Department of Justice (DOJ)
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory lobbying |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency disagreement and deference |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory legislative commentary |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Government
|
Advisory policy recommendation |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency jurisdictional dispute collaboration |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency policy disagreement and cooperation |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Hierarchical |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency coordination and jurisdictional negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Funder and trainer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Proposed legislation (Mann Act expansion, Sections 222, 223)
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Inter agency disagreement |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Non-government organizations (NGOs)
|
Potential conflict of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS and DHS
|
Collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI, DOL, DHS
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DHS/FBI/DOL
|
Inter agency coordination |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
US States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
National Advocacy Center, National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ recommends adding 'endeavor to' after 'shall' in subsection (c)(3)(A)(ii) to avoid creati... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and response to proposed legislative changes in Sections 202 and 203 of a bill relat... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and recommendations on proposed legislative changes in Secti... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes extending continued presence for trafficking victims for the duration of a civil ... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 202(a) that would legislate the existence of the 'Trafficking... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the 120-day deadline in Section 202(f) as unreasonable. | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 203 that would remove the Attorney General's role in determin... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws concerning minor victims are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on human trafficking, including discussion on using various criminal statutes. | National Advocacy Center an... | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. | Annual conferences, the Nat... | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ expresses opposition to expanding the Mann Act to federalize criminal prosecution of pand... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes a proposed subsection (g) that would expand sex tourism offenses to include illic... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ states its belief that the addition of 18 U.S.C. § 2423A is unnecessary. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the expansion of jurisdiction over offenses involving non-Americans committed out... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ criticizes Section 223, which relates to 'pimping' an alien, for removing a requirement f... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis of and opposition to proposed legislative changes in Sections 205, 211, and 213 of a... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and statement of opposition/deference regarding proposed leg... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
EFTA00025339.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from September 25, 2019, regarding the approval of a travel voucher for a DOJ employee. The voucher relates to a trip taken to West Palm Beach, Florida, on September 9-10, 2019, for the specific purpose of conducting 'Victim Interviews' for the case 'U.S. v. Epstein (2018R0618)'. This indicates ongoing investigative activity by federal authorities regarding Epstein's victims shortly after his death in August 2019.
EFTA00025334.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel regarding a travel authorization (Trip ID: 10643456-2) for a Department of Justice employee. The trip, dated September 17-20, 2019, was to Santa Monica, CA, for the purpose of conducting witness interviews related to the case 'U.S. v. Epstein' (Case ID: R19NYS13842). The email was sent on September 27, 2019, indicating the authorization was being processed retroactively or post-trip.
EFTA00025273.pdf
This document is a forensic extract of Windows Registry software information (SOFTWARE.dat). It records the installation of Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2 on November 7, 2003, with 'J Epstein' listed as the registered owner. The document is part of Department of Justice discovery materials related to US v. Epstein (2018R01618).
EFTA00025253.pdf
This document contains an email chain from November 20, 2019, regarding a travel voucher dispute for a trip taken from November 13-15, 2019. The trip's purpose is explicitly stated as 'U.S. v. Epstein - Witness Interview' in Santa Monica, CA. The traveler disputes the lodging costs ($247 vs $248) and tax inclusion, asking 'Darlene' to advise an Assistant US Attorney (AUSA).
EFTA00025250.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the E2 Solutions travel system regarding a final voucher for a trip taken by a DOJ official (name redacted). The trip, identified as ID 10808018, took place from November 13-15, 2019, in Santa Monica, California. The stated purpose of the travel was 'Witness Interviews' related to the case 'U.S. v. Epstein (2018R01618)'.
EFTA00025248.pdf
This document contains an email thread and a travel voucher notification from November 2019 regarding a trip to Santa Monica, CA, for a 'U.S. v. Epstein - Witness Interview' (Case R20NYS13179). The emails discuss administrative issues, specifically a discrepancy in lodging costs ($248 vs $247) and the reimbursement of Transient Occupancy Tax charged by the Doubletree by Hilton, noting that LA County is tax-exempt. The traveler, referred to as 'Alex', traveled from November 13 to November 15, 2019.
EFTA00025230.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 11, 2019, involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York requesting urgent travel approval. The attorney was notified of an FBI-arranged meeting with victims in the Epstein case (investigation ID 2018R01618) taking place in Florida. The travel was scheduled for the following Tuesday (October 15), involving a round trip to Florida followed immediately by a flight to Tennessee for separate work.
EFTA00025228.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 26, 2019, originating from a US Department of Justice (postmaster@voip.usa.doj.gov) voice message notification. The recipients discuss the notification, with one noting they believe they received it in error 'along with the Epstein team,' to which another replies, 'It is happening again.' The document dates from after Jeffrey Epstein's death, likely involving his estate or legal team.
EFTA00024509.pdf
This document is an automated email notification dated December 20, 2019, regarding the approval of a travel expense voucher. The voucher relates to a trip taken by a redacted individual from December 15-17, 2019, to Santa Monica, California. The stated purpose of the trip is 'R20NYS13257 - U.S. v. Epstein - Witness Interviews,' indicating the travel was part of an investigation or legal proceeding involving Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00024265.pdf
This document is a series of emails from an individual named Gregor Hirsch to various media outlets and government officials on December 15, 2020. Hirsch argues that beauty pageants constitute a form of sex trafficking similar to the Epstein case and petitions for Ghislaine Maxwell to be granted bail under strict security conditions he proposes. Notably, Hirsch includes a request to be employed as one of the security guards for Maxwell and alleges grooming behavior by Donald Trump at Miss Teen USA pageants.
EFTA00023783.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Gary Bloxsome (counsel for Prince Andrew/Duke of York) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York in July 2020. The correspondence concerns negotiations for Prince Andrew to provide a voluntary interview to US authorities regarding the Epstein investigation. The US side threatens a compelled interview via MLAT if no voluntary date is set, while the UK side complains about leaks, 'media circus', and seeks strict confidentiality assurances before agreeing to an interview.
EFTA00023342.pdf
This document is an automated email notification dated March 6, 2020, regarding a travel expense voucher. The voucher relates to a trip taken by a redacted individual to Beverly Hills, CA, from February 26-29, 2020, for the specific purpose of conducting 'Epstein Investigation Witness interviews.' The document lists the case code as R20NYS13400 and notes total expenses of $1,196.11.
EFTA00023338.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel to a redacted recipient (likely a DOJ employee) regarding a travel voucher. The voucher details a trip to Beverly Hills, CA, from February 25-29, 2020, for the explicit purpose of an 'Epstein Investigation Witness interview' (Case ID R20NYS13404), with total expenses amounting to $1,981.97.
EFTA00023316.pdf
This document is an automated email notification dated March 4, 2020, regarding a travel voucher for a Department of Justice (DOJ) employee. The voucher details a trip to Beverly Hills, CA, from February 26 to February 29, 2020, specifically for 'Epstein Investigation Witness interviews.' The document highlights ongoing federal investigative activities related to the Epstein case in early 2020.
EFTA00023306.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the Department of Justice's travel system (E2 Solutions) dated February 24, 2020. It concerns the approval of a travel voucher for a trip to Pensacola, Florida, which took place on February 19-20, 2020. The stated purpose of the trip was a 'Witness interview' for the 'Epstein Investigation' (Case ID R20NYS13401).
EFTA00023289.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the Department of Justice's travel system approving travel for an SDNY employee. The travel is scheduled for February 25-29, 2020, to Beverly Hills, CA, for the specific purpose of conducting a witness interview for the Epstein Investigation (Case ID R20NYS13404).
EFTA00023123.pdf
This document is a Fact Witness Travel Request dated October 28, 2021, for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It requests travel arrangements for a redacted fact witness residing in West Palm Beach, FL, to travel to the Southern District of New York (SDNY) for trial preparation on November 14 and 15, 2021. The witness is noted as a fact witness, not a victim-witness, and requires a hotel stay.
EFTA00023109.pdf
This document is an email dated December 30, 2020, from a DOJ Attaché at the U.S. Embassy in Paris to redacted recipients (likely SDNY prosecutors). The email refers an MLAT (Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty) request from French authorities regarding the investigation of an individual recently arrested in Paris (contextually likely Jean-Luc Brunel). The sender notes they are already in communication with the recipients regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings.
EFTA00023059.pdf
This document is the Executive Summary of a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report from November 2020 investigating the conduct of U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and other prosecutors regarding the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. OPR concluded that while Acosta exercised 'poor judgment' in resolving the case via NPA and failing to ensure victims were notified, he did not commit professional misconduct as defined by clear and unambiguous standards. The report details the history of the investigation, the CVRA litigation by victims, and the subsequent fallout leading to Acosta's resignation and Epstein's 2019 arrest and death.
EFTA00022456.pdf
This document contains email correspondence between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel Glen McGorty of Crowell & Moring LLP regarding a cooperating witness (Mr. [Redacted]). The emails arrange proffer interviews via WebEx and discuss the witness's potential testimony at Ghislaine Maxwell's trial in November 2021. Key topics of interest for the prosecution include Epstein's relationship with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in the Virgin Islands, specifically whether Epstein provided favors (such as trips to his island) to CBP agents in exchange for bypassing standard immigration processing for himself and his guests.
EFTA00022201.pdf
This document is an email thread between an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York and Gary Bloxsome, a partner at Blackfords LLP in London, dating from July 28 to August 10, 2020. The correspondence details negotiations for a 'voluntary interview' (proffer) of Bloxsome's unnamed client regarding the client's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically focusing on communications and knowledge of sexual activity with women or girls. Key points of negotiation include the scope of immunity (SDNY offering limited use immunity versus the broader protections of an MLAT compelled interview) and the specific legal ramifications of providing false statements under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001.
EFTA00021987.pdf
This document is a heavily redacted email header dated October 14, 2020. It contains a Message-ID associated with the domain 'usa.doj.gov', indicating correspondence involving the US Department of Justice. Most identifying information, including sender, recipient, and subject lines, has been obscured.
EFTA00021719.pdf
This document is an email header dated January 12, 2021, with the subject 'RE: Brunel', likely referring to Jean-Luc Brunel. The email was blind copied (Bcc) to a Department of Justice address (usahub-usajournal111@usa.doj.gov), suggesting it is part of an internal communication regarding the investigation or legal proceedings.
EFTA00021410.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the Department of Justice VoIP system (postmaster@voip.usa.doj.gov) dated July 16, 2019. It alerts a redacted recipient to a voice message from 'HOLDSCLAW SUSAN' received at 12:31 PM that same day.
EFTA00021389.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the DOJ's travel system regarding the approval of a travel voucher (Trip ID 10416822-1). The travel, which took place from July 11-12, 2019, was to West Palm Beach, FL, specifically for 'Victim Interviews' related to the case 'U.S. v. Epstein (2018R01618)'. The total expenses claimed were $779.97.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity