| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dashawn Robertson
|
Adversarial defendant vs plaintiff |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
TOVA NOEL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Thomas
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEXANDER ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. MOE
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE R. COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Todd Blanche
|
Professional employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GEOFFREY S. BERMAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Appeal | The document pertains to an appeal (Case 20-3061) before the United States Court of Appeals for t... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Oral argument request | Request for oral argument in case 20-3061, with a preference for it only if another party also re... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Court proceedings for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | Southern District | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal filing | Instructions for filing a bill of costs in the case United States of America v. Maxwell, Docket #... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | Sentencing | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal deadline | Government sentencing submission due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-06 | Legal deadline | Government response due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-06-02 | Court proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an order denying Ghislaine Maxwe... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Legal proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held a term and issued an order affirmi... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Filing of a Declaration of Sigrid S. McCawley in Support of Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Pretrial conference | The Court discussed Dashawn Robertson's motion at length with the parties and the USPO. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-02 | Deadline | Deadline for the Government to respond to the Defendant's November 25, 2020 letter request and th... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Legal proceeding | A court proceeding for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT | View |
This document is the cover page of a legal filing from September 28, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061) before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The filing is Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion to dismiss her appeal, submitted by her attorneys Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. The appeal originates from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
This is a court filing from September 24, 2020, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 20-3061). Ghislaine Maxwell, through her attorneys Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., submits an unopposed motion to file three specific documents under seal: her unredacted opening brief, Appendix Volume 2, and an unredacted response to a government opposition motion. The document originates from an appeal of the case in the Southern District of New York.
This is a Motion Information Statement filed on September 24, 2020, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061). Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Adam Mueller, is requesting permission to file several documents under seal, including an unredacted brief and Appendix Volume 2, arguing they contain confidential material. The motion states that the opposing counsel for the United States, Maurene Comey, does not oppose this request.
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed on September 3, 2020, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell is appealing the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York's decision from September 2, 2020, which denied her motion to modify a protective order. The notice cites several legal precedents to argue that the denial is immediately appealable.
On September 2, 2020, Judge Alison J. Nathan issued an order in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell regarding a motion Maxwell filed to modify a protective order. The Judge approved the Government's proposed redactions to Maxwell's earlier motion, citing the need to protect an ongoing grand jury investigation. The parties were ordered to meet and confer regarding further redactions by September 4, 2020.
This document is a Protective Order filed on July 30, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan, the order aims to protect sensitive, confidential, and personal information that the government intends to provide to the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, during the discovery process. The order is intended to prevent premature disclosure that could affect individual privacy, impede the ongoing investigation, or cause prejudicial pretrial publicity.
This is the first page of a Proposed Protective Order filed on July 28, 2020, in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan, outlines the Government's intent to produce discovery materials to the defense while restricting their public dissemination to protect ongoing investigations, privacy, and prevent prejudicial publicity.
This is the first page of a Proposed Protective Order filed on July 27, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. Judge Alison J. Nathan presides over the document, which outlines the Government's intent to produce discovery materials to the defense while limiting public disclosure to protect privacy, the ongoing investigation, and fair trial rights. The document establishes the legal framework for handling sensitive information pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16.
This document is the cover page of a superseding indictment, case number S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), filed on July 8, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The indictment is brought by the United States of America against the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and is presented by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss.
This document is the first page of a Superseding Indictment (S1 20 Cr. 330) filed in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. Count One charges her with Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts. The overview alleges that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell assisted Jeffrey Epstein in recruiting, grooming, and abusing girls as young as 14, knowing they were underage.
This document is a Memorandum Opinion and Order from Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on September 2, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses Maxwell's request to file certain discovery materials under seal, with the court deciding to adopt the Government's proposed redactions to protect an ongoing grand jury investigation. The court orders both parties to confer and submit their final proposed redactions by September 4, 2020.
This document is the cover page for Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief filed on September 24, 2020, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 20-3061). It appeals a decision from the Southern District of New York (Case 20-CR-330) involving the United States of America. The document lists her legal representation as Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of the Denver-based firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
This document is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 16, 2020. It addresses two separate appeals involving Ghislaine Maxwell: a civil case with Virginia Giuffre (20-2413) and a criminal case with the United States of America (20-3061). The order notes that on September 10, 2020, Maxwell filed a motion to consolidate the two appeals, and this document begins the court's ruling on that motion.
This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on September 16, 2020, by the United States of America in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061). The motion, submitted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, seeks to dismiss Maxwell's appeal on the grounds of a lack of jurisdiction. The document identifies the legal representatives for both parties and confirms that the opposing counsel, Adam Mueller, has been notified and intends to file a response.
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated September 16, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order confirms that Maxwell's legal counsel has set a date of October 22, 2020, to file their brief and explicitly orders that this deadline be met under threat of potential financial sanctions.
This is a legal notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 15, 2020, regarding the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket # 20-3061). The document officially announces that the case manager assigned to the matter has been changed. It provides a phone number for any inquiries related to the case.
A Memorandum Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on September 2, 2020. The order addresses Maxwell's motion to modify a protective order to allow her to file discovery materials in civil cases under seal. The Judge approves the Government's proposed redactions to the motion filings, citing the need to protect an ongoing grand jury investigation.
This document is page 1 of a Protective Order filed on July 30, 2020, in the Southern District of New York case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). Judge Alison J. Nathan outlines the need to restrict the dissemination of discovery materials to protect individual privacy, prevent interference with ongoing investigations, and avoid prejudicial pretrial publicity. The footer indicates this document is part of a Department of Justice release (DOJ-OGR-00019303).
This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled "Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion to Consolidate Appeals," submitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on September 10, 2020. The motion concerns two separate appeals involving Ghislaine Maxwell as the Defendant-Appellant: one from a civil case (15-CV-7433) brought by Virginia L. Giuffre, and another from a criminal case (20-CR-330) brought by the United States of America, both originating from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on September 10, 2020, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 20-3061, United States v. Maxwell). Attorney Adam Mueller, representing Ghislaine Maxwell, is requesting leave to file an unredacted motion to consolidate under seal. The document indicates that opposing counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, does not oppose the motion.
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on September 10, 2020, in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket Case 20-3061). Maurene Comey of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York formally enters the case as additional counsel for the Appellee (United States), working alongside co-counsel Won S. Shin.
This document is a 'Notice of Appearance' filed on September 10, 2020, for Case No. 20-3061 (United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney Ty Gee of the firm Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. is formally entering the case as additional counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, working alongside co-counsel Laura A. Menninger. The document includes Ty Gee's contact information in Denver, CO, and certifies his admission to practice in the court.
This legal document is an 'Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance' filed on September 10, 2020, by attorney Laura A. Menninger of the firm Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. Menninger formally enters her appearance as lead counsel for the defendant-appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061). The filing confirms the accuracy of case details, provides counsel's contact information, lists related cases, and certifies Menninger's admission to practice before the court.
This is a Memorandum Opinion and Order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the SDNY case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on September 2, 2020. The order addresses Maxwell's request to modify a protective order to allow her to file discovery materials under seal in related civil cases. The document notably approves Government redactions to previous filings, citing the need to protect an 'ongoing grand jury investigation.'
This document is a Notice of Appeal filed by Ghislaine Maxwell on September 3, 2020 (received September 4, 2020) in the Southern District of New York. Maxwell is appealing a September 2, 2020 court order that denied her motion to modify a protective order. The filing cites legal precedents (Pichler v. UNITE, Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., and Brown v. Maxwell) to establish jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity