ALISON J. NATHAN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Counsel of record
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Petitioner to judge |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juan Ruiz Toro
|
Professional |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial judge vs defendant |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Judicial authority |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Counsel judge |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Juan Ruiz Toro
|
Clerk judge |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Judge defendant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judge and defendant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
DAVID MARKUS
|
Judicial authority |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judge |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Freeman
|
Judicial referral |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Prosecutor to judge |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Law Clerk
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
United States Government
|
Petitioner to judge |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense/Government
|
Judicial oversight |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
US
|
Presiding judge |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Judicial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Pagliuca
|
Correspondent |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court proceeding | Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell will move the Court for an Order regarding jury selection procedures. | United States Courthouse at... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, but consente... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing hearing | The document pertains to procedures for victims to speak at an upcoming sentencing hearing for Gh... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Proposed meeting | Request for an in camera conference to discuss filing procedures for the bail motion. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Ongoing criminal case, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, against Ms. Maxwell. | Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A four-and-a-half-week jury trial for Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A thirteen-day trial was held for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Sentencing | A future sentencing hearing is planned, which victims Kate and Annie intend to attend. | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court proceeding | The court denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record but consented... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Ms. Maxwell's sentencing hearing, during which Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein have requested t... | United States District Court | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The Court granted the request for Annie Farmer, Kate, and/or Virginia Giuffre to make oral statem... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The District Court imposed concurrent terms of imprisonment of 60 months, 120 months, and 240 mon... | United States District Cour... | View |
| N/A | Court hearing | A court hearing is mentioned where Virginia Giuffre was expected to be present to give a statement. | courtroom | View |
| 2025-11-18 | N/A | Charging conference | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-22 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the sentencing held on 6/28/2022 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court filing | Transcript of Proceedings for the trial held on 12/29/21 was filed. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Judgment of conviction entered following a four-and-a-half-week jury trial. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment of conviction for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Judgment in a criminal case was imposed and filed for Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | A judgment of conviction was entered against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal judgment | A judgment was entered in the action against Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Legal proceeding | Ghislaine Maxwell's judgment of conviction was entered in the United States District Court for th... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Imposition of Judgment | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020703.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering entries from December 9 and 10, 2021. It details legal arguments over the admission of Government Exhibit 52 (GX 52), involving witness Juan Alessi, where Judge Nathan overruled defense objections. It also records minute entries for the jury trial proceedings on those dates and the filing of transcripts.
DOJ-OGR-00020702.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from December 6 to December 8, 2021. It details minute entries for the jury trial proceedings, identifying the attorneys present for both the defense (Sternheim, Pagliuca, Everdell, Menninger) and the prosecution (Pomerantz, Comey, Moe, Rohrbach). The document also includes an order regarding the reimbursement of transportation costs for Juror Number 70 and notes the filing of a transcript for a conference held on November 15, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020701.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the SDNY court case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from December 2, 2021, to December 5, 2021. It records minute entries for jury trial proceedings, orders regarding witness anonymity and juror transportation, and various correspondence regarding witnesses 'Jane', 'Michael Dawson', and 'Witness-3'. The document tracks the legal motions and daily trial activities involving the prosecution team, defense team, and Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020700.jpg
This document is a court docket page from the SDNY regarding US v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events on November 29 and 30, 2021. It details the beginning of the jury trial, orders regarding the production of materials from the Epstein Victims Compensation Program, and the handling of witness privacy and pseudonyms. It lists the legal teams for both the defense and prosecution present during the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00020699.jpg
This document is a court docket from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings from late November 2021. The entries primarily concern procedural matters ahead of trial, including court orders for the production of documents from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, motions regarding expert testimony, and letters from both the prosecution (USA) and Maxwell's defense team about trial procedures and jury instructions. The presiding judge is Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020696.jpg
This document is a court docket from November 22, 2021, detailing numerous filings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The entries include an order regarding the testimony of 'Witness-3', an endorsement about providing a video monitor, and a series of letters and motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense. These filings address various pre-trial matters such as redactions, subpoenas, and the admissibility of evidence like birth certificates and testimony from 'Accuser-3'.
DOJ-OGR-00020694.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the SDNY case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 19, 2021. It details orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a motion in limine to exclude evidence from 'Accuser-3' (Witness-3), ultimately ruling that testimony regarding Maxwell introducing the witness to Epstein and facilitating sexualized massages is admissible as evidence of Mann Act counts. It also mentions a letter from the prosecution team and procedural orders regarding the sealing and redaction of documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020692.jpg
This document is a court docket report (SDNY) covering November 15-17, 2021, detailing pretrial proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the filing of transcripts for prior conferences, a memo endorsement ordering the government to use FedEx for disclosures due to mail delays at the MDC, and minute entries for a pretrial conference, voir dire, and the beginning of jury selection. The document lists the full legal teams for both the defense and the prosecution present during these proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00020691.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from November 13 to November 15, 2021. It details procedural orders regarding jury questionnaires and voir dire logistics (including COVID protocols), the filing of transcripts for previous conferences, and a sealed document. It also lists correspondence from both the prosecution (regarding exhibits) and the defense (regarding late disclosures to the MDC).
DOJ-OGR-00020690.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 12, 2021. It details orders regarding strict COVID-19 protocols for an upcoming in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021, including the use of overflow courtrooms for the public. Additionally, it includes an order addressing a Government motion, where the Judge rules that limiting cross-examination of pseudonymous witnesses regarding their careers would violate Maxwell's Sixth Amendment rights, though specific employer names cannot be elicited.
DOJ-OGR-00020689.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the SDNY (Case 22-1426/20-cr-330) dated November 12, 2021. It details multiple 'Motions in Limine' filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Pagliuca) seeking to suppress evidence, including items seized from 358 El Brillo Way in 2005, expert testimony, and specific government exhibits. The document also includes the Government's opposition to these motions and an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding public access and sealing procedures.
DOJ-OGR-00020688.jpg
This document is a court docket report (Case 22-1426, SDNY) from November 2021 details legal proceedings in the US v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. It lists various filings including orders on redactions to protect victim privacy, motions in limine regarding 'Accuser-3' and co-conspirator statements, and a dispute over an unauthenticated hearsay document (Exhibit 52). The docket reflects active pre-trial litigation between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach) and defense counsel (Pagliuca, Everdell) regarding the admissibility of evidence and pseudonym logistics.
DOJ-OGR-00020687.jpg
This document is a court docket entry from February 28, 2023, for Case 22-1426, primarily concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. It details court orders and filings from November 2021, including COVID-19 protocols for courthouse access, scheduling revisions for motions in limine, and a pretrial conference. The entries highlight communications between the prosecution (USA) and defense (Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys) regarding trial logistics and a ruling on witness testimony, all overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020685.jpg
This document is a docket report from the SDNY for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 8-9, 2021. It details several filings, including the Government's opposition to bail reconsideration, a motion to preclude expert testimony from Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus, and letters regarding legal mail. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders scheduling a conference for November 10, 2021, denying the renewed request for bail, and establishing protocols for the defendant's transport and access to legal counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00020684.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and rulings from early November 2021. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings on motions to exclude witnesses, a denial of a motion regarding juror name disclosure, and an order compelling the government to clarify its position on the legal status of an alleged victim. The document outlines the ongoing legal arguments and procedural matters in the lead-up to Maxwell's trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020683.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the SDNY regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically detailing orders from November 2021 leading up to her trial. Key issues addressed include the logistics of transporting Maxwell from the MDC to the courthouse, security concerns, delays in Maxwell receiving legal mail, and the schedule for juror selection and peremptory strikes. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders requiring coordination with the US Marshals and MDC legal counsel to resolve these pre-trial issues.
DOJ-OGR-00020682.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from November 1-3, 2021. It details a pretrial conference where Maxwell was present and remanded, as well as various filings including motions for reconsideration regarding bond and juror disclosure. The Judge also issued orders regarding voir dire instructions and scheduled a hearing for November 10, 2021, to discuss evidentiary rules (Rule 412 and 702/Daubert).
DOJ-OGR-00020681.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, printed in 2023 as part of an appeal or related filing. It lists filings from late October and early November 2021, including multiple Motions in Limine by the defense attempting to exclude evidence regarding 'flight' logs, terms like 'victim', items seized from a 2005 search of 358 El Brillo Way, and alleged rape by Jeffrey Epstein. It also includes judicial orders regarding hearing schedules for Rule 412 (sexual behavior evidence) and Daubert (expert witness) motions, as well as orders regarding legal mail issues at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00020679.jpg
This document is a court docket from Case 22-1426, detailing a series of legal filings and court orders from October 27 to October 29, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries include an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling a pretrial conference for November 1, 2021, and numerous motions in limine filed by both the defense and prosecution to exclude specific evidence ahead of the trial. The document outlines the procedural steps and legal arguments being made by both sides in preparation for the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020677.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the SDNY regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 2021. It details a pretrial conference where Maxwell appeared via telephone and sets forth a comprehensive order regarding jury selection protocols, including the use of questionnaires, anonymized juror numbers, and schedules for voir dire in November 2021. The Judge explicitly denied a request to seal the proposed jury questionnaires, citing the First Amendment right to public access despite the case's significant media attention.
DOJ-OGR-00020676.jpg
This document is a docket report from the SDNY case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering entries from October 18-21, 2021. It details pre-trial motions regarding jury selection (voir dire), motions in limine, and sealing requests, as well as orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling a telephone conference. Notably, media organizations and reporters filed letters opposing 'secret jury selection' and the sealing of juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020675.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings from October 15 to October 18, 2021. The entries primarily concern pre-trial procedural matters, including a dispute over the timely delivery of legal mail to Maxwell at the MDC, and judicial orders setting deadlines for motions related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412. The docket reflects communications between the prosecution (USA), the defense (Maxwell's counsel), and the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020674.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court activities from October 12 to October 14, 2021. It records a series of procedural filings and orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including motions from the defense regarding jury selection (voir dire) and legal mail delivery, and letters from the prosecution (USA) concerning trial length and juror questionnaires. The docket also includes an order addressing trial access for alleged victims and the public.
DOJ-OGR-00020673.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings and orders between late August and early October 2021. It details scheduling for jury selection and pretrial conferences, handles redaction requests regarding third-party identities, and includes a significant order requiring the government to disclose the identities of unnamed co-conspirators. The document also outlines the trial schedule, anticipating opening statements to begin on November 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020671.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for the case involving Ghislaine Maxwell, dated February 28, 2023, but detailing events from August 2021. The entries describe several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including the denial of Maxwell's motion for subpoenas and instructions on sealing documents. The docket also records letters filed by both the defense, concerning interference with attorney-client communications at the MDC, and the prosecution (USA), regarding the identification of co-conspirators, along with the judge's orders for the parties to confer on these issues.
Response Deadline
Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.
Order on Redactions
Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.
Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89
A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.
Endorsement on Letter Motion
The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity