Mr. Everdell
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defense counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Rodgers
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Rodgers
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Aznaran
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Espinosa
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Parkinson
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Tracy Chapell
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Chapell
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAVID RODGERS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Sud
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Questioner
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
Defense
|
Representation |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Cimberly Espinosa
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. McHugh
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury Deliberations and Court Response to Note | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Introduction of Government Exhibit 1004 (Stipulation) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross Examination of Tracy Chapell | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding sentencing or appeal arguments (Case 22-1426). | Courtroom (likely SDNY) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Lawrence Visoski | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding upcoming sentencing and review of the presentence report. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rule 29 Argument | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal argument regarding jury instructions and a question asked by the jury. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sentencing Hearing / Pre-sentencing argument | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of witness Patrick McHugh | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of witness Kelly Maguire | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Dawson regarding a residence and inconsistent statements. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal argument regarding supplemental jury instructions | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of David Rodgers | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court ruling on the 'attorney witness issue' regarding the defense case-in-chief. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court hearing regarding Maxwell's sentencing or appeal points concerning her role in the conspiracy. | Courtroom (likely SDNY) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government's Exhibit 296R | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Extension of Jury Deliberations | New York City Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Defendant's Exhibit MA1 into evidence under seal. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conference between Defense and Government | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal argument regarding jury questions and instructions for Count Four. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial Resumption | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of Michael Dawson | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal argument regarding jury instructions and admissibility of testimony for conspiracy counts. | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017427.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, during a break in proceedings where the jury and witness are not present. The dialogue covers procedural and environmental matters, including a counsel's request to raise the courtroom temperature and the judge asking another counsel for a time estimate for questioning before announcing a 10-minute recess.
DOJ-OGR-00017424.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a pilot named Mr. Visoski by attorney Mr. Everdell. Visoski testifies that despite flying hundreds of times for Epstein, he never witnessed sexual activity or acts with underage girls on the planes. While he confirms cockpit doors were closed during flights limiting his view, he states he was never instructed that he could not leave the cockpit.
DOJ-OGR-00017419.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The testimony focuses on the timeline of aircraft Visoski flew for Mr. Epstein, establishing that Epstein sold a Hawker jet around 1994 and acquired a Boeing 727 around 2000. In the period between these events, Visoski primarily flew a Gulfstream for Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00017417.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a pilot named Visoski. The testimony confirms that Visoski worked as a pilot for Jeffrey Epstein for nearly 30 years (1991-2019), initially as co-captain under his friend David Rogers, before swapping roles to become chief pilot around 2000. The page concludes with attorney Mr. Everdell requesting to display Government's Exhibit 311.
DOJ-OGR-00017416.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the beginning of the cross-examination of Mr. Visoski by defense attorney Mr. Everdell. The text establishes that Visoski testified on direct examination that he began working as a pilot for Jeffrey Epstein around 1991.
DOJ-OGR-00017413.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. Witness Visoski is questioned by Ms. Comey about a 'female singer' identified on a document, whom the court refers to by the pseudonym 'Jane.' Visoski confirms this person was a passenger on Jeffrey Epstein's plane and recalls meeting her in the mid-to-late 1990s.
DOJ-OGR-00017408.jpg
A page from the court transcript of the US v. Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Witness Visoski testifies about traveling to Traverse City, Michigan, in the 1990s and picking up Jeffrey Epstein's luggage from the lobby of the Interlochen School of Music, which he describes as a school for gifted children. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) then moves to read a stipulation (Government Exhibit 1004) into the record without objection from the defense (Mr. Everdell).
DOJ-OGR-00017403.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness, Mr. Visoski. Under questioning by Ms. Comey, Visoski describes the interior of Jeffrey Epstein's Boeing 727 and identifies a photograph, Government Exhibit 303, as an accurate depiction of the plane's 'round room' and office area. The court, with no objection from Mr. Everdell, admits the exhibit into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00017401.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a pilot named Visoski by prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding his employment flying Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft (specifically a Boeing 727 and a G2B) between 2001 and 2004. The page also records the admission of Government Exhibits 301 and 302, which are photos of the Boeing 727, into evidence without objection from the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00017399.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Visoski. Visoski testifies that between 1994 and 2000, he frequently flew a Gulfstream G2B aircraft for Mr. Epstein. He identifies photographs of the aircraft, including one that shows Mr. Epstein standing in front of it, which are then admitted as evidence by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00017398.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Visoski. Visoski testifies that Mr. Epstein used a helicopter to travel between St. Thomas and Little St. James to avoid taking a boat. He also states that he, Ms. Maxwell, and other contract pilots flew the helicopter, and that Ms. Maxwell flew it "many times."
DOJ-OGR-00017397.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Visoski. Under questioning by government attorney Ms. Comey, Visoski states that Mr. Epstein owned one helicopter between 1994 and 2004, which he purchased around 1999-2000. Visoski identifies photos of this specific helicopter, which were entered as government exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00017392.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. A witness named Mr. Visoski is under direct examination by Ms. Comey. Visoski identifies a photo of Little St. James Island (admitted as Government's Exhibit 703), confirms Mr. Epstein owned the entire island, and begins describing specific structures, including a library that famously had a gold dome.
DOJ-OGR-00017390.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Visoski. An attorney, Ms. Comey, questions Visoski, who identifies photographs entered as government exhibits as depicting the main house and an aerial view of Jeffrey Epstein's private property on Little St. James Island. The evidence is admitted by the court without objection.
DOJ-OGR-00017386.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Witness Visoski testifies under direct examination by Ms. Comey about working at Mr. Epstein's Paris apartment, specifically handling luggage and performing audio work on a home theater. Government Exhibit 705, identified as a photo of the exterior of the Paris apartment, is admitted into evidence without objection from defense attorney Mr. Everdell.
DOJ-OGR-00017382.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Visoski by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The testimony focuses on identifying exterior photos of the main house at Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro Ranch (Exhibits 323 and 706) and describing the interior layout of the residence, specifically noting it is a square house with a central open courtyard.
DOJ-OGR-00017377.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Visoski by Ms. Comey. Visoski testifies about accompanying Mr. Epstein to his property in New Mexico, identified as 'Zorro Ranch,' approximately five or six times a year. Government Exhibit 328, a photo of the entrance driveway to the ranch, is introduced and admitted into evidence without objection from defense attorney Mr. Everdell.
DOJ-OGR-00017376.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Visoski. Mr. Visoski identifies Ms. Maxwell and Ms. Kellen in two photographs (Government Exhibits 334 and 335) which are then admitted into evidence. He also testifies that he first visited Mr. Epstein's ranch in New Mexico in the mid-1990s, around the time it was purchased in approximately 1994.
DOJ-OGR-00017375.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. In it, a witness, Mr. Visoski, is questioned by an attorney, Ms. Comey, about a photograph (Government Exhibit 310). Visoski identifies the photo as being taken at Mr. Epstein's ranch in the mid-to-late 1990s and states it shows himself, Mr. Epstein, Ms. Kellen, and a twin-engine Cessna 421 aircraft that Epstein had purchased.
DOJ-OGR-00017364.jpg
This document is page 121 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The text records a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Mr. Everdell while the jury is not present. They discuss the placement of folders containing documents under chairs and the Judge's intention to interview a juror regarding a planned trip to ensure it does not conflict with the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00017361.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It depicts the moment the judge thanks and discharges the jury following the verdict. Defense counsel Ms. Sternheim requests the court wait on the presentence report and explicitly asks for a court order to ensure Ms. Maxwell receives a COVID-19 booster shot.
DOJ-OGR-00014363.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion about jury instructions. Counsel argues that the jury should be instructed not to convict based solely on the testimony of a witness named Kate, a point with which the Court agrees. Following a brief request between counsel members, the judge calls for a 10-minute recess.
DOJ-OGR-00017608.jpg
This document is an index page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines the examination of witnesses Lawrence Visoski (Epstein's pilot) and a witness identified only as 'Jane', along with a list of government exhibits received into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00017517.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the redirect examination of a witness named Visoski. The witness confirms meeting an individual known by the pseudonym 'Jane' in the 1990s and another person, depicted in defense exhibits, in the 2000s. The witness's memory of the second person is specifically linked to seeing them on a Boeing aircraft.
DOJ-OGR-00017515.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the testimony of a witness named Visoski. Under questioning by defense attorney Mr. Everdell, Visoski denies seeing any hint of inappropriate sexual activity or underage girls during roughly 30 years of working for Jeffrey Epstein, stating he would have reported it and quit if he had. The cross-examination concludes, and prosecutor Ms. Comey begins her redirect examination.
Resting on the papers
Mr. Everdell informs the court that they are resting on the papers.
Withdrawal of request for a limiting instruction
Mr. Everdell informs the court that after conferring with the government, they are withdrawing their request for a limiting instruction, believing it would be counterproductive ('the cure is worse than the disease').
Impeachment of witness Juan Alessi
Mr. Everdell argues that they should be allowed to impeach Juan Alessi using his prior inconsistent statements to Sergeant Dawson regarding a burglary.
Border crossing data systems (TECS and APIS)
Mr. Everdell questions the witness, Aznaran, about the definition of 'border crossing' and the mechanisms by which traveler data is entered into government databases. Aznaran explains that international airline manifests are submitted to the Advanced Passenger Information System (APIS), which then links to the TECS system.
Jury Instructions
Oral argument regarding the clarity of jury instructions concerning jurisdiction and age of consent.
Jury Instructions/Verdict Sheet Language
Discussion regarding the phrasing of Counts Two, Three, Four, and Six, specifically regarding the age of victims and the name 'Jane'.
Exclusion of evidence (Government Exhibits 288, 270, 296)
Mr. Everdell argues that a portion of a video walk-through (Exhibit 296) should be excluded because it shows a photograph on a wall that the Court has already excluded as a separate piece of evidence (Exhibit 288).
2007 helicopter purchase and related financial transactions
Mr. Everdell questions Mr. McHugh about a series of financial transactions in June 2007 involving Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Air Ghislaine, and Sikorsky for the purchase of a helicopter.
Admissibility of Evidence
Argument regarding whether photographs accurately depict the location during the time of the conspiracy.
Cross-examination and submission of evidence
Mr. Everdell questions Ms. Chapell about FedEx invoices, offers Defense Exhibit TC-1 into evidence under temporary seal, and concludes his questioning.
Procedural point on cross-examination
Everdell raises a concern about the government referring to passengers as 'and others' without naming them during direct examination.
Cross Examination
Questioning regarding whether the witness saw any inappropriate activity during 30 years of employment.
Jury Instructions
Argument regarding the elimination of a jury charge concerning investigative techniques.
Age of allegations and lack of evidence
Everdell argues that highlighting the 25-year age of the allegations is fair because records get destroyed over time, explaining the absence of corroborating evidence like geo-location data.
Issue with fourth witness
Mr. Everdell informs the court of a small issue regarding the fourth witness (Mr. Rogers) and requests time to confer with the government.
Admission of Government Exhibits 925 and 925-R
Mr. Everdell states he has 'No objection' to the government's offer of the exhibits.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding office seating arrangements and introduction of Exhibit 327.
Procedure for handling a sensitive exhibit
Mr. Everdell and the Court discuss the process for entering an exhibit into evidence that contains the full names of real people. They agree that the names must be redacted, the exhibit sealed from the public, and that specific parties (the Court, Ms. Williams, the witness, the government) will view either electronic or paper versions.
Cross-examination regarding a photograph
Mr. Everdell questions the witness, Mr. Rodgers, about a photograph (exhibits GX250 and C10), asking if he has seen it before and if he recognizes the person in it. The witness tentatively identifies the person as Eva Dubin.
Jury Instructions / Case Law
Discussion regarding the use of the word 'dominant' in jury instructions for 18 U.S.C. 2421, citing United States v. An Soon Kim.
Jury Instructions for Ms. Maxwell's case
Mr. Everdell argues for a supplemental jury instruction regarding the relevance of conduct in New Mexico to a conviction under New York law. The Court rejects the proposed instruction, stating it is incorrect and that the defense failed to seek a limiting instruction on the testimony earlier.
Admissibility of Government Exhibits 250, 251, and 270
Mr. Everdell discusses photographic evidence with the judge. He confirms Exhibit 270 will not be offered, notes the prior exclusion of Exhibit 251 (a photo of a naked toddler), and argues that Exhibit 250, which depicts Jeffrey Epstein with a young girl, should be excluded as irrelevant and prejudicial.
Courtroom procedure for handling documents and witness an...
Mr. Everdell agrees with the court's directions and explains the careful procedure they have planned for handling paper binders and manila folders to respect the court's ruling on witness anonymity.
Admissibility of Evidence
Argument regarding Government Exhibits 919, 920, and 53, specifically requesting they not be described as 'schoolgirl outfits' to the jury.
Scheduling of Defense Case
Discussion regarding the timeline for the defense to present their case and the scheduling of the charging conference.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity