Alison Moe
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Co counsel prosecution |
15
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
location
USA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Geoffrey S. Berman
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Subordinate superior |
7
|
3 | |
|
location
USA
|
Employment representation |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Appellant's counsel (filer)
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Submission of legal filing concluding that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | Court filing | The Government submitted a motion filed by Kate's attorney. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Sentencing Submission filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal filing | The U.S. Government filed its sentencing memorandum in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Filing of Government's sentencing recommendation conclusion. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal document service | Christian R. Everdell served a memorandum via ECF upon four individuals. | N/A | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 661 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 660 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | Legal filing | Document 650 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 652 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-15 | N/A | Filing of Government's opposition to defendant's motion for a new trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-03-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 635 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-25 | N/A | Filing of Government's response to defendant's post-trial motions | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 617 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-16 | Court filing | Document 603 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002716.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on February 4, 2021, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney Christian Everdell certifies that on January 25, 2021, he served a memorandum and exhibits via email to Assistant U.S. Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach at the SDNY office.
DOJ-OGR-00020096.jpg
This legal document, dated December 16, 2020, is the conclusion of a filing by the U.S. Attorney's office, submitted by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and three assistants. The filing argues against a defendant's renewed motion for bail, citing the Court's previous finding that the defendant is a substantial flight risk and asserting that no new information justifies changing this conclusion.
DOJ-OGR-00020061.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated June 28, 2020. It is the U.S. Government's memorandum opposing defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release in criminal case 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The filing lists the prosecuting attorneys, including Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00017363.jpg
This document is the title page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated November 30, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the appearances of the prosecution team (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, plus others). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.
DOJ-OGR-00005652.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 386-1) is a formal request from the United States Attorney's Office (Audrey Strauss, signed by Assistants including Maurene Comey and Alison Moe) to the defense. The Government reiterates a request originally made on August 5, 2020, for reciprocal discovery regarding evidence the defendant intends to use at trial and prior statements of defense witnesses (referring to the defendant as 'she'). The document cites Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 16(b) and 26.2.
DOJ-OGR-00005648.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on October 29, 2021, certifying that on October 18, 2021, Nicole Simmons electronically filed Ghislaine Maxwell's 'Motion to Exclude' and 'Request for Daubert Hearing.' The notification of this filing was sent to prosecutors Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Andrew Rohrbach, and Lara Pomerantz at the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00005624.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is a letter from the United States Attorney's office regarding the admissibility of evidence in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It states that certain evidence is admissible as direct evidence of the crimes charged, negating the need for an in limine motion, and notes that the letter itself is designated as "confidential" under a July 31, 2020 Protective Order.
DOJ-OGR-00005621.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Signed by Nicole Simmons, it certifies that on October 18, 2021, a motion to exclude evidence on behalf of Maxwell was electronically filed and served to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00005606.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service from a legal case, filed on October 29, 2021. It certifies that on October 18, 2021, Nicole Simmons electronically filed a motion on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell to preclude certain evidence. Notification of this filing was sent to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY).
DOJ-OGR-00005555.jpg
This document is the cover page for a 'Reply Memorandum of Law' filed on October 29, 2021, by the United States Government in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case S2 20 Cr. 330). The filing is in further support of the government's motions in limine and lists Damian Williams as the U.S. Attorney along with Assistant U.S. Attorneys Moe, Pomerantz, and Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00005552.jpg
This legal document summarizes the recollections of an individual identified as "AK" regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. AK recalls the topic resurfacing due to a Miami Herald article, her interactions with the Public Corruption unit around February 2016, and sharing case materials with individuals like Alison Moe. AK asserts she had no role in opening the subsequent SDNY investigation into Epstein and was disturbed by how the case was initially resolved in the SDFL.
DOJ-OGR-00005524.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It certifies that on October 25, 2021, Nicole Simmons electronically filed "Ghislaine Maxwell’s Response to Government’s Omnibus Motions In Limine" and that notification was sent to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00005394.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled "THE GOVERNMENT'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE" for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document was filed on October 29, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The prosecution is represented by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00005382.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 3 of 3) of a legal filing submitted on October 26, 2021, in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is signed by Damian Williams (United States Attorney) and Assistant US Attorneys Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach on behalf of the Southern District of New York. The document indicates a copy was sent to Defense Counsel via ECF.
DOJ-OGR-00005374.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page contains proposed jury instructions (Paragraph 67) regarding the prohibition of electronic communications and social media usage by jurors during the trial. It is signed by the prosecution team (US Attorney's Office) and the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 11, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005365.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 22, 2021, containing proposed voir dire questions (21-25) for the jury selection in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the specific legal teams for both the defense (led by Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution (led by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach). The document includes margin comments highlighting a dispute between the prosecution and defense regarding whether to refer to Maxwell as 'the defendant' or 'the accused'.
DOJ-OGR-00005358.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled 'JOINT PROPOSED EXAMINATION OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS' for the criminal case United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Filed on October 22, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, it lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, and the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00005332.jpg
This document is page 10 of a juror questionnaire from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. The questionnaire asks potential jurors to disclose any personal acquaintance or dealings with key individuals involved in the case, including the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, the prosecution team, the defense team, and the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The purpose is to identify potential biases that could prevent a juror from being fair and impartial.
DOJ-OGR-00005294.jpg
This document is page 18 (marked -17- at the bottom) of a juror questionnaire filed on October 22, 2021, for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page focuses on establishing whether potential jurors have personal relationships or dealings with key figures in the case, including the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and the prosecuting U.S. Attorneys (Damian Williams, Audrey Strauss, Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach).
DOJ-OGR-00002673.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in federal court case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN on February 4, 2021. It certifies that on January 25, 2021, Christian Everdell served a memorandum and exhibits via email to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York: Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00020381.jpg
This is the conclusion page of a legal document filed on May 27, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. Assistant United States Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach argue that a motion filed by an individual named Maxwell should be denied. The document is electronically signed by Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00005784.jpg
This is the cover page for a legal document filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The document is the government's omnibus memorandum opposing motions in limine filed by the defendant. It lists the prosecution team, led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams.
DOJ-OGR-00005774.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It certifies that on October 18, 2021, Nicole Simmons electronically filed a motion on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell to prevent accusers from being referred to as "Victims" or "Minor Victims". The certificate confirms that counsel from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York were notified of this filing.
DOJ-OGR-00005765.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service from a legal case, signed by Nicole Simmons. It certifies that on October 18, 2021, a motion on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell to preclude testimony about alleged rape by Jeffrey Epstein was electronically filed with the court. The certificate lists four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York who were served with notification of this filing.
DOJ-OGR-00005745.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It is signed by Nicole Simmons, who certifies that on October 18, 2021, she electronically filed the 'Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell’s Motion to Suppress Identification' and that notification was sent to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense co...
Request for extension of time.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense counsel's letter.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
Request for extension until 5 p.m. the following day.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
No preview available
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity