Jane Doe
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
17
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Bradley James Edwards
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe's Mother
|
Family |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Trump
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Plaintiff defendant |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
THEODORE J. LEOPOLD
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane Doe's Father
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Haley Robson
|
Plaintiff defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
narrator
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
DONALD J. TRUMP
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert S. Glassman
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Herman
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Plaintiff defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim abuser |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Herman on behalf of Jane Doe, her father, and stepmother against Jeffrey... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jane Doe dropped her lawsuit against Epstein due to parental squabbling. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's molestation of Jane Doe and other minors. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Exhaustive attempts by Jane Doe and other plaintiffs to obtain discovery from Epstein, including ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley James Edwards filed complaints against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of two redacted clients ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of three minor girls | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley James Edwards filed state court actions on behalf of two redacted clients and a federal c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Intimidation of Jane Doe | Jane Doe's home/Hiding place | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of Jane Doe | Epstein's home (massage room) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of Jane Doe involving massage and specific sexual acts. | Epstein’s mansion in Palm B... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of RICO claim | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein filed an answer to Jane Doe's complaint, invoking his Fifth Amendment right to si... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein took Jane Doe's deposition, asking questions suggesting she is fabricating allega... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Complaint for sexual assault and abuse. | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of state and federal court actions against Jeffrey Epstein. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil action against Epstein represented by Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein sexually abused three clients of Edwards (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein filed a summary judgment motion regarding federal nexus. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein settled the case before trial. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acting classes | Herbert Berkoff Studios and... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Voice lessons | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Taking of photographs of minor Plaintiff without her knowledge | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Car trips for Doe driven by Decedent's drivers | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Alleged criminal activity | Defendants allegedly participated in an enterprise and a pattern of criminal activity, including ... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Recruitment and assault | Ms. Robson recruited Jane Doe and brought her to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane Doe was in... | Epstein's mansion in Palm B... | View |
033.pdf
Legal correspondence dated August 13, 2021, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Debra C. Freeman regarding the case of Jane Doe v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter requests permission to file a redacted statement concerning the Plaintiff's application to proceed anonymously. While the Co-Executors (Indyke and Kahn) do not oppose the anonymity, they wish to present specific material facts relevant to the application for the Court's consideration.
032.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on August 13, 2021, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cv-02365). Attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP enters his appearance as counsel for Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, in a lawsuit brought by a Jane Doe.
029.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on July 30, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cv-02365). Plaintiff Jane Doe is notifying the defendants (Executors of the Epstein Estate and various associated corporate entities) that she is moving the court for an order allowing her to proceed anonymously in the lawsuit.
028.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated June 30, 2021, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Debra C. Freeman regarding the case Jane Doe v. Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The letter requests the lifting of a stay on the proceedings. A court order is superimposed on the document, dated July 22, 2021, which grants the request, lifts the stay, sets deadlines for filings, and schedules a telephonic pretrial conference for August 26, 2021.
027.pdf
This document is a legal letter filed on July 21, 2021, in the case of Jane Doe v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Plaintiff's attorney, Daniel J. Kaiser, requests a one-week extension from Judge Debra C. Freeman to submit a motion for the Plaintiff to proceed anonymously, citing a scheduling conflict with an arbitration. The letter notes that the Defendants consent to this extension request.
026.pdf
A letter dated June 30, 2021, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Pepper to Judge Debra C. Freeman regarding the case Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein). The letter informs the court that the Plaintiff wishes to lift the stay on the action and outlines agreed-upon deadlines for the Defendants to respond to the complaint and for the Plaintiff to file a motion regarding anonymity.
025.pdf
A status report filed on June 1, 2021, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) in the case brought by Jane Doe. The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The parties jointly request that the civil case remain stayed while the compensation claim is considered, noting that a resolution via the Program would lead to the discontinuation of the lawsuit.
024.pdf
This document is a status report filed on May 3, 2021, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. It informs Judge Debra C. Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and requests that the case remain stayed pending the resolution of that claim.
023.pdf
A status report filed on April 1, 2021, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz representing the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) in a civil suit brought by a Jane Doe. The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The parties request that the civil case remain stayed while the compensation claim is considered, noting that a resolution through the Program would lead to the discontinuation of the lawsuit.
019.pdf
A status report filed on January 4, 2021, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein executors (Indyke and Kahn) in the case of Jane Doe v. Indyke et al. The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff intends to participate in the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program and requests that the current litigation remain stayed pending the outcome of that claims process.
018.pdf
This document is a legal status report filed on December 1, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz regarding the civil case of Jane Doe v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The letter informs Judge Debra C. Freeman that the Plaintiff intends to submit a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and requests that the current litigation remain stayed to preserve resources pending the outcome of that administrative claim.
017.pdf
A legal status report filed on November 2, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Indyke and Kahn). The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff (Jane Doe) intends to submit a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. Consequently, both parties request that the lawsuit remain stayed to allow for potential resolution through the Program outside of court.
016.pdf
This document is a status report filed on October 1, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein's executors (Indyke and Kahn) in the case of Jane Doe v. Indyke et al. The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff intends to submit a claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. Consequently, both parties request that the court case remain stayed to save resources while the claim is processed through the Program.
015.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York, dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order applies to multiple civil cases filed against 'Indyke et al.' (executors of the Epstein estate) and 'Nine East 71st Street et al.' The proceedings are stayed to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, with status reports required starting October 1, 2020.
014.pdf
A status report filed on August 14, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz regarding the case of Jane Doe v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The document informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff is submitting claims to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and requests that the legal action remain stayed.
010.pdf
This document is a letter filed on May 28, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Lewis J. Liman in the case of Jane Doe v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The letter outlines an agreement between the parties wherein the defendants accept service of the complaint and are granted an extension until July 21, 2020, to respond. The document includes an endorsement by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman dated June 15, 2020, ordering approval of this agreement.
005.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 18, 2020. It notifies Darren K. Indyke, as an executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, that a lawsuit has been filed against him and co-executor Richard D. Kahn by a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe. The document instructs Indyke to respond to the complaint within 21 days or face a default judgment.
003.pdf
This document is a civil summons filed on March 17, 2020, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cv-02365). Plaintiff Jane Doe is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The summons is specifically addressed to Richard D. Kahn.
002.pdf
This document is a civil summons filed on March 17, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. It notifies Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, that they are being sued by a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe. The document instructs the defendants to respond to the complaint within 21 days to the plaintiff's attorney, Daniel J. Kaiser.
038.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York, dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order applies to multiple civil cases against Indyke et al. and Nine East 71st Street et al., staying proceedings to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. Parties are ordered to submit status reports starting October 1, 2020.
081.pdf
Legal filing from July 2, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Plaintiff's counsel Isidro Garcia responds to a court order, apologizing for delays in filing a scheduling report, partly attributing the delay to difficulty serving Sarah Kellen who was 'believed to have been avoiding service.' The document announces that a settlement has been reached resolving all claims in this federal case and a companion state court case.
080.pdf
This document is a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice filed on June 30, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe II v. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen in the Southern District of Florida. The parties agreed to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled, with each party bearing their own legal costs. The document notes that a settlement was reached, and the court retains jurisdiction to enforce its terms.
080-01.pdf
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated June 2010 (entered on docket June 30, 2010). Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the case brought by Plaintiff Jane Doe II against Defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen following a settlement stipulation by the parties. The court retained jurisdiction specifically to enforce the terms of said settlement.
075.pdf
A legal response filed on March 12, 2010, by attorney Tama Beth Kudman on behalf of non-party Jean Luc Bruhnel (spelled 'Bruhnel' in document) in the case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. The filing opposes a motion to compel Bruhnel's deposition, arguing that he is a French citizen who has left the U.S. with no plans to return and cannot be compelled to appear under Federal Rules. The document alleges misrepresentation and nonfeasance by the Plaintiff's counsel and suggests using the Hague Convention to secure testimony abroad.
061.pdf
This document is Jeffrey Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to a civil complaint filed by Jane Doe II in the Southern District of Florida in October 2009. Epstein pleads the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination in response to most factual allegations. He asserts multiple affirmative defenses, claiming the plaintiff consented to the acts, that he believed she was 18 years or older, and that the claims are barred by the statute of limitations and various constitutional challenges to the retroactivity and application of 18 U.S.C. §2255.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unknown | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Plaintiff was enticed by "promises of money" to... | View |
| N/A | Received | employer | Jane Doe | $100,000.00 | Hypothetical salary for absolute income example | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Epstein chose to settle the case before trial. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Cash payments | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Mention of intent to give massage for monetary ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | monetary com[pensation] for a massage (implied ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Promise of payment for a massage (pretense for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Defendant intended to pay cash in exchange for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $300.00 | Payment for massage mentioned in complaint | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $200.00 | Fee paid on each occasion after Epstein ejacula... | View |
| 2017-10-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $2,500,000.00 | Settlement payment. | View |
| 2016-06-20 | Paid | Jane Doe | U.S. District Cou... | $400.00 | Filing Fee for Complaint (Receipt Number 0208-1... | View |
| 2005-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $300.00 | Payment for 'massage' (sexual acts). | View |
| 2004-11-09 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-11-09 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-10-12 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-10-12 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-10-09 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-10-09 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-08-30 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-08-30 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-07-30 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-07-30 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-06-07 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-06-07 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
Criticism of Plea Bargain
Jane Doe exercised First Amendment rights to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain.
N/A
Phone records showing calls made by Indyke to Jane Doe
Investigation Interview
Jane Doe met with Pagan approximately 10-12 times regarding the case.
Police Report
Witness admits to lying to police about who was in the car with her when she went to Epstein's house.
No Subject
Plaintiff believes she communicated with Kelly Bovino Umekubo.
Money and modeling career
Plaintiff was enticed with promises of money and a modeling career to attend parties.
Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A
A written declaration by the plaintiff, submitted as Exhibit A in the case.
Criticism of Epstein plea bargain
A victim appeared on TV to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain.
Criticism of plea bargain
Criticism of the unduly lenient plea bargain Epstein received.
Silence
Threatened that she would disappear like a specific 12-year-old female if she spoke out.
Defense
Questions suggesting Jane Doe is fabricating allegations.
Instructions
Told her to remove her clothes; later told her to write down her name and phone number.
Massage Request
Epstein called Doe over the telephone requesting a massage for payment, which was a fraudulent pretense for sexual acts.
Victim Statement
A statement read by Ms. Moe describing Maxwell's manipulation and role in Epstein's abuse.
Victim Statement
Written statement read aloud by Ms. Moe describing abuse by Maxwell and Epstein.
Victim impact statement regarding Jeffrey Epstein
Jane Doe provides a statement to the court detailing her sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein in 2004 at Zorro Ranch when she was 15 years old. She describes the psychological manipulation and trauma she endured.
Threats
Short threatening calls (approx 20 seconds) received after filing the initial complaint.
Investigators at their homes
Investigators were knocking on their doors trying to talk about Jane Doe.
Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum Alfredo...
Plaintiff's request to secure Alfredo Rodriguez for testimony.
Deposition Preparation
Met 'this morning' to prepare for deposition.
Solicitation
Scheduling times for Plaintiff to appear at Epstein's home for 'massages' or sexual services.
No Subject
Threatening call stating Jane Doe owed Decedent $10,000 for rent paid on her apartment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity