Trove
Sign In Sign Up

THE COURT

Person
Mentions
4828
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
2363
Also known as:
THE COURT, MR. DONALDSON
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00018065.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330, filed Aug 10, 2022) detailing a sidebar conversation during the direct examination of witness Alessi (likely Juan Alessi). The prosecutor, Ms. Comey, and the Judge discuss the admissibility of Alessi reading from an exhibit not in evidence; Alessi claims the document is a 'later version' because his name and his wife's name are missing from it.

Court transcript (sidebar conference)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018063.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Alessi by Ms. Comey. The questioning focuses on authenticating 'Government Exhibit 52,' a directory containing the date range 2004-2005, which Alessi identifies as a later version of a directory he saw while working for Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecutor also attempts to ask Alessi if Sarah Kellen's name appears in the exhibit, though the Court interrupts to sustain an objection regarding authentication foundation.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018062.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. An attorney, Ms. Comey, questions Alessi about whether his name, his wife's name, or Sarah Kellen's name appears in a specific book or binder. Another attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to the line of questioning as leading, which the court sustains before permitting a rephrased version of the question.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018060.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records the direct examination of witness Juan Alessi by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The Judge sustains a defense objection regarding a lack of foundation for Alessi's claim that an object was a 'later version of the book,' instructs the jury to disregard that statement, and allows the examination to proceed regarding a 'booklet.'

Court transcript (trial testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018059.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between a judge and two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca. The conversation centers on a foundational objection to an exhibit, specifically a book. The judge recounts the testimony of a witness, Mr. Alessi, who claimed the book in question is a later, thinner version of one he saw while employed by Mr. Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018058.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between attorneys Ms. Comey, Mr. Pagliuca, and the judge. The conversation centers on whether to admit an exhibit into evidence immediately or reserve it for a later time. Ms. Comey gives contradictory answers, first agreeing to reserve and then stating she wants to admit it now, which she explains by saying she misunderstood the judge's question.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018057.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed August 10, 2022) during the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. A procedural discussion occurs between the Judge (The Court), Defense Attorney Mr. Pagliuca, and Prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding an objection to the foundation of the witness's knowledge about a specific 'book' created after the witness left employment in 2002. The Court decides to allow the question provisionally, noting the testimony will be stricken if proper foundation is not established.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018056.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures a brief exchange between the judge (THE COURT), Mr. Pagliuca, and Ms. Comey, where they agree that a witness is not needed to verify copies. The judge then announces a short recess.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018055.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the Judge regarding the admission of Exhibit 52 (and sub-exhibits A, D, E, F, G, H) in redacted form. The header indicates this occurred during the direct examination of witness Alessi.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018054.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between attorneys Ms. Comey, Mr. Pagliuca, and the presiding judge. The parties agree on a method for admitting exhibit 52 into evidence, deciding to use a redacted version consisting of specific pages (52A, D, E, F, G, H) for the jury. The agreement clarifies that the exhibit will be authenticated and admitted in this limited form.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018053.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument between two attorneys, Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey, in front of a judge. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the method of having a witness compare a copy of a document to a book, arguing about the lack of foundation for the evidence. The judge finds the objection reasonable and instructs Ms. Comey to address the procedural issue.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018052.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022, detailing a direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The transcript captures a discussion between the judge (THE COURT) and attorneys (Ms. Comey, Mr. Pagliuca) about the witness having compared Government Exhibits 52A and 52 before taking the stand. Ms. Comey describes this as 'homework' to confirm the documents were copies, a practice the judge acknowledges.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018051.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Ms. Comey, regarding the identification of Government Exhibit 52A as a copy of a page from Government Exhibit 52. The exchange includes a legal objection for 'lack of foundation' by another attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and a discussion with the judge to clarify the nature of the exhibits.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018050.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Alessi. Alessi is questioned about a book, which he identifies as a later, thinner version of a previous one, and notes that his name, which was listed in connection with a house in Palm Beach, is absent. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to the line of questioning but is overruled by the court before the proceedings turn to a sealed government exhibit.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018049.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Alessi. Alessi is being questioned about a book he saw while working for a 'Mr. Epstein' and confirms that a version he recently reviewed is a later version, printed after he left his employment. The transcript also records objections from an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, and rulings from the court.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018047.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Ms. Comey presents Government Exhibit 52, which Mr. Alessi identifies as a directory belonging to Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein. The witness confirms he had reviewed the directory the previous night.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018031.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Alessi by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The witness confirms seeing two underage females at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence; one is referred to by the pseudonym 'Jane' to protect her identity, and the witness explicitly identifies the second female as Virginia Roberts.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018019.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, who is being questioned about his knowledge of an 'Exhibit 606' and confirms that he threw away a document he received after leaving a position in 2002. The transcript includes objections from an attorney, Ms. Comey, and rulings from the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018015.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The dialogue focuses on a procedural confusion regarding an exhibit where the pages are out of numerical order (jumping from page 42 to 49, then 50, 51, and back to 43). Ms. Comey is the attorney questioning the witness, with the Judge (The Court) intervening to clarify the document structure.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018009.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a legal case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, who is being asked to identify portions of a multi-page list he recognizes. After an objection for a leading question is sustained by the court, Mr. Alessi confirms that he recognizes the entire contents of pages 1, 2, and 3 of the document in question.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018008.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by prosecutor Ms. Comey. Alessi identifies a 58-page exhibit as a booklet of instructions he was required to follow to maintain 'the house' during his employment with Mr. Epstein.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018002.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Alessi (likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). Alessi details Jeffrey Epstein's various properties, including Zorro Ranch, Little St. James (referred to as 'Little St. Jeff'), a New York home, a Paris home, and a home in Columbus, Ohio. Alessi also describes flying once with Ghislaine Maxwell to Miami on Epstein's first plane, identified as a Hawker.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017999.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Alessi is being questioned by Ms. Comey regarding their 12-year employment with Mr. Epstein. Alessi testifies to seeing female guests (estimated to be in their twenties) hundreds of times, noting that they were topless by the pool approximately 75-80% of the time.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017998.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript involving the direct examination of a witness named Alessi by Ms. Comey. Alessi testifies that while working for Epstein in Palm Beach between 1991 and 2002, Ghislaine Maxwell slept in Epstein's master bedroom and had a desk in the garden room. The witness also confirms observing 'many, many, many females' visiting the residence, and the questioning ends just as the witness is asked about the age of these females.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017995.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of Mr. Alessi by Ms. Comey. The testimony focuses on identifying the layout of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach property, specifically describing the 'cabana' or 'pool house' where Epstein's desk, a couch, and stereo equipment were located. Government's Exhibit 299 (GX-299), a depiction of the property layout, was admitted into evidence without objection from the defense.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$162,555,000.00
16 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$162,555,000.00
16 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2021-03-23 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $9,500,000.00 Value of real property offered as collateral. View
2021-03-23 Received security company THE COURT $1,000,000.00 Bond co-signed by a security company. View
2021-03-23 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $550,000.00 Cash offered as collateral. View
2021-03-23 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... THE COURT $28,500,000.00 Proposed total bond amount. View
2020-12-14 Received Sureties (Family/... THE COURT $0.00 Meaningful pledges of cash or property in amoun... View
2020-07-13 Received Unidentified co-s... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount by the defense, which the ... View
2020-07-10 Received Co-signers (Sibli... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount to secure Maxwell's appear... View
2020-07-10 Received Defense/Co-signers THE COURT $3,750,000.00 Value of real property in the United Kingdom of... View
2020-07-10 Received Co-signers (Sibli... THE COURT $5,000,000.00 Proposed bond amount to secure appearance. View
2020-07-10 Received Ms. Maxwell / Ass... THE COURT $3,750,000.00 Value of real property in the United Kingdom us... View
2020-01-01 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL THE COURT $22,500,000.00 Proposed bond amount representing all of the co... View
2019-07-18 Received MR. EPSTEIN THE COURT $0.00 Defense offer to put up 'any amount' of collate... View
2019-07-11 Received Jeffrey Epstein THE COURT $77,000,000.00 Valuation of Manhattan residence to be mortgage... View
2010-07-01 Received Epstein's counsel THE COURT $5,000.00 Proposed sanction fine for discovery violations. View
As Sender
409
As Recipient
1009
Total
1418

Juror Bias / Sexual Abuse History

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Juror 50 testified that his history of sexual abuse would not affect his impartiality.

Hearing testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Post-Hearing Brief

From: Maxwell Defense Team
To: THE COURT

Dismissed Juror 50's responses as 'self-serving'.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Second Motion for Bail

From: . MAXWELL
To: THE COURT

Addressed concerns regarding flight risk and corroboration of evidence.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Response to Second Bail Motion

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Opposition to bail.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Third Motion for Bail

From: . MAXWELL
To: THE COURT

Offer to renounce foreign citizenship.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Admissibility of Photographs

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding whether photographs corroborate a witness's blind description of a residence interior given the time lapse.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Victim Impact Statements

From: Ms. Bryant, Ms. Maria ...
To: THE COURT

Written submissions submitted in accordance with the Court's order.

Written submissions
N/A
Communication Source

Order de-designating documents

From: Defense counsel
To: THE COURT

Motion to remove Highly Confidential status from materials.

Motion
N/A
Communication Source

Clarification on Count Four

From: The jury
To: THE COURT

Asked if defendant can be found guilty if she aided the return flight but not the flight to New Mexico where intent for sexual activity existed.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Maxwell Br. at 14-15

From: Maxwell Defense Team
To: THE COURT

Speculated that the jury was focused on a 1997 flight.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Responses regarding impartiality, burden of proof, and media consumption (CNN).

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Additional proposed redactions

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Submission of additional redactions under seal

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Maxwell Reply at 23

From: Defense counsel
To: THE COURT

Argues that Rule 606 violates Maxwell's constitutional rights.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Juror misconduct inquiry

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Statements about a second juror.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Presentation of Photos

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Everdell explains they only have single copies of certain photos received that morning and proposes walking them to the jury row rather than distributing copies.

Court proceeding
N/A
Communication Source

Withdrawal of arrest warrant request

From: defense (implied)
To: THE COURT

Withdrawal of the request to issue an arrest warrant for witness Kelly.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Disclosure of Maxwell grand jury materials

From: Victims (via represent...
To: THE COURT

Letters urging broad disclosure of investigative records regarding Epstein and Maxwell, provided identities are redacted.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Motion to [Unseal/Redact]

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Government proposes to redact names and personally identifying information of victims and third parties.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Answering Brief (Ans.Br.)

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Government claims Maxwell is attempting to have the Court weigh in on investigative methods.

Brief
N/A
Communication Source

Briefing Schedule

From: Defense Counsel (Mr. E...
To: THE COURT

Proposal for a briefing schedule after counsel confers.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Question on Count Four

From: Jury
To: THE COURT

Under Count Four, if the defendant aided in the transportation of Jane's return flight, but not the flight to New Mexico, where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity, can she be found guilty under the second element?

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Opposition to release

From: the government
To: THE COURT

Cited two pages of cases regarding health risks and dangerousness.

Legal brief/reply
N/A
Communication Source

Sidebar Request

From: Mr. Everdell
To: THE COURT

Requesting a sidebar to discuss proving an inconsistent statement of a prior witness.

Courtroom dialogue
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing Arguments

From: the defendant
To: THE COURT

Defendant's brief cited at page 12 regarding legislative history.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

Page 32 note 13

From: Brune/Defense Team
To: THE COURT

Stated defendants had no basis to inquire whether Conrad was lying.

Memorandum
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search