Protective Order filed on December 16, 2019, in the criminal case against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas (the guards on duty when Jeffrey Epstein died). The order outlines restrictions on 'Protected Materials' provided during discovery, stipulating they can only be used for defense purposes and cannot be disclosed to third parties except as specifically allowed. The defendants consented to this order.
DOJ-OGR-00021940.jpg
This document is page 9 of a 10-page court filing from November 19, 2019, in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. It is part of an "Advice of Penalties" form and consists of a map and a list defining the counties that fall under the jurisdiction of the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York federal courts. The document is marked with a Department of Justice Bates number, indicating it was produced as part of a legal proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00021936.jpg
This document is a court order filed on November 19, 2019, setting the conditions of release for defendant Michael Thomas (Case No. 19 CR 830). The order outlines five standard conditions, including obeying laws, submitting DNA samples if required, notifying the court of residence changes, and appearing in court as required. The specific next appearance date and location are left blank, noting the defendant will be notified.
DOJ-OGR-00021912.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) details the mandatory procedures for inmate counts at the MCC. It explains the process of filling out 'count slips,' the verification process by the Control Center to 'clear' a count, the protocol for a 'bed book count' if errors occur, and the BOP requirement for officers in the SHU to conduct 'rounds' every 30 minutes.
DOJ-OGR-00021860.jpg
This legal document argues that the duties of U.S. Attorneys are statutorily confined to their specific districts, a principle established since 1789. It contends that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) did not prevent the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) from prosecuting Maxwell. The document cites legal precedent ('Annabi') and statutory exceptions, such as the Attorney General's power to direct attorneys to act in other districts, to support its position.
DOJ-OGR-00021850.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024, detailing the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction. Written by Circuit Judge José A. Cabranes, it lists the legal counsel for both sides and summarizes Maxwell's June 29, 2022, conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy, including her sentencing of concurrent prison terms totaling 240 months (20 years).
DOJ-OGR-00021847.jpg
This document is a single page from a larger legal filing (Case 22-1426, Document 117), likely acting as a separator or cover page for a court order. It contains the header information, the single word title 'ORDER', and a Department of Justice bates stamp footer.
DOJ-OGR-00021834.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated November 1, 2024, discussing Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal. It details her argument that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) should have barred her prosecution in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The text also references a 2019 DOJ OPR investigation into the original handling of the Epstein case by SDFL prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00021810.jpg
This page is from a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024. It argues that the 2003 amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283 (via the PROTECT Act) regarding the statute of limitations for child abuse offenses was intended by Congress to apply retroactively. The document specifically asserts that this amendment applies to Ghislaine Maxwell's conduct as charged in her indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00021807.jpg
This legal document argues that the authority of U.S. Attorneys is statutorily limited to their specific federal districts, unless directed otherwise by the Attorney General. It applies this principle to a case involving Maxwell, suggesting that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) did not need to explicitly prevent the USAO-SDNY from prosecuting, as their jurisdiction was already confined. The argument is supported by citations to U.S. Code and the legal precedent of 'Annabi'.
DOJ-OGR-00021774.jpg
This page from a legal appeal (Case 22-1426) argues that the District Court erred in sentencing Ghislaine Maxwell by applying a leadership enhancement. The defense contends there is no evidence Maxwell supervised Sarah Kellen, noting that the Government chose not to indict Kellen and that pilots testified they did not know who Kellen worked for. The document requests that Maxwell be resentenced.
DOJ-OGR-00021740.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Compliance filed on June 29, 2023, for Case 22-1426. Assistant U.S. Attorney Won S. Shin certifies on behalf of U.S. Attorney Damian Williams that the associated legal brief complies with a court order from April 28, 2023, and contains 19,291 words.
DOJ-OGR-00021739.jpg
This document is the conclusion page (Page 92 of 93) of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated June 29, 2023. It is submitted by US Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Won S. Shin of the Southern District of New York, formally requesting that a judgment of conviction be affirmed.
DOJ-OGR-00021736.jpg
This document is page 76 (PDF page 89) of a legal filing in Case 22-1426 (United States v. Maxwell), dated June 29, 2023. It outlines the Government's argument that Maxwell's sentence was procedurally reasonable ('Point V'). Specifically, it discusses Maxwell's appeal against a 'four-level leadership enhancement' applied to her sentence, noting that Maxwell contests the finding that she acted as an organizer or leader of another criminal participant.
DOJ-OGR-00021709.jpg
This page from a 2023 appellate filing (likely by the government) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's convictions on Counts Three and Four properly qualify as offenses involving sexual abuse of a child, citing testimony from a victim named 'Jane.' It also begins a section defending the District Court's decision regarding 'Juror 50,' who failed to disclose his own history of childhood sexual abuse during jury selection.
DOJ-OGR-00021688.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a brief arguing that the District Court was correct in ruling that the charges against Maxwell were filed in a timely manner. The brief refutes Maxwell's claim that a 2003 amendment to the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse does not apply to her case. The document urges the current court to uphold Judge Nathan's previous decisions to deny Maxwell's motions to dismiss.
DOJ-OGR-00021660.jpg
This document is page xii of a legal filing (Document 79, Case 22-1426) dated June 29, 2023. It serves as a 'Table of Authorities,' listing various legal citations used in the main brief, including United States Code sections, New York Penal Law, Public Laws, Federal Rules of Evidence, and legal treatises, along with the page numbers where they appear.
DOJ-OGR-00021654.jpg
This document appears to be page 'vi' (Table of Authorities) from a legal filing, specifically Case 22-1426 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell appeal), filed on June 29, 2023. It lists various legal precedents involving the United States government against various defendants (Annabi, Archer, Ashraf, etc.) primarily in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The document serves as an index for case law citations found later in the full brief.
DOJ-OGR-00021585.jpg
This document is page 40 of a court transcript (SA-409) from Case 22-1426, filed on 06/29/2023. It records a judge's ruling during a sentencing hearing (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's, given the 'sex crime' and 'minor' context and file codes). The judge explicitly finds the defendant engaged in a pattern of prohibited sexual conduct with a minor on at least two occasions and overrules a defense objection regarding sentencing enhancements, stating that the clear text of the Guidelines overrides background commentary or legislative history.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity