Bradley J. Edwards
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
23
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Client |
17
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
L.M.
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Alan M. Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
E.W.
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jessica Cadwell
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jacquie Johnson
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
PAUL G. CASSELL
|
Co authors |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jessica Cadwell
|
Business associate |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Tony Figueroa
|
Deponent examiner |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Henderson
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Nathanael J. Mitchell
|
Co authors |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jacquie Johnson
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Employee |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Does
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
E.W., L.M., Jane Doe
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Witness evidence source |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul G. Cassell
|
Co plaintiffs |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Epstein voluntarily dismissed all claims brought by him against Bradley J. Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil action against Epstein represented by Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley J. Edwards provided notice of intent to depose Donald Trump. | Legal proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Publication of legal article regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act. | Northwestern University Sch... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Fourth Amended Counterclaim | Palm Beach County Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein filed a Second Amended Complaint against Bradley Edwards. | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Motion for Summary Judgment | Court (likely Florida) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Publication of legal article regarding Crime Victims' Rights Act | Journal of Criminal Law & C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault cases against Epstein | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Edwards on the eve of a summary judgment hearing. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a motion for joinder in the CVRA action on behalf of Jane Doe 3 and 4. | Unknown | View |
| 2022-06-26 | N/A | Filing of Document 681-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | US Court System | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Stipulation signed by attorneys for both parties | N/A | View |
| 2020-02-11 | N/A | Case management conference | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-01-28 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation and Order on Plaintiff's Anonymity | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-12-27 | N/A | Filing of Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Bradley J. Edwards. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-12-09 | N/A | Filing of this letter notifying the court of Plaintiff's intent to stand on the current complaint. | Court | View |
| 2019-12-09 | N/A | Plaintiff notified Court she would not file amended pleading | New York | View |
| 2019-10-16 | N/A | Filing of Document 24 in case 1:19-cv-07625 | New York, NY | View |
| 2017-06-09 | N/A | Supreme Court of Florida order denying discretionary review in Epstein v. Edwards. | Florida Supreme Court | View |
| 2017-05-30 | N/A | Deadline for Respondent to serve a reply | Supreme Court of Florida | View |
| 2017-03-20 | N/A | Filing of Defendant's Sur-Reply to Supplemental Reply | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2017-03-16 | N/A | Original scheduled date for hearing on Edwards Subpoena | New York, NY | View |
| 2016-12-22 | N/A | Order transferring Motion to Quash Subpoena to Southern District of New York (Giuffre v. Maxwell) | Southern District of Florid... | View |
| 2016-07-07 | N/A | Filing of Motion to Seal Bradley J. Edwards' Motion to Quash Subpoena. | Southern District of Florida | View |
032.pdf
A legal motion filed on March 13, 2017, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS). Attorney Paul G. Cassell requests admission Pro Hac Vice to represent Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards in his lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell. Cassell attests to his good standing with the Utah Bar and lack of criminal or disciplinary history.
032-01.pdf
This document is a legal declaration filed on March 13, 2017, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Paul G. Cassell submits this declaration to support his application for admission Pro Hac Vice to represent the plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, in his case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Cassell attests to his clean legal record, stating he has no felony convictions or disciplinary actions against him and is a member in good standing of the Utah bar.
030.pdf
This document is a Civil Docket Report for Case No. 0:16-mc-61262-JG, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 13, 2016. The case involves Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards filing a motion to quash a subpoena against Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The docket records various motions, including requests to seal exhibits and appear Pro Hac Vice, culminating in an order on December 22, 2016, to transfer the motion to the Southern District of New York to be handled as part of the case Giuffre v. Maxwell (1:15-cv-07433-RWS). The case was terminated in the Florida court on December 23, 2016.
024.pdf
This document is a legal notice filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys on December 16, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida regarding a subpoena served on Bradley J. Edwards. Maxwell argues that rulings made by the Southern District of New York on a similar subpoena served on Paul Cassell (another attorney for Virginia Giuffre) should be binding (res judicata) on the Edwards subpoena. The filing includes a table comparing the requests in both subpoenas and the corresponding rulings from the SDNY court, asking the Florida court to issue a consistent order requiring production of certain documents and granting the motion to quash for others.
023.pdf
This document is a formal notice filed on December 16, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida, by attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. It informs the court and opposing counsel (specifically Bradley J. Edwards' attorney Jack Scarola) that 'Exhibit B' related to a subpoena status notice has been filed under seal. The underlying case referenced is Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York.
022.pdf
This document is a motion filed on December 16, 2016, by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in the Southern District of Florida. The motion requests permission to file 'Exhibit B' under seal, noting that the exhibit is a sealed order from the Southern District of New York in the underlying 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' case. The document lists legal counsel for Maxwell and for Bradley J. Edwards, who is the subject of a subpoena in this miscellaneous action.
015.pdf
This document is a Motion to Seal filed on July 7, 2016, by attorney Jack Scarola on behalf of Bradley J. Edwards in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Edwards seeks to seal exhibits attached to his Motion to Quash a subpoena, specifically referencing confidential depositions of Ghislaine Maxwell and Rinaldo Rizzo, as well as documents related to Alan Dershowitz, which are already under seal in the Southern District of New York. The motion argues that sealing is necessary to comply with protective orders from the underlying case.
015-01.pdf
This is a court order from the Southern District of Florida filed on July 7, 2016. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman granted a request by Bradley J. Edwards to seal his reply regarding a Motion to Quash Subpoena (or for a Protective Order) in relation to the underlying civil case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
013.pdf
This document is a reply filed by Bradley J. Edwards in support of his motion to quash a subpoena served on him by Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. Edwards argues that the subpoena imposes an undue burden on him as a non-party and opposing counsel, seeking information that is already in Maxwell's possession, privileged, irrelevant, or available from other sources. The brief details the history of related litigation, including the CVRA case and a defamation suit against Alan Dershowitz, to support the argument that the subpoena is harassing and unnecessary.
013-02.pdf
This document is a Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed on April 8, 2016, in a Florida Circuit Court case between Bradley J. Edwards/Paul G. Cassell and Alan M. Dershowitz. The plaintiffs withdraw their motion pursuant to a confidential settlement agreement but explicitly state that their client, Virginia Giuffre, reaffirms her allegations and that the withdrawal is not an admission that her allegations were mistaken. They concede that filing certain allegations in a separate Crime Victims' Rights Act case was a 'tactical mistake' that caused distractions.
012.pdf
This document is a motion filed on July 7, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida by attorney Jack Scarola on behalf of Bradley J. Edwards. Edwards requests permission to file a reply exceeding the standard page limit (up to 25 pages) in support of his motion to quash a subpoena served by Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion explains that the extra length is necessary to address allegations made by Maxwell regarding Edwards' prior filings and alleged discovery withholding by his client, Virginia Giuffre.
012-01.pdf
This document is a proposed court order filed on July 7, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida. It grants a motion by Bradley J. Edwards to file a reply exceeding the standard page limit (up to 25 pages) in support of his motion to quash a subpoena related to the underlying civil case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
010.pdf
Declaration by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 30, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida. The document lists 18 exhibits (A-R) supporting Maxwell's opposition to Bradley J. Edwards' motion to quash a subpoena. Several exhibits are filed under seal, while others include procedural documents from related cases (Cassell v. Dershowitz, Epstein v. Rothstein, Jane Doe v. US) and communications regarding discovery and subpoenas.
010-15.pdf
This document is a press release and joint statement dated April 8, 2016, announcing the settlement of a defamation lawsuit between Professor Alan Dershowitz and attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell. The attorneys acknowledged it was a mistake to have filed sexual misconduct accusations against Dershowitz on behalf of their client, Virginia Roberts, and withdrew those claims. Dershowitz withdrew his counterclaims regarding unethical conduct and reiterated his denial of the allegations, citing travel records as evidence of his absence during the alleged events.
010-05.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed on January 6, 2015, in Broward County, Florida, by attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell against Alan M. Dershowitz. The plaintiffs allege that Dershowitz defamed them in media interviews (specifically on CNN) by accusing them of misconduct and lying after they filed court pleadings alleging Dershowitz participated in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal conduct. The complaint asserts that Dershowitz's statements were false, malicious, and intended to distract from his own alleged involvement in Epstein's crimes and the negotiation of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
007.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Filing' submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 29, 2016. It serves to notify the court and opposing counsel that Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell has filed Exhibits A, G, H, I, and N under seal. These exhibits are attached to a declaration by her attorney, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, in support of her opposition to Bradley J. Edwards' motion to quash a subpoena.
006.pdf
This document is a motion filed on June 29, 2016, by attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of Florida. The motion requests permission to file specific exhibits (A, G, H, I, and N) under seal because they were designated as confidential in the underlying case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) in the Southern District of New York. The document includes a certificate of service indicating the motion was served electronically to attorney Jack Scarola representing Bradley J. Edwards.
005.pdf
This document is a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed on June 29, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida. Attorney Denise D. Riley requests that attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca of the Colorado firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman be admitted to represent Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in matters related to a subpoena issued to Bradley J. Edwards. The document includes contact information for the attorneys involved and a certificate of service to opposing counsel Jack Scarola.
005-02.pdf
This document is a proposed court order filed on June 29, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida, granting attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca permission to appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The order relates to a subpoena issued to Bradley J. Edwards in connection with the underlying case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It also establishes electronic filing notifications for Pagliuca and his legal assistant, Nicole Simmons, at the firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
005-01.pdf
This document is a formal certification filed by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 29, 2016. It pertains to a subpoena issued to Bradley J. Edwards in relation to the underlying case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca certifies his compliance with local rules and his good standing with the Colorado bar.
001-05.pdf
This document outlines Ghislaine Maxwell's formal objections and responses to Virginia Giuffre's second request for production of documents in the 2015 civil case. Maxwell's counsel objects to numerous requests on grounds of privilege, relevance, and burden, specifically refusing to produce financial documents (tax returns, bank statements, asset lists) pending a motion for a protective order. The document also addresses requests for Joint Defense Agreements with Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz, communications regarding sexual abuse allegations, and funding sources for the TerraMar Project, including any from the Clinton Foundation.
001-03.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued by the US District Court (SDNY) on behalf of Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell to attorney Bradley J. Edwards in May 2016. It demands the production of various documents, including those related to previous litigation involving Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz, communications with journalist Sharon Churcher, and records regarding the organization 'Victims Refuse Silence, Inc.' A check for $45.00 payable to Edwards is included, likely as a witness fee.
001-01.pdf
Legal declaration by attorney Bradley J. Edwards filed on June 13, 2016, in support of a motion to quash a subpoena from Ghislaine Maxwell. Edwards details his representation of Virginia Giuffre and the undue burden of reviewing over 200,000 emails for communications with journalists. He explicitly states that Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein share a joint defense agreement and mentions Giuffre's association with the organization 'Victims Refuse Silence, Inc.'
042.pdf
This document is a 'Joint Stipulation for Dismissal' filed on November 9, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-11869). Plaintiff 'Anastasia Doe' agrees to dismiss her case against the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Indyke and Kahn) with prejudice because her claims were resolved through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The order is signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil.
040.pdf
A court filing from the Southern District of New York dated November 2, 2020, stipulating the dismissal of a case brought by 'Anastasia Doe' against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The dismissal is with prejudice and results from the plaintiff resolving her claims through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The document is signed by attorneys Bradley J. Edwards (Plaintiff) and Bennet J. Moskowitz (Defendants).
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-06-13 | Paid | Bradley J. Edwards | Court | $46.00 | Filing fee for Petition/Motion (Complaint) RE: ... | View |
| 2016-05-27 | Received | EST | Bradley J. Edwards | $45.00 | Check #31834, Memo: Menninger. Likely a witness... | View |
Epstein Case
Epstein alleges Edwards had contacts with media to publicize cases.
Responses to solicitation
Responses received by Edwards from the solicitation letters.
No Subject
Email address listed as Brad@pathtojustice.com
Request for evidence/information
Request for collected info regarding sexual abuse of clients. Request was declined.
No Subject
Email address listed as Brad@pathtojustice.com
Solicitation for assistance
Form solicitation letters requesting assistance as a witness in the case, allegedly attempting to 'guilt' witnesses.
Witness solicitation / Investigation
Maxwell alleges these are 'witness solicitation letters' containing a 'skewed version of allegations'. Edwards argues they are protected work product.
Case Status Update and Discovery Schedule
Letter informing the court that plaintiffs do not wish to stay their cases despite the Compensation Program and outlining an agreed discovery schedule.
VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Request for extension of time to file Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss until December 18, 2019.
VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Request for extension of time to file Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
Re: VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Notification that Plaintiff VE does not intend to file an amended pleading and will defend her current First Amended Complaint against the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Opposition to Defendants' request for extension of time to respond to complaint.
VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Notice of supplemental authority bringing a decision by Judge Castel in a related Epstein case to the court's attention regarding proceeding anonymously.
Subpoena to Produce Documents
Legal command to produce documents related to Virginia Giuffre, previous litigation, and media communications.
Service of court documents
Service of foregoing document
Stipulation of Dismissal
Filing of stipulation of dismissal with prejudice via CM/ECF.
Motion for Limited Appearance
Request to admit Paul G. Cassell as co-counsel
Certificate of Service
Service of motion via US Mail or other authorized manner
Notice of Striking Certificate of Service
Filing of document striking previous certificates DE 5 and DE 6
Service of Process
Edwards advised Knight that Plaintiff M.J. had service on Mr. Epstein at his building in New York.
Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Modification of Order
Request to modify settlement conference rules to prevent contact between Doe and Epstein.
Plaintiff Jane Doe's Protective Response
Filing of protective response and service to parties via CM/ECF
Deposition Testimony
Edwards testified regarding his lack of knowledge of the scheme and lack of discussion regarding Epstein cases with Rothstein.
Certificate of Service (L.M. case)
Service of documents via US Mail and Facsimile
Jane Doe
Requesting a HIPAA release signature from Jane Doe to obtain records from the Milton Center (DJJ facility). Also asking for a one-week extension on responses to 'Net Wirth ROGS'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity