Bradley J. Edwards
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
23
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Client |
17
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
L.M.
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Alan M. Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
E.W.
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jessica Cadwell
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jacquie Johnson
|
Business associate |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
PAUL G. CASSELL
|
Co authors |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jessica Cadwell
|
Business associate |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Tony Figueroa
|
Deponent examiner |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Henderson
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Nathanael J. Mitchell
|
Co authors |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jacquie Johnson
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Employee |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Does
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
E.W., L.M., Jane Doe
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Witness evidence source |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul G. Cassell
|
Co plaintiffs |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Epstein voluntarily dismissed all claims brought by him against Bradley J. Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil action against Epstein represented by Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley J. Edwards provided notice of intent to depose Donald Trump. | Legal proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Publication of legal article regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act. | Northwestern University Sch... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Fourth Amended Counterclaim | Palm Beach County Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein filed a Second Amended Complaint against Bradley Edwards. | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Motion for Summary Judgment | Court (likely Florida) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Publication of legal article regarding Crime Victims' Rights Act | Journal of Criminal Law & C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault cases against Epstein | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Edwards on the eve of a summary judgment hearing. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a motion for joinder in the CVRA action on behalf of Jane Doe 3 and 4. | Unknown | View |
| 2022-06-26 | N/A | Filing of Document 681-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | US Court System | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Stipulation signed by attorneys for both parties | N/A | View |
| 2020-02-11 | N/A | Case management conference | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-01-28 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation and Order on Plaintiff's Anonymity | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-12-27 | N/A | Filing of Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Bradley J. Edwards. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-12-09 | N/A | Filing of this letter notifying the court of Plaintiff's intent to stand on the current complaint. | Court | View |
| 2019-12-09 | N/A | Plaintiff notified Court she would not file amended pleading | New York | View |
| 2019-10-16 | N/A | Filing of Document 24 in case 1:19-cv-07625 | New York, NY | View |
| 2017-06-09 | N/A | Supreme Court of Florida order denying discretionary review in Epstein v. Edwards. | Florida Supreme Court | View |
| 2017-05-30 | N/A | Deadline for Respondent to serve a reply | Supreme Court of Florida | View |
| 2017-03-20 | N/A | Filing of Defendant's Sur-Reply to Supplemental Reply | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2017-03-16 | N/A | Original scheduled date for hearing on Edwards Subpoena | New York, NY | View |
| 2016-12-22 | N/A | Order transferring Motion to Quash Subpoena to Southern District of New York (Giuffre v. Maxwell) | Southern District of Florid... | View |
| 2016-07-07 | N/A | Filing of Motion to Seal Bradley J. Edwards' Motion to Quash Subpoena. | Southern District of Florida | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013391.jpg
This document is page 22 of a legal filing arguing that defendant Bradley J. Edwards is entitled to summary judgment against plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein based on the affirmative defense of privilege/absolute immunity. The text cites various Florida case laws regarding litigation privilege and concludes by asking the court to grant judgment in Edwards' favor on the remaining claim.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013372.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing (likely a Motion for Summary Judgment) arguing that Jeffrey Epstein's lawsuit against attorney Bradley J. Edwards should be dismissed. The text argues that Epstein cannot sue Edwards while simultaneously asserting his Fifth Amendment privilege ('sword and shield' doctrine) to avoid answering questions about sexual abuse. It also notes that Epstein recently settled three cases handled by Edwards for amounts significantly higher than the 'minimal value' Epstein claimed they were worth.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013370.jpg
This document is the first page of a Renewed Motion for Final Summary Judgment filed by Bradley J. Edwards in a civil lawsuit brought by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County, Florida (Case No. 50 2009CA 040800...). Edwards argues that there is no evidence he participated in fraud against Epstein and asserts that his actions were legitimate legal representation of three clients (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) whom Epstein sexually abused. The document is marked as Exhibit B and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013369.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal affidavit signed by attorney Bradley J. Edwards on September 21, 2010. In the text, Edwards attests that Jeffrey Epstein filed a complaint against him with the Florida Bar alleging involvement in 'Rothstein's scheme,' which was investigated and dismissed. Edwards declares that his actions in prosecuting claims against Epstein were ethically proper and done in good faith to represent his clients.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013362.jpg
This document is a cover sheet for 'Exhibit N' attached to Defendant Bradley J. Edwards's Statement of Undisputed Facts in the legal case Epstein v. Edwards (Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG). It indicates the document is part of a larger legal filing and bears a House Oversight production stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013355.jpg
This document outlines facts regarding Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme at the law firm RRA. It specifically addresses allegations that Rothstein used cases against Jeffrey Epstein—handled by attorney Bradley J. Edwards—to lure investors. The text defends Edwards, stating he worked at RRA for less than a year, had no knowledge of the fraud, and never substantively discussed the Epstein cases with Rothstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013352.jpg
This document outlines statements attributed to Jeffrey Epstein regarding his legal challenges, including minimizing his Florida conviction and disparaging victims as seeking a 'meal ticket.' It specifically alleges Epstein committed perjury during a February 17, 2010 deposition by denying he knew journalist George Rush, despite having given him a recorded interview. The text also details Epstein's defense of Ghislaine Maxwell and his animosity toward attorney Bradley Edwards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013346.jpg
This legal document outlines evidence connecting Bill Clinton and Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein to justify discovery efforts. It details Clinton's frequent travel on Epstein's plane between 2002-2005 with alleged co-conspirators (Maxwell, Kellen, Mucinska) and notes the presence of significant contact information for Clinton in Epstein's directory. Additionally, it justifies the deposition of Donald Trump based on phone messages left at Epstein's West Palm Beach mansion and a Vanity Fair quote where Trump praises Epstein and comments on their shared interest in "younger" women.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013333.jpg
This document details the timeline in June and July 2008 when attorney Bradley Edwards was retained by victims E.W., Jane Doe, and L.M. It highlights that AUSA Villafaña failed to disclose a negotiated plea agreement that would block federal prosecution while simultaneously confirming concrete evidence of Epstein molesting minors. It also notes the U.S. Attorney's Office refusal to share collected evidence, specifically listing items confiscated from Epstein's home such as sex toys and massage equipment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013332.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal filing detailing attorney Bradley J. Edwards' representation of Epstein victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe starting in April 2008. It highlights the victims' concerns that the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office were secretly arranging a plea deal with Epstein without notifying the victims, despite previous assurances in January 2008 that the investigation was ongoing and they would be consulted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013319.jpg
This document is a 'Statement of Undisputed Facts' filed by defendant Bradley J. Edwards in a civil case brought by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County, Florida (Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG). The filing asserts as Fact #1 that Epstein has a 'sexual preference for young children,' citing a deposition from March 17, 2010. A footnote details that during this deposition, Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent regarding this subject, which Edwards argues allows for an adverse inference against Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013317.jpg
This document is a 'Certificate of Service' page from a legal filing dated January 17, 2014. It certifies that attorney William B. King served a copy of 'Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment' via E-Serve. The document lists the contact information for the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., representing Bradley J. Edwards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013304.jpg
This is a legal filing from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County in a case where Jeffrey Epstein is suing Bradley J. Edwards and Scott Rothstein. Edwards is responding to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment, arguing that Epstein's claims of malicious prosecution and abuse of process are meritless. The text details Epstein's allegation that Edwards and Rothstein used sexual assault lawsuits against Epstein to 'pump' cases for Rothstein's Ponzi scheme investors, an allegation Edwards vehemently denies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029896.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 6, 2009, between paralegal Jessica Cadwell (Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman) and the office of attorney Bradley Edwards. The correspondence concerns discovery in a case involving a 'Jane Doe.' Cadwell requests a HIPAA release signature from Jane Doe to access records from the Milton Center (a Department of Juvenile Justice facility) and asks for an extension on responding to 'Net Wirth ROGS' (interrogatories regarding net worth).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029892.jpg
This document is an email thread from August 2009 involving paralegal Jessica Cadwell and attorney Bradley Edwards. Cadwell requests a signed HIPAA release from Jane Doe to obtain records from the Milton Center (a Department of Juvenile Justice facility) and asks for an extension on 'Net Wirth ROGS' (interrogatories). A brief reply notes that Edwards is out of the office until the afternoon.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029887.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 6, 2009, between paralegals Jacquie Johnson and Jessica Cadwell regarding the 'Jane Doe' case. The correspondence focuses on scheduling a deposition for Jeffrey Epstein and confirming the signing of 'Stays.' Attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Robert D. Critton Jr. are included in the correspondence loop.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014091.jpg
A legal motion filed on March 24, 2015, in Broward County Circuit Court by plaintiffs Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell against Alan M. Dershowitz. The plaintiffs seek to compel Dershowitz to produce documents he claims to possess that prove he did not sexually abuse 'Jane Doe No. 3,' noting that he has refused a discovery request for over 45 days. The document is marked with a House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014088.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) dated March 24, 2015, submitted by attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell on behalf of Jane Does No. 1-4. The text argues that the Court should deny Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene, citing his conflicting positions regarding the possession and collection of records. The document includes contact information for the attorneys and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014038.jpg
This document is the first page of a 2014 law review article titled 'Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations?' published in The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. Co-authored by Bradley J. Edwards (a prominent attorney for Epstein victims), Paul Cassell, and Nathanael Mitchell, the article argues that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply during the investigation phase, contrary to a DOJ memorandum. The text alludes to a 'notorious federal sex abuse case' (referencing the Epstein case) where victims were deprived of rights before charges were filed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014037.jpg
This document is the cover page for a 2014 legal article titled 'Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges Are Filed,' published in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. The article is co-authored by Bradley J. Edwards, a key attorney for Epstein's victims, and Paul G. Cassell, suggesting a focus on the legal failures regarding the non-prosecution agreement in the Epstein case. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was included in evidence provided to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021863.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021863). It involves questioning by Mr. Simpson regarding the timeline of a written agreement relative to December 30, 2014, and references a 'motion for joinder' (Exhibit 2) that concerns 'other minors' in addition to Virginia Roberts. The text lists several legal entities involved in Virginia Roberts' representation, including Boies Schiller, Bradley J. Edwards, and the Utah Attorney General's office.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021840.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript of Paul G. Cassell, questioned by Mr. Simpson. They discuss a 'motion for joinder' filed in a previous 'CVRA action' on behalf of Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4. The document confirms that Cassell and attorney Bradley J. Edwards were co-signatories on this motion.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021825.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a rough draft transcript for the videotaped deposition of Paul G. Cassell, taken on October 16, 2015, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The deposition relates to the lawsuit 'Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell versus Alan M. Dershowitz.' The transcript lists the legal appearances, including counsel for the plaintiffs, counsel for defendant Alan Dershowitz, and counsel for Virginia Roberts (Sigrid McCawley).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021824.jpg
This document is the cover page for a 'Rough Draft Transcript' of a deposition for the case 'Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs. Alan M. Dershowitz'. The deposition of witness Paul G. Cassell took place on October 16, 2015. The document includes standard legal disclaimers regarding the raw nature of the transcript, defining potential errors such as conflicts, untranslates, and reporter's notes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014120.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 3) of a legal filing bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014120. It lists the counsel of record, including attorneys from Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP (Sigrid McCawley, Meredith Schultz, David Boies), Bradley J. Edwards' firm, and Paul G. Cassell from the University of Utah (representing privately). Contact information is provided for each attorney, with some contact details (likely phone/email) redacted.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-06-13 | Paid | Bradley J. Edwards | Court | $46.00 | Filing fee for Petition/Motion (Complaint) RE: ... | View |
| 2016-05-27 | Received | EST | Bradley J. Edwards | $45.00 | Check #31834, Memo: Menninger. Likely a witness... | View |
Solicitation for assistance
Form solicitation letters requesting assistance as a witness in the case, allegedly attempting to 'guilt' witnesses.
Epstein Case
Epstein alleges Edwards had contacts with media to publicize cases.
No Subject
Email address listed as Brad@pathtojustice.com
No Subject
Email address listed as Brad@pathtojustice.com
Witness solicitation / Investigation
Maxwell alleges these are 'witness solicitation letters' containing a 'skewed version of allegations'. Edwards argues they are protected work product.
Request for evidence/information
Request for collected info regarding sexual abuse of clients. Request was declined.
Responses to solicitation
Responses received by Edwards from the solicitation letters.
Case Status Update and Discovery Schedule
Letter informing the court that plaintiffs do not wish to stay their cases despite the Compensation Program and outlining an agreed discovery schedule.
VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Request for extension of time to file Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Request for extension of time to file Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss until December 18, 2019.
Re: VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Notification that Plaintiff VE does not intend to file an amended pleading and will defend her current First Amended Complaint against the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Opposition to Defendants' request for extension of time to respond to complaint.
VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN)
Notice of supplemental authority bringing a decision by Judge Castel in a related Epstein case to the court's attention regarding proceeding anonymously.
Subpoena to Produce Documents
Legal command to produce documents related to Virginia Giuffre, previous litigation, and media communications.
Service of court documents
Service of foregoing document
Stipulation of Dismissal
Filing of stipulation of dismissal with prejudice via CM/ECF.
Certificate of Service
Service of motion via US Mail or other authorized manner
Motion for Limited Appearance
Request to admit Paul G. Cassell as co-counsel
Notice of Striking Certificate of Service
Filing of document striking previous certificates DE 5 and DE 6
Service of Process
Edwards advised Knight that Plaintiff M.J. had service on Mr. Epstein at his building in New York.
Plaintiff Jane Doe's Motion for Modification of Order
Request to modify settlement conference rules to prevent contact between Doe and Epstein.
Plaintiff Jane Doe's Protective Response
Filing of protective response and service to parties via CM/ECF
Deposition Testimony
Edwards testified regarding his lack of knowledge of the scheme and lack of discussion regarding Epstein cases with Rothstein.
Certificate of Service (L.M. case)
Service of documents via US Mail and Facsimile
Jane Doe
Jessica Cadwell asks Bradley Edwards to have Jane Doe sign a HIPAA release form to obtain her records from the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) regarding her time at the Milton Center. She also requests a one-week extension on responses to 'Net Wirth ROGS'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity