UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dashawn Robertson
|
Adversarial defendant vs plaintiff |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
TOVA NOEL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Thomas
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEXANDER ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. MOE
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE R. COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Todd Blanche
|
Professional employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GEOFFREY S. BERMAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Appeal | The document pertains to an appeal (Case 20-3061) before the United States Court of Appeals for t... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Oral argument request | Request for oral argument in case 20-3061, with a preference for it only if another party also re... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Court proceedings for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | Southern District | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal filing | Instructions for filing a bill of costs in the case United States of America v. Maxwell, Docket #... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | Sentencing | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal deadline | Government sentencing submission due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-06 | Legal deadline | Government response due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-06-02 | Court proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an order denying Ghislaine Maxwe... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Legal proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held a term and issued an order affirmi... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Filing of a Declaration of Sigrid S. McCawley in Support of Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Pretrial conference | The Court discussed Dashawn Robertson's motion at length with the parties and the USPO. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-02 | Deadline | Deadline for the Government to respond to the Defendant's November 25, 2020 letter request and th... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Legal proceeding | A court proceeding for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009002.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing, specifically 'Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial', submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on February 24, 2022. It identifies the case as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell and lists the defendant's legal counsel from three different law firms. The case number is 1:20-cr-00330-PAE and 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
DOJ-OGR-00008972.jpg
This is a court order filed on February 18, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses proposed redactions to the Defendant's motion for a new trial, rejecting specific redaction requests because the information constitutes legal arguments or is widely reported in the press. The document specifically lists page and line numbers in the Defense Brief where redactions were denied.
DOJ-OGR-00008925.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 11, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is an omnibus memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her post-trial motions. The document lists the names and contact information for her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00008916.jpg
This document is a court order issued by District Judge Alison J. Nathan on February 11, 2022, in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order is a response to a request from the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) to file an amicus brief regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial. The judge sets a deadline of February 18, 2022, for any party to file such a motion and outlines four specific requirements that must be met for the court to consider it.
DOJ-OGR-00008909.jpg
This is a court order filed on February 11, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Judge denies the defendant's motion to seal all documents related to her motion for a new trial in their entirety, ruling that sealing must be narrowly tailored. The document also references a motion to intervene by 'Juror 50' and mentions that media organizations have requested the unsealing of documents.
DOJ-OGR-00031523.jpg
This document is a criminal 'Information' filed on September 26, 2000, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, case number 00-8124CR-HURLEY. The United States Attorney charges a defendant (name redacted), a resident of Palm Beach County and a registered mortgage broker, in connection with the activities of Mortgage Express, Inc., a Florida-based mortgage brokerage. The charges fall under federal statutes 18 U.S.C. 1341, 1344, and 2.
DOJ-OGR-00019865.jpg
This document is the first page of the Government's Memorandum in Support of Detention for Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 2, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. The prosecution argues that Maxwell poses an extreme flight risk due to her wealth, three passports, foreign citizenship, and lack of ties to the US, and requests she be detained pending trial for her alleged role in partnering with Jeffrey Epstein to exploit minors.
DOJ-OGR-00019864.jpg
This document is the cover page for the Government's Memorandum in Support of Detention in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330 AJN), filed in the Southern District of New York. It lists Audrey Strauss as the Acting U.S. Attorney and identifies Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey as Assistant U.S. Attorneys handling the case. The header indicates the document was originally filed on July 2, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00019860.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled 'Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's Appendix to the Motion for Pretrial Release', dated April 1, 2021. The filing is part of an appeal (No. 21-770 & 21-58) in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, originating from a case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The parties are the United States of America (Appellee) and Ghislaine Maxwell (Appellant), who is represented by attorney David Oscar Markus of MARKUS/MOSS PLLC.
DOJ-OGR-00019829.jpg
This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on April 1, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 21-770/21-58). Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by attorney David Oscar Markus, is appealing a decision by Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York, requesting reasonable bail or an evidentiary hearing. The motion is opposed by the United States of America, represented by AUSA Won S. Shin.
DOJ-OGR-00019826.jpg
A legal Notice of Appearance filed on April 1, 2021, for the case United States of America v. Maxwell. Attorney David Oscar Markus of the firm Markus/Moss PLLC formally enters the case as additional counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, noting that he will be co-counsel with Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP.
DOJ-OGR-00019824.jpg
This document is a 'Notice of Defective Filing' from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 1, 2021, regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket 21-58). The court clerk notified the appellant that a 'Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel' submitted on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell was rejected because the PDF file was not text-searchable, violating Local Rules 25.1 and 25.2. The document lists Judge Nathan as the District Court judge and references the underlying SDNY docket number 1:20-cr-330-1.
DOJ-OGR-00019822.jpg
This document is a 'NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 1, 2021. It addresses a 'Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel' submitted on March 30, 2021, on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, stating that the filing does not comply with federal and local court rules. The notice lists numerous specific reasons for the defect, ranging from missing acknowledgments and supporting papers to formatting issues like incorrect pagination and font.
DOJ-OGR-00019821.jpg
A Notice of Appearance form filed on March 30, 2021, for Case 21-58 (Docket No. 21-770), United States v. Maxwell. Lara Pomerantz of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is formally entering the case as additional counsel for the Appellee (United States of America), serving alongside co-counsel Won S. Shin.
DOJ-OGR-00019796.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-00330-AJN). The appeal is directed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and challenges the District Court's order from March 22, 2021, which denied her third motion for release on bail. The document lists Maxwell's counsel as David Oscar Markus and the Assistant U.S. Attorneys as Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00019770.jpg
This is a formal court notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated March 29, 2021. It confirms that the 'Record on Appeal - Electronic Index' has been filed in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket #: 21-770), originating from the SDNY under Judge Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00019744.jpg
This is a docketing notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated March 29, 2021, for the case of "United States of America v. Maxwell". The notice confirms that an appeal has been filed and assigned the docket number 21-770. It instructs the parties' counsel on the procedures for filing a Notice of Appearance and for maintaining correct contact information with the court.
DOJ-OGR-00019737.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on January 12, 2021, in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket No. 21-58). Attorney Lara Pomerantz of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is entering the case as additional counsel (co-counsel) alongside Won S. Shin representing the United States (Appellee).
DOJ-OGR-00019715.jpg
This is a legal notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated January 12, 2021, for the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket # 21-58). The document confirms that the "Record on Appeal - Electronic Index" has been officially filed with the court. The notice is issued under the authority of Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Clerk of Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe.
DOJ-OGR-00019687.jpg
This is a legal notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated October 19, 2020, regarding the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Docket # 20-3061cr). The document formally announces that the case manager assigned to the matter has been changed and provides a phone number for any related inquiries.
DOJ-OGR-00019681.jpg
This document is a 'Bill of Costs Instructions' sheet from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated October 19, 2020. It relates to the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Docket #: 20-3061cr) and outlines the procedural requirements for filing a bill of costs under FRAP 39. The document lists the presiding judges (Chief Judge Livingston and DC Judge Nathan) and provides specific rules regarding filing deadlines, verification, service, and allowable printing charges.
DOJ-OGR-00019676.jpg
A court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated October 9, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061). The order grants the Appellant's (Maxwell) motion to file an unredacted reply brief under seal without prejudice.
DOJ-OGR-00019671.jpg
This is a legal motion filed on October 8, 2020, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, through her law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., requests permission to file an unredacted reply brief under seal. The motion is part of an appeal concerning a lower court order by Judge Nathan which denied a request to modify a criminal protective order.
DOJ-OGR-00019647.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically 'Ghislaine Maxwell’s Reply Brief', submitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on October 8, 2020. The brief is part of an appeal (Case 20-3061) from a lower court case (20-CR-330) in the Southern District of New York, where the United States of America is the plaintiff against defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell is represented by attorneys Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the Denver-based law firm HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00019645.jpg
This document is an Oral Argument Statement filed by Lara Pomerantz on behalf of the United States of America in the case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell' before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Dated October 2, 2020, the United States, as the Appellee, indicates a preference for oral argument only if at least one other party also requests it. The form outlines procedures and requirements for requesting and conducting oral arguments for the appeal.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity