Lara Pomerantz
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
12
Very Strong
|
15 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Won S. Shin
|
Co counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
location
USA
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Appellant's counsel (filer)
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Oral argument request | Request for oral argument in case 20-3061, with a preference for it only if another party also re... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Submission of legal filing concluding that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | Court filing | The Government submitted a motion filed by Kate's attorney. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal filing | The U.S. Government filed its sentencing memorandum in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Filing of Government's sentencing recommendation conclusion. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal document service | Christian R. Everdell served a memorandum via ECF upon four individuals. | N/A | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 661 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 660 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | Legal filing | Document 650 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 652 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-15 | N/A | Filing of Government's opposition to defendant's motion for a new trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court filing | USA filed a MEMORANDUM in Opposition to the motion for a new trial. | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-03-07 | N/A | Filing of Document 632 | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-03-07 | N/A | Filing of Document 632 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 635 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001358.jpg
This document is page 2 of a government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) regarding the confinement conditions of the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). It details security protocols including daily emails with counsel, twice-daily pat-down searches, weekly body scans, and nightly flashlight checks every 15 minutes to ensure the inmate is breathing. The government asserts these measures are necessary for safety and clarifies that strip searches are currently suspended due to lack of in-person visitation.
DOJ-OGR-00001346.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, addresses the court regarding the stringent and individualized detention conditions of a detainee, Ms. Maxwell. The filing notes that a previous letter of complaint received no meaningful response and suggests that the facility's warden, Warden Tellez, should be directed to provide a first-hand explanation to the court for these specialized conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00001344.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York regarding the conditions of confinement for a defendant (identified by case number as Ghislaine Maxwell) at the MDC. The text details the defendant's schedule, including 13 hours of time outside the isolation cell daily (7am-8pm), access to discovery materials, computers, CorrLinks, and legal calls. It asserts that the defendant has more access to discovery and attorney communication than any other inmate at the facility, even while in quarantine.
DOJ-OGR-00001342.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Compliance filed on April 12, 2021, as page 25 of a larger filing (Case 21-770). Assistant United States Attorney Lara Pomerantz certifies that the associated opposition brief complies with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and contains 5,200 words. The document bears a Department of Justice footer stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00001341.jpg
This is the conclusion page (page 24) of a legal filing dated April 12, 2021, submitted by the Southern District of New York (Assistant US Attorneys Pomerantz, Comey, and Moe). The document argues that Judge Nathan acted correctly in denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for temporary release and concludes that the motion should remain denied.
DOJ-OGR-00001318.jpg
This document is a legal affirmation filed on April 12, 2021, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Lara Pomerantz to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The filing formally opposes the appeal made by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell regarding two prior District Court orders, dated December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, which denied her requests for pre-trial release.
DOJ-OGR-00001316.jpg
This document is an Affirmation filed on April 12, 2021, by Assistant US Attorney Lara Pomerantz in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Pomerantz requests permission to file an unredacted copy of 'Exhibit F' (Government's Memorandum in Opposition to Release) under seal. She notes that the public version was redacted to protect third-party privacy interests and confidential discovery material, but the Government believes the unredacted information is pertinent to the appeal.
DOJ-OGR-00001251.jpg
This document is the conclusion page (Page 9) of a legal filing submitted on March 9, 2021, by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The filing argues that the defendant (identified by case number as Ghislaine Maxwell) poses a substantial flight risk and that their 'Third Bail Motion' should be denied. The document is signed by Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00001178.jpg
This legal document is the conclusion of a filing by the U.S. Attorney's office, dated December 16, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The prosecution argues that the defendant's 'Renewed Bail Motion' should be denied, referencing a prior court finding that the defendant “poses a substantial actual risk of flight.” The document asserts that no new information justifies changing this conclusion.
DOJ-OGR-00001143.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing from the U.S. Government in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed on June 25, 2020, in the Southern District of New York, it is a memorandum opposing Maxwell's renewed motion for release. The document lists the prosecuting attorneys, including Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss.
DOJ-OGR-00000903.jpg
This is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 30, 2021, in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket No. 21-770). Lara Pomerantz of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is entering the case as additional counsel, joining co-counsel Won S. Shin, on behalf of the United States (Appellee). The document certifies her admission to the court and provides her contact information.
DOJ-OGR-00000900.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-770) covering March 22–24, 2021. It details the denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bail by Judge Alison J. Nathan and Maxwell's subsequent notice of appeal. Additionally, it contains a significant order regarding a defense subpoena directed at a law firm representing alleged victims, outlining the procedural requirements for victim notification and privacy protection under Rule 17(c)(3).
DOJ-OGR-00000899.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770 covering February 23, 2021, to March 18, 2021. It details Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bond, the Government's opposition to it, and various scheduling orders regarding pretrial motions. A significant order on March 18, 2021, addresses the redaction and sealing of documents, specifically denying the Government's request to completely seal 'Exhibit 11' because portions of the transcript are already public record in the *Giuffre v. Maxwell* civil case.
DOJ-OGR-00000898.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770 (related to Ghislaine Maxwell) covering filings between February 4, 2021, and February 16, 2021. It details numerous defense motions filed by Maxwell's legal team (Cohen, Pagliuca) to dismiss charges, suppress evidence, and strike surplusage, alongside multiple sealed documents. The log also records correspondence to Judge Nathan regarding conditions at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00000897.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from Jan 26 to Feb 4, 2021. It details significant pre-trial activity, including the filing of twelve pre-trial motions by the defense, disputes over laptop access at the MDC Brooklyn involving the Bureau of Prisons, and specific motions to suppress evidence and dismiss charges (counts 1-6). The document highlights the involvement of various AUSAs, defense attorneys, and Judge Alison J. Nathan in managing redactions and discovery disputes.
DOJ-OGR-00000895.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from late 2020 and early 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's bail application due to flight risk, citing specific charges including conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts and perjury. The docket tracks correspondence between the prosecution (USA) and defense (Everdell), sealed documents, and Maxwell's subsequent filing of a Notice of Appeal after a request for an extension of time was denied.
DOJ-OGR-00000891.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from December 2020 in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details correspondence regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC and a denied request for an in camera conference regarding a renewed bail motion. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders balancing privacy interests with public access, ultimately allowing tailored redactions to defense letters but denying the request to keep proceedings entirely sealed or in camera.
DOJ-OGR-00000890.jpg
This document is a page from a federal court docket in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, listing entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various filings including letters regarding discovery deadlines, affidavits, mandates from the USCA dismissing an appeal, and several memo endorsements and orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding discovery schedules and conditions of confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00000889.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing legal filings from September to November 2020. It chronicles a series of letters, motions, and orders between the prosecution (USA, represented by AUSAs Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz) and the defense (Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by attorneys including Sternheim, Everdell, and Pagliuca), all overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The filings primarily concern procedural matters such as requests to delay disclosure of evidence, modify protective orders, and confirm the government's disclosure obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00000862.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 covering the denial of Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for bail and her subsequent appeal of that decision. It also details a legal dispute regarding a defense subpoena targeting a law firm representing alleged victims, with Judge Nathan ordering the firm to formally file objections to protect victim privacy under Rule 17(c)(3). The document lists various filings including letters from prosecutors (AUSAs) and defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00000861.jpg
This document is a docket summary from the legal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court filings and orders from late February to mid-March 2021. Key events include Maxwell's third motion for bond, subsequent responses and replies, and a motion for a time extension which was granted. The document culminates in a detailed order from Judge Alison J. Nathan on March 18, 2021, addressing disputes over the redaction and sealing of pretrial motions and exhibits, setting deadlines for the parties to confer and propose joint redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00000860.jpg
This document is a court docket log from February 2021 for Case 21-770 involving Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the filing of numerous defense motions including attempts to suppress evidence, dismiss counts based on time-bars and a non-prosecution agreement, and strike surplusage. The log also records the filing of sealed documents and correspondence between attorneys (both defense and prosecution) and Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00000859.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770), covering entries from January 26, 2021, to February 4, 2021. It details various legal filings, including government letters regarding laptop access at MDC Brooklyn, a denial of a BOP request to vacate an order, and multiple defense motions to suppress evidence and dismiss specific counts of the indictment. The document highlights the active legal maneuvering regarding redactions, detention conditions, and pre-trial dismissal attempts.
DOJ-OGR-00000857.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770), covering late December 2020 to mid-January 2021. It details the denial of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail due to flight risk, referencing charges related to the enticement and transportation of minors for illegal sex acts. The document tracks subsequent procedural filings, including sealed documents and Maxwell's eventual filing of a Notice of Appeal on January 11, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00000853.jpg
This is a court docket sheet from December 2020 (entries 78-84) detailing proceedings in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records correspondence regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC and legal arguments concerning the sealing and redaction of defense letters. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders requiring MDC counsel to submit information, approved specific redactions based on privacy interests, denied a request for an in-camera conference, and ordered three documents to be placed in a sealed vault.
Notice of Appearance
Formal notice that Lara Pomerantz is appearing as additional counsel for the Appellee.
RE: Activity in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell Order
Confirming agreement with a draft joint letter to the Court and attaching it.
Notice of Appearance
Assistant United States Attorney Lara Pomerantz files a notice to formally appear in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell and requests to be added to the electronic filing notification list.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity