Alison Moe
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Co counsel prosecution |
15
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
location
USA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Geoffrey S. Berman
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Subordinate superior |
7
|
3 | |
|
location
USA
|
Employment representation |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Appellant's counsel (filer)
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Submission of legal filing concluding that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | Court filing | The Government submitted a motion filed by Kate's attorney. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Sentencing Submission filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal filing | The U.S. Government filed its sentencing memorandum in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Filing of Government's sentencing recommendation conclusion. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal document service | Christian R. Everdell served a memorandum via ECF upon four individuals. | N/A | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 661 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 660 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | Legal filing | Document 650 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 652 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-15 | N/A | Filing of Government's opposition to defendant's motion for a new trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-03-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 635 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-25 | N/A | Filing of Government's response to defendant's post-trial motions | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 617 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-16 | Court filing | Document 603 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00015537.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330 AJN). In it, both the prosecution and the defense agree to the authenticity of three government exhibits (11, 12, and 13), which are certified copies of birth certificates from the states of New York, Rhode Island, and Missouri. This agreement serves to enter these documents into evidence without the need for further authentication in court.
DOJ-OGR-00015211.jpg
This document is a signature page from a legal filing dated December 17, 2021, in New York, New York. It identifies the legal teams for a case in the Southern District of New York, listing Damian Williams as the U.S. Attorney for the prosecution and several attorneys, including Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger, as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00015210.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, agreeing to the admissibility of Palm Beach County School records. It confirms that witness Dominique Hyppolite would verify the records' authenticity and identifies specific exhibits (DH-1, DH-2, DH-3, J-2) related to a redacted individual and a witness identified as 'Jane'. The document itself is marked as Defense Exhibit DH-4.
DOJ-OGR-00015186.jpg
This document is a signature page from a legal stipulation dated December 6, 2021, in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It confirms that 'Defendant's Trial Exhibit B' is agreed to be received in evidence. The document is signed by Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution team from the Southern District of New York (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach).
DOJ-OGR-00015170.jpg
This is a legal stipulation dated December 17, 2021, from a case in the Southern District of New York. The document is an agreement between the U.S. Attorney's office, representing the prosecution, and the attorneys for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, allowing a specific piece of evidence (Government Exhibit 1010) to be admitted at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00015169.jpg
This is a legal stipulation in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330). Both the prosecution and defense agree that on August 17, 2021, attorney Robert Glassman told a prosecutor that he had previously advised his client, a witness known as 'Jane', to cooperate because it was 'morally right' and would 'help her case.' This document is marked as Defendant's Exhibit A-6.
DOJ-OGR-00015168.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 17, 2021. It records an agreement between the prosecution (SDNY) and the defense to admit specific exhibits (MG-12, MG-1, 610-A, and A-5) into evidence. The document bears signatures from both the Assistant United States Attorneys and Maxwell's defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00015166.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (S2 20 CR 330). It represents an agreement between the prosecution and defense regarding the authenticity of UK land registry records. Specifically, it validates records retrieved in 2021 concerning properties at 69 Stanhope Mews East and 44 Kinnerton Street in London, with one record dating back to ownership confirmation in January 1994.
DOJ-OGR-00015165.jpg
This legal document is a stipulation dated December 17, 2021, between the attorneys for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The parties agree that a document marked as "Defense Exhibit A1" may be received as evidence at trial. The agreement is signed by representatives from both the defense and the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00015164.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed in the Southern District of New York. It states as an agreed-upon fact that a witness, referred to as "Kate," and her counsel met with government prosecutors on September 3, 2021. During this meeting, Kate's counsel provided a partially completed U-Visa application and discussed her visa status with the prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00002370.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service from the court case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It attests that on January 25, 2021, Christian R. Everdell served a legal memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The served memorandum was a motion to suppress evidence and dismiss two counts against Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002370(1).jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on February 4, 2021, for the court case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It attests that on January 25, 2021, Christian R. Everdell served a legal motion on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York via their official email addresses.
DOJ-OGR-00002338(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on February 1, 2021, is the U.S. Government's response regarding a defendant's access to a laptop for reviewing discovery materials. The U.S. Attorney's office argues that the current arrangement, where the MDC and BOP provide the defendant with 65 hours of laptop access per week plus optional weekend desktop access, is sufficient, noting that the trial is still approximately six months away.
DOJ-OGR-00002336.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 28, 2021. The US Attorney's office is addressing Judge Nathan regarding proposed redactions to the defendant's motions (Motions 3, 10, and 11) to protect victim-witness privacy and the integrity of the ongoing investigation. The government agrees to most redactions but intends to submit limited additional redactions for Motion 3 via email under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00002336(1).jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 28, 2021. The US Attorney's office is addressing Judge Nathan regarding proposed redactions to the defendant's motions (Motions 3, 10, and 11) to protect victim-witness privacy and the integrity of the ongoing investigation. The government agrees to most redactions but intends to submit limited additional redactions for Motion 3 via email under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00002333.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN on January 25, 2021. In it, Christian Everdell certifies that on that same date, he served a memorandum and accompanying exhibits via email to Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002318.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. Signed by Nicole Simmons, it certifies that a memorandum supporting Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss several counts of her indictment was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court. The certificate confirms that notification of this filing was sent to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002308.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. Nicole Simmons certifies the electronic filing of a memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell and confirms that notification was sent to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office in New York: Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Andrew Rohrbach, and Lara Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00002308(1).jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service from a legal case, dated January 25, 2021. It certifies that Nicole Simmons electronically filed a memorandum on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell and that notification was sent to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00002232.jpg
A legal letter dated December 30, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter confirms that neither the prosecution nor the defense proposes any redactions to the Court's December 28, 2020 Opinion and Order denying Maxwell's renewed bail motion. The document is signed by Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00002232(1).jpg
This document is a letter filed on December 30, 2020, by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutors inform the court that, after conferring with the defense, both parties agree that no redactions are necessary for the Court's December 28, 2020 Opinion and Order denying Maxwell's renewed bail motion. Consequently, they have no objection to the order being filed publicly in its entirety.
DOJ-OGR-00002197.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing from the Acting U.S. Attorney's office, dated December 16, 2020, and filed on December 18, 2020. The prosecution argues that a defendant's Renewed Bail Motion should be denied, citing the Court's previous finding that the defendant 'poses a substantial actual risk of flight' and that no conditions of bail can assure their presence in court.
DOJ-OGR-00002197(1).jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing from the office of the Acting United States Attorney, dated December 16, 2020, and filed on December 18, 2020. The prosecution argues that a defendant's 'Renewed Bail Motion' should be denied, reiterating the Court's previous finding that the defendant 'poses a substantial actual risk of flight' and that no conditions of bail can ensure their presence in court.
DOJ-OGR-00001843.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing from the US Attorney's Office for the SDNY regarding the detention conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutors argue that Warden Tellez should provide a first-hand accounting of why Maxwell is subject to strict surveillance measures (body scans, flashlight checks) despite 24/7 camera monitoring, noting that the MDC Legal Department would only provide second-hand information.
DOJ-OGR-00001834.jpg
This document is a court order from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Government requested to delay the disclosure of sensitive witness information to the defense to protect an ongoing investigation and encourage victim cooperation. Judge Alison J. Nathan granted the request for delay but rejected the Government's proposed timeline, ordering that the materials be produced by March 12, 2021, to ensure the defense can adequately prepare for trial.
Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense co...
Request for extension of time.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense counsel's letter.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
Request for extension until 5 p.m. the following day.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
No preview available
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity