| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
27
Very Strong
|
45 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
19
Very Strong
|
27 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
15
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Adversarial |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Accuser accused |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Roberts
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Accused accuser |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Unknown |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mike Tyson
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Claus Von Bulow
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
O.J. Simpson
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Bill Clinton
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Arthur Goldberg
|
Clerk justice |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mishcon de Reya
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Guy Fronstin
|
Professional |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Epstein made available then pulled back from Palm Beach Police Department. | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alan Dershowitz clerked for Justice Arthur Goldberg. | Unknown (likely Washington ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Alan Dershowitz and Detective Recarey regarding alleged police impersonation by i... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement of defamation case between Edwards/Cassell and Dershowitz | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maria Farmer observed Alan Dershowitz going upstairs at the mansion at the same time young girls ... | Epstein's New York Mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alan Dershowitz and his wife at 'the island'. | the island | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alan Dershowitz at his house in Boston. | Boston | View |
| N/A | N/A | Allegations made against Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jean Luc Brunel b... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Woman accused of being a sex slave by Jeffrey Epstein levels claims against his friends. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defamation lawsuits between Dershowitz and Edwards/Roberts | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Fundraiser for Vanessa Redgrave where Dershowitz distributed leaflets. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Debate on laws criminalizing Holocaust denial. | Canada | View |
| N/A | N/A | Teaching career at Harvard | Harvard | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Alan Dershowitz and David Boies where Dershowitz attempted to persuade Boies of h... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interview on the Today Show regarding Matthew Hale's bar admission denial. | Today Show Studio | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged sexual encounter | Unknown (context implies Ep... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Planned deposition where Alan Dershowitz and a special master will be present. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing involving Alan Dershowitz arguing before Judge Aldrich and Judge Julian regarding o... | Courtroom (likely Federal C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Von Bulow Case/Appeal | Courts | View |
| N/A | N/A | The O.J. Simpson Case | Courts | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dershowitz visiting Epstein's Palm Beach residence. | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mike Tyson's Appeal | Court (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Classroom discussions on rape law | Harvard Law School | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/Legal Interview | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dershowitz speech at Shriver Hall, Baltimore, interrupted by student protest. | Shriver Hall, Baltimore | View |
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) detailing his legal representation of Jim Bakker during an appeal of a 45-year sentence. It includes excerpts from a New York Times article describing the dynamic between Dershowitz and his Texas co-counsel, highlighting Dershowitz's media presence and courtroom performance. The text also includes Jim Bakker's positive assessment of Dershowitz contrasted with his criticism of his other attorneys regarding their legal strategy.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book (possibly by Alan Dershowitz) containing a transcript of court testimony regarding the Woody Allen and Mia Farrow custody dispute. Dershowitz testifies that he was not trying to be Allen's criminal lawyer but that Farrow had asked him to intervene, and he expresses his belief that Allen received terrible legal advice which escalated the situation. The text includes Dershowitz's commentary on the testimony, noting that the court would not allow him to expand on a perceived 'hidden agenda' during the proceedings.
This document appears to be an excerpt from a memoir or legal narrative (likely by Alan Dershowitz, author of *Chutzpah*) describing his involvement in the 1992 conflict between Mia Farrow and Woody Allen. It quotes a harsh appellate court opinion regarding Allen's photography of Soon-Yi Previn and details the narrator's attempts to mediate a private resolution between Farrow and Allen to avoid public scandal. The document includes text of a letter sent to Allen warning him of the destruction of his career.
This document appears to be a page from a book manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) dated April 2, 2012. The text discusses the author's involvement in the Clinton impeachment, his interactions with Monica Lewinsky's mother, and his book 'Sexual McCarthyism.' It concludes with a transition to a 'next celebrity' (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein) whom the author describes as having thin skin compared to Clinton and Starr.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) labeled with Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017365. It details a contentious Congressional hearing during the Clinton impeachment era involving the Starr investigation, featuring a heated debate between Dershowitz, Leon Higginbotham, and Congressman Bob Barr regarding the concept of 'real America.' The text also includes a humorous interjection by Congressman Rogan regarding Harvard Law School.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir draft by Alan Dershowitz (dated 4.2.12 in header). In it, he discusses the ethical complications and public backlash he faced for representing Mike Tyson in his rape appeal. He quotes several angry letters he received and describes how Harvard Law School students protested his involvement, with some threatening to file sexual harassment charges against him for creating a 'hostile environment'.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) dated April 2, 2012, discussing the appeal process for Mike Tyson's rape conviction. It details the defense's strategy, criticizing Trial Judge Patricia Gifford for legal errors and bias, and quotes a USA Today report praising Dershowitz's performance in court. The text highlights specific legal arguments used in the appeal, including blocked testimony, jury instruction errors, and alleged prosecutorial misconduct regarding book/film rights.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (dated 4.2.12) written by Alan Dershowitz (implied context) regarding his representation of Mike Tyson. The text recounts their first meeting in Indianapolis where Dershowitz called Tyson a 'schmuck' for putting himself in a compromising position, which led to Tyson hiring him. It details Tyson's honorable conduct as a client, his time in prison, and his eventual repayment of legal fees after his release, while criticizing Tyson's original trial counsel.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir draft written by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. In the text, Dershowitz discusses his philosophy on criminal defense, explaining why he represents guilty clients and referencing his past work on high-profile cases like Claus Von Bulow and O.J. Simpson. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript drafted by Alan Dershowitz (indicated by the header date and style) discussing the legal appeal of Dr. Sybers. It details the legal strategy employed by Dershowitz and his brother, Nathan, focusing on challenging the scientific evidence and lab practices (including the FBI lab) used to convict Sybers. The text concludes with the mention of the court reversing the conviction.
This document appears to be a page (183) from a manuscript or book draft, likely written by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. The text recounts the forensic defense strategies used in the O.J. Simpson trial (specifically regarding blood on a sock) and the Claus Von Bulow appeal (disproving insulin injection theories). The author frames these cases as establishing his reputation as the 'go-to' lawyer for scientific defenses, leading to a new case with an 'eerie resemblance' to the Von Bulow matter.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (possibly by Alan Dershowitz given the self-reference) included in House Oversight evidence. It recounts a specific legal argument before the Supreme Court involving Justice Scalia regarding the 'Enmund' case (Enmund v. Florida) and the application of the felony murder rule when guns are provided during a crime. The text is a dialogue transcript interspersed with narrative commentary.
This document is page 162 of a manuscript, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text appears to be written by Alan Dershowitz (identified by the claim of being the clerk who drafted the 'Rudolph' opinion for Justice Goldberg). It discusses the legal history of the death penalty for rape, specifically the backlash from the Georgia Supreme Court against federal intervention, scholarly criticism from Herbert Packer, and the subsequent formation of a litigation project by the ACLU and NAACP.
A draft manuscript page dated April 2, 2012, narrated by Alan Dershowitz. It details his time as a law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg in 1963, focusing on their shared ambition to declare the death penalty unconstitutional via the Eighth Amendment. The text highlights Dershowitz's lifelong opposition to capital punishment and Goldberg's view of the Constitution as an evolving document.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the specific biographical details) discussing defamation law and the First Amendment. The author recounts a personal legal battle where he was charged with criminal defamation in Turin, Italy, for criticizing a judge's ruling on terrorism during a phone interview. The text also references the 1988 Supreme Court case involving Jerry Falwell and Hustler Magazine to illustrate legal standards regarding ridicule and public figures.
This document appears to be a page from a book draft or manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the Bates stamp context and footer citation) dated April 2, 2012. It discusses the First Amendment, contrasting the historical Pentagon Papers case with the modern challenges posed by Julian Assange and Wikileaks. The text argues that while traditional media acts as a check and balance with accountability, modern 'hackers' and anonymous leaks pose a greater threat to national security without those constraints.
This document is a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) produced in the House Oversight investigation. It details Dershowitz's legal defense of actor Harry Reems regarding the film 'Deep Throat,' noting the eventual dismissal of the case by the Justice Department. It also recounts a separate incident at Harvard involving the Quincy House Film Society showing the same film to raise funds for a screen damaged during a showing of 'Animal House,' which drew protests from female students.
This document appears to be a page (p. 99) from a manuscript or memoir draft written by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. It recounts a historical courtroom exchange between Dershowitz, Judge Aldrich, and Judge Julian regarding First Amendment protections for the film 'I Am Curious Yellow' and the definition of obscenity. The text focuses on legal arguments concerning whether profit motives invalidate First Amendment protections. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production related to investigations involving Dershowitz.
This document appears to be a page (page 95) from a manuscript draft, likely written by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. It discusses First Amendment legal theories regarding nudity, pornography, and 'fighting words,' citing Dershowitz's own 2002 book 'Shouting Fire' in a footnote. The document was produced as part of a House Oversight investigation.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript draft (likely a memoir or legal text) written by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. In the text, the author defends his controversial legal positions regarding torture warrants, affirmative action, free speech, and Israel, framing his career as a pursuit of accountability and clear legal standards. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was submitted as evidence in a congressional inquiry.
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript, likely by Alan Dershowitz (based on the reference to his book 'The Best Defense'). It outlines thirteen cynical 'Rules of the Justice Game' regarding the conduct of police, judges, and prosecutors, asserting that the system often relies on lying and constitutional violations to convict guilty defendants. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Bates number.
This document appears to be page 43 of a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the biographical details regarding Yale, Harvard, and his son Elon) submitted to the House Oversight Committee. The text recounts the author's time at Yale Law School, including a moot court victory against a Taft family member, his role as the first Orthodox Jewish Editor-in-Chief of the Law Journal, and his graduation featuring JFK. It also details his academic development, mentorship under various professors like Joseph Goldstein, and early writings on the 5th Amendment.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript by Alan Dershowitz, included in House Oversight Committee records (Bates stamped). It details his early experiences at Yale Law School and his struggles with job hunting in New York in the late 1950s/early 1960s, specifically focusing on antisemitism and religious discrimination at major law firms like Sullivan and Cromwell and Paul, Weiss. It concludes with an anecdote about working for Milton Handler at Kaye, Scholer.
This document is a page from a manuscript or memoir, likely by Alan Dershowitz (identified in text), produced by the House Oversight Committee. It details his personal history, including his acceptance to Yale Law School over Harvard, a humorous correspondence with the Dean of Columbia Law School, his early marriage to his wife Sue, and anecdotes about his professors at Yale, specifically Guido Calabresi. The text focuses on his Jewish heritage and family dynamics.
This document appears to be page 5 of a draft manuscript for an autobiography by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. The text discusses his philosophy on writing an autobiography, comparing it to a defendant taking the stand, and contrasts his aggressive public legal persona with his private life. It mentions his son Elon, his representation of Claus Von Bulow, and the film *Reversal of Fortune*. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was gathered as evidence during a Congressional investigation, likely related to the Epstein inquiry given Dershowitz's involvement.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Harry Reems | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | $0.00 | Legal 'fee' consisting of a signed photograph. | View |
| N/A | Paid | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | Unnamed Cab Driver | $0.00 | Paid the cab driver what his fare would've been... | View |
| N/A | Received | Paul, Weiss, Rifk... | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | $100.00 | Weekly salary offer for a summer job (subsequen... | View |
| 2021-05-26 | Paid | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | CNN | $300,000,000.00 | Defamation suit amount | View |
| 2019-04-01 | Paid | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | Edwards and Cassell | $900,000.00 | Settlement for defamation lawsuit. | View |
| 2015-03-24 | Paid | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | Edwards and Cassell | $0.00 | Request for order to pay reasonable costs and a... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | $0.00 | Dershowitz representing Epstein as a 'private, ... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Received | Orin Kramer / Hed... | ALAN DERSHOWITZ | $0.00 | Restitution of lost investment funds following ... | View |
Dershowitz wrote an updated letter to Recarey detailing investigation findings on one of the girls, including a website and fascination with marijuana.
Dershowitz met privately with Krischer to discuss the case.
Defense of investigators accused of impersonating police; attack on witness credibility including mention of 'pimp juice' nickname and drug arrest.
Arguments that a president cannot be prosecuted for exercising constitutional prerogatives.
Provided damaging information about teenage girls/accusers.
Provided facts urging attendees to ask Redgrave to explain her hypocrisy regarding blacklisting Israeli artists.
Stated they discovered evidence inconsistent with Dershowitz's representations, that travel records were incomplete, and suggested he should have settled.
Statements asserting Roberts lied about trafficking/abuse, committed perjury and extortion.
Requests for legal representation/review of cases.
Dozens of posts denouncing Ransome as delusional and claiming Boies is retaliating.
Dershowitz tried to write Allen a letter; unsure if read.
“There’s absolutely no kernel of truth to this story,” he’d said.
Calling Giuffre a 'liar' and denying allegations.
Calls the motion 'the sleaziest legal document' and threatens disbarment for Edwards and Cassell.
Dershowitz called Michael to ask if he had spoken to his wife (Rebecca).
Hate mail and criticism regarding Dershowitz's decision to represent Mike Tyson on appeal.
Dershowitz offers to investigate the source of claims if they do not originate from 'the two women mentioned above' and expresses a desire to bring the matter to a close.
False and defamatory statements made to discredit Roberts and silence her efforts to expose sexual abuse.
To make sure their memories coincided
Dershowitz offers to investigate the source of allegations if names are provided and expresses a desire to bring the matter to a close.
Friend stated Roberts felt pressure to go after Dershowitz to get money from Wexner. Dershowitz claims to have a tape recording.
"And I wrote that to you, something that you have falsely denied."
Handwritten letter from prison imploring Dershowitz to join his appellate team.
Dershowitz filed documents regarding a reporter who believes Giuffre fabricated evidence.
Debate over whether the term 'Real America' is a code word for racism/bigotry.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity