Trove
Sign In Sign Up

PAUL M. DAUGERDAS

Person
Mentions
222
Relationships
11
Events
38
Documents
109
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
11 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
location UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
22
View
organization UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Legal representative
8 Strong
3
View
person Conrad
Juror defendant
8 Strong
4
View
person Parse
Co defendants inferred
5
1
View
person Michael Hammer
Professional
5
1
View
person Michael Hammer
Professional correspondence
5
1
View
person Catherine M. Conrad
Juror defendant
5
1
View
person Ms. Conrad
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Ms. Conrad
Juror defendant
5
1
View
person Pauley
Defendant judge inferred
5
1
View
person Conrad
Juror defendant
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Legal case Legal case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. Southern District View
N/A Legal case Court proceedings for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. Southern District View
N/A Legal case Legal proceedings in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., as indica... Southern District View
N/A Legal proceeding Court case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. Southern District View
2022-02-24 Legal filing Filing of Document 646-10, an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII), in case 13-1388-cr in the United Sta... United States Court of Appe... View
2022-02-24 Legal filing Filing of Document 1616-1, Page 65 of 67, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. U.S. District Court (implie... View
2014-02-24 Legal filing Filing of an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII) in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Dau... United States Court of Appe... View
2012-03-24 Legal filing Document 1646-20 was filed in Case 2:09-cr-00582-ABN. N/A View
2012-03-22 Legal filing Document 646-10 was filed in Case 6:10-cr-00333-PAB-N. N/A View
2012-02-15 Legal proceeding The document is an index from a transcript related to the court case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,... SOUTHERN DISTRICT View
2012-02-15 Legal proceeding Court case titled 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.' for which this transcr... Southern District View
2012-02-15 Legal proceeding Court hearing for the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. Southern District View
2012-02-15 N/A Court proceeding or deposition for United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas Southern District (New York) View
2012-02-15 N/A Court proceeding/transcript date for US v. Daugerdas Southern District Court View
2012-02-15 N/A Court proceeding for United States v. Daugerdas Southern District (New York) View
2012-02-15 N/A Court proceeding for United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. Southern District (implied NY) View
2012-02-15 N/A Court Proceeding / Deposition Southern District (implied) View
2012-02-15 N/A Court proceeding for United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas Southern District of New Yo... View
2012-02-15 N/A Date of the transcript or proceeding associated with this index page. Southern District (likely NY) View
2012-02-15 N/A Court proceedings including recross-examination Southern District Court View
2012-02-15 N/A Legal proceeding/transcript date Unknown (likely Southern Di... View
2012-02-15 N/A Court proceedings/Trial Southern District Court (im... View
2012-02-15 N/A Court proceeding date listed in header. Southern District (likely S... View
2012-02-15 N/A Court Proceeding/Transcript Date Southern District (Court) View
2012-02-15 N/A Court proceedings in USA v. Paul M. Daugerdas Southern District of New Yo... View

DOJ-OGR-00009246.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing an afternoon session where the Court addresses matters that arose during a luncheon recess, including a financial affidavit from Ms. Conrad and a voice mail she left stating she would not attend the hearing. The transcript also covers an examination by Mr. Gair and Mr. Okula regarding a prior conversation on December 20th with Judge Pauley about 'The Answerer's' financial ability to hire a lawyer and their personal finances, which 'The Answerer' claimed were irrelevant.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009245.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, by an attorney, Mr. Gair. The questioning focuses on a prior court appearance where Conrad, upon being given a financial affidavit to determine her eligibility for a court-appointed lawyer, declared, "This is garbage." Gair probes Conrad's memory, motivations, and the rationality of her statement, which she describes as a "kneejerk reaction."

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009244.jpg

This document is a court transcript from the trial 'United States v. Daugerdas' dated February 15, 2012, which was filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). The transcript features the cross-examination of a witness named Conrad, focusing on her mental state (medication use), her refusal to accept a subpoena during a December 20th hearing before Judge Pauley, and her financial inability to hire counsel. The questioning attorney challenges Conrad on whether her behavior of rejecting a subpoena and inviting arrest was 'rational' conduct for an officer of the court.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009243.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Conrad. The questioning focuses on Conrad's defiance of a previous court order from Judge Pauley to testify, her background as a suspended lawyer, and her mental health. Conrad is evasive, repeatedly stating she is not a psychologist, and provides minimal answers, including claiming she only takes "Water" as medication.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009242.jpg

This document is a court transcript from 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas' (dated Feb 15, 2012) filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the cross-examination of a witness named Conrad (likely the infamous Juror 50 from the Daugerdas trial) regarding her bias, her admission to 'Googling' the judge and attorneys, and her 'smart a-s-s' comments about Judge Pauley being a 'Clinton appointee.' This transcript was likely used in the Maxwell case to argue legal precedent regarding juror misconduct.

Court transcript (min-u-script)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009241.jpg

This document is a condensed court transcript from the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas', filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It features the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, regarding her alcohol consumption (specifically 'cheap vodka') and her behavior during a previous court appearance before Judge Pauley on December 20th. The testimony highlights erratic statements Conrad previously made to Judge Pauley, including comments about his intelligence, his attendance at Duke University, and his potential desire for a 'Clinton appointment'.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009240.jpg

This court transcript from February 15, 2012, documents the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, who is also a trained lawyer. The questioning centers on her defiance of a court order to appear, having told Judge Pauley's clerk she was not coming, and her rationale for this action which she is unable to explain. The testimony also reveals she was unaware of a potential immunity deal and had met with her apparent counsel, Ms. Sternheim, six times before the hearing.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009239.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, for the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. It captures the direct examination of witness Catherine M. Conrad, who initially pleads the Fifth Amendment regarding her prior testimony from March 2011. After being granted use immunity by the court, Conrad admits under questioning that her previous testimony as a prospective juror contained both omissions and lies.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009238.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, in the case of U.S. v. Daugertas. The transcript details a legal argument regarding a request to close the courtroom for the testimony of a witness, Catherine Conrad, due to sensitive information about her alcohol dependency and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior disclosures of the information and the defendants' right to a public proceeding. The transcript also reveals that Ms. Conrad intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment right, and counsel has submitted an application to compel her testimony with immunity.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009237.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, featuring Ms. Trzaskoma's testimony during redirect and recross-examination. The questioning primarily concerns information about juror Catherine Conrad, specifically when Ms. Trzaskoma became aware of Conrad's background as a suspended lawyer with a criminal record and civil lawsuit, and whether this information was properly disclosed during the trial. The Court also inquires about a juror replacement event on May 16th during deliberations, and Ms. Trzaskoma denies any intent to mislead the court.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009229.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing's table of contents or exhibit list, specifically from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. It lists various communications (letters, emails, faxes) dated between 1999 and 2002, identifying the sender, recipient, date, and exhibit number for each item. The list also includes references to documents from Oxford Bloomfield Investors, Inc. and client statements from Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009224.jpg

This document is the cover page for Volume XVI of a legal appendix filed on February 24, 2014, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The case, docket number 13-1388-cr, is an appeal by Defendant-Appellant David Parse and others against the United States of America, originating from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The page identifies the parties involved, their legal roles (Appellee, Defendants, Defendant-Appellant), and their respective legal counsel.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00010155.jpg

This document is an affidavit filed by David Parse on August 7, 2012, in the criminal case *USA v. Daugerdas et al.* (Case 1:09-cr-00581). In the affidavit, Parse attests that during jury selection, he heard attorney Theresa Trzaskoma mention a juror had the same name as a suspended attorney but dismissed it as a coincidence. Parse states he only learned later (after a motion for a new trial was filed) that the issue of the juror ('Conrad') actually being the suspended lawyer had surfaced prior to deliberations. Note: While this document bears a DOJ-OGR stamp often associated with Epstein-related releases, the text strictly concerns the Daugerdas tax fraud case and juror misconduct.

Legal affidavit (court filing)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00010126.jpg

This document is the first page of a declaration by Stephen Gillers, a legal ethics professor at NYU, filed on April 6, 2012, in the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. Gillers outlines his qualifications and states he was asked to address whether attorneys for the firm Brune & Richard met their ethical obligations regarding the disclosure of a 'July 21 letter' and an investigation into 'Juror No. 1.' The document appears to be part of a larger Department of Justice release (DOJ-OGR stamp), though the specific text on this page relates to the Daugerdas tax fraud case rather than explicitly mentioning Epstein.

Legal declaration (court filing)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009981.jpg

This document is an index page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the legal case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. The index, prepared by Southern District Reporters, covers words from 'weeks' to 'younger' and lists their corresponding page and line numbers in the transcript. The index includes references to individuals named Weiss and Winslow, locations such as Westchester and York, and the legal research service Westlaw.

Court transcript index
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009980.jpg

This document is a single page from an index of a court transcript for the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., dated February 15, 2012. The page, produced by Southern District Reporters, lists words alphabetically from "Tylenol" to "week" and provides the corresponding page and line numbers where each word appears in the full transcript. The document is marked with the identifier A-5697 and DOJ-OGR-00009980.

Legal document (court transcript index)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009979.jpg

This document is a concordance (word index) page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.' (Case 1:20-cv-03088-PAE, Document 646-20). While filed within a docket often associated with Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cv-03088 is Giuffre v. Maxwell), the document itself pertains to the Daugerdas tax fraud case, likely serving as a legal precedent or exhibit. The index lists occurrences of words starting with 'T' (testify, Theresa, Trzaskoma, trial, truth, etc.) and their corresponding page/line numbers in the full transcript.

Court transcript word index / concordance
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009978.jpg

This document is a page from a 'Min-U-Script' word index (concordance) for a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, in the case of United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas. The index lists words starting with 'S' through 'T', including names such as Sternheim (who testified), Stetler, Susan, Swan, Swann, and Sweeney, along with their frequency and line references in the transcript. The document bears a DOJ-OGR stamp, indicating it was processed as part of a Department of Justice release, potentially related to the Epstein/Maxwell document productions where this case may have been cited or included.

Court transcript word index (min-u-script)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009977.jpg

This document is a page from an index for a legal transcript in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., dated February 15, 2012. The page covers keywords alphabetically from 'set' to 'step', providing the page and line numbers where each term appears in the full transcript. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters and is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00009977.

Legal document (transcript index)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009976.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript index (concordance) dated February 15, 2012, for the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.'. It lists words alphabetically (from 'revisit' to 'sessions') alongside their frequency counts and specific page:line citations within the transcript. While the content pertains to the Daugerdas tax fraud case, the header indicates this document was filed on March 10, 2022, as Document 646-2 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, which is the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, suggesting it was used as a legal exhibit or precedent in her trial.

Court transcript index / concordance (filed as exhibit)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009975.jpg

This document is Page 7 of 30 from a court transcript index (concordance) filed on February 24, 2022, for the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. Checks against the index indicate the transcript is from proceedings on February 15, 2012. The page lists the frequency and page:line citations for words beginning with 'recross-examination' through 'revised'.

Court transcript index / concordance
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009974.jpg

This document is a page from an alphabetical index for a court transcript dated February 15, 2012. It pertains to the legal case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. The index on this page covers words from 'production' to 'recovery', listing the page and line numbers where each word appears in the full transcript.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009973.jpg

This document is an index (concordance) page from a court transcript in the case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.', dated February 15, 2012. It lists words alphabetically from 'petition' to 'product' alongside their frequency and specific page/line citations within the full transcript. The document includes references to legal terms (plaintiff, plead, probation), generic terms, and the acronym 'PMD' (likely referring to the defendant, Paul M. Daugerdas).

Court transcript index / concordance
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009972.jpg

This document is a word index (concordance) page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.' It tracks the frequency and location (page:line) of words alphabetically from 'otherwise' to 'petit'. Although the content concerns the Daugerdas tax fraud case, the header 'Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN' indicates this document was filed on February 14, 2022, as Exhibit A-5689 in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.

Court transcript word index / concordance
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009970.jpg

This document is a page from an index for a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, from the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. The page indexes words from 'measure' to 'next', providing the page and line number for each occurrence in the transcript. The document was produced by Southern District Reporters and is marked with the identifier DOJ-OGR-00009970.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
2
As Recipient
0
Total
2

No Subject

From: PAUL M. DAUGERDAS
To: Michael Hammer

Letter listed as exhibit GX43-1.

Letter
2002-08-28
Communication Source

N/A

From: PAUL M. DAUGERDAS
To: Michael Hammer

Exhibit GX43-1

Letter
2002-08-28
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search