Alison Moe
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Co counsel prosecution |
15
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
location
USA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Geoffrey S. Berman
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Subordinate superior |
7
|
3 | |
|
location
USA
|
Employment representation |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Appellant's counsel (filer)
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Submission of legal filing concluding that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | Court filing | The Government submitted a motion filed by Kate's attorney. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Sentencing Submission filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal filing | The U.S. Government filed its sentencing memorandum in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Filing of Government's sentencing recommendation conclusion. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal document service | Christian R. Everdell served a memorandum via ECF upon four individuals. | N/A | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 661 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 660 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | Legal filing | Document 650 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 652 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-15 | N/A | Filing of Government's opposition to defendant's motion for a new trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-03-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 635 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-25 | N/A | Filing of Government's response to defendant's post-trial motions | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 617 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-16 | Court filing | Document 603 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019723.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from July 8 to July 13, 2020. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment, motions for attorneys to appear on Maxwell's behalf, and a detailed court order outlining the procedures for a remote bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, due to COVID-19 restrictions. The order specifies how the public, press, victims, and legal counsel can access the proceedings via teleconference and limited in-person viewing.
DOJ-OGR-00019711.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) detailing proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell between late December 2020 and January 12, 2021. It records Judge Nathan's denial of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail on the grounds that she remains a flight risk, the filing of sealed documents, and the subsequent denial of a request to extend the time to file an appeal. The log concludes with Maxwell filing a Notice of Appeal and the transmission of the case to the US Court of Appeals.
DOJ-OGR-00019707.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from December 1-3, 2020, detailing procedural events in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes letters from the prosecution regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement and sealing requests, as well as orders from Judge Alison Nathan denying an in camera conference but allowing specific redactions to protect the privacy interests of individuals referenced in defense letters. The Judge also orders MDC legal counsel to submit information regarding confinement conditions and sets the stage for a renewed bail motion.
DOJ-OGR-00019706.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Page 13 of 19) for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various procedural filings including letters from the prosecution (USA) and defense regarding discovery deadlines, conditions of confinement at the MDC, and the dismissal of an appeal by the Second Circuit. Key events include Judge Nathan setting new deadlines for motions and discovery, and ordering parties to confer regarding Maxwell's request for Warden Heriberto Tellez to address her detention conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00019705.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58), covering filings between September 8, 2020, and November 5, 2020. It records procedural events including the transmission of appeal records, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim. The docket also details a back-and-forth correspondence between the Prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and Defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding the delay of disclosure of materials and the review of investigative files, culminating in a Rule 5(f) order by Judge Nathan confirming Brady disclosure obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00019702.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) covering entries between July 27 and July 30, 2020, regarding *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. Key entries include a dispute over the terms of a Protective Order, specifically regarding Maxwell's ability to publicly reference alleged victims who have previously spoken publicly about her or Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a Memorandum Opinion & Order siding with the Government to restrict Maxwell from publicly referencing these victims/witnesses to protect their privacy and safety.
DOJ-OGR-00019701.jpg
This document is a court docket summary from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty, the denial of her bail, and the setting of a trial date. The document also records various orders and motions filed by both the defense and prosecution concerning discovery deadlines, extrajudicial statements, and a proposed protective order.
DOJ-OGR-00019700.jpg
This document is a court docket from Case 21-58, detailing legal proceedings related to Ghislaine Maxwell between July 8 and July 13, 2020. Key events include the filing of a superseding indictment, motions and notices for attorney appearances on behalf of Maxwell, and a detailed court order outlining the procedures for a remote bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The order, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan, specifies how the public, press, and involved parties can access the hearing via teleconference and limited in-person viewing due to COVID-19 restrictions.
DOJ-OGR-00019688.jpg
This is a Summary Order and Mandate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, issued on November 9, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061-cr). The document lists the panel of judges (Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi) who presided over the term held on October 19, 2020. It identifies the legal counsel for both the Appellee (US Attorneys including Lara Pomerantz and Maurene Comey) and the Defendant-Appellant (Adam Mueller and Ty Gee of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.).
DOJ-OGR-00019683.jpg
This document is the first page of a Summary Order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated October 19, 2020. It lists the judicial panel (Judges Cabranes, Pooler, and Raggi) presiding over the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061-cr). It identifies the legal counsel for both the United States (Appellee) and Maxwell (Defendant-Appellant).
DOJ-OGR-00019677.jpg
This document is the first page of a Summary Order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated October 19, 2020, for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It identifies the presiding judges (Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi) and lists the legal counsel for both the appellee (United States), led by AUSA Lara Pomerantz, and the defendant-appellant (Ghislaine Maxwell), represented by Adam Mueller. The order was issued from the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse in New York City.
DOJ-OGR-00019608.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal brief filed by the United States of America on October 2, 2020, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The case is an appeal by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061) from a decision in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The brief lists the government's legal counsel, including Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant U.S. Attorney Lara Pomerantz, who is set to argue the case.
DOJ-OGR-00017350.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 29, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It identifies the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, as well as the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution and the defense. The case number is 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
DOJ-OGR-00017334.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 28, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives in the courtroom.
DOJ-OGR-00017305.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The trial took place on December 27, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, with the Honorable Alison J. Nathan presiding as District Judge. The document lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present at the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00017279.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 21, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00010736.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated June 26, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter serves as a court filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. In it, the government submits a motion filed by the attorney for an individual named 'Kate', which was attached to her victim impact statement, in response to a court order issued that same day.
DOJ-OGR-00010732.jpg
This is page 4 of a legal document filed on June 26, 2022, by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The document argues against adjourning a defendant's sentencing, stating that her continued access to legal documents and counsel means the sentencing should proceed as scheduled on June 28, 2022. The document is signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey on behalf of U.S. Attorney Damian Williams.
DOJ-OGR-00010728.jpg
This legal document, filed on June 26, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, is a submission from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The government states it does not oppose an application for an unspecified party to speak at sentencing but notes that the request appears to be governed by a previous court order from June 24, 2022. The document is submitted by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and signed by four Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00010658.jpg
This is a letter dated June 16, 2022, from Alan Dershowitz's attorneys to the U.S. prosecutors in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The attorneys inform the prosecution about a recent, confidential deposition of Virginia Giuffre from her civil lawsuit against Dershowitz, arguing it contains information critical to her credibility. They urge the prosecutors to obtain and review this deposition transcript before allowing Giuffre to provide a victim impact statement at Maxwell's upcoming sentencing.
DOJ-OGR-00010654.jpg
This document is a letter dated June 7, 2022, from legal ethics expert Bruce A. Green to the SDNY prosecutors handling the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Green, retained by Alan Dershowitz, argues that prosecutors may have an ethical obligation to review a sealed deposition given by Virginia Giuffre in a separate civil case before Judge Preska. Dershowitz claims this deposition proves Giuffre lacks credibility regarding the Epstein-Maxwell matter, and Green suggests the prosecutors should verify this before Giuffre provides a victim impact statement at Maxwell's sentencing.
DOJ-OGR-00010590.jpg
This is the conclusion page (page 55) of a court filing submitted by the United States Attorney's Office on June 22, 2022, regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government explicitly requests a prison sentence between 360 and 660 months (30 to 55 years) citing the magnitude of her crimes involving the sexual exploitation of young girls.
DOJ-OGR-00010446.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE on June 15, 2022. In it, Christian R. Everdell certifies that he electronically served a memorandum to four individuals, Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach, all of whom have U.S. Department of Justice email addresses.
DOJ-OGR-00010417.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 2 of 2) of a court filing submitted on May 11, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It is submitted by United States Attorney Damian Williams and signed by Assistant United States Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach from the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00010415.jpg
This is the signature page (page 2) of a legal document filed on May 11, 2022, in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell criminal trial). It lists Damian Williams as the United States Attorney, with specific signatures from Assistant US Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach representing the Southern District of New York. The document indicates a copy was sent to the Defense Counsel via ECF.
Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense co...
Request for extension of time.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense counsel's letter.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
Request for extension until 5 p.m. the following day.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
No preview available
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity