UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dashawn Robertson
|
Adversarial defendant vs plaintiff |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
TOVA NOEL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Thomas
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEXANDER ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. MOE
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE R. COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Todd Blanche
|
Professional employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GEOFFREY S. BERMAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Appeal | The document pertains to an appeal (Case 20-3061) before the United States Court of Appeals for t... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Oral argument request | Request for oral argument in case 20-3061, with a preference for it only if another party also re... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Court proceedings for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | Southern District | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal filing | Instructions for filing a bill of costs in the case United States of America v. Maxwell, Docket #... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | Sentencing | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal deadline | Government sentencing submission due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-06 | Legal deadline | Government response due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-06-02 | Court proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an order denying Ghislaine Maxwe... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Legal proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held a term and issued an order affirmi... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Filing of a Declaration of Sigrid S. McCawley in Support of Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Pretrial conference | The Court discussed Dashawn Robertson's motion at length with the parties and the USPO. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-02 | Deadline | Deadline for the Government to respond to the Defendant's November 25, 2020 letter request and th... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Legal proceeding | A court proceeding for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021878.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 22-1426-cr). The appeal, originating from the Southern District of New York, was argued on March 12, 2024, and decided on September 17, 2024. The presiding judges were Cabranes, Wesley, and Lohier.
DOJ-OGR-00021877.jpg
This document is a formal Mandate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, issued on December 2, 2024. It affirms the lower court's June 29, 2022 judgment of conviction against Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). The decision was rendered by Circuit Judges Cabranes, Wesley, and Lohier.
DOJ-OGR-00021876.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated November 25, 2024. It formally denies Ghislaine Maxwell's petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc regarding case docket number 22-1426.
DOJ-OGR-00021875.jpg
This document is a blank court form titled 'Verified Itemized Bill of Costs' from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 17, 2024. It relates to the appeal case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Docket #: 22-1426cr), referencing the original District Court case presided over by Judge Nathan in the SDNY. The form is intended for counsel to submit costs pursuant to FRAP 39(c), though the specific fields for amounts and signatures are unfilled in this copy.
DOJ-OGR-00021874.jpg
This document is a procedural instruction sheet from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the filing of a 'Bill of Costs' in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket 22-1426cr). Dated September 17, 2024, it outlines the specific requirements under FRAP 39 for recovering costs, such as printing fees, following a judgment. The document lists Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Clerk Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe.
DOJ-OGR-00021848.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, pertaining to the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (also known as Sealed Defendant 1). The appeal, originating from the Southern District of New York, was argued on March 12, 2024, and decided on September 17, 2024, by Circuit Judges Cabranes, Wesley, and Lohier.
DOJ-OGR-00021825.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically a 'PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC', submitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on November 1, 2024. The petition is filed by attorneys Arthur L. Aidala and Diana Fabi Samson on behalf of their client, Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The case is an appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00021824.jpg
This is a formal Judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 17, 2024. The document affirms the June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction against Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant-Appellant) following her appeal. The decision was rendered by Circuit Judges Cabranes, Wesley, and Lohier.
DOJ-OGR-00021795.jpg
This document is the title page of a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 22-1426-cr). The case was argued on March 12, 2024, and decided on September 17, 2024, by Circuit Judges Cabranes, Wesley, and Lohier.
DOJ-OGR-00021794.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on March 12, 2024, in the appellate case United States v. Maxwell (Docket 22-1426). Hagan Scotten of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York officially enters the case as additional counsel, joining co-counsel Danielle R. Sassoon to represent the United States (Appellee). The document includes contact information for Scotten and bears the footer DOJ-OGR-00021794.
DOJ-OGR-00021786.jpg
This is a Revised Notice of Hearing Date from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Docket # 22-1426cr). The document schedules an oral argument for Tuesday, March 12, 2024, at 2:00 p.m. at the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse in New York City, allotting 10 minutes per side. It provides instructions for counsel regarding registration, remote participation options, and withdrawal motions.
DOJ-OGR-00021784.jpg
This document is a Notice of Hearing Date from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket #: 22-1426cr). It schedules the oral argument for Tuesday, March 12, 2024, at 10:00 am at the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse in New York City. The document outlines procedural rules regarding time allotment (10 minutes per side), registration, remote vs. in-person attendance, and withdrawal motions.
DOJ-OGR-00021778.jpg
This is a legal notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated December 11, 2023, regarding the case of 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Docket # 22-1426cr). The document formally announces that the case manager assigned to this legal matter has been changed. It provides a phone number for any inquiries related to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00021741.jpg
This is an Oral Argument Statement filed on June 30, 2023, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). Filed by attorney Maurene Comey on behalf of the United States (the Appellee), the document indicates a conditional request for oral argument, contingent on another party also requesting it. The form also lists several dates in late 2023 on which Ms. Comey is unavailable to appear in court.
DOJ-OGR-00021661.jpg
This document is the first page of a legal brief filed by the United States of America in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The brief is in response to an appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted on June 29, 2022, in the Southern District of New York after a jury trial presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document outlines the charges from the March 29, 2021 superseding indictment, beginning with conspiracy to entice minors to travel for illegal sex acts.
DOJ-OGR-00021546.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The hearing took place on June 28, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present at the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00021525.jpg
This is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, which alleged that a juror (Juror 50) lied during jury selection. However, the Court agrees to a limited evidentiary hearing to determine if Juror 50 provided a materially false answer on the questionnaire.
DOJ-OGR-00021431.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically Volume II of a Supplemental Appendix, in the appeal case of Ghislaine Maxwell versus the United States of America. The case, docket number 22-1426, is before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and was filed on June 29, 2023. The filing was submitted by Damian Williams, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, on behalf of the government.
DOJ-OGR-00021173.jpg
This is the cover page for Volume I of the Supplemental Appendix filed on June 29, 2023, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). It lists the parties involved, specifically the United States as Appellee and Ghislaine Maxwell as Defendant-Appellant, and identifies Damian Williams as the US Attorney representing the government.
DOJ-OGR-00021171.jpg
A court order from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dated April 28, 2023, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. granted the Government's motion to file an oversized opposition brief (up to 20,000 words) and set a new briefing schedule with deadlines in June and July 2023.
DOJ-OGR-00021164.jpg
This legal document is an affirmation filed on April 26, 2023, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew A. Rohrbach in the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell. The U.S. Government is requesting permission from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to file an oversized brief of up to 20,000 words to adequately respond to Maxwell's brief. The government also requests a 30-day extension for this filing, moving the deadline from May 30, 2023, to June 29, 2023.
DOJ-OGR-00021163.jpg
This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on April 26, 2023, by the U.S. government in the appeal of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). The government requests permission to file an oversized brief of up to 20,000 words and a 30-day extension of time to file it, proposing a new deadline of June 29, 2023. This would consequently extend the deadline for Ghislaine Maxwell's reply brief to July 27, 2023. The motion is noted as being unopposed by Maxwell's counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00021162.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated March 14, 2023, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No: 22-1426). The order, signed by Clerk of Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, mandates that the Appellee, the United States of America, must file its brief on or before May 30, 2023.
DOJ-OGR-00019643.jpg
This is the conclusion page (page 36 of 37) of a legal filing submitted on October 2, 2020, by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The filing argues that the District Court's order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to modify a Protective Order should be affirmed. It is signed by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys Pomerantz, Comey, Moe, and Metzner.
DOJ-OGR-00019614.jpg
This document is a legal brief filed by the United States of America in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061). The brief's preliminary statement outlines that Maxwell is appealing a September 2, 2020 order from the Southern District of New York which denied her motion to modify a protective order. It also summarizes the superseding indictment filed on July 8, 2020, which charges Maxwell with assisting Jeffrey Epstein in the sexual exploitation of minors between 1994 and 1997.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity