The Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
25 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Legal representative |
18
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Legal representative |
16
Very Strong
|
35 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Williams
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
196 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
228 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
MR. WEINGARTEN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
61 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Members of the jury
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Weinberg
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
116 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
155 | |
|
person
MR. ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MR. COHEN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
136 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Court proceeding regarding trial schedule, closing arguments, and jury deliberation timing relati... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court proceedings/Trial discussions | Courtroom (referenced by Tr... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Maxwell's Sentencing Proceeding | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Deliberations and Court Response to Note | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Detention Hearing Decision | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment based on fabricated stories and perjurious conspiracy by ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Payment of criminal monetary penalties within 30 (or 60) days after release from imprisonment, ba... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing discussing attorney misconduct and potential retrial. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Government Exhibit 1004 (Stipulation) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court Recess pending verdict | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion regarding Exhibit 3505-005 | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court proceeding sidebar or argument regarding courtroom logistics and COVID protocols. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Court and Counsel at 8:45 AM. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial sessions planned for Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday before Christmas and New Year's. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | 10-minute break (Recess) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | 9 a.m. conference regarding the jury charge. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Charging Conference (Trial Tr. at 2758–61) | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal sidebar/conference regarding a response to a jury question concerning witness Carolyn and a... | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror No. 50 questioning during trial. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding admissibility of testimony. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding sentencing enhancements for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020608.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal motion filed on January 16, 2023, in Case 22-1426 (United States v. Maxwell appeal). The defense is requesting permission to file an oversized brief of 20,000 words, citing the complexity of the case, a 3,000-page trial transcript, and specific legal issues regarding evidentiary rulings, juror misconduct, and a non-prosecution agreement. The filing notes that the US Attorney's Office for the SDNY (specifically AUSAs Rohrbach, Pomerantz, Moe, and Comey) has been notified via email.
DOJ-OGR-00020597.jpg
This legal document is a letter from attorney John M. Leventhal to a court, dated July 28, 2022. Leventhal requests an extension to file an Appellant's Brief until January 30, 2023. The justification for the request is the necessity of a meeting with his client at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn and his obligations to other clients, including a Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00020568.jpg
This legal document is a court docket summary from July 2022, detailing filings and orders from February 2022 in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries, primarily orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan, concern procedural matters like redactions and amicus briefs. The most significant action is the Court's order for an evidentiary hearing to investigate whether 'Juror 50' failed to truthfully disclose a history of sexual abuse during jury selection, a matter which could impact the validity of the trial's verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00020553.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket log for Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022. It details a series of legal filings that occurred primarily on November 22, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan and various letter motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense concerning evidence (birth certificates, Exhibit 52), witnesses (Witness-3, Accuser-3), subpoenas, and proposed redactions to court documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020503.jpg
This legal document, a page from the court docket in Case 22-1426, details several filings and orders from December 2020 concerning defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan issues an order approving redactions to letters, denying an in-camera conference, and setting a detailed briefing schedule for Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. The document also logs letters filed on Maxwell's behalf by Christian R. Everdell, as well as a letter from Sophia Papapetru and John Wallace regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00020483.jpg
This legal document, part of a criminal judgment against Ghislaine Maxwell dated June 29, 2022, outlines the special conditions of her supervised release. The conditions are highly restrictive, requiring her to submit to searches of her property and electronic devices, participate in sex offender and mental health treatment, and submit to polygraph testing. She is also barred from having any contact with her victims or with minors under 18, and her financial activities and internet usage are subject to strict monitoring and control by her probation officer.
DOJ-OGR-00020467.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from February 2022 for the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. It details several procedural orders regarding motions for a new trial, redactions to protect juror privacy, and the filing of an amicus brief. The most significant entry is an order granting an evidentiary hearing to investigate whether Juror 50 failed to truthfully disclose a history of sexual abuse during jury selection, while denying a broader hearing involving other jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00020452.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022, detailing numerous filings that occurred on November 22, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan and a series of letter motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense. The filings cover procedural matters such as proposed redactions, motions to quash subpoenas, admissibility of witness testimony (Witness-3), and evidence related to specific exhibits and accusers (Accuser-3).
DOJ-OGR-00020450.jpg
This document is a log of court filings from November 19, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The entries detail orders and a memorandum opinion concerning evidentiary motions, specifically the admissibility of Government Exhibit 52 and the testimony of a witness referred to as 'Accuser-3' and 'Witness-3'. The court is ruling on what testimony from this witness regarding her relationship with Maxwell and Mr. Epstein will be permissible, setting deadlines for the parties to propose redactions to court documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020441.jpg
This document is a log of court filings and orders from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell between November 3 and November 8, 2021. The entries detail procedural matters ahead of her trial, including Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders on motions for reconsideration, jury selection logistics, and deadlines for witness-related briefings. The filings also concern motions to exclude evidence related to an alleged victim and the government's response to defense motions.
DOJ-OGR-00020432.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from September 1, 2021, to October 13, 2021. Key entries include Judge Nathan ordering the government to disclose the identities of unnamed co-conspirators, scheduling jury selection for November 19, and various filings regarding redactions and voir dire procedures. The document highlights the logistical preparations for the trial, including scheduling around the Christmas holidays.
DOJ-OGR-00020426.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from May 17 to May 25, 2021. The entries primarily concern pre-trial motions filed by Maxwell's defense team, including motions to suppress evidence, strike surplusage, and dismiss the superseding indictment. The log also records correspondence with Judge Alison J. Nathan from both the defense and the prosecution (USA) regarding document redactions and scheduling.
DOJ-OGR-00020412.jpg
This document is a court docket log from Case 22-1426, detailing filings and orders from late March 2021 in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment by the U.S. government, multiple letters and orders concerning redactions in court documents, motions related to subpoenas, and the payment of appeal fees. The log shows active litigation between Maxwell's defense team, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, and the prosecution, all under the supervision of Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020410.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from Case 22-1426, detailing legal filings and orders in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell between March 9 and March 24, 2021. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's third motion for bail and several orders concerning the redaction and sealing of court documents. The docket also describes an order related to Maxwell's attempt to subpoena a law firm representing her alleged victims, outlining the legal procedure for such an action.
DOJ-OGR-00020402.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court case file dated July 8, 2022, details court activities from December 2020 in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes a court order by Judge Alison J. Nathan approving redactions to letters, denying an in-camera conference, and ordering parties to prepare a briefing schedule for Maxwell's renewed bail motion. The document also logs several letters filed with the court and a subsequent order establishing specific deadlines for the bail motion submissions.
DOJ-OGR-00020396.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the legal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court filings and orders from late July 2020. The entries primarily concern procedural matters, including a defense motion to limit extrajudicial statements (which was denied) and a series of letters and responses between the defense and prosecution regarding a proposed protective order. The presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan, issued several orders setting deadlines and warning counsel to adhere to court rules.
DOJ-OGR-00019056.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. After a series of questions about aircraft ownership were objected to by Ms. Comey and sustained by the court, the questioning shifts to Mr. Rodgers' familiarity with a place called Interlochen, described as a summer arts camp for musicians and singers.
DOJ-OGR-00018988.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge (THE COURT) and two attorneys, Mr. Everdell and Ms. Comey. The judge rules that document redactions are overly broad and must be narrowed. Ms. Comey agrees, noting the task will be time-intensive, and receives permission from the Court to complete the work over an upcoming long weekend.
DOJ-OGR-00018978.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers authenticates their pilot logbook, confirming it is an accurate record kept in the regular course of their duties. The government attorney, Ms. Comey, successfully moves to admit the logbook into evidence as a sealed exhibit (662) and a redacted public version (662-R), which the court accepts without objection from opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell.
DOJ-OGR-00018905.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Shawn testifies about receiving phone calls from three women—one named Sarah, one with an English accent, and one with a French-sounding accent. The purpose of these calls was to convey a message that a person named Jeffrey was requesting someone named Carolyn to work.
DOJ-OGR-00018857.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between attorneys and the judge. The primary topic is the status of witnesses, with the government (represented by Ms. Moe) seeking confirmation that the defense will not recall a witness named Jane, following the completed testimony of Matt and the withdrawal of Brian. The defense (represented by Ms. Menninger) requests time to consider, and the judge instructs them to confer and address the issue the next day.
DOJ-OGR-00018853.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion about witness scheduling. The government's counsel, Mr. Rohrbach, informs the court that an investigation could not be completed and they will not call a witness named Brian. In response to a request from defense counsel, the court directs that an updated witness list be provided that evening.
DOJ-OGR-00018845.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning focuses on discrepancies between lawsuits she filed against Epstein and Kellen in 2008-2009 and a subsequent claim she made to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Carolyn denies adding a 'Ms. Maxwell' to her fund request and, after her memory is refreshed, clarifies she was awarded $2,804,000, not the suggested amounts of $3.25 million or $3.9 million.
DOJ-OGR-00018747.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The questioning establishes that approximately 19 years prior, Carolyn visited a specific house for the first time, accompanied by Virginia Roberts, who led her inside and upstairs. The proceedings are then paused for a lunch break by the judge, who addresses an individual named Mr. Pagliuca.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity