| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Judge
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Judge (implied speaker)
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Judge
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The jury
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Speaker (presumably the judge)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Designating Party
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The President
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Administrative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MDC warden
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Peters and Peters
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-09 | Legal filing | A motion for discovery was filed on behalf of Defendant Thomas, requesting reports and other info... | Court | View |
| 2020-02-20 | N/A | Call with counsel (referenced in email subject) | Unknown | View |
| 2020-02-20 | N/A | Call with counsel (Accepted) | Teleconference | View |
| 2020-02-20 | N/A | Call with counsel | Conference call | View |
| 2020-02-11 | N/A | Rule 16 conference | Court | View |
| 2020-01-30 | N/A | Scheduled control date court appearance at 11 a.m. | Court | View |
| 2020-01-28 | N/A | Judge Debra Freeman issues an order directing counsel to submit an update regarding settlement di... | SDNY | View |
| 2019-12-02 | N/A | Status Conference where the court raised questions about standing under the Wiretap Act. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-11-25 | N/A | Scheduled next conference date before Judge Torres. | SDNY | View |
| 2019-11-01 | N/A | Status conference in the Southern District (SDNY) regarding sexual abuse survivors of Epstein. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-10-28 | N/A | Scheduled date for oral argument on motions. | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-10-15 | N/A | Meeting between Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office representatives and Epstein's victims/counsel. | Florida | View |
| 2019-09-10 | N/A | Continuation of Proffer Meeting | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court proceeding | A court proceeding where victims and their counsel were permitted to be heard. | court | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Nolle conference / Status Conference | 500 Pearl, Courtroom 17B | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Brief hearing regarding the nolle prosequi order proposed by the US Attorney following Epstein's ... | Courtroom 17B, SDNY | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Conference regarding the dismissal of the indictment in light of Epstein's death | Courtroom 17B, 500 Pearl St... | View |
| 2019-08-14 | N/A | Distribution of legal hold notice | Department of Justice | View |
| 2019-07-31 | N/A | Scheduled status conference | SDNY | View |
| 2019-07-31 | N/A | Scheduled status/scheduling conference | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court proceeding where the current judge is reviewing a transcript of a previous SORA hearing. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing regarding bail and classification levels. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Phone conversation between SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney and counsel for subpoena recipient. | Phone | View |
| 2019-07-15 | N/A | In-court hearing regarding bail | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-15 | N/A | In-court hearing regarding release/remand | SDNY | View |
This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. An unnamed speaker, likely the judge, details the logistical plan for the final phase of jury selection, explaining how 58 remaining jurors will be questioned for bias via a live feed and how counsel will then exercise peremptory strikes on a smaller pool of 40 jurors.
This document is a partial transcript from a court hearing on July 22, 2022, discussing factual objections and the calculation of sentencing guidelines. The Court, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Moe participate in the discussion, with the Court adopting PSR recitations and outlining the process for guideline calculation. The defense contends a guideline calculation of 51 to 63 months' imprisonment, while the government's contention is cut off.
This document page, marked as a House Oversight exhibit, appears to be a manuscript draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz) detailing legal work during the Apartheid era. It begins with a quote from 'Woody' (likely Allen) about blacklisting, then recounts the narrator's denied visa to South Africa, collaboration with Irwin Cotler, and secret negotiations with an East German lawyer to exchange client Anatoly Sharansky and potentially Nelson Mandela. It notes Mandela's refusal to be part of a spy swap.
This document is page 8 of a legal memorandum from Kirkland & Ellis LLP defending Jeffrey Epstein against federal charges under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). The text argues that the prosecution lacks evidence of 'inducement' or 'enticement' occurring over the phone or internet, noting that communications were often handled by secretaries and did not contain explicit content. The defense claims the women involved ('masseuses') were 'friends of friends' who visited Epstein's home voluntarily, often without direct prior contact with Epstein himself.
The document appears to be a narrative report or excerpt from a book concerning the Mueller Investigation, produced to the House Oversight Committee. It details the Special Counsel's concerns regarding the President's absolute pardon power, specifically regarding a potential pardon for Michael Flynn in early June. It outlines the legal strategy the Mueller team prepared to argue that pardoning a witness to protect oneself constitutes a corrupt act and obstruction of justice, despite the broad constitutional authority of the pardon power. Note: This document pertains to the Trump/Mueller investigation and does not contain text related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is page 51 of a legal transcript, identified as HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446. It captures a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, and Mr. Tein regarding the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold objects to a question, stating it has been asked multiple times and is harassing the witness, while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein defend their line of questioning.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Plaintiffs | Counsel | $0.00 | Obligation to pay counsel a reasonable fee for ... | View |
| 0001-07-01 | Received | Attorney General ... | Counsel | $0.00 | Hypothetical refusal of the Special Counsel's b... | View |
Notice including name, address, and telephone number of attending reporter.
Four-hour legal conference marked by restrictions on water, earbuds, and privacy.
Legal materials and correspondence on the hacked phone.
Reference to Maxwell's need to communicate freely with counsel to prepare for defense.
Emails deleted by MDC prior to the 180-day retention period.
Request for sign interpreters or hearing aids.
Counsel attempted to address the restrictive conditions of Ms. Maxwell's confinement through numerous communications, but to no avail.
Document claims conditions impair ability to communicate effectively with counsel.
Joint submission of four lists regarding which jurors should proceed or be excused.
Meetings behind closed doors, visible but not audible to staff.
Videoconferencing with counsel, observed by guards writing notes.
Chambers will email counsel with information on how to access the video conference for the July 14, 2020 proceeding.
The defendant is permitted to make legal calls for up to three hours per day in a private room.
Facilitated on-going communication.
The Court received regular updates regarding the defendant's conditions of confinement based on regular communications between the Government and Bureau of Prisons legal counsel.
The defendant is permitted to make legal calls for up to three hours per day in a private room.
Sent more than 1.1 million documents merely as attachments with minimal records.
Briefing received by the court at 9:45.
The Court discussed the jury's note with counsel.
Request for a legal call to confer with counsel regarding pretrial motions was denied.
The Court refers to an email between counsel which appears to contain a disclosure, which is a point of discussion in the hearing.
The court speculates that counsel would have filed an application or a letter to an administrative agency to get a response regarding the individual's registration requirements.
5 hours daily / 25 hours weekly of privileged attorney-client communication.
Guards are described as feverishly writing while observing Ms. Maxwell during videoconferencing with her counsel.
Monitor repositioned further away, impacting document review.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity