Jane Doe

Person
Mentions
614
Relationships
126
Events
160
Documents
291
Also known as:
Jane Doe II

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
126 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
19 Very Strong
15
View
person Bradley J. Edwards
Client
17 Very Strong
12
View
person BRAD EDWARDS
Client
11 Very Strong
7
View
person Edwards
Client
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Abuser victim
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Bradley James Edwards
Client
8 Strong
4
View
person MS. MAXWELL
Legal representative
8 Strong
2
View
person Jane Doe's Mother
Family
8 Strong
3
View
person Mr. Epstein
Legal representative
8 Strong
2
View
person Mr. Trump
Legal representative
8 Strong
2
View
person Epstein
Perpetrator victim
7
3
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Plaintiff defendant
7
2
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Victim abuser
7
3
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Alleged abuser victim
7
3
View
person THEODORE J. LEOPOLD
Client
7
3
View
person Jane Doe's Father
Family
7
3
View
person Haley Robson
Plaintiff defendant
6
1
View
person narrator
Client
6
1
View
person DONALD J. TRUMP
Legal representative
6
1
View
person Robert S. Glassman
Client
6
2
View
person Edwards
Legal representative
6
2
View
person JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
Legal representative
6
1
View
person Jeffrey Herman
Client
6
2
View
person Sarah Kellen
Plaintiff defendant
6
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Victim abuser
6
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Herman on behalf of Jane Doe, her father, and stepmother against Jeffrey... N/A View
N/A N/A Jane Doe dropped her lawsuit against Epstein due to parental squabbling. N/A View
N/A N/A Epstein's molestation of Jane Doe and other minors. N/A View
N/A N/A Exhaustive attempts by Jane Doe and other plaintiffs to obtain discovery from Epstein, including ... N/A View
N/A N/A Bradley James Edwards filed complaints against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of two redacted clients ... N/A View
N/A N/A Sexual assault of three minor girls N/A View
N/A N/A Bradley James Edwards filed state court actions on behalf of two redacted clients and a federal c... N/A View
N/A N/A Intimidation of Jane Doe Jane Doe's home/Hiding place View
N/A N/A Sexual assault of Jane Doe Epstein's home (massage room) View
N/A N/A Sexual assault of Jane Doe involving massage and specific sexual acts. Epstein’s mansion in Palm B... View
N/A N/A Dismissal of RICO claim Federal Court View
N/A N/A Jeffrey Epstein filed an answer to Jane Doe's complaint, invoking his Fifth Amendment right to si... N/A View
N/A N/A Jeffrey Epstein took Jane Doe's deposition, asking questions suggesting she is fabricating allega... N/A View
N/A N/A Filing of Complaint for sexual assault and abuse. Palm Beach County, Florida View
N/A N/A Filing of state and federal court actions against Jeffrey Epstein. Florida View
N/A N/A Civil action against Epstein represented by Edwards. Court View
N/A N/A Epstein sexually abused three clients of Edwards (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe). Unknown View
N/A N/A Epstein filed a summary judgment motion regarding federal nexus. Court View
N/A N/A Epstein settled the case before trial. Court View
N/A N/A Acting classes Herbert Berkoff Studios and... View
N/A N/A Voice lessons Unknown View
N/A N/A Taking of photographs of minor Plaintiff without her knowledge Unknown View
N/A N/A Car trips for Doe driven by Decedent's drivers Unknown View
N/A Alleged criminal activity Defendants allegedly participated in an enterprise and a pattern of criminal activity, including ... Florida View
N/A Recruitment and assault Ms. Robson recruited Jane Doe and brought her to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane Doe was in... Epstein's mansion in Palm B... View

EFTA00014450.pdf

This document is an email chain from June to August 2020 between attorney Robert Glassman (Panish Shea & Boyle LLP) and a representative of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a 'Touhy Request' for evidence related to the case 'Jane Doe v. Indyke et al.' On August 4, 2020, the USANYS representative responded with attachments explicitly named as relating to information about Jeffrey Epstein.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25

EFTA00014146.pdf

This document is a declaration by an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of Florida responding to a victim's emergency petition regarding the Epstein case. It details the timeline of the federal investigation, the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the government's efforts (and limitations) in notifying victims. The declaration notably reveals that attorney James Eisenberg, who represented a victim, was paid by Epstein, and explains why certain victims were not included in the federal indictment list due to credibility concerns.

Legal declaration (united states district court)
2025-12-25

EFTA00014077.pdf

This document is the Government's response to a victim's emergency petition under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The Government argues that because no federal charges were filed against Epstein (no 'court proceeding'), the CVRA rights did not fully attach in the way the petitioner claims. The document details the timeline of the 2006-2008 investigation, the negotiations for the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the Government's 'best efforts' to notify victims' counsel (Brad Edwards) of the state plea hearing on June 27, 2008. It defends the secrecy of the negotiations as necessary to prevent Epstein from impeaching victim witnesses and to secure a provision allowing victims to sue under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.

Legal filing (government response)
2025-12-25

EFTA00013976.pdf

This document is a legal petition filed on July 7, 2008, by attorney Brad Edwards on behalf of 'Jane Doe,' a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The petition seeks to enforce Doe's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically asserting that the US Attorney's Office failed to confer with her regarding ongoing plea negotiations with Epstein. The filing details that Epstein had already pleaded guilty to state charges on June 30, 2008, and argues that the federal government was on the verge of finalizing a plea deal without victim input.

Legal filing (petition for enforcement of crime victim's rights)
2025-12-25

EFTA00013943.pdf

An email dated August 21, 2008, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) to attorneys Roy Black and Jay Lefkowitz. The email attaches a response to a previous letter from Lefkowitz and a Protective Order received in the 'Jane Doe v. United States' litigation. The document originates from the West Palm Beach U.S. Attorney's office.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00011496.pdf

A court order from the Southern District of New York dated June 16, 2021, in the case of Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et al. Judge John G. Koeltl orders the plaintiff to pay $13.70 in costs to defendant Ghislane Maxwell, affirming Maxwell as a prevailing party after the plaintiff dismissed the action against her with prejudice.

Court order
2025-12-25

EFTA00010435.pdf

A formal letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to attorney Roberta Kaplan providing documents in response to a request regarding the case Doe v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The enclosed documents include reports of grand jury subpoenas served on Jane Doe, a biographical report on Jane Doe, FBI contact reports, and evidence retrieved from Epstein's residences in New York (2019) and Palm Beach (trash pull in 2005).

Legal correspondence / doj cover letter
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00030279.tif

This document is a page from a court filing, Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM, dated September 17, 2009, listing multiple attorneys and their respective law firms, contact information, and the specific related cases they represent plaintiffs in. It details legal counsel for various plaintiffs, including 'Jane Doe' and 'C.M.A.', across several related case numbers, providing contact details for each attorney and their firm.

Court document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015129.jpg

A legal letter dated August 6, 2025, from attorney Robert S. Glassman to the SDNY Victim and Witness Coordinator regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases. Glassman, representing a 'Jane Doe' victim, joins a previous letter submitted by Annie Farmer's attorney and strongly opposes the release of any information that identifies victims, requesting redactions if materials are released.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001917.jpg

This page of a court transcript captures a hearing in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It begins with a quote from a 'Jane Doe' expressing fear of Maxwell's potential to flee or cause harm. Subsequently, Ms. Moe introduces victim Annie Farmer, who addresses the court to describe her abuse by Maxwell starting at age 16.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001044.jpg

This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, detailing the beginning of a victim's testimony. A victim, identified as Annie Farmer, begins her statement by accusing Ghislaine Maxwell of being a sexual predator who groomed and abused her when she was 16. The transcript also includes a quote from a 'Jane Doe' expressing fear that the accused is a flight risk with international connections.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00001042.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021. Prosecutor Ms. Moe reads a written statement from an anonymous victim ('Jane Doe') to the court. The statement accuses Ghislaine Maxwell of sadistic manipulation, claiming she was 'in charge,' recruited other victims for amusement, and was essential to Jeffrey Epstein's ability to commit abuse.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000729.jpg

This legal document is a Notice of Withdrawal filed on September 26, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Gloria Allred and her law firm, Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, are formally withdrawing as legal counsel for one of the anonymous victims, referred to as 'Jane Doe,' whose victim impact statement was read in court during a hearing on August 27, 2019.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000714.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, in which an attorney, Ms. Allred, reads a victim impact statement from her client, Jane Doe. The statement describes being molested by Jeffrey Epstein, a subsequent incident involving ATVs, and the feeling of powerlessness against Epstein and the 'system that supported him'.

Legal document (court transcript)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000713.jpg

This document is a court transcript of a victim impact statement from a woman identified as "Jane Doe." She recounts being flown on Jeffrey Epstein's private plane to his Zorro Ranch in 2004 at the age of 15, where he sexually molested her and psychologically manipulated her. The testimony highlights Epstein's use of his connections to powerful individuals to intimidate his victims and the lasting trauma caused by his actions.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000712.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, from the case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. It contains a portion of a victim impact statement delivered by Teala Davies, who describes being manipulated and victimized by Jeffrey Epstein as a vulnerable 17-year-old. Davies explains that she still considers herself a victim due to the lingering fear and the profound, lasting impact of Epstein's actions on her life.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000711.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, where an attorney, Ms. Allred, addresses the court on behalf of victims. She describes the case as being about power and the victims' fear of the rich and powerful, while expressing gratitude to the court for giving them a voice and demanding accountability for all conspirators. Ms. Allred then requests that two of her clients be permitted to address the court, a request which the judge grants.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000702.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, in a case involving Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Teri Gibbs appears on behalf of attorney Lisa Bloom to read victim impact statements into the record, including a powerful statement from "Jane Doe 6" addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The statement describes the lasting harm caused by Epstein and asserts the author's identity as a survivor, not a victim.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000675.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. It shows an attorney, Mr. Edwards, introducing his client as 'Jane Doe 2' to the court. Jane Doe 2 then begins her victim impact statement, speaking about the widespread nature of the trauma, the 'Me Too' movement, and her intention to address the difficult question of why victims stayed in the abusive situation.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00000668.jpg

This document is page 30 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein). Attorney Mr. Edwards addresses the court regarding his clients (victims) who wish to speak, establishing protocols for those who wish to remain anonymous ('Jane Doe'). Edwards also acknowledges presentations made by attorneys Weingarten and Weinberg, expressing professional respect for Weinberg despite the adversarial nature of the case, and references the 'tragic ending' (Epstein's death) in relation to potential civil rights violations.

Court transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00030427.jpg

This is a page from a Motion for a Protective Order filed on February 5, 2008, by attorney Theodore J. Leopold on behalf of a 'Jane Doe' victim. The motion alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and his agents have been harassing the victim at her workplace, including an incident where a man falsely posed as an attorney to contact her. The document argues these actions are 'insult to injury' for an emotionally scarred girl and requests a court order prohibiting further harassment.

Legal motion / court filing (motion for protective order)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00030398.jpg

This document is a legal notice from Ricci~Leopold, P.A., dated June 18, 2008, informing all counsel that hearings scheduled for that day have been cancelled. The hearings pertained to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Enlargement of Time and Defendant Haley Robson's Motion to Quash Service of Process in the case of Jane Doe vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen, filed in Palm Beach County, Florida.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015261.jpg

This document is a Plaintiff's response to interrogatories in a civil case against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It lists specific interactions Jane Doe had with Epstein's associates between 1994 and 1999, identifying Ghislaine Maxwell, Juan Alessi, Darren Indyke, Adam Perry Lang, Lesley Groff, Mark Epstein, and Sarah Kellen. The response details roles these individuals played, ranging from facilitating abuse and meetings to providing transportation and making threatening financial demands.

Legal filing (plaintiff's response to interrogatories)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015260.jpg

This document is a Plaintiff's response to interrogatories in litigation against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It itemizes evidence establishing the relationship between Jane Doe and Epstein, including flight logs, phone records from Darren Indyke, and financial records covering rent, tuition, acting classes, and intimate items like underwear. It also alleges that Epstein took photographs of the Plaintiff as a minor without her knowledge, which are currently held by the federal government.

Legal filing (plaintiff's response to interrogatories)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015259.jpg

This document is the first page of a legal filing in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cv-00484-JKG). It details Plaintiff 'Jane Doe's' response to the first set of interrogatories sent by the defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, who are the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The page contains standard legal preliminary statements regarding non-admission of facts and is marked as a Defendant's Exhibit (J-15-R) in a related criminal case (S2 20 Cr. 330).

Legal court filing (response to interrogatories)
2025-11-20
Total Received
$2,600,800.00
30 transactions
Total Paid
$400.00
1 transactions
Net Flow
$2,600,400.00
31 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Unknown Jane Doe $0.00 Plaintiff was enticed by "promises of money" to... View
N/A Received employer Jane Doe $100,000.00 Hypothetical salary for absolute income example View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein Jane Doe $0.00 Epstein chose to settle the case before trial. View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein/E... Jane Doe $0.00 Cash payments View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein Jane Doe $0.00 Mention of intent to give massage for monetary ... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein Jane Doe $0.00 monetary com[pensation] for a massage (implied ... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein Jane Doe $0.00 Promise of payment for a massage (pretense for ... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein Jane Doe $0.00 Defendant intended to pay cash in exchange for ... View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein Jane Doe $300.00 Payment for massage mentioned in complaint View
N/A Received Jeffrey Epstein Jane Doe $200.00 Fee paid on each occasion after Epstein ejacula... View
2017-10-01 Received Jeffrey Epstein Jane Doe $2,500,000.00 Settlement payment. View
2016-06-20 Paid Jane Doe U.S. District Cou... $400.00 Filing Fee for Complaint (Receipt Number 0208-1... View
2005-01-01 Received Jeffrey Epstein Jane Doe $300.00 Payment for 'massage' (sexual acts). View
2004-11-09 Received Epstein/Kellen Jane Doe $0.00 Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts View
2004-11-09 Received Mr. Epstein (impl... Jane Doe $0.00 Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... View
2004-10-12 Received Mr. Epstein (impl... Jane Doe $0.00 Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... View
2004-10-12 Received Epstein/Kellen Jane Doe $0.00 Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts View
2004-10-09 Received Epstein/Kellen Jane Doe $0.00 Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts View
2004-10-09 Received Mr. Epstein (impl... Jane Doe $0.00 Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... View
2004-08-30 Received Epstein/Kellen Jane Doe $0.00 Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts View
2004-08-30 Received Mr. Epstein (impl... Jane Doe $0.00 Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... View
2004-07-30 Received Mr. Epstein (impl... Jane Doe $0.00 Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... View
2004-07-30 Received Epstein/Kellen Jane Doe $0.00 Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts View
2004-06-07 Received Mr. Epstein (impl... Jane Doe $0.00 Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... View
2004-06-07 Received Epstein/Kellen Jane Doe $0.00 Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts View
As Sender
12
As Recipient
10
Total
22

Silence

From: Defendant Trump
To: Jane Doe

Threatened that she would disappear like a specific 12-year-old female if she spoke out.

Verbal threat
N/A

Massage Request

From: Jeffrey Epstein
To: Jane Doe

Epstein called Doe over the telephone requesting a massage for payment, which was a fraudulent pretense for sexual acts.

Call
N/A

Investigation Interview

From: Jane Doe
To: Michelle Pagan

Jane Doe met with Pagan approximately 10-12 times regarding the case.

Meeting
N/A

Police Report

From: Jane Doe
To: Police

Witness admits to lying to police about who was in the car with her when she went to Epstein's house.

Statement
N/A

No Subject

From: Jane Doe
To: Kelly Bovino Umekubo

Plaintiff believes she communicated with Kelly Bovino Umekubo.

Communication
N/A

Money and modeling career

From: Unspecified
To: Jane Doe

Plaintiff was enticed with promises of money and a modeling career to attend parties.

Promise/enticement
N/A

Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A

From: Jane Doe
To: THE COURT REPORTER

A written declaration by the plaintiff, submitted as Exhibit A in the case.

Legal declaration
N/A

Criticism of Epstein plea bargain

From: Jane Doe
To: Public

A victim appeared on TV to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain.

Television appearance
N/A

Criticism of plea bargain

From: Jane Doe
To: Public

Criticism of the unduly lenient plea bargain Epstein received.

Television appearance
N/A

Defense

From: Jeffrey Epstein (Counsel)
To: Jane Doe

Questions suggesting Jane Doe is fabricating allegations.

Deposition
N/A

Criticism of Plea Bargain

From: Jane Doe
To: public

Jane Doe exercised First Amendment rights to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain.

Television appearance
N/A

N/A

From: Darren Indyke
To: Jane Doe

Phone records showing calls made by Indyke to Jane Doe

Call
N/A

Instructions

From: Jeffrey Epstein
To: Jane Doe

Told her to remove her clothes; later told her to write down her name and phone number.

Verbal
N/A

Victim Statement

From: Jane Doe
To: THE COURT

A statement read by Ms. Moe describing Maxwell's manipulation and role in Epstein's abuse.

Court statement
2021-04-01

Victim Statement

From: Jane Doe
To: THE COURT

Written statement read aloud by Ms. Moe describing abuse by Maxwell and Epstein.

Statement
2020-12-10

Victim impact statement regarding Jeffrey Epstein

From: Jane Doe
To: THE COURT

Jane Doe provides a statement to the court detailing her sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein in 2004 at Zorro Ranch when she was 15 years old. She describes the psychological manipulation and trauma she endured.

Court testimony
2019-09-03

Threats

From: Blocked/Unavailable nu...
To: Jane Doe

Short threatening calls (approx 20 seconds) received after filing the initial complaint.

Call
2016-04-26

Investigators at their homes

From: Ex-boyfriends
To: Jane Doe

Investigators were knocking on their doors trying to talk about Jane Doe.

Call
2010-07-01

Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum Alfredo...

From: Jane Doe
To: Court

Plaintiff's request to secure Alfredo Rodriguez for testimony.

Legal motion
2010-06-29

Deposition Preparation

From: Jane Doe
To: Mr. Leopold

Met 'this morning' to prepare for deposition.

Meeting
2008-02-20

Solicitation

From: SARAH KELLEN
To: Jane Doe

Scheduling times for Plaintiff to appear at Epstein's home for 'massages' or sexual services.

Call
2003-06-01

No Subject

From: Darren Indyke
To: Jane Doe

Threatening call stating Jane Doe owed Decedent $10,000 for rent paid on her apartment.

Phone call
1998-01-01

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity