Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Counsel

Person
Mentions
172
Relationships
34
Events
237
Documents
81
Also known as:
Plaintiffs' Counsel Plaintiffs' counsel (Edwards and Cassell) Special Counsel Jeffrey Epstein's Counsel Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein All Counsel Counsel General (South African) Counsel General Nine victims who had previously retained counsel legal counsel at the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”) Government and Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) legal counsel Counsel (Comey and Sternheim)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
34 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jury
Professional
5
1
View
person Loftus
Legal representative
5
1
View
person The Defendant
Client
5
1
View
person Recipient of Information
Legal representative
5
1
View
person The President
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Assistant United States Attorney
Legal representative
1
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
1
1
View
person The Court (Judge)
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Assistant United States Attorney
Opposing counsel
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Legal visits characterized by uncomfortable conditions, lack of privacy, and surveillance MDC Legal Visiting Rooms View
N/A N/A Meeting between Court and Counsel at 8:45 AM. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Trial sessions planned for Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday before Christmas and New Year's. Courtroom View
N/A N/A 10-minute break (Recess) Courtroom View
N/A N/A 9 a.m. conference regarding the jury charge. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Charging Conference (Trial Tr. at 2758–61) Court View
N/A N/A Jury Charge / Instructions phase of the trial. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Scheduled oral argument in both cases. Court View
N/A N/A Side bar conferences Courtroom View
N/A N/A Government Exhibit 10 is admitted into evidence. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Potential firing of the Special Counsel or Attorney General by the President. Washington D.C. (Implied) View
N/A N/A Jury Deliberation Scheduling Discussion Courtroom View
N/A N/A Reading of Jury Note regarding Count Four Courtroom View
N/A N/A Jury Deliberation/Recess Courtroom View
N/A Legal proceeding The Hearing N/A View
N/A N/A Protracted discussion regarding a jury note Courtroom View
N/A N/A Potential Evidentiary Hearing Court View
N/A N/A Guards setting up a tripod/camera focused on Maxwell during legal conferences. MDC View
N/A N/A Closing arguments in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell Courtroom View
N/A N/A Counsel Meeting Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal conferences where Maxwell is separated by a cloudy plastic shield, cannot handle documents,... MDC Visiting Room View
N/A Trial A trial in which the jury is being instructed on how to evaluate witness testimony. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The Court and the Defendant's counsel discussed a note received from the deliberating jury. Court View
N/A Meeting A daily meeting scheduled for 8:30 a.m. beginning 'tomorrow' to prepare for voir dire. courtroom, 518 View
N/A Court proceeding The court is in session to discuss a note from the jury regarding their deliberation schedule aro... Courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00011668.jpg

This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. An unnamed speaker, likely the judge, details the logistical plan for the final phase of jury selection, explaining how 58 remaining jurors will be questioned for bias via a live feed and how counsel will then exercise peremptory strikes on a smaller pool of 40 jurors.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011537.jpg

This document is a partial transcript from a court hearing on July 22, 2022, discussing factual objections and the calculation of sentencing guidelines. The Court, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Moe participate in the discussion, with the Court adopting PSR recitations and outlining the process for guideline calculation. The defense contends a guideline calculation of 51 to 63 months' imprisonment, while the government's contention is cut off.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017415.jpg

This document page, marked as a House Oversight exhibit, appears to be a manuscript draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz) detailing legal work during the Apartheid era. It begins with a quote from 'Woody' (likely Allen) about blacklisting, then recounts the narrator's denied visa to South Africa, collaboration with Irwin Cotler, and secret negotiations with an East German lawyer to exchange client Anatoly Sharansky and potentially Nelson Mandela. It notes Mandela's refusal to be part of a spy swap.

Manuscript draft / legal exhibit
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012149.jpg

This document is page 8 of a legal memorandum from Kirkland & Ellis LLP defending Jeffrey Epstein against federal charges under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). The text argues that the prosecution lacks evidence of 'inducement' or 'enticement' occurring over the phone or internet, noting that communications were often handled by secretaries and did not contain explicit content. The defense claims the women involved ('masseuses') were 'friends of friends' who visited Epstein's home voluntarily, often without direct prior contact with Epstein himself.

Legal memorandum / defense filing
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030263.jpg

The document appears to be a narrative report or excerpt from a book concerning the Mueller Investigation, produced to the House Oversight Committee. It details the Special Counsel's concerns regarding the President's absolute pardon power, specifically regarding a potential pardon for Michael Flynn in early June. It outlines the legal strategy the Mueller team prepared to argue that pardoning a witness to protect oneself constitutes a corrupt act and obstruction of justice, despite the broad constitutional authority of the pardon power. Note: This document pertains to the Trump/Mueller investigation and does not contain text related to Jeffrey Epstein.

Investigative narrative / document produced to house oversight committee
2025-11-19
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446.jpg

This document is page 51 of a legal transcript, identified as HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446. It captures a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, and Mr. Tein regarding the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold objects to a question, stating it has been asked multiple times and is harassing the witness, while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein defend their line of questioning.

Legal transcript
2025-11-17
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
2 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
2 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Plaintiffs Counsel $0.00 Obligation to pay counsel a reasonable fee for ... View
0001-07-01 Received Attorney General ... Counsel $0.00 Hypothetical refusal of the Special Counsel's b... View
As Sender
33
As Recipient
75
Total
108

Disclosure

From: Counsel
To: Counsel

The Court refers to an email between counsel which appears to contain a disclosure, which is a point of discussion in the hearing.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Restrictions on Ms. Maxwell's confinement

From: Counsel
To: ["MDC warden", "MDC le...

Counsel attempted to address the restrictive conditions of Ms. Maxwell's confinement through numerous communications, but to no avail.

Letters, emails and calls
N/A
Communication Source

jury note

From: Court
To: Counsel

The Court discussed the jury's note with counsel.

Discussion
N/A
Communication Source

Rule 4-4.2

From: counsel for Defendant
To: Counsel

Correspondence stating that pursuant to Rule 4-4.2, 'parties to a matter may communicate directly with each other'.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Interpreter Services

From: Counsel
To: Calendar Team

Request for sign interpreters or hearing aids.

Written notice
N/A
Communication Source

Legal calls

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Counsel

The defendant is permitted to make legal calls for up to three hours per day in a private room.

Phone call
N/A
Communication Source

In-person legal conference

From: Counsel
To: Ms. Maxwell

Four-hour legal conference marked by restrictions on water, earbuds, and privacy.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Video conference

From: Counsel
To: Ms. Maxwell

Session reduced by 90 minutes; severe audio/video technical issues impacting confidentiality and visibility.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Exhibit 52 issue

From: Counsel
To: THE COURT

Briefing received by the court at 9:45.

Briefing
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Counsel
To: Counsel

Back and forth emails between counsel described as self-serving and hearsay

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Defense

From: the defendant
To: Counsel

5 hours daily / 25 hours weekly of privileged attorney-client communication.

Video-teleconference (vtc)
N/A
Communication Source

Defense Preparation

From: Ms. Maxwell
To: Counsel

Reference to Maxwell's need to communicate freely with counsel to prepare for defense.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Defense

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Counsel

Videoconferencing with counsel, observed by guards writing notes.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Investigation Documents

From: Trump's Lawyers (Dowd/...
To: Counsel

Sent more than 1.1 million documents merely as attachments with minimal records.

Document production
N/A
Communication Source

Registration status

From: Counsel
To: ["administrative agency"]

The court speculates that counsel would have filed an application or a letter to an administrative agency to get a response regarding the individual's registration requirements.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Court Reporter Attendance

From: Counsel
To: calendar clerk

Notice including name, address, and telephone number of attending reporter.

Written notice
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Lists

From: Counsel
To: THE COURT

Joint submission of four lists regarding which jurors should proceed or be excused.

Legal submission
N/A
Communication Source

Video conference

From: Counsel
To: Ms. Maxwell

Monitor repositioned further away, impacting document review.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Defense Preparation

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Counsel

Document claims conditions impair ability to communicate effectively with counsel.

Legal consultation
N/A
Communication Source

CorrLinks Correspondence

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Counsel

Emails deleted by MDC prior to the 180-day retention period.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Civil Litigation

From: Counsel
To: The Defendant

Legal materials and correspondence on the hacked phone.

Correspondence
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Defense

From: Ms. Maxwell
To: Counsel

Meetings behind closed doors, visible but not audible to staff.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Pretrial motions

From: Ms. Maxwell
To: Counsel

Request for a legal call to confer with counsel regarding pretrial motions was denied.

Legal call request
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Defense

From: Ms. Maxwell
To: Counsel

Facilitated on-going communication.

Video conferencing
N/A
Communication Source

Legal consultation

From: Ms. Maxwell
To: Counsel

Guards are described as feverishly writing while observing Ms. Maxwell during videoconferencing with her counsel.

Videoconference
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search