The Post
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Manhattan District Attorney
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
John M. Browning
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant's Counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Manhattan District Attorney’s Office
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Manhattan District Attorney
|
Adversarial investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
District Attorney's Office
|
Adversarial investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
First Department
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sue Edelman
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
District Attorney
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Media subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant's current counsel
|
Communication |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Deanna
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Manhattan District Attorney's Office
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Motion to unseal appellate briefs | New York Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Motion by 'The Post' to unseal or produce appellate briefs. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Post's Motion | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Appeal | New York Courts | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Post’s Efforts to Obtain the Appellate Briefing | First Department | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Post's motion to unseal appellate briefs. | New York Court | View |
| 2019-12-21 | N/A | The Post moved the Court for an order unsealing appellate briefs (Note: The text says 2019, but c... | New York Court | View |
| 2019-01-04 | N/A | The Post filed a letter withdrawing the December 21 Motion. | Court | View |
| 2019-01-04 | N/A | The Post voluntarily withdrew its December 21 Motion to resolve a procedural dispute. | New York Court | View |
| 2019-01-04 | N/A | Filing of a letter withdrawing the December 21 Motion to address procedural issues. | Court | View |
| 2018-12-21 | N/A | The Post filed a motion requesting an order unsealing appellate briefs with victim names redacted. | Manhattan (implied court) | View |
| 2018-12-21 | N/A | The Post filed a motion to unseal appellate briefs. | Manhattan (implied) | View |
| 2018-12-20 | N/A | Epstein's lawyer states he needs to review the brief before taking a position. | N/A | View |
| 2018-12-01 | N/A | The Post published an article titled 'Manhattan DA sided with pedophile billionaire after botchin... | New York | View |
| 2014-01-01 | N/A | Pulitzer Prize for public service awarded to The Post and The Guardian. | USA | View |
| 2013-06-06 | N/A | The Washington Post publishes the PRISM scoop. | USA | View |
| 0021-12-01 | N/A | Date of the original motion filed by the Post, which was subsequently withdrawn. | New York Court | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022991.jpg
This document is a page from a news report (archived by the House Oversight Committee) discussing the connections between Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and Alex Acosta. It highlights a 2002 quote from Trump praising Epstein and noting his interest in 'younger' women, which attorney Spencer Kuvin finds suspicious given Epstein's later convictions. The text also details Alex Acosta's defense of the lenient plea deal he arranged for Epstein while serving as U.S. Attorney, a topic raised during Acosta's confirmation hearings for Labor Secretary.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013429.jpg
This document is an archived page from the Palm Beach Daily News dated June 11, 2009, discussing the legal battle to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. It features statements from attorney Edwards, representing three underage victims, and Deanna Shullman, representing the press, both arguing that the sealing of the plea agreement is unusual and violates public records rights in Florida. The document is stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013429', indicating it is part of a congressional investigation file.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021777.jpg
This document is a text of a Palm Beach Post editorial from February 13, 2008, criticizing State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It argues that the prosecution was too lenient, influenced by Epstein's defense team (including Alan Dershowitz), and failed to pursue stronger charges despite significant evidence collected by police.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016476.jpg
This document is the final signature page of a legal brief or correspondence dated December 28, 2018, signed by Assistant District Attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo. It references the procedural history of a SORA hearing and copies the law firm Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016475.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing (likely by a New York prosecutor) opposing a motion by 'the Post' to release appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein. The document argues that New York Civil Rights Law § 50-b prohibits the release of these documents to protect the privacy of sex crime victims. The author notes that the underlying crimes were prosecuted in Florida and that 'the Post' has not properly notified the victims or the Florida prosecutors as required by law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016474.jpg
This is a legal affirmation filed on December 31, 2018, by Assistant District Attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo in the New York Supreme Court. It is a response to a motion by NYP Holdings, Inc. (The Post) seeking to unseal 2011 appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein's adjudication as a Level III sex offender. The document highlights privacy protections for sex crime victims under Civil Rights Law § 50-b while acknowledging the media's request for redacted copies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016462.jpg
A 2018 New York Post article reporting on a January 2011 court hearing where the Manhattan DA's office, represented by Jennifer Gaffney, requested a downgrade of Jeffrey Epstein's sex-offender status from Level 3 to Level 1. The request stunned Judge Ruth Pickholz, who noted she had never seen prosecutors make such a downward argument for such a troubling case. The document is stamped as part of a House Oversight Committee review.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016460.jpg
This document appears to be a media article preserved in House Oversight records describing a New York court hearing where Judge Ruth Pickholz expressed shock that the DA's office argued for leniency regarding Jeffrey Epstein's sex offender status. Despite the DA's arguments, Epstein was assigned Level 3 status (the highest risk level), a decision upheld by the NY Court of Appeals citing evidence of multiple victims. The article also references Virginia Roberts' allegations against Prince Andrew.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016427.jpg
This document is page 4 of a declaration by John M. Browning, dated January 11, 2019, detailing procedural steps taken by 'the Post' regarding a motion to unseal appellate briefs. It outlines communications with the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida to coordinate service of the motion. The document bears a House Oversight Committee bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016426.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal affirmation detailing procedural history regarding a motion by 'The Post' to unseal appellate briefs related to the Epstein case. It chronicles communications between the Post's legal counsel, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office (specifically Karen Friedman Agnifilo), and Epstein's counsel (Mr. Weinberg) between December 2018 and January 2019. Key points include the DA's opposition to the motion, the suggestion to notify Florida prosecutors, and Mr. Weinberg formally stating that Epstein took no position on the unsealing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016425.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal affidavit, likely filed by representatives of the New York Post in December 2018. It details the newspaper's efforts to unseal legal briefs related to an appeal by Jeffrey Epstein, chronicling communications between Post reporter Susan Edelman and the Manhattan DA's office, as well as the affiant's communications with Epstein's lawyers, Jay Lefkowitz and Martin Weinberg. The DA's office indicated they would not oppose a petition for a redacted brief.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022250.jpg
This document is an email chain from April 3, 2011, between Jeffrey Epstein, Lesley Groff, Darren Indyke, and Scott Denett. The conversation revolves around a forwarded commentary on a New York Post article about Epstein's return to NYC, his controversial quotes, and questions directed at D.A. Cyrus Vance Jr. The participants also discuss technical difficulties in accessing highlights made by Epstein ('Je') on related documents.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity