| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe Number One
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sunny Drescher
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Employment affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sunny Drescher
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alicia Valle
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Referral |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Bureau of Prisons
|
Institutional friction |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP
|
Institutional conflict |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
THOMAS
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein's counsel
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP
|
Professional interagency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Two Guards
|
Subject of deferred prosecution agreement agreed to interviews |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOP
|
Governmental administrative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutorial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
|
Institutional conflict |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial collusive plea deal |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Bureau of Prisons
|
Governmental organizational |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP
|
Inter agency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Informant collaborator |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agreed to plead guilty in Florida state court to soliciting minors for prostitution and s... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interviews of two guards with U.S. Attorney's Office and DOJ-OIG as part of an ongoing OIG invest... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Opening of the case/Investigation | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's attorneys approached U.S. Attorney's Office to resolve federal investigation. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement granting immunity | Federal Court/DOJ | View |
| N/A | N/A | U.S. Attorney's Office agreed not to charge Epstein with federal crimes and not to bring criminal... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of non-prosecution agreement. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office officially identified 36 women as victims. | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-05 | N/A | Transfer of discovery production | U.S. Attorney's Office SDNY | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Government Discovery Production 7 | USAfx (Digital Upload) | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Discovery Production 7 | SDNY (via Email/USAfx) | View |
| 2020-08-01 | N/A | Grand Jury Investigation into the conduct of the defendant and other possible co-conspirators of ... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-08-01 | N/A | Grand Jury Investigation | Unknown | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein death / suicide attempt | Federal Prison / Hospital | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Bail submission due date (referred to as 'due Friday' relative to the email date of Thursday, Jul... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-02-21 | N/A | District Judge in Miami issues opinion finding victims' rights were violated in the Epstein case ... | Miami | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Epstein charged in SDNY; Epstein death at MCC; dismissal of case against Epstein. | SDNY / MCC | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | A victim met with the U.S. Attorney's Office. | Unknown | View |
| 2012-11-08 | N/A | Sen. Alvin Williams Jr. was arrested by federal agents. His chief of staff, Kim Blackett, was als... | St. Thomas, V.I. | View |
| 2012-11-08 | N/A | Sen. Alvin Williams Jr. and his chief of staff, Kim Blackett, were arrested by FBI agents. A fede... | St. Thomas, V.I. | View |
| 2011-09-01 | N/A | Judge Kenneth Marra rules that U.S. Attorney's Office should have notified victims. | Federal Court | View |
| 2010-08-01 | N/A | Investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's activities involving molestation of underage girls. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2010-07-20 | N/A | Narrator received victim notification letter regarding Rothstein case. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-07-10 | N/A | Final list of thirty-two victims provided to Mr. Goldberger via certified mail. | N/A | View |
This is page 8 (the signature page) of a legal letter dated May 19, 2008, addressed to Mark Filip. Attorneys Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley request that the recipient review the case and discontinue federal involvement, arguing that the matter should be closed by the State and that current federal attempts involve an overreach of statutes. They request a meeting to discuss these issues of federalism and selectivity. The letter mentions U.S. Attorney Acosta.
This document is a House Oversight record containing a news article from The Palm Beach Post regarding ongoing litigation between Edwards and Jeffrey Epstein. It discusses a malicious prosecution case, allegations linking Edwards to the Rothstein Ponzi scheme, and Edwards' attempts to depose high-profile figures like Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, and David Copperfield. The article also references Epstein's non-prosecution agreement with the U.S. Attorney's office and his guilty plea in Palm Beach County.
This document, stamped by the House Oversight Committee, contains the text of a Daily Beast investigative report detailing ongoing federal scrutiny of Jeffrey Epstein and his associate Jean Luc Brunel. It highlights the FBI's investigation into potential sex trafficking, Brunel's role in sourcing girls via the MC2 agency, and the $1 million payment from Epstein to Brunel. The text also criticizes the leniency of Epstein's 2007 plea deal, noting irregular privileges such as the use of a private psychologist for evaluation.
This document is page 71 of a 2014 legal analysis (likely a law review article) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It uses the Epstein case as a primary example of why victims need rights before formal charges are filed, specifically citing how Jane Doe Number One and Two were not informed that prosecutors had secretly bargained away sex offense charges. The text argues that the CVRA's plain language supports extending rights to victims throughout the criminal justice process, even before charges are filed.
This page is a rough draft transcript of a deposition involving the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp 021933). A witness is being questioned about why they filed a motion accusing Professor Alan Dershowitz without contacting him first to verify facts or ask for refutation. The witness explains that the U.S. Attorney's Office had delayed answering a request for consent for months (dating back to Summer 2014), leading to a court filing on January 21, 2015. The witness begins to explain the decision not to contact Dershowitz as a 'cost benefit situation' before the page ends.
This document, stemming from a House Oversight collection, appears to be an excerpt from a report or article comparing the U.S. Attorney's Office's strict handling of a defendant named McDaniel with their lenient handling of Jeffrey Epstein. It details how prosecutors Acosta and Villafaña negotiated a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein's lawyers (including Jay Lefkowitz) in 2007, suppressing a 53-page federal indictment and keeping victims uninformed to ensure the deal's success. The text highlights the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation which exposed these actions.
This document appears to be a page from a media report or article included in House Oversight materials (Bates stamp 021746). While the caption highlights Alex Acosta's role in the Jeffrey Epstein plea deal, the body text details a parallel or related legal case involving a defendant named McDaniel who preyed on minors. In that case, Judge Zloch criticized prosecutor Villafaña for withholding the defendant's predatory history, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Lourie attempted to have the judge's comments struck from the record.
This document is a news article excerpt, marked as House Oversight Committee evidence, detailing the scrutiny surrounding Alexander Acosta and A. Marie Villafaña regarding the non-prosecution agreement they negotiated for Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights a federal judge's ruling that the deal violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by intentionally withholding information from victims. The text also notes a DOJ probe launched in January into potential professional misconduct and mentions that the White House was reviewing Acosta's involvement.
An email from Darren Indyke forwarding a Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown. The article details how A. Marie Villafaña, a prosecutor involved in Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal, had previously been rebuked by Judge William J. Zloch for withholding information in a separate child sex case, an action that was defended by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta.
This document serves as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation, likely highlighting systemic issues or specific personnel (like Andrew Lourie or Alex Acosta) within the U.S. Attorney's office. While the caption references the Epstein plea deal, the body text details a separate case ('McDaniel') presided over by Judge Zloch, where prosecutors (Villafaña and later Lourie) were criticized for failing to disclose the defendant's predatory history or arguing it was irrelevant. The document illustrates a pattern of prosecutorial conduct regarding sexual abuse cases.
An email chain from March 14, 2019, in which Darren Indyke forwards a Miami Herald article to 'J' (jeevacation@gmail.com), who then forwards it to a legal team including Martin Weinberg, Kathy Ruemmler, and Jack Goldberger. The article, by Julie K. Brown, details how Alexander Acosta (then U.S. Attorney) was notified that A. Marie Villafaña, the lead prosecutor in the Epstein case, had been previously rebuked by a judge for concealing victim information in a separate 2007 case. The document highlights the legal team's monitoring of press coverage regarding the handling of Epstein's plea deal.
This document is a printout of a Palm Beach Daily News article from August 2011 detailing legal arguments before Judge Kenneth Marra regarding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement. Attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, representing two Jane Does, argued that the U.S. Attorney's Office violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by failing to confer with victims before signing the deal. The attorneys sought to nullify the agreement and unseal correspondence, aiming to expose Epstein to federal prosecution.
A June 10, 2009, article from The Palm Beach Post reporting on legal efforts to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's confidential non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors. Attorneys for The Post and victims (including 'E.W.') argue the public has a right to know the details of the 'unprecedented' deal that allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state charges and avoid federal prosecution. The article details the sidebar conference where the deal was originally sealed by Judge Pucillo and notes Epstein's connections to high-profile figures like Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Prince Andrew.
This document is a page from an informational brochure or FAQ regarding the Victim Notification System (VNS). It provides instructions on what to do if a PIN is forgotten, how the automated call system functions when a user is unavailable, and how to access the VNS website to register or log in. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional document production.
This document is a page from an informational brochure or FAQ regarding the Department of Justice's Victim Notification System (VNS). It explains how victims can access case details, update their contact information via the web or phone, and explicitly states that the system does not ensure safety. The page bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was part of document production for a congressional investigation.
The document is a news article detailing the scrutiny faced by Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance's office over its handling of Jeffrey Epstein's sex offender hearing, following revelations of a secret non-prosecution agreement in Florida. It highlights critical remarks from Judge Pickholz, the involvement of prosecutor Gaffney, and the role of then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta in sealing a federal indictment, ultimately questioning how Vance could have been unaware of the high-profile case.
A 2018 New York Post article reporting on a January 2011 court hearing where the Manhattan DA's office, represented by Jennifer Gaffney, requested a downgrade of Jeffrey Epstein's sex-offender status from Level 3 to Level 1. The request stunned Judge Ruth Pickholz, who noted she had never seen prosecutors make such a downward argument for such a troubling case. The document is stamped as part of a House Oversight Committee review.
This document is an excerpt from a news story or report produced by the House Oversight Committee detailing the career transition of Bruce Reinhart from Assistant U.S. Attorney in South Florida to a defense attorney for Jeffrey Epstein's employees. It highlights the controversy surrounding his move on January 2, 2008 (one day after leaving the DOJ), subsequent accusations of ethical violations for 'switching sides,' and the U.S. Attorney's Office's claim that he did possess confidential information about the case despite his denials. The text specifically notes Reinhart represented Epstein's pilots, scheduler Sarah Kellen, and Nadia Marcinkova.
This document is a page from a news report (likely the Miami Herald) included in House Oversight materials. It features a photograph and interview with Micelle Licata, a victim who describes the lack of repercussions for Jeffrey Epstein compared to ordinary citizens. The text notes that Licata was one of 36 women officially identified by the FBI as victims and details that she was assaulted at Epstein's Palm Beach mansion while a high school sophomore.
This document appears to be a page from a report or news article (likely the Miami Herald's investigation) included in House Oversight records. It highlights Alexander Acosta's personal involvement in legal negotiations as the U.S. Attorney in Miami, noting his subsequent position in the Trump Cabinet and consideration for Attorney General. It also references the Miami Herald's analysis of records identifying over 80 victims.
This document is page 4 of a declaration by John M. Browning, dated January 11, 2019, detailing procedural steps taken by 'the Post' regarding a motion to unseal appellate briefs. It outlines communications with the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida to coordinate service of the motion. The document bears a House Oversight Committee bates stamp.
This document is an Affidavit of Service filed in the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, for the case of The People of the State of New York v. Jeffrey E. Epstein. John Browning attests that on January 14, 2018, he served legal documents via Federal Express to Martin Weinberg, Karen Friedman Agnifilo, David Aronberg, and Dexter Lee.
This document summarizes articles from The Daily Beast about Jeffrey Epstein, detailing his lenient 2007 plea deal for sex offenses and subsequent special treatment, such as using his own private psychologist for a court-required evaluation. It highlights Epstein's financial relationship with Jean Luc Brunel, who received $1 million and whose modeling agency, MC2, recruited girls who flew on Epstein's private jets. The document concludes with a statement from Epstein's lawyer asserting his client's full compliance with legal agreements.
This document is a printout of a 2010 article by Conchita Sarnoff for The Daily Beast, detailing allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and his associate Brunel. It highlights a $1 million wire transfer from Epstein to Brunel, the use of private jets to transport young women, and alleged efforts by Epstein's team to intimidate victims' families and interfere with the Palm Beach police investigation. The article compiles claims from various sources, including an unnamed police chief and former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, painting a picture of criminal activity and obstruction of justice.
This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where an unidentified witness, a plaintiff in a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Epstein, is being questioned. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to questions regarding financial arrangements with their first lawyer, Jeff Herman, citing attorney-client privilege. The witness repeatedly denies knowing Jeff Sloman, despite being told he is a high-ranking prosecutor and the ex-partner of their lawyer, Jeff Herman.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity