Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Counsel

Person
Mentions
172
Relationships
34
Events
237
Documents
81
Also known as:
Plaintiffs' Counsel Plaintiffs' counsel (Edwards and Cassell) Special Counsel Jeffrey Epstein's Counsel Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein All Counsel Counsel General (South African) Counsel General Nine victims who had previously retained counsel legal counsel at the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”) Government and Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) legal counsel Counsel (Comey and Sternheim)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
34 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Judge
Professional
8 Strong
3
View
person Juror 50
Client
7
3
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional
7
3
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
7
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
6
2
View
person defendant
Professional
6
2
View
person Judge (implied speaker)
Professional
6
1
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Judge
Legal representative
6
2
View
person the defendant
Professional
5
1
View
person The jury
Professional
5
1
View
person Unnamed Speaker (presumably the judge)
Professional
5
1
View
person defendant
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
Professional
5
1
View
person the defendant
Client
5
1
View
person Designating Party
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
5
1
View
person The President
Adversarial
5
1
View
person Attorney General
Administrative
5
1
View
person Juror No. 50
Client
5
1
View
person MDC warden
Adversarial professional
5
1
View
organization Peters and Peters
Professional
5
1
View
person Juror 50
Professional
5
1
View
organization The Court
Professional
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2025-06-01 N/A Special Counsel rushed to build a case regarding the pardon authority believing a Michael Flynn p... Washington D.C. View
2025-01-03 Trial A trial expected to last at least six weeks, with the jury sitting from 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. fi... Courtroom View
2024-01-12 N/A Final pre-trial conference and oral argument on summary judgment motions at 4:00 PM (Handwritten) SDNY Court View
2023-06-29 N/A Court hearing involving victim impact statements against Ghislaine Maxwell. Courtroom (likely SDNY) View
2022-08-22 Court hearing A court hearing where victim impact statements are being presented. Ms. Ransome gives oral testim... N/A View
2022-08-22 N/A Court filing date of the transcript document. Southern District of New York View
2022-08-10 N/A Filing of Document 757 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Recess pending verdict Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court Recess Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings adjourned for the evening. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court filing of transcript for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) Southern District of New Yo... View
2022-08-10 N/A Jury Selection / Voir Dire Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Scheduling of Rule 29 Motion Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Filing of Document 763 in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell Southern District of New York View
2022-08-10 N/A Court Colloquy Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony (Cross-examination of McHugh) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Southern District Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Filing of Document 747 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Southern District of New York View
2022-08-10 Court testimony Cross-examination of witness Jane regarding her activities in 1996 and any connection to Jeffrey ... Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Trial proceedings A judge gives preliminary instructions to the jury at the start of a trial, covering rules of con... courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court recess The court announced a morning break for 10 to 15 minutes. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A judge is giving a charge, or instructions, to a jury as part of a criminal trial (Case 1:20-cr-... Southern District (implied) View
2022-08-10 Jury selection The speaker outlines the procedure for the final stage of jury selection, which involves question... Courthouse View
2022-08-10 Court testimony Direct examination of witness Maguire by attorney Ms. Moe regarding the seizure of evidence. Courtroom (implied) View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding A court session held at 9:35 a.m. where the judge addressed a note from the jury regarding transc... In open court View

DOJ-OGR-00011668.jpg

This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. An unnamed speaker, likely the judge, details the logistical plan for the final phase of jury selection, explaining how 58 remaining jurors will be questioned for bias via a live feed and how counsel will then exercise peremptory strikes on a smaller pool of 40 jurors.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011537.jpg

This document is a partial transcript from a court hearing on July 22, 2022, discussing factual objections and the calculation of sentencing guidelines. The Court, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Moe participate in the discussion, with the Court adopting PSR recitations and outlining the process for guideline calculation. The defense contends a guideline calculation of 51 to 63 months' imprisonment, while the government's contention is cut off.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017415.jpg

This document page, marked as a House Oversight exhibit, appears to be a manuscript draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz) detailing legal work during the Apartheid era. It begins with a quote from 'Woody' (likely Allen) about blacklisting, then recounts the narrator's denied visa to South Africa, collaboration with Irwin Cotler, and secret negotiations with an East German lawyer to exchange client Anatoly Sharansky and potentially Nelson Mandela. It notes Mandela's refusal to be part of a spy swap.

Manuscript draft / legal exhibit
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012149.jpg

This document is page 8 of a legal memorandum from Kirkland & Ellis LLP defending Jeffrey Epstein against federal charges under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). The text argues that the prosecution lacks evidence of 'inducement' or 'enticement' occurring over the phone or internet, noting that communications were often handled by secretaries and did not contain explicit content. The defense claims the women involved ('masseuses') were 'friends of friends' who visited Epstein's home voluntarily, often without direct prior contact with Epstein himself.

Legal memorandum / defense filing
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030263.jpg

The document appears to be a narrative report or excerpt from a book concerning the Mueller Investigation, produced to the House Oversight Committee. It details the Special Counsel's concerns regarding the President's absolute pardon power, specifically regarding a potential pardon for Michael Flynn in early June. It outlines the legal strategy the Mueller team prepared to argue that pardoning a witness to protect oneself constitutes a corrupt act and obstruction of justice, despite the broad constitutional authority of the pardon power. Note: This document pertains to the Trump/Mueller investigation and does not contain text related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Investigative narrative / document produced to house oversight committee
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446.jpg

This document is page 51 of a legal transcript, identified as HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446. It captures a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, and Mr. Tein regarding the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold objects to a question, stating it has been asked multiple times and is harassing the witness, while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein defend their line of questioning.

Legal transcript
2025-11-17
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
2 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
2 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Plaintiffs Counsel $0.00 Obligation to pay counsel a reasonable fee for ... View
0001-07-01 Received Attorney General ... Counsel $0.00 Hypothetical refusal of the Special Counsel's b... View
As Sender
33
As Recipient
75
Total
108

Video conference access information

From: Chambers
To: Counsel

Chambers will email counsel with information on how to access the video conference for the July 14, 2020 proceeding.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Legal consultation

From: Ms. Maxwell
To: Counsel

Guards are described as feverishly writing while observing Ms. Maxwell during videoconferencing with her counsel.

Videoconference
N/A
Communication Source

Legal calls

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Counsel

The defendant is permitted to make legal calls for up to three hours per day in a private room.

Phone call
N/A
Communication Source

Investigation Documents

From: Trump's Lawyers (Dowd/...
To: Counsel

Sent more than 1.1 million documents merely as attachments with minimal records.

Document production
N/A
Communication Source

Disclosure

From: Counsel
To: Counsel

The Court refers to an email between counsel which appears to contain a disclosure, which is a point of discussion in the hearing.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Defense

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Counsel

Videoconferencing with counsel, observed by guards writing notes.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Video conference

From: Counsel
To: Ms. Maxwell

Monitor repositioned further away, impacting document review.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Video conference

From: Counsel
To: Ms. Maxwell

Session reduced by 90 minutes; severe audio/video technical issues impacting confidentiality and visibility.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Counsel
To: Counsel

Back and forth emails between counsel described as self-serving and hearsay

Email
N/A
Communication Source

jury note

From: Court
To: Counsel

The Court discussed the jury's note with counsel.

Discussion
N/A
Communication Source

Restrictions on Ms. Maxwell's confinement

From: Counsel
To: ["MDC warden", "MDC le...

Counsel attempted to address the restrictive conditions of Ms. Maxwell's confinement through numerous communications, but to no avail.

Letters, emails and calls
N/A
Communication Source

Defense Preparation

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Counsel

Document claims conditions impair ability to communicate effectively with counsel.

Legal consultation
N/A
Communication Source

CorrLinks Correspondence

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Counsel

Emails deleted by MDC prior to the 180-day retention period.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Civil Litigation

From: Counsel
To: The Defendant

Legal materials and correspondence on the hacked phone.

Correspondence
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Defense

From: Ms. Maxwell
To: Counsel

Meetings behind closed doors, visible but not audible to staff.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Pretrial motions

From: Ms. Maxwell
To: Counsel

Request for a legal call to confer with counsel regarding pretrial motions was denied.

Legal call request
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Defense

From: Ms. Maxwell
To: Counsel

Facilitated on-going communication.

Video conferencing
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Lists

From: Counsel
To: THE COURT

Joint submission of four lists regarding which jurors should proceed or be excused.

Legal submission
N/A
Communication Source

In-person legal conference

From: Counsel
To: Ms. Maxwell

Four-hour legal conference marked by restrictions on water, earbuds, and privacy.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Interpreter Services

From: Counsel
To: Calendar Team

Request for sign interpreters or hearing aids.

Written notice
N/A
Communication Source

Rule 4-4.2

From: counsel for Defendant
To: Counsel

Correspondence stating that pursuant to Rule 4-4.2, 'parties to a matter may communicate directly with each other'.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Defense Preparation

From: Ms. Maxwell
To: Counsel

Reference to Maxwell's need to communicate freely with counsel to prepare for defense.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Exhibit 52 issue

From: Counsel
To: THE COURT

Briefing received by the court at 9:45.

Briefing
N/A
Communication Source

Court Reporter Attendance

From: Counsel
To: calendar clerk

Notice including name, address, and telephone number of attending reporter.

Written notice
N/A
Communication Source

Defendant's conditions of confinement

From: Counsel
To: ["The Court"]

The Court received regular updates regarding the defendant's conditions of confinement based on regular communications between the Government and Bureau of Prisons legal counsel.

Legal communication
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search